Why You Should Eat Fish

We all can agree on the importance of clean air and water. However, it is inaccurate and irresponsible to conflate recreational fishing issues with the consumption of safe and healthful commercial seafood.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

Just like the Meryl Streep commercial about alar horrified new moms away from apples in the late 1980s, fear-mongering messages about mercury in seafood contribute to the woefully low amount of seafood women eat today in the U.S. The distinction is that seafood- and omega-3-deficient diets introduce measurable risks to health. According to a Harvard study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, "Avoidance of modest fish consumption due to confusion regarding risks and benefits could result in thousands of excess [coronary heart disease] deaths annually and suboptimal neurodevelopment in children."


While alar was a chemical sprayed by humans on fruit to regulate its growth, traces of mercury have existed in ocean fish since the beginning of time from sources like underwater volcanic activity. The mercury generated by coal-fired power plants is a real threat to freshwater fish caught by recreational fishermen in certain lakes and streams, and it is imperative for folks who regularly eat fish caught by friends and family to keep an eye on local U.S. Environmental Protection Agency advisories. But most fish Americans buy in stores and restaurants come from the open ocean or aquaculture, which are not subject to the same contamination issues as enclosed bodies of water. According to a peer-reviewed U.S. Food and Drug Administration report, "Limited data suggest that methylmercury concentrations in commercial fish have not increased or decreased over time."


The scientific community has exhaustively researched the overall effect of eating fish and shellfish, traces of mercury and all. They repeatedly conclude that eating commercial seafood boosts both heart and brain health, and when people don't eat fish they might miss out on these benefits. Specifically:

  • The 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommend people increase the amount and variety of seafood consumed by choosing seafood in place of some meat and poultry. Pregnant and breastfeeding women are specifically encouraged to eat at least 8 ounces and up to 12 ounces of seafood per week, of which half (6 ounces) can be albacore tuna. There are simply four exotic species for this special population to avoid: shark, swordfish, king mackerel, and tilefish.
  • A 2010 World Health Organization report concluded experts should emphasize the heart and brain development benefits of eating fish, and the risks to heart and brain health from not eating fish.
  • A 2009 study published in the Public Library of Science calculated low seafood/omega-3 consumption is responsible for about 84,000 deaths per year, making seafood-deficiency the second biggest dietary contributor to preventable deaths (behind high sodium consumption).

We all can agree on the importance of clean air and water. However, it is inaccurate and irresponsible to conflate recreational fishing issues with the consumption of safe and healthful commercial seafood.

Popular in the Community

Close

HuffPost Shopping’s Best Finds

MORE IN LIFE