More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jennifer Donahue

Jennifer Donahue

Posted: January 20, 2010 09:13 AM

President Obama Needs to Leader Up

What's Your Reaction:

Embrace the fact that Brown is the new Red in America.

Yesterday's Massachusetts vote left pundits who were in denial about the independence of Independents nationally backpedalling. (Except me: read last Tuesday's Republicans Have Already Won MA Senate Race). Here is the headline: If this hurts, Democrats need to man up before voters repudiate their party en masse next November.

Voters feel their power. That was what they felt when they voted for President Obama and that is what they felt when they voted for Senator-Elect Scott Brown. Voter Up. Nurture the indies and reach out to the base. President Obama: accept the fact the Indies are your base.

Obama should show the Senate and House the door on health care before voters do in November. Something like, "We appreciate your hard work on the bill but now I'm taking over." Leader up.

Pelosi said yesterday she will do anything to pass the elements of the House version of health care reform; the one Americans just told us they don't want. The Brown victory is a huge
repudiation of Pelosi and the House bill, as well as Senator Reid and the overloaded Senate bill.

President Obama: do you want to put a gun to the head of moderate Democrats? It is much more difficult to hold real battleground states than to hold than Massachusetts.

A cross-section of American people have said not what they want but what they don't want. Hear it now, or face the wrath in November.

Do what Bill Clinton did after the 1994 health care rebuff: re-group and move to the center. There are elements of the Senate bill that can still pass: pre-existiing conditions, wellness care, filling the donut hole for seniors. Make it a modest bill, work with Himbo Scott Brown, and make it a small but notable victory.

It would show that the White House is not tone deaf. It would allow your party live to fight another day.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 44
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
05:43 PM on 01/20/2010
Sigh. We are doomed if we move more to the center.
Sergeant
Dress Right
03:38 PM on 01/20/2010
You are right but it will never happen. It is groupthink. Even though the evidence is there, the left wing will assume it means that they haven't gone liberal enough instead of having gone too liberal. Hearing what they want to hear.

This is a conservative country. Even the liberals look rightwing conpared to europeans. But they will continue their advance to the rear.
10:11 PM on 01/20/2010
I think you're right, but frankly, I can't fathom the irrational logic that's required to come to that conclusion when the voters elected a man more or less because he promised to shoot down the Democrats' latest piece of legislation. I mean, how can they see that and not realize that the independents are saying that the Democrats are too far left for their taste?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GreenPlanet
03:34 PM on 01/20/2010
Wrong! I knew you guys would be talking about going to the center. Obama already did, this is why Obama lost. He became a continuation of Bush. Look at the exit results in Massachussets. People want progressive change that didn't happen, more regulation of banks, and a health care reform that does more, not less. Since when did Obama go to the left?? LOL. This is what he should have done!!!
Sergeant
Dress Right
03:39 PM on 01/20/2010
Obama didn't lose anything. But those who keep the status quo will.
03:23 PM on 01/20/2010
Can we evolve past left, right, center and talk about health care reform that is fair and effective? Mandates, probably not such a great idea. How about this - OK, you don't have to buy it, but if you get sick and don't have it, you will not receive treatment except on the hospital's terms and hospitals will not have to give you treatment. You are on your own. If a hospital demands cash up front to treat you, then that what you will have to produce.
02:47 PM on 01/20/2010
Except he can't triangulate because the Republicans have no ideas to steal. Which means the voters are unhappy with both parties.
03:38 PM on 01/20/2010
Bingo! And the repubs have once again out-politicked us - quickly rebranding themselves as "teabaggers" and grabbing the angry mobs' affections, while Obama and the dem-controlled Congress continue to dish up biz as usual. Viz - credit card reform that has resulted in jacked up interest rates, jacked up fees and card cancellations and somehow got us all screwed again.
Sergeant
Dress Right
03:44 PM on 01/20/2010
People keep saying the republicans have no ideas. That is not true. But the democrats have had the ability to do what they want without republican support and they have squandered it. The voters saw it and acted accordingly. Now the republicans will be at the table and cooler heads can prevail.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gilbert Garibay
02:40 PM on 01/20/2010
This is hilarious how after any type of electoral defeat the left always has to make concessions to satisfy this mythical center that the media talking heads deem all so important. What did Emmanuel say "don't worry about the left they're gonna come along anyways" or something to that effect, they didn't because of Obama's tepid policy decisions.
02:32 PM on 01/20/2010
Move to the center? Didn't one aspect of Clinton's brilliant "move to the center" give us a major catalyst to our current economic woes when he undid Glass-Steagall in '99?

That's the direction you're suggesting we go?

Amazing. Simply, amazing.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ManwithaParachute
Not Seeking Your Approval
02:17 PM on 01/20/2010
If Obama moved to the center, he would be moving away from the right.

Obama has never governed from the center because he has been too busy trying to chase down any Republican affections he can find.

I believe however that Obama will continue to move to the right and you will continue to suggest he has not moved far enough.
02:09 PM on 01/20/2010
Lol! President Obama is to the RIGHT of center. That is why the loss in Massachusetts!

We don't need another "New Democrat" like Bill Clinton but that's what it looks like we've gotten in Obama.
03:27 PM on 01/20/2010
You know, I'm to the left of the left wing of the Democratic Party, but I really fail to see how Obama being to the right of center, assuming he is and I do not, lost the election in Massachusetts. That's just delusional. I really, really, really wish that the electorate of MA voted for Scott what's his name because they thought Obama was not left enough, but I really do not think so.
Sergeant
Dress Right
03:46 PM on 01/20/2010
I don't think it was so much for Scott Brown as it was against the idea that the seat "belongs" to the democrats. That attitude was clear and it was offensive.

All politics is local.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marignymitch
E pluribus unum percent
01:47 PM on 01/20/2010
Clinton's move to the 'center' was a disaster for gay Americans (see DOMA, DADT). You'll pardon me for not supporting your position, I hope.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kwalters
01:45 PM on 01/20/2010
BULLPUCKY!

What planet do you live on??? Do what Bill Clinton did??? Move to the center??? Become a Republican??? WWWHHHHHHAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTT???

Jennifer...hate to throw a little reality your way, but Obama became Bill Clinton immediately after his inaugeration. He surrounded himself with Clinton retreads. Then he moved center, AGAINST THE PROMISED CHANGE-when he started trying to appease the party of "You LIE!" and "NO!"

Obama needs to do just the opposite. Obama needs to get a little Bush-like. He needs to cut 8 Democratic senators loose, tweak health care reform to include a STRONG public plan that 50 senators will support (Biden would pass the tie breaking vote), and pass a progressive healthcare reform package via RECONCILIATION!

FDR passed much of his New Deal legislation without a 58 Senate Super Majority vote (AK and HI were not yet states). Newt Gingrich rammed through Contract with America that way. W Bush got his tax cuts through that way. The Republican party is the party of DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO OR HAVE DONE!

Obama needs to do exactly the opposite of your ill advised recommendations.
01:27 PM on 01/20/2010
But but but the American people decided! So what?! I'm becoming convinced the (my) American people would run off the side of a cliff if one side or the other convinced them the grassy meadow in the opposite direction was full of land mines.
01:24 PM on 01/20/2010
It is clear Obama tried to take on the enormous task of health care way to quickly. Not only is it an immesnse undertaking, but with all of the economic problems going on the timing was just horrible. Add to that the fact that he failed to take on Wall Street & you have a receipe for disaster. This is nothing but a firm failure of leadership, period. It looks like a GOP landslie in 2010. Also, to be flat honest, unless Obama starts showing some leadership skills he will be a one termer. The GOP just needs to find the right person to run, just like they did in the Mass. senate race, & Obama will be going home in Jan. 2013.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marignymitch
E pluribus unum percent
01:50 PM on 01/20/2010
It's clear that Obama works for corporations, not the voters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
I'm actually a radical leftist
01:16 PM on 01/20/2010
Show me people who are moving "to the center," and I'll show you people who aren't moving to anything, who are only moving AWAY from something.
02:27 PM on 01/20/2010
Exactly.

The notion that "independents" are "centrists" is total fiction. Independents are all over the map, save for one thing, they don't think either major party represents them.

This notion of "centrism" is seethingly stupid. This idea that somehow "moderation" is some kind of substance that can be applied to any problem to come up with some kind of ideal solution. What is the "moderate" position on HCR exactly? That instead of 45,000 people dying every year for lack of coverage, 22,500 is okay? That we should reduce by 50% the number of lobbyists who work on Capital Hill, magically reducing their influence in half? That 10% unemployment is too high (17% when you factor in the people who've dropped off, given up, work pt, etc.) but 8.5% is fine. Let's see, should we nationalize half the big banks? Or allow half of them to give giant bonuses but not the other half? 50% of the time torture is justified? We can adhere to 50% of our treaties?

In addition to the incredibly annoying notion of the magic center, our poster juxtaposes the concept with "leadering up".

Yep, nothing smells like leadership so much as backpedaling, compromising, and cringing away from a legitimate fight. Oh yeah, definite prescription for sucess going forward.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
I'm actually a radical leftist
09:48 PM on 01/20/2010
Centrism isn't leading, it's following.
Sergeant
Dress Right
04:09 PM on 01/20/2010
They are moving toward the majority of americans politically and away from losing.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
myke3000
01:11 PM on 01/20/2010
I have to disagree.

There was quite a bit of disagreement with elements of the House Bill that were NOT present in the Senate bill. There is no choice for a Public Option in the Senate Bill, there is one in the House; there are no State sweetheart deals (Nelson-NB) in the House bill; the House Bill covers more uninsured than the Senate Bill, and lowers the deficit further than the Senate Bill. Nancy Pelosi was also able to pass the bill much faster than her counterpart, Reid in the Senate and had her ducks in a row in the process.

Max Baucus held up things too long in his committee because he tried to be bipartisan with those who wanted nothing of the sort, and listened to too many insurance industry insiders, including his staffer who wrote much of their bill - a former health insurance senior.

Out of committee, it was Lieberman who "vetoed" the bill when a cost containment provision was added to lower the Medicare age to 55 year olds to buy into. No one would have been harmed by this except the health insurance industry that Lieberman represents.

That this all points to dems is one thing, but it only does so because the Republicans defaulted themselves party-wide to a "NO" vote to see Obama fail. If the President succeeds, then the Dems do, and that ensures democrat victories and republican losses.

The Republican strategy worked, and the US is fUkd because of it.