iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jim Yong Kim

GET UPDATES FROM Jim Yong Kim
 

What Can We Learn From Expensive Chicken Wings on Super Bowl Sunday?

Posted: 02/05/2013 12:54 pm

One bit of bad news for millions of Americans during the Super Bowl was that chicken wings were suddenly more expensive. The cause, in part, was the U.S. drought last summer. The drought was the most widespread in more than 50 years, and it drove up the cost of chicken feed.  In all, 2012 was the hottest year ever recorded in the United States.

The bad news for the 850 million undernourished people around the world is that erratic weather is affecting food production globally. High and volatile food prices have become the new normal, and more and more extreme weather events are partly to blame.

Climate trends have already affected food production around the world, driving up prices for everything from bread and tortillas to chicken wings.

Crop yields are already down globally by 2 to 3 percent, and climate scientists tell us that for every 1 degree Celsius increase in average temperature around the world, crop yields will decrease by an average of 5 percent.

2013-02-05-climatefood550.jpg

Looking ahead, feeding the world will get harder with each passing year. We need to produce 70 percent more food by 2050 to feed the 9 billion people who will be living on the planet by then.

Climate change is making that challenge more difficult.

It is no secret that agriculture is a major part of the climate problem - it generates 32 percent of total greenhouse gas emissions. But, by changing the way we grow our food, it can become part of the solution.

Done right, we can increase agricultural productivity, make farmers better able to ride out droughts or floods, and pull greenhouse gasses out of the atmosphere into the soil. Agriculture can be climate smart and if we get it right, it can be a triple win.

So what will it take? A combination of age-old methods like better mulching and crop rotation, together with improved water and livestock management, more accurate weather forecasting and crop insurance, and new crops like scuba rice that survive longer under water, and drought-tolerant maize that thrives despite erratic rainfall.

It means ramping up agricultural research through groups like CGIAR, the Global Agricultural Research Partnership, so they can focus on climate-proofing food crops and make agriculture a carbon sink.

It means all of us knowing more about how our food is grown.

And it means building on what we know: Climate-smart agriculture is already at work in small farms in Western Kenya and across millions of hectares in Brazil, where zero-tillage cultivation is producing encouraging results, and in the U.S., no-till farming is also a growing trend.

For many Americans, the higher price of chicken wings was bad news. But the good news that could emerge from food-price sticker shock is that more people will ask what we can do in agriculture to help stop climate change while still feeding the world.

 

Follow Jim Yong Kim on Twitter: www.twitter.com/worldbank

FOLLOW GREEN
One bit of bad news for millions of Americans during the Super Bowl was that chicken wings were suddenly more expensive. The cause, in part, was the U.S. drought last summer. The drought was the most ...
One bit of bad news for millions of Americans during the Super Bowl was that chicken wings were suddenly more expensive. The cause, in part, was the U.S. drought last summer. The drought was the most ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 308
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
10:56 AM on 02/25/2013
As Tristram Stuart proves in his book Waste, we already produce enough food to feed 9 billion people. The problem is not production it is the systems of distribution and usage. 32% of greenhouse gas emissions come from agriculture. However, the application of biochar to fields reduces field emissions to virtually zero. Losses due to adverse climate will be added on top of those lost to pests and blights, however numerous studies have shown that merely planting different varieties of rice next to each other greatly reduces such losses. Climate will become more adverse but this should merely be a spur to microclimate creation. At Los Gaviotas in Colombia, the revival of a forest has resulted in a drop in temperature and a rise in rainfall. The climate does not merely affect crops. Crops also affect the climate with factors such as albedo, multistory shading, shaded water, ponds etc. Additionally systems such as George Chan's Integrated Waste Management and Farming Systems permit soil building, along with biochar, EM farming, and symbiotic crop relationships with fungi, all of which assist crops in the management of heat stress, protection from blights etc. As for Scuba Rice, well the system of rice intensification is presently breaking production records in India, and not just for rice but for potatoes etc. This effort seems to me to be misguided. Additionally this piece makes no reference to soil building, which is rather odd as there can be no real production without it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerome Graber
I'm off to fight on the side of the gods.
05:52 PM on 02/10/2013
Global food production fell 2% last year because of the drought, but it was up 3.5% the previous year, and 3% the year before that, and the year before that. in fact, we produce double the amount of food we did just 50 years ago, despite the fact that we use 1/3 less farmland in the developed world now than then.

there is no reason to think that this general trend will not continue for the foreseeable future. one bad drought year does not a trend make
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HopeMom
my micro-bio is empty
07:02 PM on 02/10/2013
over 7 bilion people on the planet and headed toward 9 billion by mid century --
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerome Graber
I'm off to fight on the side of the gods.
08:41 PM on 02/10/2013
yeah? at current productivity levels per acre, all we'd have to do is re-convert the 1/3 of Western agricultural land that has gone fallow I the last 70 years back to producing crops and we'd be able to feed most all those extra people
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
sillyfrog
Pastafarian and UU student
12:25 PM on 02/10/2013
What happened to the rest of the chicken?
09:16 AM on 02/10/2013
If the other parts of the chicken are not outrageously priced, then it is a demand, not a supply problem. Years ago, wings were considered unservable by many restaurants and fed to the kitchen help.
photo
Hutchy
If you're not laughing you're not paying attention
11:52 AM on 02/10/2013
My brother in law met the guy who invented the original McNugget in culinary school, and really what he did was invent a machine which strips meat off of chicken wings, which was then formed into nuggets.

Now, like bacon on a pig or ribs on a cow, these cheap cuts which were turned into wonderful delicious stuff by poor chefs in ages past have become delicacies we all love and thereby push down the prices of the basic meat. Now, because wings are so popular they have to make nuggets out of actual cuts of meat.

Modern chefs, like composers of old looking to the folk music of their day for inspiration, look to beef tongue, ox tails, cow hoof gelatin, offal of all kinds to create delicacies and thereby change the market.
07:57 PM on 02/10/2013
And I hope McD's never competes with those chefs for the beef tongue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rob1964
03:49 PM on 02/10/2013
I remember watching an chef cooking Indian food. He pointed out that the thigh was juicier and had so much more flavour compared to the breast that he used them in his recipes. But in the UK demand was for chicken breast so he could get is thighs much cheaper.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
starrynights
got the red state blues
06:10 PM on 02/10/2013
Oh no, don't let out the secret that thighs taste better!
09:11 AM on 02/10/2013
Maybe we need to subsidize more chicken feed (corn) to be made into ethynol, further reducing food supplies and creating greenhouse gases that are far worse than power plant emissions. Yeah, you "green" guys have lots of great answers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ghostberry
All empty souls tend toward extreme opinions.
12:38 PM on 02/10/2013
We are open to hearing your answers.
08:01 PM on 02/10/2013
My answer is simple - common sense. It is missing in the environmental debate. There is so much waste - this writer talks about food shortages. We waste as much, if not more food than we eat. I am all for conservation, but not from a Chicken Little approach, but because it is the right thing to do. Did anyone really believe that subsidizing corn which produces something like 1.3 units of energy for 1.0 units put into making it really made sense?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HopeMom
my micro-bio is empty
07:03 PM on 02/10/2013
what makes you think green guys are FOR ethanol?
07:40 AM on 02/10/2013
If the world grew crops to eat rather than feed farm animals their would be no shortages. A meat free diet is the answer.
photo
Sei
Micro-bio? I don't need no stinking micro-bio.
05:10 PM on 02/10/2013
Actually, it isn't. Unfortunately, there are a lot of people who cannot do a vegan or vegetarian diet. I happen to be one of those people. I'm allergic to or sensitive to so many different vegetable sources that I would get sick from eating such a diet.
06:49 PM on 02/10/2013
Another fantasy case! Read The Vegetarian Myth by Lierre Keith. Growing crops is devastating to the ecology as now practiced. Totally unsustainable and killing the earth. And feel free to eat your GMO Round UP laced grains all you want and see where it takes you!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HellBank
Curve: The loveliest distance between two points.
06:22 AM on 02/10/2013
First the rest of the world needs to stop breeding like rabbits.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
sillyfrog
Pastafarian and UU student
12:24 PM on 02/10/2013
But not us?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HellBank
Curve: The loveliest distance between two points.
03:38 PM on 02/10/2013
We have a negative birthrate.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:01 PM on 02/10/2013
No, not us. The U.S. does not really have a population growth problem, although we do have a "use of resources" problem, and at least some of our population growth is attributable to immigration, which is higher in the U.S. than it is is in many countries, not to birth rate. The high rates of population growth due to a higher birth rate (and improved infant survival rate) are not generally in countries in the developed world, most of which have a low, zero, or even negative rate of population grown. Japan and Italy actually have NEGATIVE population growth, for example. The countries with highest rates of population growth are in Africa and the Middle East, where the resources aren't sufficient to support the growing population, followed by the Indian Subcontinent, parts of Southeast Asia, and Central and South America. This is what happens when you reduce infant mortality in cultures that are resistant to birth control.
03:41 PM on 02/10/2013
Or .... we need to stop living like chickens.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pepper1311
POGS are dirt
05:25 AM on 02/10/2013
We've been doing this since Penn and I find most posts crazy. Farms run on market demand. We don't because of size,but 90% can't afford our products so I don't care. My grandfather ( old prick) told me in 1956 about supply /demand, he explained dust bowl farmers went to growing more and more till land was used up. Look at bottled water it's about 8-12 dollars a gallon if it were gas you would rioting. Nothing wrong with well or city water, but you still buy thos bottles. Funny ones are 'go vegan' who grows the product? How much is grown and you don't know if chemicals are in it. So if can afford wings buy them if not don't . Corn is a waste for us, but see how much food would cost without it. Our days are numbered, not because costs of product, but effort involved.im up at 2:15 am and down at 10pm it gets old as I am.
10:48 PM on 02/08/2013
As we expect for lower energy consumption from our cars and other devices we use, we have to learn how to live with less food. People in 3rd world countries do that. Stop food waste, large food portion (super size) and control obesity in rich countries such as USA.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pepper1311
POGS are dirt
05:00 AM on 02/10/2013
Your saing forced food choices to be made by government! Good luck on that one...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HopeMom
my micro-bio is empty
07:04 PM on 02/10/2013
education is the key
06:56 PM on 02/10/2013
People in 3rd world countries do with less because they must and many are forced to grow and produce for export and are not allowed to grow food for themselves.
05:47 AM on 02/08/2013
Yes. In order to go forth we will need to go back in time to the old ways. With the side effect of less need for pesticides and artificial fertilizers to foul the earth.
I don't know about the "new crops" he mentions though. If he means the GM "superfoods" , let's skip that if you will. Growing large amounts of plants with genes from animals or whatever is just scary. We need to focus more on human population control , or eventually our sheer numbers are going to catch up to us anyways. But of course that may not matter in a few more generations when our grandkids are being born with a radish for noses or insect wings.
09:13 AM on 02/10/2013
Most of the posts here are "artificial fertilizer".
09:08 PM on 02/06/2013
Actually, probably one of the biggest factors for chaotic climate change and social disorder is all the bulldozing, drilling and mining we do to maintain the lifestyles of people like Jim Yong Kim. It removes mountains from our Earth which causes changes in wind patterns and temperature differentials. It also fills our air, land and water with toxic chemicals. It is always amazing to me that people that have lifestyles that are destroying the beauty and peacefulness of our Earth always seem to think they have the best solutions. They are the biggest part of the problem. If we grow our food locally, produce our clothing locally, build human powered transportation systems based on plants and animals, design energy system that are based on the natural motions of the Earth and its surrounding, stop filling our atmosphere with airplanes, space ships, drones, bombs and satellites and learn to live simply and not depend on materialistic things like smart phones, computers, large screen TVs, health clubs, electric batteries, lavish medical centers and luxurious universities the Earth can probably survive. North and South America seemed to be fine for almost 5000 years of people. It has only been the last 500 years that have been disastrous for North and South America.
05:13 PM on 02/06/2013
Around 20 inches of global warming expected to hit Boston this week.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ghostberry
All empty souls tend toward extreme opinions.
12:40 PM on 02/10/2013
The uneducated idea that cold=global cooling is just so head smackingly irritating.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:04 PM on 02/10/2013
Amen.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sabelmouse
i love to tumble , ask me why .
01:08 PM on 02/11/2013
It's more accurately referred to as "climate change," and one
snowstorm does nothing to refute the fact that overall global
temperatures are on the rise
03:47 PM on 02/06/2013
They may taste good but getting something that is more Skin&Bone that goes in the trash than meat that goes in my mouth means I don't buy 'em.
05:49 PM on 02/10/2013
The skin get's fried, then eaten. If you're throwing it away with the bones, you're doing it wrong!
03:42 PM on 02/06/2013
we must think a lot of ourselves if as Jim Yong Kim thinks we have the power to stop(his words), climate change.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
paulhunterjones
A new age Republican
03:04 PM on 02/06/2013
It is a fact of life that the Super Bowl and chicken wings go hand in hand with each other. I watched the game with a few friends. We stuffed ourselves with wings and other traditional foods served at tailgate parties. Neither my guests nor I made a connection between the wings and global warming. We all were impressed with the commercial about the resourcefulness of the American farmer which had at its core Dodge Ram Trucks. Hunger and problems of crop production is a problem that needs to be better addressed. Maybe the World Bank Group should have purchased an advertising spot to present its views on world hunger and climate change.