Senator Brown, Leading Energy Think Tanks Push for More Research Investment and New National Institutes of Energy

Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH) and leading DC-based think tank Third Way are the latest political figures to issue a call for significantly increased public investment in clean energy innovation. The Ohio Senator and the moderate progressive think tank joined the Breakthrough Institute today to unveil a new report calling for both the creation of a "National Institutes of Energy" and a dramatic increase in federal funding for energy research and development. The report, titled Jumpstarting a Clean Energy Revolution with a National Institutes of Energy, argues that these two measures are necessary to make clean energy cheap and get America running on clean energy.

"Clean energy is the future of our nation, but it can also create jobs now - in Ohio and across the Midwest," Senator Sherrod Brown said. "Done right, increased research and development of new clean energy technologies will drive innovation and reduce our dependence on foreign energy. Already in Ohio entrepreneurs and workers are leading the way."

"Our nation has a history of rising to meet pressing challenges by investing the resources necessary to overcome them," said Jesse Jenkins, Director of Energy and Climate Policy at the Breakthrough Institute and one of the report's authors. "Now, America must dramatically increase our investment in clean energy research and development and employ new and effective models to put that money to work. Clean, cheap energy technologies are needed to revitalize our economy, secure the nation's energy independence, and avert the risks of climate change," Jenkins added.

Modeled after the National Institutes of Health, a New National Institutes of Energy (NIE) would be designed to most effectively channel R&D funding toward the development of new, low-cost commercial clean energy technologies. The NIE would function as a nationwide network of regionally based, commercially focused, and coordinated innovation institutes. Alongside other effective research institutions, the new NIE would critically strengthen the nation's energy innovation capacity.

The report also calls for a sustained increase of $15 billion in annual federal energy R&D funding, consistent with President Barack Obama's proposals. This would result in a total annual R&D budget of roughly $20 billion per year. The purpose of both the R&D increase and the establishment of a new NIE is to close what the authors call "the clean energy price gap" - the difference between the current low price of carbon-intensive energy production like coal and the comparatively higher price of today's non- or low- carbon emitting technologies.

"Getting America running on clean energy is the defining challenge - and opportunity - of our time," said Josh Freed, a co-author of the paper who runs Third Way's Clean Energy Initiative. "Establishing a National Institutes of Energy and fully funding R&D will drive the research that will lead to the next generation of clean technologies. These not only will fight global warming, they will allow the United States to be the energy leader in a carbon-constrained world."

The authors also point to Energy Secretary Steven Chu, who has said that it is a "myth [that] we have all the technologies we need to solve the energy challenge... We need new technologies to transform the [energy] landscape." The authors argue that their proposal would create the structure and provide the funding the United States needs to transition from an aging, insecure energy infrastructure to clean, cheap energy. Neither the private sector nor the federal government is currently meeting these needs at a time when other nations around the world, including China, South Korea and Japan, are dramatically increasing their clean energy funding.

Both groups also lauded the involvement of Senator Brown, who keynoted an event on Capitol Hill today to release the new report. "Sherrod Brown has been a leading voice in the Senate calling for energy reforms that helps to transform and save the American manufacturing sector. He understands that the best way to do that is for America to develop the technologies that will close the price gap and make clean energy cheap. This will help create the kind of jobs and industries we need to have a thriving economy in the 21st century," said Michael Shellenberger, President of the Breakthrough Institute. Freed added that Third Way "looks forward to continuing the work with Senator Brown that we have kicked off here today."

U.S. Congressman Rush Holt (D-NJ) also joined the event to make brief remarks in support of the Breakthrough Institute and Third Way's efforts to advance critical clean energy research investments. The carbon prices established by the American Clean Energy and Security Act recently passed by the House "will not be enough," the Congressman explained, to spur clean energy research and ensure we have the technologies we need to achieve deep emissions reductions. Congressman Holt, who holds a PhD in Physics, warned that if the U.S. does not invest significantly more in clean energy research, "We may find ourselves five years from now, after we've deployed the technologies we have ready today and picked that low hanging fruit, and we're going to look around and say, 'Who was in charge of inventing the next generation of technologies we need?' ... The Market is not just going to do that for us."

Despite differences in their views on the energy bills currently before Congress, Third Way and the Breakthrough Institute said that the two groups had joined together to highlight the critical importance and urgency of energy R&D to the nation's economic future and the fight against global warming.

Third Way can be found on the web at www.ThirdWay.org. The Breakthrough Institute is at www.theBreakthrough.org.

A copy of the full report, Jumpstarting a Clean Energy Revolution, can be downloaded here.

Any questions about the report can be referred to Jesse Jenkins at [e-mail].

Click here for a press release from the Office of U.S. Senator Sherrod Brown

Press Coverage:

Call for 'National Institutes of Energy' to propel research - ClimateWire ($ubsc required)

Push is on for more clean energy research - Chicago Tribune

Images from event (via ThirdWay):

Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio

Senator Sherrod Brown and Matt Bennett of Third Way

Congressman Rush Holt (D-NJ), Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus of Breakthrough Institute, and Josh Freed of Third Way

Congressman Rush Holt and Josh Freed

Follow Jesse Jenkins on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JesseJenkins

Comments

[alvdh1]

Time and time again, I read Huff Post articles that talk about clean energy. What I find disturbing is the frequency with which the article omit a discussion of energy efficiency as the basis for developing clean, renewable energy. Every spare dime available should be first going toward energy efficiency and energy conservation before we commence with developing renewable energy.

For example, anyone who installs solar power on their roof top before replacing all of their lighting with LED's is just throwing money away. It take one 200 watt solar panel to power two 100 watt incandescent light bulbs. A two hundred watt solar panel costs approximately $900 with tax. This does not include the inverter or the labor to install. Two decent LED replacement lights will cost you
$80 to $130 per LED. Let's do worst case scenario and spend the $260. You just saved $640 not including the inverter and labor to save 180 watts of power assuiming the LED's each use 10 watts of electricity.

This logic can be extended to super efficient appliances. If you can afford to install solar, then you can certainly afford to install LED lighting which will help eliminate several solar panels on your roof and more if you buy a efficient appliances.

[mcmchugh99]

Now that's a good idea. I have never thought it was enough simply to say "stop pollution tomorrow". We need a National Investment bank, financed by the Federal reserve, to fund all kinds of new industries, infrastructure, research and education in THIS country. I like this idea much better than just giving Wall Street a bunch of pollution credits to play Monopoly with.

[bryanetahoma]

Right now, $20 billion a year toward research for better clean energy, but I believe that in the long haul more people will feel thankful that we invested all this money on getting more clean energy sources. It will improve the environment and potentially lower costs on energy.

[leduck]

we need to focus on renweable energy -- yes...,
but it will not lower the cost of energy in thelng run
PEAK OIL means the end of cheap energy
and there is nothing out there that can replace oil

google PEAK OIL
and EROIE (net energy)

wind and solar enegy are very diffuse