iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jeremy Symons

GET UPDATES FROM Jeremy Symons
 

Canadian Government Plans to Poison Wolves Due to Tar Sands Project

Posted: 02/10/2012 2:31 pm

The toll of tar sands development has been largely hidden hundreds of miles to the North. Canadian forests once provided the last undisturbed refuge in North America for migrating songbirds, ducks and geese, and the vast stretches of wilderness in northern Alberta have been ideal for wild wolves and caribou that have thrived in balance with nations of native Canadians for countless generations. But that was all before oil companies moved in and took control of the Albertan government.

A recent report from the National Wildlife Federation has drawn attention to Canada's plan to poison thousands of wolves in a desperate effort to save caribou decimated by oil development. Recent scientific studies have proved that Canada's Woodland caribou herds are heading toward extinction due to habitat destruction from tar sands and other oil development. Today's Los Angeles Times article sums up the story:

Woodland caribou herds in Canada are declining, and tar sands development is a big part of the reason why. But Canada's national and provincial governments know what do about that: Kill the wolves.

The National Wildlife Federation's biologists have concluded:

Canada's proposed solution to habitat destruction from tar sands development is to destroy the wolves that prey on caribou, instead of protecting their habitat.

Two particularly repugnant methods of destroying wolves -- shooting wolves from helicopters and poisoning wolves with baits laced with strychnine -- would be carried out in response to the caribou declines. Strychnine is a deadly poison known for an excruciating death that progresses painfully from muscle spasms to convulsions to suffocation, over a period of hours. Wildlife officials will place strychnine baits on the ground or spread them from aircraft in areas they know wolves inhabit. In addition to wolves, non-target animals like raptors, wolverines and cougars will be at risk from eating the poisoned baits or scavenging on the deadly carcasses of poisoned wildlife.

Americans have been dragged into this mess via the controversial Keystone XL pipeline proposal, which would move the thick black crude under 1,700 miles of the U.S. heartland. So now the same oil companies that have ravaged Alberta's wilderness have brought their deep pockets to America to fight President Obama's prudent decision to deny a permit for this massive new tar sands pipeline.

They're running millions of dollars in TV commercials and spending millions more on lobbying. By turning tar sands into a kitchen table issue in the United States, Transcanada has drawn more scrutiny on what is really happening with the massive tar sands expansion than Alberta was prepared for.

This story is gaining a lot of attention and picking up steam and has gone viral, which isn't surprising since National Wildlife Federation is the United States' largest conservation organization with four million supporters. National Wildlife Federation was also a leading voice in the reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone National Park -- wolves imported from Canada thanks to the generous cooperation of the Canadian government in the mid-90's.

Wolves aren't the only wildlife impacted by tar sands. Waterfowl that land on the industry's toxic tailing ponds have been killed in the thousands.

You can learn more about tar sands' impacts on wildlife by reading our November NWF magazine story.

We have a voice and a role to play here in the United States. Oil companies have convinced some members of Congress to try to overrule the president's prudent decision on the tar sands pipeline. Let Congress know that America shouldn't reward Alberta's oil industry by reviving Transcanada's tar sands pipeline project. This tar sands pipeline is the oil export gateway that oil companies need to drive a massive expansion of habitat-destroying tar sands operations. And it would amount to an American seal of approval for the strychnine-poisoning of Alberta's wolves.

This post has been modified since its original publication.

 

Follow Jeremy Symons on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JeremySymons

 
 
  • Comments
  • 49
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
08:03 PM on 02/21/2012
As a Canadian, it's weird to be in this position: if you're a US citizen, please for the love of all that is good in this world, demand a moratorium on Tar Sands oil. The US market buys more oil from Canada than any other market – join the European Union in boycotting this senseless "development project."
03:59 PM on 02/18/2012
Please sign the petition to stop this: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/2/stop-wolf-poisoning-and-aerial-shooting-in-canada/
12:52 PM on 02/13/2012
The wolf cull is in response to the higher caribou predation by wolves resulting from fragmented habitat caused by the development of the oil sands (shown by studies from the University of Alberta). So, this cull is protecting the caribou from population decline (which could lead to other negative consequences).

That being said, it is horrible that it even needs to come to this. Having to conduct organized culls to mitigate the detrimental effects of the oil sands on biodiversity demonstrates the pressures introduced to the native biodiversity by the oil sands. Not only are the oil sands affecting caribou, now they are having negative impact on wolves. What next? Living organisms are all connected within communities and ecosystems, and having the slightest impact on one species will undoubtedly affect another.

If only our government could understand/care about that they are not representing every Canadian's interests with their extraction of the oil sands (and that sometimes they need to consider issues extending beyond immediate economic gain), environmental perturbations that will cause extreme stress to humans and other living things in the future (or even the present as we see in this article) could be avoided.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:13 PM on 02/12/2012
And we are doing all of these - killing/poisoning the wolves, destroying caribou habitats - for what?

Oh, yes, it is for the communist Chinese who desperate want Canadian tar-sand oil. Currently, there is only 1 outlet for it and it's America. Wait until the Republic'CONS' and its gas-oil industry lobbyists getting the pipeline to Texas, Americans can expect higher energy cost because they now can sell it to the highest bidder in open market.

Communist China gov't has to thank their American Republic'CONS' in Congress for their loyal support!
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
09:52 PM on 02/12/2012
Thanks for making the connection between cruelty to animals and the destruction of habitat for Big Energy schemes. All forms of Big Energy, even big wind and solar, destroy wilderness along with its diversity of plant and animal life. But as long as people feel that, come wind or high water, we must continue to stoke the fire of Industrial Capitalism's energy paradigm rather than seek a quieter and gentler path (like distributed, point-of-use energy generation--solar panels on every roof, for instance) wildlife will be on the front lines if suffering, with humans sure to follow.
12:19 PM on 02/12/2012
http://www.enr.gov.nt.ca/_live/pages/wpPages/soe_wildlife_biodiversity.aspx#4

Scroll down to 15.4. Realize that the majority of the Caribou are not withing thousands of miles of The Oil Sands/
Please appreciate how HUGE Canada is? Alberta is 3 times the size of Texas with 1/10 the population.
82% of those people live in the bottom 1/3 of the province.
They have tracked wide ranging fluctuations in the Caribou herds back to the 1700's mostly through Russian and Northern European historical Data
The majority of the worlds herds are 3x the size they were in the 1970's
Do some research on (Nematoda; Protostrongylidae): A new parasite of caribou and other ungulates in high latitudes of North America.
Yes it is a closed system... Climate change allows proliferation of insects that transfer parasites that impact maternal health that impact calf survivability. The same holds true for the Wolves... truthfully... give them a few years and they would self balance as this parasite is similar to the Heartworm in the lower US States.
However... again... please realize that Wolf have a pack range. They could drop bait from Helicopters everyday of the year and impact 1/1000 of the wolf population across Canada.
This is a promotional photo-op for the prime minister so he can be seen to be doing something for Northern communities.
photo
Artemesian
Spiritual Messenger of the Earth
02:16 PM on 02/12/2012
I appreciate what you're saying - but even with all of the open, unspoiled land in the world, why would anyone carelessly and irresponsibly introduce poison baits into the environment and poison an entire food chain of animals? Isn't there a better, more 21st century solution? Just totally irresponsible.
07:15 PM on 02/12/2012
Agreed there.... Like I mentioned... Wolf packs run in a territory.
So anywhere where there are issues...Shooting and trapping works.
For years there was a bounty. Back in the 70's it was about $50 as I recall.
The trick being that it has to be low enough to not clean out entire areas.
Yet high enough that Hunters make darn sure they are dead. Gives a good count also.
A fast search online and They tried bounties in Alberta in 2009-2010.
You have to be a Game member and counties offer $3-500 ...limit of 50 kills per county.
So that gives you a couple of hundred dead in the province out of a population of 5000 plus.
Alaska had a bounty of $150 with 600 out of 11,000 killed.

I should just learn to walk away from topics like this but an article that has so many inflamatory buzzwords and based on so little actual fact is boggling.
I don't want to read slanted fiction in a news website. So before you hug that tree, check it for pitch.
10:17 AM on 02/12/2012
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/sep/17/oil-sands-wildlife

This is not a new news "uncovered by the National Wildlife Federation". The story first ran internationally in the Guardian in September 2011. In any case, that does not diminish the concerns raised in this article and the original story.
11:08 AM on 02/12/2012
I just realized that the story also ran in the Huffington Post on September 22, 2011.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-genovali/caribou-tar-sands_b_968632.html
photo
Artemesian
Spiritual Messenger of the Earth
08:03 PM on 02/11/2012
Speaking of wolves, in the state of Oregon cattle ranchers want to introduce a 'state of emergency' bill to by pass the state Endangered Species protection and wolf management plan because of supposed cattle depredation.

Following is a link to a petition to the governor of Oregon opposing the bill if anyone reading in the US is interested in signing. Thx.

https://www.change.org/petitions/the-governor-of-or-save-oregons-29-wolves-oppose-hb-4158
12:51 PM on 02/11/2012
I suggest America's insatiable appetite for oil plays the largest role in this news story. Full stop
photo
Artemesian
Spiritual Messenger of the Earth
10:38 AM on 02/11/2012
How brilliant - killing wolves will do nothing to save the declining caribou (which is due to habitat loss), but what it will do is wipe out two species for the price of one. And why poison? It will have a devastating effect on the environment and other animals. I hope someday our continent won't be flattenned asphalt, concrete and grey skies from one end to the other.
photo
fineartist1
The average person thinks he isn't
12:13 PM on 02/12/2012
Have you ever flown over Canada or the US----there is a vast amount of wilderness. You have been watching too many dooms day movies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
angusmciver
Feels Empty
01:03 PM on 02/12/2012
So you think the idea of killing off more wolf populations is prudent? Sure, there are vast expanses of land but do you deny the nastiness of the tar sands projects? Or does that not have any impact on you?
photo
Artemesian
Spiritual Messenger of the Earth
01:17 PM on 02/12/2012
Why yes, I have as a matter of fact. I hope by 'vast amounts of wilderness' you don't mean plenty more to exploit! Are you one of those who haven't been paying attention to the warnings? ;)
11:11 PM on 02/10/2012
As a Canadian, I beg you, please, hurt our government where it hurts most. I know that a lot of my fellow countrymen will hate me for this, but for nature's sake, punish my country for the hurt it causes to the environment. Please. Show my government that you will not buy our dirty oil, and worse, that you'll boycott Canadian products if we keep on hurting our corner of Planet Earth.
10:51 PM on 02/10/2012
This is disgusting, these people should be ashamed of themselves doing this to poor innocent animals when they could just leave THE ANIMALS land alone !! i hope they arent able to do this to these animals because they dont deserve it, they were there before us.
10:45 PM on 02/10/2012
I remember when I used to be able to say I was proud to live in Canada. A little. Honestly, it's starting to get hazy.
08:44 PM on 02/10/2012
I am personally anti Tar Sands...definitely against all pipelines south/ west and have nothing but contempt for Multinational Oil corporations.
The same contempt I have for people who whine about dirty oil and don't look at the practices in their own countries and households. ... however...
How many of you have ever seen what a Wolf pack can do to decimate a Moose or Caribou population? I'm holding up my hand... anyone else? How they target the young, feed one time and let the rest rot? Anyone do research, ask what people that live with those wolves deal with? How they can't let their kids walk home from the bus stop or play in the yard?
There is more impact on Caribou with Toilet paper you use from Boreal Forests or Wheat from Mid and Eastern Canadian Farmland.
The Tar Sands footprint is about 1/10,000 of the Canadian Caribou Range
Extraction of Alberta’s tar sands has expanded steadily in recent years, to about 232 square miles.
http://interboreal.org/images/caribou/maps/Caribou-LargeProtectedAreas.png
http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=wolf+ranges+canada&view=detail&id=BAC70EB2F85A5529B9F1A6400DEF1A96A16F524A&first=0&FORM=IDFRIR

I think they should give out traps and bring back the bounty system.
Then make fur coats rather than killing all those Chinese polyesters made from ...OIL.
Of course... that would be introducing logic into a government situation...
I don't believe that has ever been tried before that I can recall.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:08 PM on 02/10/2012
what a horrific,cruel and barbaric idea.NOT!! we need to leave nature alone and respect her and all animals.human beings are a virus and fur,contrary to what you believe,takes FAR more energy than synthetic and is NOT green!! also,green non animal alternatives including green synthetics DO exist and are superior BY FAR! killing the wolves is killing us!
11:53 AM on 02/11/2012
Who is this nature you are talking about?
02:53 PM on 02/11/2012
You do realize that "green synthetics" just use less oil, or more highly refined oil, right? Lets also remember that without petroleum, thousands of human beings would die from disease an starvation all around the globe. And lets not forget that every bit of information transmitted over the web draws at least some of it's energy from fossil fuel plants, which means that you, as a "Huffpost Super User" have likely burned hundreds of dinosaur bits with your posting. Also, as a common courtesy, please remember that capitals are for proper nouns and sentence beginnings, and commas have spaces after them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
09:12 PM on 02/10/2012
Did you realize, the greatest statement ever written on the ecology of our ecosystem, dependent Earth and the first seeding of the word green as a metaphor for the conservation and salvation of Earth's ecosystems, were all about an ecosystem dying in the absence of her wolves. Mountain was used as a metaphor for ecosystem, for the Earth.

After the wolves on the mountain were killed for the same reasons the Canadians are poisoning the wolf to increase caribou populations, the deer herds populations exploded. They devoured all of the plant biodiversity that held the entire ecosystem intact. And, they, then, died off from their own too much. Plants/trees are the habitats/homes, food, shelter, nurseries and cover of all animal biodiversity, and when the deer herds exploded, they devoured all the plant diversity. The soil, with no anchors/roots in place, allowed the winds to blow away the soil of the ecosystem, and without its wolves, a vital keystone specie, became a planet more like Mars than green Earth and her life giving and supporting ecosystems.

It was Earth who chose her wolves to be in America, so the caribou, elk and deer do not devour the Earth unto the destitution of Mars. Think like an ecosystem; think like the Earth. What is Earth's opinion of her wolves?

"In Wildness is the salvation of the Earth and the preservation of all life...long known among mountains and wolves but seldom perceived by man."
11:55 AM on 02/11/2012
LOL
Linus you are falling over the edge
The earth chose?????