iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Jessica Jensen

Jessica Jensen

Posted: June 30, 2008 12:31 PM

Wall-E: Robotic Ode to Environmental Protection [SPOILER ALERT]


SPOILER ALERT: THE FOLLOWING CONTAINS PLOT POINTS FROM WALL-E IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE PICTURE BELOW







2008-06-30-walle_20080626112252.jpg







As I waited in line on opening night on Friday to see Wall-E, I thought it would be something of a robotic version of Nemo. Having loved Nemo, I was excited to detach from my work-week stress load and calmly watch the movie.

Little did I know I was in for one of the most moving, gorgeous, and dare I say "important" movie experiences I can remember in a long, long while. This movie is a blatant and powerful indictment of our environmental destruction, and it is also a completely entertaining and warm love story. I humbly encourage everyone to see it.

**While this will be a glowing review, please scroll down to read my two complaints about the film as well.

Wall-E is the last remaining trash-collecting robot left on an abandoned planet Earth. He roams the smoggy, trash-covered landscape of our destroyed planet, crushing refuse and hanging out with his only friend, a plucky cockroach. But Wall-E has a video of Hello Dolly that he watches on endless loop, and he longs for something more: singing, dancing, and inter-personal (or inter-machine) contact. In short, he is love-sick.

Where have all the humans gone? We learn that they were forced to flee their dying planet over 700 years ago in a huge space-craft called The Axiom. On the ship they have become obese, immobile blob-beings who can only sit in their spaceship deck chairs and consume what is shown to them on their personal video monitors. The scenes on the Axiom are scarily reminiscent of present-day Las Vegas: the over-fed humans are detached from their daily cares and are free to sit on their backsides, consume, and be constantly entertained.

I won't spoil the plot for you, but let's just say that a beguiling robot named Eve comes from the Axiom down to Earth in search of life forms. She and Wall-E meet and indeed find a little sprout of a plant growing in an old boot. Life blooms on Earth, love blooms for Wall-E and Eve, and great changes befall the humans quietly sipping their smoothies on the Axiom.

But I do have two beefs with Wall-E:

+ Why did Pixar pass up the opportunity to help people learn what they can do to become better stewards of the planet?? The movie is an inspirational environmental call to action, and yet there is no mention of how or where people can learn to cut carbon emissions, save water, reduce their trash production, etc. Why didn't Pixar put up a simple screen with "ten recommendations for loving planet Earth" at the end of the film -- or a link to a site with educational information? It pains me that MILLIONS of people will see this movie and learn nothing about what they can do to save the planet!

+ I also find the message at the end of the film a bit troubling. The humans return to Earth and it seems as if everything will just be hunky-dory. Yes they have some clean up to do, but it won't be that bad. I was sad to see that Pixar took this easy out; we don't need to be telling Americans that our environmental practices can be swept away with some kind of simple big broom.

Please share your comments on what you thought of the movie!

SPOILER ALERT: THE FOLLOWING CONTAINS PLOT POINTS FROM WALL-E IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE PICTURE BELOW As I waited in line on opening night on Friday to see Wall-E, I thought it would be s...
SPOILER ALERT: THE FOLLOWING CONTAINS PLOT POINTS FROM WALL-E IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE PICTURE BELOW As I waited in line on opening night on Friday to see Wall-E, I thought it would be s...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ruffmama
your ad here.....inquire within.
04:16 PM on 07/02/2008
Or how about the fact that there was no government but instead the whole "world" was run by a huge corporation called B&L.
08:03 AM on 07/02/2008
I thought the film's vision of earth devoid of plant-life unlikely. In World Without Us, Alan Weisman discusses how quickly nature would take over again if humans disappeared from the planet.
On the other hand, I did like the film's portrayal of future humans too lazy and media-manipulated to leave their screens. That picture of us seems all too true today.
12:24 PM on 07/01/2008
I saw this movie with my 12 year old daughter, she got the message as did the audience. Personally I though it was a bit long in the middle. Also I did not like as much as Cars, The Incredibles, Nemo. Still well worth the money and time.
11:07 AM on 07/01/2008
I don't think the point of the movie was environmental destruction.

Think of the environmental destruction like the stolen money in psycho. It was merely a plot device to develop the characters and move the story along.

Personally, I am glad the movie wasn't preachy. I get preached at every day about global warming, ozone holes ect. Sometimes a fella just wants to watch a great movie.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LegalCat
09:48 AM on 07/01/2008
I thought it was plenty heavy-handed as it was. I say this as a dedicated environmentalist; I'm not an SUV owner who resents the movie for its environmental message. I just thought it was way over the top on the polemic side, and that interfered with the plot. I also don't think anyone needs to see a Pixar movie to find out what to do about the environment; there are plenty of places to find that out and they're not particularly shy about sharing the information.

I hate to be a contrarian, but I thought "WALL-E" was boring. The technological stuff, as always from Pixar, was awesome, amazing, just totally sublime, TOTALLY worth the price of admission -- but the actual story line was, well, dumb. I agree with the reviewer's other point: ok, so this one plant managed to grow; that means that agriculture will work again? Using what for seeds? Are they going to live on weed leaves? Etc., etc. It just wasn't well thought out.

I still think "Ratatouille" is the best thing Pixar has ever done or probably ever will do, with "The Incredibles" a close second. Basically, I'm much more of a Brad Bird fan than a Pixar fan.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KingHuff
03:07 AM on 07/01/2008
I don't think you need to worry about " the message " getting through; I watched with 2 teen girls who left the theatre swearing to get " everyone we know to start recycling ".
The real genius of the film is not the message anyway. It's that you are captivated for nearly an hour with virtually zero dialog and that you completley care about this little robot who displays the full gamet of human emotions .
In the end , it takes a robot-in-love to reawaken humanity to the wonder of nature and our individuality. I didn't want the story to end....but I thought the film ended with the perfect note of optimism.
GO SEE IT.....BIG SCREEN... amazing visuals
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OnTheOtherBeach
02:18 PM on 06/30/2008
As Sam Goldwyn used to say: "If you want to send a message, call Western Union."
01:35 PM on 06/30/2008
I think your beef with the movie is missplaced. Why would you want them to make such heavy handed pronouncement. It is an amazing movie and it stands just fine the way it is. I for one will see it again.
01:22 PM on 06/30/2008
I saw it this weekend too--I think the movie would have been much too scary to have tips or in any way insinuate that that was really happening to our planet. It also needed easy fixes at the end. Remember the target audience for the movie--little kids. The movie was quite scary enough without directly connecting it to the real world. It was pointed enough that their parents couldn't help but get the message.