Send all your eco-inquiries to Jennifer Grayson at eco.etiquette@gmail.com. Questions may be edited for length and clarity.
Friends came over for dinner recently, and the wife was asking us to explain to her husband why it's important to spend the extra money on organic milk for their children, who drink a lot of it. I tried to explain, but he's skeptical and thinks the whole thing is a hoax. Can you point me toward any legitimate studies to educate him?
-Karen
First off, Miss Eco Etiquette applauds your decision to leave the bulk of your organic milk manifesto for after the dinner party. To paraphrase Michael Pollan, what we choose to eat is a political act, and we all know that politics don't usually make for polite dinner conversation. Your spirited debate could have gone from moo to boo faster than you can say Stonyfield Farm.
As a new parent, I admit I had a knee-jerk reaction to your question: Even if your friend is not convinced that organic milk (which is produced without antibiotics, synthetic hormones, and pesticides) is healthier, why wouldn't he take the position of better safe than sorry? Is it worth risking a child's health to shave a buck or two off the weekly grocery bill?
But then I caught a glimpse of this week's headlines: 11.5 million jobs now missing from our labor market. The national unemployment rate holding steady at an abysmal 9.6 percent. We're all looking for ways to scrimp and save, especially when it comes to feeding voracious children who are eating us out of house and home.
I can relate. My little one may only be 6 weeks old as of this writing, but for us, the budget crunch began in utero: Even I had to reevaluate my commitment to local and organic once I realized my pregnancy craving for Redwood Hill Farm organic goat yogurt was costing me upwards of 20 bucks a week. Those giant, cheap tubs of the non-organic (but hormone-free) cow's milk variety at my local big-name grocery chain were just too darn tempting. I occasionally succumbed.
I'm evidently not the only one questioning whether organic is really worth it: Organic milk production, long considered one of the fastest growing segments of US agriculture, has begun to slow in the past year as Americans tighten their belts.
But just as we need to invest in clean energy to help create the green jobs of the future, we also need to invest in our children's health by ensuring that what goes in their mouths won't harm their delicate, developing systems.
Moove over conventional! Here's why organic milk is the best choice for your family:
Organic milk is produced without pesticides. Testing by the USDA's Pesticide Data Program found industrial chemicals in nearly all of the conventional milk it examined. Among the most alarming: DDE, a breakdown of the now-banned toxic insecticide DDT, was discovered in 96 percent of the samples. Ninety-nine percent contained diphenylamine (DPA), a chemical used in plastic and rubber manufacturing, and 18 percent contained the endocrine disruptor endosulfan, which EPA moved to ban this year.
Organic milk is produced without added hormones. You wouldn't give human growth hormone to your healthy 5-year-old, so why would you expose her to milk that's filled with bovine growth hormone (linked to an alarming rise in calf deformity)? While the US continues to allow the injection of the genetically engineered hormone rBGH (or rBST) into lactating cows to increase milk production, the potential risks are enough of a concern that the European Union, Canada, Japan, and Australia have all banned its use.
Organic milk is produced without antibiotics. The antibiotics routinely given to dairy cattle to discourage mastitis may never make it into your milk (conventional milk is tested for antibiotic residues), but they could lead to you catching a life-threatening disease later in life. Sound implausible? The FDA has called the overuse of antibiotics in food animals "a serious public health threat," linking it to the emergence of super-scary superbugs like MRSA.
Organic milk is healthier. A study by Newcastle University found that organic dairy cows in the UK produce milk that is higher in vitamins, antioxidants, and "good" fats -- including conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), which has been linked to lower rates of heart disease. The healthier milk is the result of cows grazing on fresh grass; since USDA recently passed strict regulations requiring the pasturing of organic dairy cows, it stands to reason that American organic milk offers the same increased nutritional benefit.
Hope your friend finds this information udderly convincing!
Follow Jennifer Grayson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jennigrayson
John Robbins: Female Infants Growing Breasts: Another Disaster From Hormones in Milk Production
Waylon Lewis: Update: Whole Foods dumps Silk Soy (VIDEO)
Kirsten Dirksen: The Campaign to Bring Goats to Your Backyard... And to the White House (VIDEO)
Very good article!
1) You assert: "Organic milk is produced without pesticides" and cite a study that shows that there is chemical residue in conventional milk. You ASSUME that there is no residue in organic milk. There is no data to support that. In fact, since DDT has been banned for decades, rest assured that even organic fields would have that residue today.
2) You say that organic milk cows have not been treated with anti-biotics but at the same time you say that conventional cows are tested to see that there is no residue in their milk.
3) You make big claims about BGH but the reality is that only 17.2% (2007 study by the FDA) of cow are treated with it and in fact, I cannot find supermarket milk that has it. I have personally yet to find conventional milk in a supermarket that doesn't say that the cows used have not been treated with BGH. I suspect that GBH treated milk is used in cheese production where its use gets lost in the shuffle.
But what is really happening is that we are risking future illness to save a few pennies today. Obesity and diabetes are the mostly costly, long term epidemics in this country. Eating healthy, having kids participate in physical education in and out of school is the only way to stop these diseases.
Making food without pesticides and hormones isn't done because it's directly better for the consumer. It's done because it's better for the PLANET, and that is better for the consumer and every other living thing.
The husband was probably informed by food industry "studies" that show there is no direct health benefit from eating organic, which isn't the point anyway. The food industry encourages this confusion. An organic food writer for Huffington Post should be smart enough not to play along.
"All our cows have names & they only see the doctor when they are sick"
This made sense to him (& me).
I would ask your friends husband if would he put 'Contaminated Fuel' in his car?? if not, why would he put "contaminated fuel" in his kids???
We still don't know how human-beings works.
Yeah, except for ballooning numbers for ADHD, autism, childhood cancers, obesity, adult onset diabetes...
We're poisoning our kids with a chemical stew, but hey, if you're cool with that, so should we all be.
Now, I'm not entirely convinced we ought to be drinking cows milk, but there is a difference.
Also, adding all that junk to the cow's feed means the cow may be treated in an inhumane way and still live to produce. That just seems wrong too.
Still, if you don't have much money but have a large family, what are you to do?
We are empty nesters and DO find ourselves able to purchase the better quality foods.
Guess when we get older and our retirement money won't cover the extra cost we will have to make some decisions too.
Isn't all of this a shame?