iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jeremy Bird

Jeremy Bird

Posted: January 6, 2010 09:39 AM

Organizing for America: Looking Back, Marching Ahead

What's Your Reaction:

Twelve months ago Organizing for America was little more than a big idea. Yes, we had the Obama for America email list – an incredible tool – but what we wanted to do was unprecedented. For the first time ever, we set out to transform a political campaign into a long-term grassroots effort driven by issues and a commitment to organizing at the local level.

Back then – before the Recovery Act fight, the health care battle and the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor – we liked to say we were building the plane as we flew it. And we were. We had thousands of volunteers, but not one staffer in the states. Today, we have permanent offices in all 50 states and active volunteers in every congressional district. We’ve built a lasting infrastructure that’s already translated into success in legislative organizing, and we’re eager to train our fire on the elections later this year.

Like most organizers, I’m usually focused on the next step, the next campaign; but in this first week of a new decade, I think it’s the perfect time to remember who OFA is and where we came from.

Immediately following the 2008 election, several of President Obama’s senior organizers spent six weeks talking to supporters and mining the data of a massive online survey to understand what volunteers wanted to see the 2008 campaign become. We held one-on-one conference calls, hosted a massive in-person conference of over 300 volunteer leaders and carefully analyzed survey data gathered at thousands of house parties around the country.

Our volunteers were incredibly clear: their number one goal was to organize around the policies President Obama articulated during the campaign. So, since its inception, OFA’s role has been to engage our volunteers to build support for the President’s policy agenda. A volunteer suggested the name Organizing for America and volunteers urged OFA to maintain the 2008 campaign model, based on neighborhood team leaders. Now called “community organizers,” these volunteers dedicate 20 to 30 hours a week to OFA and are the defining characteristic of our organizational structure.

Last month we held more than 200 volunteer trainings across the country. I traveled to four events in Colorado: two in Denver, one in Fort Collins and another in Golden. At every stop I met volunteers who saw the need for change in their communities and chose to organize with us to make it happen. I met volunteers who took ownership over their turf and relished their seat at the leadership table with OFA staff. The people at our trainings are the folks you rarely read about in the news or see on TV, but they’re the ones building support for the President’s agenda through old fashioned shoe leather and meticulous reporting. They know change won’t come easy and they know it isn’t always pretty, but they’re doing it anyway – neighbor by neighbor and block by block.

Every OFA staffer follows that same methodical, focused, disciplined approach. We track how many one-on-one meetings staff have with volunteers to make sure we’re building strong relationships on the ground. States submit weekly “hearing on the ground” reports to keep OFA headquarters’ staff connected to local volunteer leaders. And an OFA state staffer’s very first job was to conduct a state wide “Listening Tour,” to which every 2008 Obama campaign volunteer – and anyone who wanted to get involved – was invited to talk about the issues and provide insight into their states’ organizing plan. Greg Schultz started as OFA’s Ohio State Director in March 2009. He and field director Michelle Domke hosted 32 Listening Tour sessions across the state: in Appalachian towns, the suburbs of Cincinnati and inner-city neighborhoods of Cleveland. All told, OFA held more than 400 Listening Tours and heard from tens of thousands of volunteers. Many of the people who attended those early Listening Tour meetings became our core “community organizers.”

That’s a snapshot of our offline organizing infrastructure. But new people are joining our online community everyday – we just got our 3 millionth follower on Twitter, for example, and we have 7 million friends on Facebook (all 50 state OFA organizations also have their own Twitter and Facebook accounts, making it even easier for supporters to talk to one another about local events and issues). The online community from the campaign still exists, with all the same tools that allowed the campaign to empower volunteers to set up local events and reach out to voters. But now volunteers can execute peer-to-peer organizing through our Neighbor-to-Neighbor technology to advocate for the policy priorities we fought for during the election and push for local candidates, local laws and local service projects. We also have tools, like a Letter to the Editor tool and personal blogs, that give individuals an opportunity to communicate their ideas to the public. We upped the capacity of our online tools in 2009 and we’ll only get better in 2010 at using technology in new ways to empower our volunteers to take action in their own communities.

OFA kicked off our campaign for health reform last June. More than 2.5 million people volunteered through our campaign by signing a statement of support, making a phone call, attending an event, visiting a congressional office or going door to door. Our volunteers organized 25,000 events in all 50 states in every Congressional District. Since August, our network has generated more than 1 million calls to Congress in support of reform. And in one week last August, when tea party protesters were burning Members of Congress in effigy, “death panel” rumors dominated water-cooler talk and Washington pundits were ready to pen health reform’s obituary, 65,000 OFA supporters visited their local Congressional offices – demonstrating massive public support for reform and keeping the fight alive for another day. Now we’re closer than ever to extending coverage to more than 30 million Americans: the greatest expansion of health care since Medicare. It’s something seven presidents have tried and failed to do; heck, no one else has been able to get a full floor vote, let alone final legislation out of the House and Senate!

On a campaign, you measure success by winning elections, and by doing it in a way that leaves more behind than when you started. The metrics of success are clear (win more votes) and the end date (Election Day) is certain. Legislative organizing isn’t so clear cut. You measure success by winning on issues, but “winning” is a little messier and more ambiguous than tallying election night results; and as we’ve seen in the health care debate, the finish line is almost never a sure thing.

OFA volunteers have been central in the effort to building public and legislative support for President Obama’s agenda – easily the most ambitious policy agenda in decades. From the Recovery Act, to the President’s 2010 budget, health reform and energy and climate legislation, volunteers have shaped and guided OFA’s efforts every step of the way.

The fact is, every policy President Obama pursued in 2009 has either been passed by Congress, or is on the cusp of becoming reality. Did we get every single thing we wanted? Nope. The Rolling Stones were right – you can’t always get what you want. But I am incredibly proud of what OFA accomplished in 2009 thanks to the leadership of our volunteers and our incredibly talented staff of organizers. The millions who continued the fight for change – either by organizing with OFA or another organization – have a unique story to tell about 2009. It’s a story of incredible legislative successes, unparalleled cooperation between groups, unheard of activism in an off-off election year, and continued technological advancement in grassroots organizing.

OFA has taken our lumps and we know we’ve still got a lot to learn – but we’ve come a long way from a big idea. We’re committed to strengthening our infrastructure and fine-tuning our strategy and tactics, which is why every OFA organizer is in the process of conducting one-on-one meetings with their volunteer leaders to evaluate 2009. Right now, we are surveying our supporters about their top priorities in 2010. And OFA state directors are planning another series of listening tours in the next few months.

Six days into 2010, I can tell you President Obama’s grassroots army is enormously proud of what we’ve accomplished. A year ago, the cynics didn’t think we’d make it – just as many pundits prematurely panned Barack Obama’s candidacy. With discipline and diligence, we’ve built a strong, volunteer-based infrastructure. We’ve kept working, kept the conversation going, and expanded our base of support, all the while mounting victory after victory. With a win on health reform in our sites, new legislative battles looming and important elections ahead, I can’t wait to see what we accomplish in the New Year.

Jeremy Bird, the National Deputy Director of Organizing for America, is a long-time organizer in Democratic politics, legislative campaigns and advocacy work.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 186
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
01:10 PM on 01/07/2010
Obama has chosen to "win" the bad compromises rather than lose the good fight! It's a shameful betrayal of the ideals he represented during the election. I just hope that disillusionment doesn't lead to apathy in all of those who voted for real change and ended up making lemonade.
10:50 AM on 01/07/2010
Congrats Jeremy, and thank you, and all OFA members, for the hard work over the last year! I am so very proud to say that I am a member with the brains to participate on behalf of OFA when I agree, and to not participate when I don't. Often at those times, I am active on behalf of other organizations that may be more in step with my specific thinking. I still always appreciate the dedication and hard work all of us put into the thankless job.

In coming years, more likely sooner than later, people will most likely consider many of the legislative successes now to be akin to actual rights, surpassing simple protections. Hopefully they will also come to realize that although the outcomes are rarely perfect, ONLY consistent and positive citizen action facilitates a better tomorrow for all of us.

Great job at inspiring many to test the concept. Great job at achieving some very impressive results! Great job at doing what you can personally do to try and make this world a better place. Great job at hanging in there when the criticisms abound. Tenacity is so very underrated. Keep up the good work, and know that some of us truly do recognize the awesome job you're doing.
10:42 AM on 01/07/2010
To all the conspiracy theorists:

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, right or wrong - is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. "

Theodore Roosevelt
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Samalabear
10:00 AM on 01/07/2010
I knew there was something I forgot -- my New Year's gift to myself -- get off the OFA e-mail propaganda list -- the list of lies and constant begging for money. Remember, when you sign off this list they ask you why. Make sure you give them an ear-full.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Balancement
Timendi causa est nescire. -- Seneca
09:31 AM on 01/07/2010
The negative comments on this thread show people looking at reality.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Stephen C. Rose
Fulltime writer, blogger, thinker, activist.
07:25 AM on 01/07/2010
Negative comments on this Jeremy Bird article at HuffPo show the effects of Arianna's consistent bashing of Obama.

It is reassuring to hope that in 2010 the actual fruits of a real on the ground operation will result in a victory that alters the usual history of minority party resurgence. 2010 is all about getting the Obama Agenda done with a more responsible Congress than we have now.

Instead of Tea Parties, V Parties.
07:55 AM on 01/07/2010
I am convinced this site has been taken over for the most part by the teaparty masquerading as "disenchanted Obama supporters".
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Stephen C. Rose
Fulltime writer, blogger, thinker, activist.
09:09 AM on 01/07/2010
Very interesting. Also true that the negative part of the Alinsky spectrum is emerging in the TPers. Rubbing raw the sores of discontent and all that. We must be as tough, more vigilant and vastly better in terms of what we're proposing and wanting to achieve. The battle is joined. The pundits remain blind.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yoursotruly
I think, therefore I don't thwim.
12:47 PM on 01/07/2010
As usual, rabid allegiance to a person or party instead of principles make you deaf to any criticism. You not only have driven a large number of people out of the OFA, you are determined to make sure none of us return. Don't just ignore me but insult me too.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ObamaSupporterPete
02:07 PM on 01/07/2010
My opinion and my disgust were engendered by the President himself and his foils. It had nothing to do with what anyone else had to say. I'm looking at the reality and I'm seeing nothing I like. It had nothing to do with Arianna or anyone else. Some of us are critical thinkers.

You guys just can't believe that there would be former supporters who are really pissed about what's going on. I'm not a teabagger (at least not in the current sense of the word) and I am beginning to feel like our Government is out of touch with real citizens. The Democrats are not looking out for our best interests. All of this wrangling has been about protecting corporate interests and forclosing any sort of free-market or any other type of competition. This is a real problem. If y'all don't get your heads out of the sand, you are going to wake up in November and find that this inability to fix the system is going to lead to a blood bath. I'm not looking forward to it, but I can see this train wreck from a mile away. There are a lot of disaffected voters out there and they aren't all nutty fringe teabaggers. Our home team has been doing everything they can to weaken financial oversight and take out any real power to make corrective actions. This isn't just about health care.
07:21 AM on 01/07/2010
Shame about the OFA. The idea had great potential, but defending Obama's (and the Democrats) betrayals is not what I signed up for. Count me out. I've unsubscribed to their emails as well as those from the Obama administration. There is hardly an issue of importance on which Obama hasn't disappointed. Being more articulate than Bush at lying isn't change I can believe it.
07:09 AM on 01/07/2010
The problem with fast food is that it never looks quite as good in reality as the product they portray in their advertising.

The problem with modern American politics is the same.

I’m sorry, Jeremy. I’m afraid the consumers have gotten this one home, taken off the soggy paper wrapper and found it dripping with the same grease, accompanied by the same wilted lettuce, pale tomatoes, decaying onions and phony cheese that all the other establishments offer up. In addition to that, many of us went out of our way and exerted much energy only to find that the fries tasted like the fish that tastes like the grease that yesterdays junk was fried in.

Good luck turning the first-time buyers into loyal customers if this is all the better you can do.
02:18 AM on 01/07/2010
I unsubscribed from all OFA emails and quit altogether many months ago.

one can not simply wish away Obama's corporatist governance.
01:44 AM on 01/07/2010
"What so many liberal critics really want in a Democratic president now is someone who will denounce the wealthy and punish the barons of industry (and insurance). Exasperated by the old notion of a rising tide that lifts all boats, something that turned out not to be true in the era of globalization, the left demands confrontation and contrast, and, at almost every juncture, Obama gives them compromise and complexity instead."
02:14 AM on 01/07/2010
trickle-up economic policy is not what Americans want.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
tralbry
03:22 AM on 01/07/2010
>> Obama gives them compromise and complexity instead."

Nope. Backbone. Complexity? Haven't seen it. In fact, haven't seen HIM much at all in the details of the HC debate so I don't know how complex that could be. Now that he's under attack on National Security we've seen him tho. Motivated by fear I guess.

But proably we don't see all this complexity because he's a chess master and everyone else is playing checkers. Isn't that the standard meme?
01:42 AM on 01/07/2010
"In his writings, Obama casts himself as a flexible idealist, a less-partisan Democrat who rejected the dogmas of the ’60s generation. But largely because of his early stance against the Iraq war, and because he was a onetime community organizer and the first African-American president, liberals felt certain that he had to be, at heart, one of them."
02:15 AM on 01/07/2010
it was more than simply a "feeling" re: his stated policies - it was his STATED POLICIES.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
tralbry
03:26 AM on 01/07/2010
>>.who rejected the dogmas of the ’60s generation

True, just as Clinton did. In favor of corporatism.

>>> But largely because of his early stance against the Iraq war, and because he was a onetime community organizer and the first African-American president, liberals felt certain that he had to be, at heart, one of them."

Also true but pretty reasonable that at least ONE of those things would make him a bit progressive.

Is this the Time article you're pasting so well? It sounds familiar.
01:40 AM on 01/07/2010
US is not a parliamentary democracy but presidential. In parliamentary democracy, the left and left-center parties can form coalition government and distribute ministerial positions accordingly. In presidential democracy, it is the winner takes all.

The way it works in presidential democracy, like the US for Democrat Party is : during the primaries , the left and left-center candidates campaign for nomination and who ever that wins the party nomination, the whole party unites under the candidate for the general election.

President Obama is not a lefty-progressive but a center-left liberal. He has chosen his economic and national security teams with people of like minds and political philosophies.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
tralbry
01:58 AM on 01/07/2010
>>> President Obama is not a lefty-progressive but a center-left liberal. He has chosen his economic and national security teams with people of like minds and political philosophies

By which you mean center-right corporate Clintonian Democrat.

Other famous "liberals": Gates, Summers, Geithner, Emannuel and a ton of leftover Bushies.
02:16 AM on 01/07/2010
You have it right, tralbry!
10:50 AM on 01/07/2010
Obama looks liberal only when compared with the extremists in the Republican party. There have been no liberal Democratic presidents since LBJ.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
masher
software engineer
01:35 AM on 01/07/2010
You're proud of what Obama accomplished?? The trillions in bailouts to Wall Street with no reform nor any reform in sight? Or is it the H-1B and B1 federal regulations that ensure wages will never rise?
Is it the continuing off shoring of jobs that makes you happy? Or that all the green jobs are being off shored?

Seriously, please tell us what you are so proud of.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
tralbry
01:59 AM on 01/07/2010
He told you. They're good at organizing and there was something about Health Care in there. The Bachus bill that Obama wanted without the Public Option will be passed soon. That kind of accomplishment.
02:17 AM on 01/07/2010
one can not simply wish away Obama's corporatist governance.
12:25 AM on 01/07/2010
If Obama had tried, REALLY TRIED, and failed, then we could blame Republicans or Blue Dogs or something other than Obama. Time and time again, he has not tried at all. The lies revealed are nothing but embarrassing; e.g., I was not elected to prop up fat cat bankers, when that is exactly what he has done. Personally, I was through by March, when I found myself yelling at Axelrod on the TV as he portrayed Obama "agonizing" about his decision to let the torture criminals off the hook. Best moniker, stolen from another post, is OBAMARAHMA. Keeps the focus on who is the boss.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wahoocheryl
11:35 PM on 01/06/2010
First of all thank you, President Obama. Thank you, OFA.

In reading many of these posts, I cannot believe what I am reading. What this President told you was that change was difficult and that the status quo would not give up without a fight. Just because some things may not be going as you would like or as quickly as you would like, you want to run, pout or start a third party. This President has not sold you out or let us down, he has worked hard with his administration to do what he promised as well as what he feels will work for the American people. He told us that he would not always tell us what we wanted to hear, but what we needed to hear. Did you really think that real change would be easy? That it wouldn't require sacrifice and yes, compromise.
This is our chance to make real change. This is breakpoint where the strong truly endure not whine and complain from a standpoint of fear, not one of hope, change and progress. If you look back through history at the fight to end slavery, for civil rights, there were people like those of you who had given up or scrap the plan for an easier fix. We have to endure and continue towards the path of progress and change. Again Change is not easy, change begins with each of us, the change is within ME!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Balancement
Timendi causa est nescire. -- Seneca
12:29 AM on 01/07/2010
Have you been paying attention at all?

Here, let me borrow those rose-colored glasses--I want to see what color the sky is in *your* world.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
masher
software engineer
01:38 AM on 01/07/2010
The change is with in you? You said "the change is within ME". So you have the power to change banking regulations inside YOU? That's remarkable.