Yesterday was the first day of the World Economic Forum in Davos, a little mountain village in Switzerland, where each January corporate CEOs, heads of state and leaders of nonprofit organizations from around the globe gather to reflect upon the state of the world.
I had been to Davos before the financial crisis of 2008, as part of a group of religious leaders who came to discuss interfaith cooperation, but who also began to dialogue with the other participants at Davos about moral values and the economy. Quite honestly, these conversations about moral values and the economy often felt like an extra-curricular activity, with sessions at 7 a.m. on the third floor. But after the economic crisis hit, our values conversations felt more like a necessity, and we were quickly moved to prime time in the main hall.
At Davos 2008, the World Economic Forum convened a plenary session for all its participants on "Values and the Market." I was on the panel and said that asking when the crisis will end was the wrong question; the right question was, how will the crisis change us? Looking out over a huge hall full of business and political leaders (not my usual audience), I suggested that too often people didn't believe they had to bring virtue and values to bear on economic decisions -- that the market would automatically take care of those things. But, as the economic crisis has shown, this was the wrong mentality. The panel caused a buzz, and its questions resonated through that week, leading to many "pastoral" conversations with CEOs who told me they had "lost" some important values. The positive response I felt at Davos eventually led me to write a new book, Rediscovering Values: A Guide for Economic and Moral Recovery. I began to speak at business schools, and found business leaders coming to talk to me like Nicodemus at night.
A year later, at Davos 2009, there were 17 sessions with the word "values" in the title. I found myself on a plenary panel with Muhammad Yunus, founder of the Grameen Bank in Bangladesh, addressing the subject of "Rethinking Values in the Post-Crisis World," and talking about business with a moral purpose -- even as a tool for eliminating poverty. But some of us began to feel the danger of just holding values seminars as a response to a devastating economic crisis. Behaviors created this crisis, and unless our values talk led to changed behaviors, it all wouldn't mean very much.
Out of that conference a Global Agenda Council on Values was formed, and I now find myself unexpectedly as its chair. This Council on Values has been given the task of shaping what the World Economic Forum is calling the "Moral Economy Dialogue" -- a multi-year process that will develop serious tools for personal, organizational, corporate and national values assessments that focus on changing behaviors.
This week at Davos 2011, new metrics like "human flourishing" and "the common good" are being lifted up. Again, I have had many personal conversations with business executives who feel alone in their soul-searching for values. Furthermore, business ethics professors at some of the country's leading business schools have also told me that their courses are over-subscribed, yet they still feel marginal to the curriculum.
All day yesterday, in many of the sessions here at Davos, we wrestled with feeling "stuck" in trying to implement values-change at big corporations and banks. We are now moving from just a conversation on values to a conversation on behavioral change. For example, we had a session yesterday on "Defining Shared Norms." We spoke of the need for both external regulation and self-regulation; both external accountabilities and the internal moral compass which comes from embedding values in a business. This is all good news to Klaus Schwab, the founder and executive chairman of Davos who, as a young Swiss economist many years ago, wrote about the need for business to not only take into account the interests of shareholders, but also of the many other stakeholders -- including employees, consumers, the poor, the environment and future generations.
That Davos would take these issues very seriously, and would turn to faith community leaders for help, is good news to me. But the headline in yesterday's International Herald Tribune -- "The Super-Rich Pull Ever Farther Ahead" -- indicated we still have a long way to go. Many of those super-rich are at Davos, and I indicated yesterday that the only people whose lives seem to have got back to "normal" since the financial crisis began are those whose behaviors caused it in the first place. They are back to record profits, while a seminar I attended yesterday showed how dramatic and devastating unemployment still is around the globe -- especially for young people.
But the conversations here lasted far into the night, and I woke up this morning with a full day of more work before us, including one session where I will speak on "Mindful Leadership." Indeed, leadership -- moral leadership -- is clearly the issue now, and our session today is already overbooked. And that's a good sign. I find myself spending time at Davos every year now with an exciting group of about 50 young entrepreneurs called the Young Global Leaders, who are asking some of the most important questions that are before us.
The snow keeps falling here, but there are signs and hopes for spring.
Jim Wallis is the author of Rediscovering Values: On Wall Street, Main Street, and Your Street -- A Moral Compass for the New Economy, and CEO of Sojourners. He blogs at www.godspolitics.com. Follow Jim on Twitter @JimWallis. Click here to get email updates from Jim Wallis
Follow Jim Wallis on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jimwallis
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011 | World Economic Forum ...
World Economic Forum - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in Davos-Klosters, Switzerland ...
Wall Street Partying in Davos as Crisis Angst Fades - Bloomberg
1. what did I receive from x . . . ?
2. What did I give x . . . ?
3. What distress have I caused x . . . ?
At first, that looks like a very strange, even topsy-turvey heuristic but a moment's reflection and I can see that the Crisis (capital C!) gave me a pause in an otherwise high intensity time of my life. What I gave back remains to be clarified but it's already clear to me that my give-back includes a sense of temperance and thrift that did not play a large part before in my economic life. As to what distress I might have caused x . . ., if x = Crisis I don't have that worked out yet because I'm still floundering along, hoping for at least a little bit of stability in my finances. If distress means my role in the Crisis, then yes, I admit I overdid.
Here is my suggestion (preferably for local community and regional levels): a combination of Community Visioning Initiatives, “Community Teaching and Learning Centers”, and sister community relationships.
The more comprehensive Community Visioning Initiatives invite community residents to a series of meetings which focus on five particular areas: identifying challenges, prioritizing challenges, identifying solutions, prioritizing solutions, and creating action plans.
Well thought out preliminary surveys can help residents appreciate the need for the Community Visioning Initiative, and for “Community Teaching and Learning Centers”—both of which can help people
a) accumulate and integrate the knowledge and skill sets necessary for the highest percentage of people to act wisely in response to challenges identified as priority challenges
b) deliberately channel their time, energy, and money into the creation of “ways of earning
a living” which are directly related to resolving high priority challenges
Sister community relationships—with communities in other countries where there has been well documented calls for assistance with basic human needs—can create service work capable of uniting diverse communities of people, and a variety of opportunities for person-to-person peacebuilding.
People who participate in such a “constellation” of initiatives will surely learn much about how the ways we “invest” our time, energy, and money have a direct impact on the “ways of earning a living” that are available.
Too often people don't make the connection between economic bankruptcy and moral bankruptcy but the they intimately connected.
Beneath it all is corruption and greed. We'll never "fix" the economy until we look at the underlying causes and address them.
I love you more than any poster on this website, and I congratulate you for your efforts described here. But this is a classic example of what Christ said: You cannot serve God and Mammon. I'm so happy these young entrepreneurs/financiers etc. are concerned about their lives affecting others in positive ways. But their signatory goals have to do with making as much money as they can - that's capitalism. And that's simply opposed to accomplishing real, lasting social good.