iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jim Wallis

Jim Wallis

Posted: May 13, 2010 02:39 PM

My mother taught her children never to "toot our own horn." So last year, when Sojourners became the first publication ever (so far as I know) to win the best general interest magazine awards from both the Associated Church Press and the Evangelical Press Association in the same year, we mentioned it, but were quite modest about it. The ACP is mostly made up of mainline Protestant and Catholic publications, and the EPA is the major association of Evangelical magazines and newspapers. To win highest honors at both conventions is a major accomplishment in this era of polarization, not only in politics, but in the church.

From the research we have done in the past 24 hours, no other publication has received both of these awards in the same year -- at least since the days of the early church. (Though I must say, first century records of publication awards are a bit thin.) Apparently, there was a running competition between hand-carried letters (sometimes called epistles) put out by editorial teams in both Corinth and Ephesus.

So I'm sorry, Mom... but since Sojourners magazine won both awards again this year, I have to say a word about why I think this is a big deal, and why it makes me very grateful for our mission and our staff. To be able to speak across the whole spectrum of church life in times like these is very encouraging to me. Our mission statement is "to articulate the biblical call to social justice." And these awards are important because of the way they show how central social justice has become to so many of our churches (sorry, Glenn Beck). In particular, it demonstrates how a new generation of Christians want their faith to make a real difference, both in their lives and in the world. They share our strong commitment to demonstrate God's love for this world and God's compassion for the poor in particular. I meet them all over the country and around the world -- half of our audiences now are under thirty. And many of them are looking to Sojourners to help them put their faith into action. Nothing could make me happier.

Some of the best of this new generation work for Sojourners, and we are lucky to have them. Our whole team deserves credit for these wonderful awards. I have little to do anymore with the day-to-day operation of Sojourners magazine, and I am very proud of the people who do -- a combination of veteran writers and editors along with a core of young communicators for a new age of social media. Watching them do what they do is a great fulfillment of what a few of us envisioned when we were the young writers and editors with a new mission to combine personal faith with social justice.

But enough talking about awards. Okay, Mom -- now back to the mission.

Yesterday, the long-awaited announcement of a new energy and climate bill finally occurred in the United States Senate. On hand were Senators John Kerry and Joe Lieberman, environmentalists, business leaders (including some from the energy industry), and even a few faith leaders. Now we get to see the actual bill, and we can begin to evaluate it. Like all things political, this bill will be full of compromises and concessions to get the necessary support for passage. Nonetheless, it promises to be the beginning, and just the beginning, of a new direction in America's energy future; it could mark a turn away from oil and fossil fuels toward cleaner and renewable energy sources. The attempt is to start mitigating the effects of climate change and to begin the critical process of adapting to a new energy future. For that adaptation, much more help will be needed for the world's poorest people and regions than this bill (in its current form) delivers.

Larry Schweiger, president of the National Wildlife Federation (and a person of faith), raised a prophetic word when he spoke of our "addiction" to oil. Addictions, as many people have discovered, eventually make your life not work anymore. And that is what has happened to the U.S. and the world -- our oil addiction is making things not work. The list of consequences is long -- from critical climate changes, to the loss of jobs, to supplying money for terrorists, to sacrificing the lives of our young people in wars over oil, to watching an oil spill that nobody seems to know how to stop pour hundreds of thousands of gallons each day into the Gulf of Mexico.

At a deep level, what's not working in the U.S. is our lifestyle -- particularly the consumerist energy habits we showcase to the rest of the world. Moving toward a "clean energy economy" will require more than just a re-wiring of the energy grid; it will also take a re-wiring of ourselves -- a conversion, really, of our habits of the heart. We must adjust our expectations, demands, and values.

Jim Ball, president of the Evangelical Environmental Network, says this bill is like the starter's gun at the beginning of a race. We have to start running in a different direction, and this bill would allow us to do that. But it will only be the start of a long marathon that will be completed by our children and grandchildren -- a marathon to overcome our addiction and be better stewards of our earth, our economy, our international relations, and finally, our souls.

portrait-jim-wallisJim Wallis is the author of Rediscovering Values: On Wall Street, Main Street, and Your Street -- A Moral Compass for the New Economy, CEO of Sojourners and blogs at www.godspolitics.com.

+ Ask President Obama and Congress to support a climate and energy bill that protects people and the planet, not polluters.

 
 
 

Follow Jim Wallis on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jimwallis

 
 
  • Comments
  • 189
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
Dave24
Without God, life is everything.
01:49 PM on 05/17/2010
We are not "stewards of the Earth." We're one animal species amongst millions: except we humans have the capacity to f*ck it up for many of said species.

We depend on the environment 100%, not because some nonsensical deity decided this was the case but because this is how reality naturally unfolded.

If we looked at ourselves as the animals we are (and start abandoning the negative connotation associated with calling oneself an animal), maybe we'd start respecting the places in which we live, which we rely on, but do not rely on us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OtayPanky
You're welcome
01:23 PM on 05/16/2010
Jim Wallis: Moving toward a "clean energy economy" will require more than just a re-wiring of the energy grid; it will also take a re-wiring of ourselves -- a conversion, really, of our habits of the heart.

===

Please share with us how you take your own sage advice. How many square feet is your home, for example? How much energy does it use? How big is your own carbon footprint?

Thanks, Rev.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OtayPanky
You're welcome
11:15 AM on 05/17/2010
Bueller? Bueller? Anyone?
09:24 AM on 05/16/2010
Are there two more repugnant merchants, then lieberman and kerry? Having worked in the energy industry for almost three decades, I know all to well, what makes lieb tick. Being a veteran as well, I know kerry missed the lessons of duty, honor, and discipline. As Jefferson stated, "Merchants have no country."
jane bond
a cure for pollution is a cure for cancers ETC.
11:43 AM on 05/16/2010
Did Bush miss those lessons???? and how about being elected the highest office "President" and using it for your own self- interest...The American people should have never elected anyone so VESTED in oil... The republicans attitudes are shameful toward our veterans, they don't want to give you benefits your entitled to....and they'll even try and convince you your not entitled...I know lots of Veterans that have had to fight for their benefits upon returning home, and that my friend is shameful!!!
jane bond
a cure for pollution is a cure for cancers ETC.
03:10 PM on 05/15/2010
we can debate global warming, but their is NO denying fossil fuels from coal-fired power plants have contaminated fish and air quality with mercury....according to EEN evangelical environmental network 650,000 babies are born anually with dangerous levels of mercury...I know couples who have miscarried due to mercury toxicity from tuna fish consumption...mercury is a crisis in our Nation...Jim will you please tell me why there is a pro-life website that has an article "abortion verses mercury" the article condemns 9 states led by New Jersey who filed a suit against Bush administrations policies, that caused the unborn to be harmed by mercury emissions, the conclusion was that if the states are concerned for the unborn, they should focus only on abortion the greater threat...why can't all pro-life issues be included, if not their simply anti-abortion... why have we let them call themselves pro-life, when they turn their noses up at the unborn in reguards to pollutuion????
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TomZart
12:45 PM on 05/15/2010
GULF COAST OIL SPILL POEM


Overrun by war and uncontrolled greed
Our world becomes more dangerous each day.
Dishonest politicians, criminals and the media
Survive by their falsehoods at play.

Bible believers preach, that the end is near
Our world as a whole is beyond reform.
God will eradicate all, which is wicked
By His fire of eruption and storm.

To evil’s victory, I will never concede
May its supporters anguish in hell.
By the grace of God and the power of faith
The goodness of man will prevail.

What greed has done, Heaven will measure
As patriots respond to the blunders of man.
Protect and defend what we love till death
As tar balls pollute the air, sea and land.


Free To Use To Teach
By Soldier For The Lord
Tom Zart
Most Published Poet
On The Web
And Your Friend Tom
Thank You For Your Friendship.

You can hear all of Tom Zart’s 358 poems
of love, war, faith and more 24-7 on web radio at

http://internetvoicesradio.com/Arch-TomZart.htm

Tom Zart ARCHIVES:


Our men and woman who serve in harm’s way,
Are the armor of what the free world depends on.
Without their sacrifice of body and soul,
All that we stand for is gone.

Come to Tom Zart’s Facebook friends page and unite with soldiers in field and visit with some of the worlds most beautiful women and Christians.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OtayPanky
You're welcome
01:43 PM on 05/16/2010
That's some stunning poetry, right there. I don't care who you are.

Some particularly memorable lines:

"Dishonest politicians, criminals and the media
Survive by their falsehoods at play."

"To evil’s victory, I will never concede
May its supporters anguish in hell."

"Protect and defend what we love till death
As tar balls pollute the air, sea and land."

I can see why you're the most published poet on the web!
09:58 AM on 05/15/2010
If the government invested more money into alternative energies directly, I would actually believe that they are serious. But once I got wind that Goldman Sachs is involved with carbon trading, and that it hasn't work well in Europe, it's seems like another bill enacted to enrich the rich.
08:53 PM on 05/14/2010
My sister has to be on oxygen 24/7 ,what should I do,Jim?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
acudoc
08:45 PM on 05/14/2010
Stop taxing ALL energy companies. Stop providing subsidies to ANY energy company. Get out of the way of the way of entrepeneurial activity and stop trying to please lobbyists of all stripes.

When property is destroyed by energy companies, file suit.

We don't need a NEW government energy policy further distorting the market in any direction. Stop taxing us for imperial mis-adventures and grandiose political and legislative designs and just see what happens! That alone would be enough to release the creative potential of the American people in the arena of energy supply.

Politics is not the solution.

I agree, however, that we need a change of heart. That comes from a sense of justice in the hearts of the citizenry, not in the hearts of politicians and their crooked bankster supporters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OleProfessor
"Ours is not a system based upon trust"
07:55 PM on 05/14/2010
We could start growing Industrial Hemp tomorrow we're an agrarian nation it could do for us what Sugar Cane did for Brazil!

http://www.hemp4fuel.com/page.php?2
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Buck Rogers
07:49 PM on 05/14/2010
I don't own a car. I moved to a city and neighborhood decades ago where I could walk everywhere.

My friends crack jokes about how I carry 2x4's home from the hardware store three at a time for a project rather than ask a buddy to take me in his pickup. I tease them back about how they don't think twice about carrying a backpack through the mountain trails for vacation.

I'm 52, 6'3", and weigh 170 lbs. I start my day with mocha breve's loaded with whipped cream, I drink whole milk from the carton, and sit around at night squirting whipped cream on strawberries for snacks.

A lot of people could move to a similar kind of neighborhood where one could walk almost everywhere. This would reduce America's need for oil and reduce America's waistline at the same time - a win/win. Make your kids walk to school or ride a bike. The city I grew up in laid their schools out so that every child in city limits was within walking distance of a public school. We all walked to school everyday.
leftcoastindy
Where did I put my MOJO
08:10 PM on 05/14/2010
Milk may be (one of) the least healthy things you consume.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Buck Rogers
08:25 PM on 05/14/2010
lol, I intend on being buried in a tub of butter - just to bug the vegans in my neighborhood:)

(disclaimer - I make medical marijuana butter and I want to be buried in THAT)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ScreenName05
05:37 PM on 05/14/2010
I am really getting tired of these articles. Yes, we all use gas, we are addicted to gas. Yadayadayada. The problem is not our addiction, the problem is we are stuck with no alternative. And no one is helping, especially our governments. I looked into getting a natural gas conversion for my pick up truck, before anyone can start converting any vehicle to natural gas in California they have to pay a $1 million bond for each and every vehicle type. We can produce enough electricity in our county - through wind , wave and bio conversion - to fuel half of Northern California, but there is no grid to carry the energy anywhere, and none likely to be built because the electric company likes having its monopoly and the state and feds are happy to leave well enough alone. So much so that the bio-conversion plant was shut down because PG&E would only pay them 10 cents on the dollar for what they produced - after all PG&E already has a natural gas generation plant here. What do they need all that extra energy for?

So we trudge on, and without a major federal investment in a national energy grid we will trudge on for the next 50 or 100 years.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:13 PM on 05/14/2010
Your sentiments are admirable but a tad naive.
We in Amerika have, as Dick Cheney said, a "non-negotiable lifestyle"- which means we (as a nation) would rather die in a heap of mercury laden, oil soaked, radiation saturated, e-coli contaminated pile of crap than do anything a bunch of dirty hippies, scientists, or clergy suggest.
Demand destruction is the only way that conservation will be implemented.
leftcoastindy
Where did I put my MOJO
08:13 PM on 05/14/2010
My winger relatives pride themselves on NOT doing anything or even 'considering' the environmental impact of anything they do.
charles77
Just the Facts Please
03:53 PM on 05/14/2010
Most of us old enough to remember the 1970’s see the overall joke in this whole conversation.

I can remember seeing brown snow from coal ash. Most people thought Nuclear was a much better and cleaner solution. This was way before anyone talked about CO2.

The so-called environmentalists fought Nuclear; they said use Natural Gas and Coal “it’s natural” or “if God wanted us to use Nuclear he wouldn’t have gave us coal and gas and oil”! Never mind we dig uranium out of the ground just like coal or oil or iron.
Environmental groups TOLD US to put all of the CO2 from Coal and Gas used in power production in the air for the last 40 years.

And now that environmentalists are concerned about CO2, instead of just saying we were wrong, lets build Nuclear, many are still fighting it. (In fairness many environmental groups, and even Al Gore, are now supporting Nuclear or at least not opposing it.)

And one environmental group or another is fighting every other solution.

Environmental groups fight wind farms because of birds or “sight pollution”.
Environmental groups fight solar farms in the desert that harm desert life.
Environmental groups fight biofuels as not “clean enough” or “compete with food for cropland”.

But even today the extreme environmentalists are STILL trying to stop Nuclear power, and they don’t seem even to realize that means more coal, or electric bills at least 5 times higher.

That’s the joke!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aacme
My micro-bio is on a strict need-to-know basis.
07:03 PM on 05/14/2010
Excuse me, you seem to remember a different '70s than I do. As one of the nuclear protesters you mention, I don't remember anyone I knew championing fossil fuels. Discussion of CO2 was going on at the time. Lots of people knew what was going to happen if we took the path we took. That's what it was all about. I do agree about anyone complaining about "sight pollution", etc. Can't please all the people all the time.
charles77
Just the Facts Please
12:09 PM on 05/15/2010
Then you were the problem. You fought Nuclear and the only alternative was fossil.

I hope you have seen the error of your ways now like Al Gore and many mainstream environmental groups.

And the groups fighting the Comanchee Point nuclear plants, which I saw with my own eyes, held signs saying use natural gas instead.
02:26 PM on 05/14/2010
Is this the same Michigan SDS leader and longtime socialist advocate, founder of a far-left magazine, Sojourners, that has championed communist causes?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OtayPanky
You're welcome
10:51 AM on 05/14/2010
I'm amused (or disgusted, depending on my mood) at rich, liberal elites exhorting us to save the planet by living more simply and cheaply.

I don't mind the message. It's the hypocritical lifestyles of the messengers.

Take Jim Wallis, for example. I read elsewhere on HuffPo that the public record shows he lives in a house worth 1.3 million bucks.

Or Al Gore - who now has not one, but TWO humongous homes - one in Tennessee, and the other in California.

The list of eco-celebrities doing the same sort of thing would be - well - endless.

There's a saying from my old neighborhood: PUT YOUR MONEY WHERE YOUR MOUTH IS.

If you want to talk about reducing our energy dependence, having a smaller carbon footprint, stopping global warming or whatever, SHOW US BY EXAMPLE HOW TO LIVE.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shawn de Montaigne
http://thepiertoforever.webs.com
02:23 PM on 05/14/2010
I'm in complete agreement.

As one who lives very simply, I feel a wave of disgust anytime one of these rich bigwig HuffPo pundits tells me to do more. Uh huh.

Hypocrites, the lot of 'em.
leftcoastindy
Where did I put my MOJO
08:19 PM on 05/14/2010
The problem is about .001% people like Gore who have to use a lot of energy to get out the message, and about 99% people who don't give a damn about taking care of our home (earth).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OtayPanky
You're welcome
11:56 PM on 05/14/2010
Question: What does using "a lot of energy to get out the message" have to do with having two obscenely huge homes?

Answer: Nothing.