More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jenifer Fox

Jenifer Fox

Posted: October 31, 2009 10:23 AM

The War at Home: Let's Fix U.S. Schools Before Exporting Them

What's Your Reaction?

In the October 28th, 2009 Opinion column in the New York Times, Nicholas Kristof advocated that building schools in Afghanistan would be a better use of U.S. resources than spending money on the deployment of more troops. He wrote,

"Dispatching more troops to Afghanistan would be a monumental bet and probably a bad one, most likely a waste of lives and resources that might simply empower the Taliban. In particular, one of the most compelling arguments against more troops rests on this stunning trade-off: For the cost of a single additional soldier stationed in Afghanistan for one year, we could build roughly 20 schools there."

Mr. Kristoff's idea is an example of America's current obsession with action before purpose. One of the reasons we are currently in an economic recession is that we waste money: on bad investments; unhealthy products that end up costing us more to clean up the messes they leave than the value of their short-lived joy -- on homes and products we can't afford but buy anyway, thinking they will make us happy -- only to find that the anxiety over the debt we have accumulated in their purchase robs us of the satisfaction we searched in the first place. We waste money on the current American methods of schooling which are ineffective at inspiring lifelong learners who are enriched with the sort of education needed to sustain our democracy. If we can't do it here, what makes anyone think we would be successful promoting schools anywhere else? Wouldn't it be a very poor economic choice for us to try and fix a failing nation with a failing product?

The truth is we build better bombs, train better soldiers and manufacture better guns than we do schools, teachers, or curriculum materials. If you are going to fight a war, then fight or get out. Perhaps that seems like a naive statement. It is-- intentionally. The truth is that there is a war at home and it is raging on U.S. soil. Our schools are in crisis. Mr. Kristoff writes, "Schools are not a quick fix or silver bullet any more than troops are. But we have abundant evidence that they can, over time, transform countries, and in the area near Afghanistan there's a nice natural experiment in the comparative power of educational versus military tools."

What do children need to know to be successful? How do we train teachers for the 21st Century? How can we best organize our school system so they can focus on learning? We have not invested enough money, time, energy and lives in our educational system to have this right. People outside of the world of schools believe the mere idea of school is an answer to problems across the globe. Giving other countries second-rate education because it is better than none at all is naive at best and arrogant at worst. It reminds me of the way schools package up their dinosaur computers and send them off to the less fortunate while they make room for nice, new educational tools.

When people outside of the education world suggest that we educate the rest of the world, the image that comes to my mind is one, popularized during the Vietnam protest era, of a flower stuck in the barrel of a gun. Schools are not flowers. Schools are complex, problematic, dramatic and highly misunderstood institutions. And because we have not paid attention to our schools in the manner needed to sustain their viability, we are in the midst of war in our own country about how to best educate young people. And here is the thing: our students are currently involved in the largest form of mass protest this country has ever seen. They are, for the most part, peacefully dropping out. The dropout crisis can be viewed as democracy in action -- conscientious objection -- "We aren't going to school because it wastes the time we have to explore life." Right or wrong, ill-conceived or not, most students who drop out of high school do so because they think there is something better for them outside of school. School is boring them to death.

So before we go spreading our dollars around to encourage better educational opportunities around the world, we should think about what exactly it is we are supporting. To offer funds for schools in Afghanistan when we don't even know how to get it right at home will be like offering computers that don't work and then when they turn to us for technical support, we will have to say they were broken when we sent them and we don't know how to fix them. Let's bring the money home and fight the war at home.

 
 
 

Follow Jenifer Fox on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jeniferfox

 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveVoice
12:28 AM on 11/04/2009
Our schools have been under attack for the last 30 years, just as so many other government programs for "the common good" have been. What could we expect after cutting out art, music, sports, field trips, school libraries . . . everything that rounds out education? The ridiculous argument for teaching creationism - an out and out falsehood - has devalued all sciences. I am surprised that no one seems to be studying schools and the decline of our educational system.

The biggest improvement we can make to education is educating parents on the importance of parental participation. Of the total of all we learn in our lives, 70-80% is learned between ages 2 and 5 years. Parents need good enriching environments, either through high quality day care/education centers or the financial freedom to stay home to create and supervise good environments.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jenifer Fox
09:41 PM on 11/04/2009
Parents are key, but a trusting partnership between parents and teachers will ultimately be key. Sarah Lawrence Lightfoot wrote a wonderful book called Respect about the necessary and often conflicted relationships between parents and teachers in this country. Worth a read. She suggests we find new ways to understand each other.
07:36 AM on 11/03/2009
Strong one Jenifer. I find it deeply disappointing that the President talked so eloquently about reexamining how we would spend out precious resources during the election, but now has essentially opted for the status quo. Or rather he has avoided making any hard choices about reallocating resources. It's both and. The "Race to the Top" seems as naive to me as the thinking that got us into Iraq and to a lesser extent Afghanistan. It is a lack of respect for the problem. If we just use the the same old tactics (no strategy), in this case reducing the problem of creating better schools to test score comparisons, we will solve it. The school problem in this country is a wicked one, in that when broken down to its component parts, each is just as knotty as the original problem, not more easily dealt with. It requires sustained attention, which as you point out it will not likely get as long as the President and his administration spend their hours obsessing over next steps in Afghanistan.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jenifer Fox
09:38 PM on 11/04/2009
"Race to the aTop." Who was int he room when they coined that? Don't get me wrong--I favor the President. I just think he needs to listen to the innovations here.
10:06 PM on 11/02/2009
I am not commenting on the issue of the war itself, or even the value of education in Afghanistan, because I don't necessarily agree with some of the points made here (& because I don't want to dilute my comment).

I do believe that education is critically important in this country, and far too much time, energy and money are being wasted under the title "education" but not EDUCATING! We live in an incredibly amazing time, with unbelievable resources! Many of which are even free! Yet we spend so much time and focus on beaurocracy, etc., that we are failing the very children that we claim to recognize are our future. We build new schools that look like Universities and then have kids in them that after 2 years of preschool, 2 years of kindergarten and then first grade, are told that they can't read (and then when they are tested outside of the school system it is determined that they simply were never taught 'the fundamental skills' and within 6 weeks they are reading at a 4th grade level!)

When a child believes that he/she is dumb or inadequate, they will seek to excel in some other way. When they are bored in school, they will seek stimulation and 'something more' somewhere else.

In my opinion, until education becomes front page news, we will continue to have plenty of crime and violence stories to fill that space.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jenifer Fox
11:02 PM on 11/02/2009
The time and place to really "invest" in education is in preschool. Our country needs to adopt universal preschool--the time when the brain is forming at the most rapid rate.
09:53 PM on 11/02/2009
Jenifer, you are right on about the questions we need to ask - and for the most part are not asking - about our schools: "What do children need to know to be successful? How do we train teachers for the 21st Century? How can we best organize our school system so they can focus on learning?" Today, too many of the questions are "How do we assess, measure, catch and punish?"
And so yes, so many of our students are bored. Bored to death. The natural reaction is: "The purpose of school is not to entertain students". OK... But education and learning should be - and IS when it is relevant and about what one is interested in - a fascinating and exciting endeavor. What is better that getting totally jazzed about something new? Something we didn't know about before? Why don't we want that for our kids?
Schools are being left in the dust whilst the policy folks circle around more and more assessment and paperwork that could only diagnose itself as the problem.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jenifer Fox
11:03 PM on 11/02/2009
I actually have no problem with learning being entertaining!