"You are trampling on our constitution," Craig Miller shouted at Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Spector last Tuesday.
"This is about the dismantling of this country," Katy Abram added.
"They are talking about killing people," said Laurel Tobias.
The question that kept coming up for me was, WHY.
Why are people so angry? Why are so many lashing out, like never before, at both Democrat and Republican representatives?
"This isn't just about health care," said Carolyn Doric of Harrisburg. "It's about political power and a means to regain political power."
Contrast that meeting with Mr. Obama's town hall in New Hampshire. No angry shouts about "death panels," no claims of un-Americanism. In fact, the crowd was so friendly Mr. Obama specifically asked for tough questions.
However, protesters outside the president's meeting were in full anger mode. Diane Campbell of Kingston, N.H. said, "Adolph Hitler was for exterminating the weak... that's what's going to happen."
"I think they're ill-informed," David Matayabas, of Waltham, Massachusetts, and supporter of reform said, "...and they're regurgitating talking points from Rush Limbaugh."
In spite of the fact that several news agencies and independent organizations have detailed "truth vs. fiction" points about health care in stories and web sites, there remains a very vocal crowd that believes the worst.
Why are people so quick to believe misinformation instead of facts? And why does President Obama seem to get a pass on all this outrage? (Although Montana might tell a different story.)
The answer may lie in a perfect storm of events.
In part, this began 18 to 24 months ago when the economy took a steep slide off the cliffs of insanity -- the subprime crisis, failures at Fannie and Freddie, Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, A.I.G., Chrysler, GM, followed by massive layoffs.
Although never labeled a depression, most experts agreed that we were now experiencing the greatest recession since that time. Uncertainty became the new normal.
The 2008 election brought a great change in political leadership. The Democrats were in charge of both the White House and Congress. The first black president in the history of the country promised "Change You Can Believe In."
But just how much "change" can some people believe in, in the midst of so much uncertainty?
Finally, there's the issue of trust and the egregious behavior by political and corporate figures that's been ratcheting up since 2006. In just the last few weeks, we've seen: former Democratic Congressman William Jefferson's bribery conviction; Republican Governor Mark Sanford's affair in which he lied to his own staff about his whereabouts; and thousands of internal e-mails that show that White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove did play an active and unethical role in the 2006 firings of a number of U.S. attorneys.
Is it any wonder that trust in public officials is at an all time low?
Last May, the Capps/Zogby First 100 Days -- Integrity, Leadership, Trust poll revealed that only 18 percent of 3,367 likely voters gave Congress a positive rating in the area of "restoring trust in government" compared to Mr. Obama's positive score of 50 percent. While most people still trust Mr. Obama, Americans passionately distrust Congress.
Okay, but why so much fear and outrage over health care? This was an issue that ranked third in terms of actionable issues Americans said were most important last November in the Capps/Zogby Post-Election Poll that I detailed in The Winter of Our Discontent.
People have been angry and mistrusting for so long over so much corruption that they're willing to grab hold of anyone or anything that validates that anger. And that is the moment when demagogues are given an unusual credibility as their voices serve as a catalyst to authenticate and perpetuate the outrage.
In 2006, I commissioned a poll from Zogby International entitled, Honesty and Trust in America, with analysis by the Center for Cultural Studies in Philadelphia.
In May of that year, the Center wrote "The survey reflects a growing perception of a large gap between the values of corporations and government institutions and the values of the American middle class. Values gaps are always perceived as threatening, and a perceived threat to the middle class inevitably leads to social action as it did during the Great Depression."
I wrote in the conclusion to that report, "...with public opinion at a 'tipping point,' the necessary courage [to take action] could be achieved fueled by the anger of more ethics scandals involving political and corporate leadership."
"It will take only one precipitating event," the Cultural Studies group wrote, "an Ethical 9/11, in conjunction with the rise of a recognized [perceived] champion of the middle class... to gain critical mass."
Mr. Obama became that champion, coming to office with a calm presence and clear leadership style that reflected many of the American values that seem to have been tossed aside in Washington in favor of secrecy, corruption and deceit.
But the mountain of change that is health care reform, an issue Mr. Obama not only campaigned on but was largely supported by voters, has turned many of those same voters into an angry mob fueled by basic distrust of anything governmental.
Americans may trust Mr. Obama, but they don't trust Congress, certainly not about major reform of health care and not in such uncertain times.
However, Americans have faced uncertain times before -- the Great Depression - and come through it. They've faced demagogues -- 50's Senator Joseph McCarthy who fueled fears of a nationwide Communist conspiracy -- and survived.
And we can come through this uncertainty IF... we remain clear and rational ourselves.
The last question in the 2006 "Honesty" poll asked, "What two or three specific changes would have to take place in order to improve honesty and trust in America?" More than 8,000 Americans offered some very timely advice:
"We need less media pundits... [that] do nothing but spread hatred in order to make themselves more popular."
"We need to show respect for people that are honest even when we may not agree with them."
"We need leadership that places a high value on honesty, even when they have to pay a high price for it..."
Jim Lichtman writes and speaks on ethics. A member of the National Advisory Board of the Walter H. Capps Center for the Study of Ethics, Religion and Public Life at the University of California at Santa Barbara, his commentaries can be found at www.ethicsstupid.com
Eric Tang: Anh "Joseph" Cao: The Surprises Are Just Beginning
The improbable victory of Joseph Cao gave Republicans something to gloat about in the wake of its November defeats. But Republicans may soon learn that they're getting more than they bargained for.
Chris Weigant: The Silly Season In Politics
"Silly season" refers to late summer, when governments go on massive taxpayer-funded vacations all over the world. This year's season could produce a bumper crop of silly.
John W. Whitehead: Rule by Thieves
We, the taxpayers, will be the ones to pay the bill when it comes due.
Jim, you've got it wrong: We don't trust Obama OR Congress. Obama has proven himself, already, as NOT interested in actually moving us out from the status quo - he's a "centrist", which means, really, he's a flipping Republican. Just look at how he is following Bush on so many issues!
And while there are many in congress we love - Jim Webb, Dennis Kucinisch, Dr. Dean, Feingold - we are also well aware that Nancy Pelosi is a sell-out, the entire DLC is filled with Republicans and Harry can't-find-a-spine-to-save-his-life Reid is such a looser that we are doomed before we even begin.
Oh no, we have a LONG way to go before we have "taken this country back" from the corporate masters that consolidated their power during Reagan...
.
We know this bill if heavily flawed. It's 1,000 pages of special interest. We see through it. It's not going to make anything better and that's key. This is about us being fed up. It's about our future. The government is full of lawyers who have no clue about making or saving money for us, just spending it and we are sick of it.
We see through it, Democrats and Republicans - it's not about party. It's about us saying enough is enough. Fool me once it's your fault, fool me twice, it's mine. The bailout was a scam and this is just scam number ??? and we need real solutions that come from the people, not special interest.
The GOP machinery and insurance lobby is capitalizing on the disenfranchisement by spreading talking points that confirms every one of the ideological problems these people have against the Left (just as Karl Rove did with the fundamentalists in previous election regarding abortion/gays). These people don't need to go and verify facts. The "organizers" are pointing them at the means to make their anger known - town hall meetings.
As to why meetings with Obama don't have "organized" protests, the machinery directing these people don't want it because they are afarid of a backlash if things get too confrontational. Like any President, Obama is also the ceremonial head of the US and such hostility will be taken as the President being insulted. Also, there is a fear that too much disruption at an Obama meeting will provide an excuse for an investigation of the people who disrupted it (for security reasons) that will expose the organization behind the "spontaneous anger". So they are encouraging demonstrations outside rather than face-face confrontation with Obama. The meetings with Congress representatives are more local and under less national scrutiny and makes for more sympathetic press. The "angry people" themselves believe they will be under FBI scrutiny at Obama meetings, so they heed what the organizers are telling them.
Many on the teevee like to talk about how the nature of work and the workplace are changing. What older folks hear is: there's no room for me in the world of tomorrow. Makes for much upset. Which they take to the town hall. Perhaps we should concern ourselves more with their futures, if any.