iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jim Wallis

Jim Wallis

GET UPDATES FROM Jim Wallis

10 Reasons Why I'm Fasting for a Better Budget

Posted: 03/28/11 04:43 PM ET

1. Because I am an evangelical Christian and the root of the word "evangelical" is found in the opening statement of Jesus in Luke 4, where Christ says he has come to bring "good news (the 'evangel') to the poor." So to be an evangelical Christian is to try and bring good news to poor people.

2. Because some very bad news is happening to the poorest and most vulnerable people in Washington's battle over the budget -- both those at home and around the world.

3. Because budgets are moral documents -- they reveal our priorities, who and what is important, and who and what are not. To address excessive deficits is also a moral issue -- preventing our children and grandchildren from having crushing debt. But how you reduce a deficit is also a moral issue. We should reduce the deficit, but not at the expense of our poorest people.

4. Because it is simply wrong -- morally and religiously -- to focus our budget cuts on the people who are already hurting, and make them hurt more. Programs that are effectively reducing poverty should not be cut. They should be made as effective as possible, but not cut.

5. Because there is a selective cruelty going on in this budget debate. Instead of focusing on where the real money is, some budget cutters are actually targeting vital and effective programs that support and protect poor people and some initiatives that are literally saving lives. It was not spending on poor people that created this deficit, and these drastic cuts in programs that help poor people will do little to get us out of our deficit.

6. Because to really reduce the deficit, we should put everything on the table, especially the biggest public outlays in military spending, corporate subsidies and tax loopholes, long term health-care costs etc. -- all of which could actually reduce the deficit, when much smaller poverty programs will not. Last night, 60 Minutes exposed 60 billion lost in revenue to corporate tax havens in Switzerland -- enough to protect many programs for the poor.

7. Because there is a difference between deficit hawks -- some of whom I know, respect and work with on restoring fiscal health -- and deficit hypocrites, who won't go to where the real money is, but go instead to the poor, who have little political clout in Washington to defend themselves, and are an easy targets to score political points with a political base. We do not fast today against fiscal responsibility, but against political hypocrisy.

8. Because those of us who are Christians are bound by Jesus' command to protect the least of these. So people of faith ask, "What Would Jesus Cut?" The extreme budget cuts proposed to critical programs that save the lives, dignity and future of poor and vulnerable people have crossed a moral line. Politicians have only just begun to hear from the many church leaders who are ready to wage the good fight over these bad decisions. This crisis is bringing us together. Those with money and armies of lobbyists have their interests protected. They won't bear the burden of reducing the deficit. But the work to protect the poor is a Christian vocation and obligation, and we will be faithful to it.

9. Because I am blessed to be in the company of dear brothers and sisters, Tony Hall, David Beckham, Ritu Sharma, the 38 organizations that have joined this fast coalition, and the growing movement of people of faith and conscience who together intend to form a circle of protection around vital poverty-fighting programs. Every Christian, regardless of political affiliation, is called to take up the cause of the poor and the needy because that is God's heart, and we will be calling every legislator who says they are a Christian or person of conscience to listen to God's heart as they make their decisions.

10. Because, ultimately, this is a fast before God, to whom we turn in prayer and hope to change hearts -- our hearts, the heart of our lawmakers, the heart of the nation. We will pray and fast, each of us in our own ways, for mercy, compassion, wisdom, strength and courage as we make the critical budget choices about who and what are most important. A line has been crossed in this budget debate; extreme budget cuts are now being proposed and this fast is a spiritual escalation to bring these critical moral choices to the attention of the nation, and to seek God's help in doing so. "Is not this the fast that I choose," says the prophet Isaiah, "to loose bonds of injustice ... to let the oppressed go free?"

Join me in prayer, fasting, and action in response to Congress' proposed budget cuts.

portrait-jim-wallis

Jim Wallis is the author of Rediscovering Values: A Guide for Economic and Moral Recovery and CEO of Sojourners. He blogs at www.godspolitics.com. Follow Jim on Twitter @JimWallis. +Click here to get email updates from Jim Wallis

 
 
 

Follow Jim Wallis on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jimwallis

 
 
  • Comments
  • 82
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thrugreeneyez
09:32 PM on 04/04/2011
So beautifully said...truly inspiring. I pledged to fast today, and I'm almost through the day. Maybe I might extend it. What kind of society turns its back on starving children? We are better than that!
09:31 PM on 04/02/2011
I'm with you, Jim.

Today I fasted not only from food, but also from energy. During daylight hours, whenever I wanted to turn on the light I'd ask myself "Can I do what I need to do with only natural light?"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:14 PM on 03/31/2011
So now as I’m leavin’
I’m weary as Hell
The confusion I’m feelin’
Ain’t no tongue can tell
The words fill my head
And fall to the floor
If God’s on our side
He’ll stop the next war

– Bob Dylan, "With God on Our Side"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ArjenBoatsma
No such thing as too much coffee.
04:32 PM on 03/29/2011
Fasting = foregoing consumption.

Consumption = an american value

conclusion: fasting is un-american
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AccezzTom
Veteran with disabilities; Writer
03:30 PM on 03/29/2011
Politician? Christian?

Pardon me; I need a moment to gather myself...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nomccain
02:53 PM on 03/29/2011
Either many of those serving in congress are NOT Christians or they're carnel Christians. No Christian I know would devote the majority of the budget cuts to programs that benefit the poor, middle income, disabled, unemployed, homeless, and those ignorant of birth control methods or unable to afford birth control devices, while further empowering the wealthy and the big corporations who are robbing americans of jobs at home for higher profits. just sayin.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeannette Lacey
04:30 PM on 03/29/2011
I know some professed Christians who would, under the Calvinist guise of "God's Elect"; if people are poor, ill or suffering other bad fortune, it is simply because they are sinning and "aren't right with God". Take last weekend's announcement (reported here in Huff Po: “Social Conservatives Say Their Issues Are Inextricably Linked With Economy In 2012”) from the conservative right saying that their culture war agenda is directly connected to the economy. Because if "we aren't good, God won't bless us financially". Therefore, not helping the poor, or even mocking them, is allowable because they “did it to themselves”.

But I agree with you, people who behave this way - and leaders who marginalize the poor, are NOT good Christians!
11:25 PM on 03/29/2011
Three errors in your post.

1. Our constitution is an enumerated powers constitution which limits the authority of Govt. According to those who wrote it, there is NO provision in the Federal govt under the constitution to provide for social programs.

That power under the 10th amendment is given to the states and the people respectively.

2. Helping those in need is indeed both an obligation and an evidence of true Christian life. But to surrender that responsibility to govt is to take the glory from God and give it to man and govt. That is idolatry and a sure path to hell Jesus in Matthew 7 "Not everyone who says to me Lord Lord will enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven." and also in accordance with Matthew 25 and Isaiah 58.

3. Corporations don't "rob" Americans of jobs. That is liberal mythology.

Rev Larry Robinson
01:48 PM on 03/29/2011
We are given wisdom and intelligence to live our lives for the better. I agree with that...but you, like so many others, conveniently left out public employee unions who refuse to sacrifice like all of us have. They are the biggest reason we are in this mess and the reason the truly needy will have to be cut.

But, of course, that is not on your radar and you left it out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
USAFree1
04:08 PM on 03/29/2011
You are wrong. Quit listening to news liars. The reason for the attack on public employees is that conservatives don't believe in democracy in the workplace known as unions. Second, the state invested their state employee pension funds with Wall Street and lost most of it during the economic collapse of 2007. All public employee unions are willing to help states balance their budgets, but to deny them the right of collective bargaining is anti-democratic. You, obviously, don't know how much public workers make; it ain't all that much.
11:31 AM on 04/05/2011
Um, that is not true that conservatives don't believe in workplace rights. I do...but I recognize that it's the private sector employees that need help not, not over bloated, overly powerful public sector unions who don't care if the taxpayer is suffering, they want their money and they want it NOw!!! What disgusts me is that they feel entitled and don't care how others are suffering. Sorry, they need to be cut down to size so the private sector can feel it's legs again. After all, ALL WEALTH comes from the private sector ultimately. The private sector has to take risks, adjust to price points and the economy...while the public sector is unwilling to make such sacrifices. I am sorry, that is selfish to me. I want more power to the private sector who is suffering terribly and earns so much less!
As far as your state "all public employee unions are willing to help states balance their budget" is not true. In CA they are not budging. Their ONLY solution is to tax us more, those of us who make so much less and don't get ANY benefits, so they can still have their largesse. They are not even willing to pay a fraction of their healthcare like everyone else. I am voting NO. Why should I pay more for the benefits of my public employee sector friends who pay ZERO co pays on their health, earn enough to buy property ane Priuses. Sorry, not fair.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thrugreeneyez
09:37 PM on 04/04/2011
What are you talking about? In WI the workers AGREED TO THE CONCESSIONS!! They agreed to a reduction in pay, and to pay more for benefits, for example. Walker took it too far by trying to take away collective bargaining rights!! The unions are not to blame- working people had nothing to do with the economic meltdown! The banks and wall street are to blame!
11:27 AM on 04/05/2011
Yes, they did but the "collective bargaining rights" gives them the most power. With "collective bargaging, the unions can shake down the taxpayer and government for all kinds of goodies, and some are outrageous, that will not fall under the taxpayer radar and thus they are fighting for them tooth and nail.
For example, in CA, community college teachers "won" the right to have their pensions based on ONE YEAR of working over time. Now, any sane person would recognize this as unfair, but it is something they won with collective bargaining.
I have to disagree with the unions not being a part of the problem. Yes, they did not cause the economic meltdown, but neither did I, or all the millions of other taxpayers who pay for them. We should not bear the whole brunt, either. Public employee unions are only powerful because they take union dues and give them to politicians to buy their benefits. It's not fair that the taxpayer, who has no such "union" be ransacked because of it.
So the agreeing to concessions is just a ruse...they want to hold onto shake down rights to keep their power for the future.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pingufan
NJ "Blue Dog" Prolife Dem
01:23 PM on 03/29/2011
It was reported on Fox that GE paid no federal income tax in 2010. It's time we got serious about tax loopholes for the big corporations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
USAFree1
04:09 PM on 03/29/2011
Wrong. GE got a $3.2 billion refund. How's that for ya?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pingufan
NJ "Blue Dog" Prolife Dem
07:22 PM on 03/29/2011
USAFree1: Source http://money.cnn.com/2010/04/16/news/companies/ge_7000_tax_returns/

How's that for ya?
01:02 PM on 03/29/2011
Dear Friends,

Christians are required to work if they want to eat, this is a simple fact.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thrugreeneyez
09:39 PM on 04/04/2011
What are you saying? That children whose parents don't work should starve? Hungry children are hungry through no fault of their own!! Maybe I don't get your point and you are trying to be satirical, I hope so. Where is our compassion for little innocent starving children?! Millions will be affected by this immoral budget!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zell
12:17 PM on 03/29/2011
Rev. Wallis, may the Lord bless and keep you as you fast for justice that affects We, the People......My prayers are for you and all the other ministers.......
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:03 PM on 03/29/2011
I can't remember once where Christ demanded that his followers turn towards Ceaser for help towards others. What were those words "Demand from Ceaser what we need"? Doesn't sound familiar.

If Churches want to do the Christian thing, they should ask their flock to reach into their pockets just a little deeper to help those in need. But rarely do Churches do this.

It's far eaiser to side with the tax collector to take more from others as long as other people's money is going towards you or the causes you support. Somehow, I think Christ would take issues with this tactic.
12:18 PM on 03/29/2011
Churches do this all the time. They do reach out to those in need. Our largest aid organizations, Catholic Charities, Lutheran World Relief, UNICEF, and others, including the red cross, are all at their root Christian organizations. However, insofar as the government in a democracy ought to be a reflection of the general population, meaning that our representatives ought to act in accordance with the values and ideals of those making up the entire population of the country, the government should pursue actions that reflect a care of its citizens as part of its mission. You seem to forget that Christians are also taxpayers with jobs. It is not simply taking money from one group and giving to another. It is a directive to the government of where they want THEIR money to go too. I for one would much rather have my tax dollars going to programs helping the homeless than to paying for the interest on tax breaks we've given to the rich which are not paid for, but are actually deficit spending. I suppose if making sure that all citizens have basic needs met is a "cause," then so be it. If asking our government to do its part with some of our money to support the Christian "agenda" of helping others, then so be it. Dana: How about you put some of your money where your mouth is.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:32 PM on 03/29/2011
Let me ask you this. From the charities you mentioned or welfare which has a better record of actually lifting people out of poverty? Does welfare work with people to better their lot in life? The war on poverty started 50 years ago and we have more poor today then back then. Maybe the government method isn't working all that well.

Is it right to raise taxes on a young family that could use the extra money to save for their kids future education? Or to raise taxed on the elderly to force them to help the poor instead of them being able to purchase needed medications?

How better to control your money than to give as you see where it help best? You think your tax dollars go where it helps or to corporate welfare? How would you know?

This country works best when individuals do the right thing. I would rather let people keep their money so they have more to give. Oh, yea, I do pay it forward. Just because I don't believe the government programs work doesn't mean I don't do what's right.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pingufan
NJ "Blue Dog" Prolife Dem
01:25 PM on 03/29/2011
You must not be a Catholic. We hear the need to reach into our pockets and help the poor from the pulpit all the time.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:18 PM on 03/29/2011
Then pratice what you preach.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:36 AM on 03/29/2011
"But you, when you fast, anoint your head and wash your face, so that you do not appear to men to be fasting, but to your Father who is in the secret place; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you openly."

Thanks for the announcement---such a secret place you found!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pingufan
NJ "Blue Dog" Prolife Dem
01:26 PM on 03/29/2011
Jesus was addressing the Pharisees, who publicly flaunted their fasting. This is a call for folks to fast, not a bragging about his own fast.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:51 PM on 03/29/2011
Dear Ping, Jesus was not addressing the Pharisees. In Matthew 5,6 and 7 he is speaking only to his disciples; ("Seeing the crowds, he went up on the mountain, and when he sat down his disciples came to him. And he opened his mouth and taught them...."

Now, back to brag, "10 reasons why I'm fasting for a better budget," sounds a little heavy on the "I" which is common with Wallis.
11:28 AM on 03/29/2011
Bad Medicine Jim.
Once you state that budgets are moral documents you are impling that govs are also moral entities. Based on whose morals? what punishment for not upholding these morals? No Jim do your work because you think it is the right thing to do and don't go down the gov has moral responsibility road
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pingufan
NJ "Blue Dog" Prolife Dem
01:27 PM on 03/29/2011
You're kidding, right? All laws are based on morality. Why are there laws against murder, rape, robbery, fraud, theft, etc., if there are not immoral people who commit such acts?
01:58 PM on 03/29/2011
Wrong, all laws are not based on morality.Adultry is a moral sin in most religions but is not agianst the law in the US. Drinking is against the law in Moslem countries because they consider it a sin [ie } immoral. I'm saying a free country should not base it's laws and policy on one certain religions view of morality
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CountryBeforeParty
We are against misconduct, not against wealth
01:58 PM on 03/29/2011
Based on whose morals? - What were the basic morals of the Founding Fathers? The country was not founded on the principles of being a safe haven for corporations and aristocrats.

What punishment for not upholding these morals? - How about not being re-elected?

Our government is supposed to be a representation of who we are, yet it has become tainted over the years. There's always been some corruption, but I don't believe it has been nearly as great as it is now.
lastpost
see biography
11:09 AM on 03/29/2011
“Because it is simply wrong -- morally and religiously”
not to mention practically. Since where we are headed, there will be a requirement to derive every ounce of ability our kind is capable of. That won’t result as a consequence of tying a large part of the population’s hands behind their backs.

“there is a selective cruelty going on in this budget debate”.
Aided and abetted by the deployment of two distinct strategies. Restricted or non-existent access to the balance sheets. Denial of the fundamental principles of democracy.

“What Would Jesus Cut?"
An observation slit, in the shroud of secrecy that swathes and swaddles government.

“We will pray and fast”
While they play fast and loose with us?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pembrokelib
10:34 AM on 03/29/2011
What would make anyone think that fasting will affect God? Action in this world, yes, but giving up certain foods, no. I am not a believer, but if I were, I would not expect a god to act on what food I ate. As for prayer, by now you should know that it is a basic human instinct which does not work. Don't you think that the concentration camp victims and the torture victims tried prayer? If you get solace from prayer and fasting, fine, but don't expect accomplishment.
12:25 PM on 03/29/2011
And many of the SURVIVORS of the concentration camps and torture also "tried" prayer, which for many helped them get through their ordeals and helped keep them faithful and focused in the midst of inhumane treatment and existence. If they were practicing meditation, would you have the same derogatory comments for the person? Prayer and fasting are acts of faith, a spiritual practice that centers a person on God and others rather than the self. Prayer and fasting in and of themselves are not a substitute for action, and the writer of this particular editorial does so as a call to others to take similar actions. The fact is that people engaged in prayer and fasting are often ALSO engaged in action, supporting causes through their letters, their monetary support, and their demonstrations. There is faith in prayer and fasting that gives people strength for action.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pembrokelib
01:55 PM on 03/29/2011
You are right and I am sorry that my remarks were derogatory. Although I do not have this faith, I did not intend to denigrate those who do. I have been upset about some of the religious right who bring their God into politics and into public schools, I believe in reason and in morality for the good of mankind but not in organized religions.
01:06 PM on 03/29/2011
Dear Pembroke,

Fasting is not to cause God to act, it is so you can understand that your material needs are nothing compared to the needs of your soul.

By denying yourself food, and you are strenghting your soul, and allowing yourself freedom from the material world. You are also understanding the pain of the people that do not have enough to eat.

Fasting is good for your soul.