More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

A View From Afghanistan: Why McChrystal Spoke Out

What's Your Reaction:

Originally Published at Demagogues and Dictators


Here in Afghanistan the talk in the hallways and cafeterias has been dominated by discussions of what will happen when "the boss" meets with President Obama tomorrow at the White House. There is no question that General McChrystal will offer to resign as a result of comments made by him and his aides to free lance journalist Michael Hastings author of the controversial Runaway General article in Rolling stone. When I initially heard murmuring about this article two days ago I assumed that the comments contained within were a strategic move on the part of General McChrystal and his staff to have their voices heard in order to pressure Congress and the Obama administration to stop playing politics with his war. After conducting more than 50 interviews with experienced military professionals here in Afghanistan, I can tell you first hand that many commanders here echo McChyrstal's point that they are being asked to sell an unwinnable position. Setting a deadline of July 2011 for the start of a withdrawal essentially cuts counterinsurgency strategy off at the knees. However, now having read the Rolling Stone article, it is clear that General McChrystal and his staff went native with this reporter, letting their guard down too much to someone who was not to be trusted.

General McChrystal is obviously not the superman that the media had made him out to be. He is a man who has often blundered when it comes to off the cuff remarks to the media. He is however the exact person that America needs running the war in Afghanistan.

Counterinsurgency doctrine is a relatively new introduction to Afghanistan and there are still many commanders who who do not buy into it. It will take a known warrior like McChrystal, who has more than his fair share of blood on his hands from his days running the Joint Special Operations Command in Iraq, to convince the most stubborn hold out here that we cannot kill our way out of Afghanistan. Besides his credibility amongst the majority of the troops here in Afghanistan, McChrystal is the only American that President Karzai is known to actually like in the whole country. The Rolling Stone article wrongly depicts General McChrystal as having stolen the diplomatic playbook for Afghanistan away from Ambassadors Eikenberry and Holbrooke. However, the plain fact of the matter is that both those men have publicly questioned Karzai's ability to lead and as a result he does not want to work with them.

The Western media has apparently flipped the switch on its collective brain and has begun incorrectly comparing General McChrystal to General MacArther, the commander of U.S. forces on the Korean Peninsula in 1951 who was subsequently fired by General Truman for insubordination. General McChrystal is guilty of poor judgment obviously but has come no where close to committing insubordination. General MacArthur on the other hand flat out refused to follow several of President Truman's direct orders and was in fact secretly negotiating with influential congressman behind the Presidents back in order to gain approval for the escalation of the Korean War. Had MacArthur not been removed from his command the Korean War may very likely have gone nuclear. General McChrystal has disobeyed no direct orders nor has he sought to subvert President Obama's influence and thus has not committed insubordination.

 

Follow Jeremy White on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jwhite583

 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:04 AM on 06/26/2010
Wish this article had gotten out much earlier..
01:01 PM on 06/24/2010
After conducting more than 50 interviews with experienced military professionals here in Afghanistan, I can tell you first hand that many commanders here echo McChyrstal's point that they are being asked to sell an unwinnable position.

------ REPLY------

It's what McChrystal signed on to do....
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
helenwheels
SEDAGIVE?!?
12:59 PM on 06/24/2010
It's way past time for the left to start protesting this war en masse again.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Yank in France
Thomas Paine, expat in France 1792-1802
12:13 PM on 06/24/2010
Correction to last post.

In my last sentence in the second paragraph, I meant to say: The American RIGHT always loved him because he was as crazy as they are!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Yank in France
Thomas Paine, expat in France 1792-1802
12:11 PM on 06/24/2010
Thanks for a very thoughtful article. I probably do not agree with McChrystal's overall political philosophy but I respect him as a man who is at the same time highly competent, very dedicated, hard-working and loyal to his country.

MacArthur was a disaster in Korea whose actions provoked the Chinese onslaught that led to the loss of tens of thousands of American lives and several times that many Korean ones. The American always loved him because he was as crazy as they are!

It disturbs me to think that Obama's team may be playing politics with the Afghan war, but I have to admit that I do not see how America can pull out a year's time. Maybe Obama figures the war is unwinnable, but in that case, why not pull out now and save stop wasting lives and money?

As for Biden, he is one of the dumbest, most idiotic individuals on the American political. He is just lucky he had an even bigger idiot, in Sarah Palin, on the Republican side of the campaign!
photo
SamEllison
I feel so clean!
06:10 PM on 06/23/2010
COIN takes twenty years, half a million troops with no guarantee of success.
Everybody knew that going in, time to rethink going in.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kiku
03:18 PM on 06/23/2010
Military officers live under a code of conduct:

888. ART. 88. CONTEMPT TOWARD OFFICIALS

Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
03:08 PM on 06/23/2010
McChrystal read and signed off on the story before it was published. It wasn't that he let his guard down. It's that he's arrogant and hubristic, but also legitimately frustrated with lack of progress and political dithering in Washington. A complicated issue and not as one-sided as any blog account I've read.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kiku
03:00 PM on 06/23/2010
It is against military code to criticize the President, VP, SOS, Governors, and more.

This wasn't just trash talking, Petraeus demonstrated such disrespect for the President that it raised questions about undermining the operation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Romulus
01:08 PM on 06/23/2010
If, say, a Major, had come out publicly and criticized McChrystal, he or she would find himself in the brig facing a court martial.
09:06 AM on 06/23/2010
If the general lets his guard down with the Rolling Stone, do you really think he is the man who can face the enemy? (and I might add, whoever the enemy might be)
01:42 PM on 06/24/2010
It seems after reading the RS article that military leaders, love being bullies. McCrystal says he can kick anybody's ass, at his age I find that questionable
The comments he made, showing himself as the tough guy, reminded me of "Raiders of the Lost Ark". Remember when the vicious Muslim swordsman demonstrated his power, big and mean, only to be shot dead.