- BIG NEWS:
- Barack Obama
- |
- Joe Lieberman
- |
- Sarah Palin
- |
- GOP
- |
Cable news and the blogosphere heated up with a new controversy in the lead-up to a noon-time address that President Obama gave as a back-to-school message for students across the country. Jim Greer, Republican Party chairman of Florida, had this to say: "President Obama has turned to American's children to spread his liberal lies, indoctrinating American's youngest children before they have a chance to decide for themselves." A state legislator from Oklahoma said, "This is something you'd expect to see in North Korea or in Saddam Hussein's Iraq."
Let me be clear. I do not believe these statements are at all representative of the vast majority of Republicans or even conservative Republicans in our country today. The fact that what a state legislator from Oklahoma thinks makes national news shows just how far the media is stretching to find political leaders who will make such outrageous statements. News cycles thrive on controversy and the extreme, so those elements of our country are continuing to get more and more airtime.
This morning, conservative cable news host Joe Scarborough was fed up. "Republicans have so many things to talk about right now ... instead of talking about issues and ideas, we are talking about death panels and indoctrination ... come on ... grow up!" He made a call for leaders within his party to squash this type of talk as the unproductive and alienating rhetoric it is. Joe described those who attacked the president for the idea of giving a speech telling school children to work hard and take responsibility for their education as "stupid." This whole controversy is made for TV and just plain stupid.
As for the "liberal lies" and the "indoctrination" of America's youth? Read the speech and judge for yourself.
Jim Wallis is the author of The Great Awakening, Editor-in-Chief of Sojourners and blogs at www.godspolitics.com.
Follow Jim Wallis on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jimwallis
David Kronke: How Right-Wing Pundits Would Spin News That Obama Had Rescued A Child From Drowning
Michelle Malkin: Why didn't Obama save every child from drowning? Why just one? This myopia stems from his old, outdated liberal-elitist sensibility.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Let's all sing: Sookie, Sookie by Steppenwolf.
Mr. Wallis,
I think you miss the point.
You say that, "The fact that what a state legislator from Oklahoma thinks makes national news shows just how far the media is stretching to find political leaders who will make such outrageous statements" Some in 'the media' always have and always will search for the controversy. And politicians of all stripes will provide it. I scream at my television every night, watching what passes for journalism too, but blaming "the media" will not help.
The issue is that when the candidate for dogcatcher in a one stoplight town makes ridiculous statements about the leader of the free world, that the leaders of that persons political party don't discredit or disown the statement or the person.
To get rid of these "made for TV contoversies, There needs to be some leadership. Have you seen a senior Republican saying, "the birth certificate issue is stupid"? "the death panels are a bogeyman"?, and not we'll look into it, or they have the right of free speech"?
These are serious times. We need a grown up loyal opposition.
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with