Much has been written about the Susan G Komen for the Cure Foundation vs. Planned Parenthood vs. breast cancer screening PR disaster. Was Komen's initial decision to pull funding from Planned Parenthood a political one in the fight against abortion? Was Komen just trying to protect its brand and the money of so many women who contribute annually because of an ongoing investigation into Planned Parenthood? Was it a move to advance the far right's larger efforts to cut women off from reproductive health care, especially for those who can't afford it on their own because they lack health insurance?
This is a story that isn't going away anytime soon, even though I'm sure Komen never thought in a million years that women would react as viscerally as they have. And that's why the Komen Foundation is probably finished, because they misjudged their constituency. Not understanding the motivations of supporters is a death knell for any organization.
But the real story in this whole fiasco is one that most have missed -- the role that women in online and social media had, and continue to have, in bringing attention to a story that Komen must have believed would go relatively unnoticed because the amount of money involved was such a small portion of Planned Parenthood's annual budget.
The fight against breast cancer is supremely personal in a way many other causes are not. A true sisterhood was born around this one medical issue and the bonds of that sisterhood have only grown and become stronger over time. Women across the country have come together in support of each other to raise awareness for the need to fund the research for a breast cancer cure. We've walked together in pink t-shirts and we've taken money out of otherwise tight family budgets to donate to "the cure."
This sisterhood exists not only in real life, but in the virtual world, as well. And as anyone who is the least bit social media savvy knows, women rule online spaces. In the last few years, those women have created powerful brands and successful businesses out of knowing how to leverage those tools for maximum effect. How any organization could have failed to foresee that tech-savvy women, who are the same ones who've been their primary supporters, wouldn't use those same tools to fight back on behalf of loved ones who need the screening and preventive care services Planned Parenthood offers, is about the biggest corporate communications failure I've witnessed for a long time.
Women felt betrayed and they had the tools and presence to do something about it.
Facebook and Twitter lit up with users speaking out against Komen's decision, encouraging people to stop giving money to Komen and take it to other breast cancer organizations. Women announced they would stop "buying pink." (The issue of pink-washing is another story for another day). And Beth Kanter, one of the leading authorities of how non-profit organizations can use social media effectively, created the "Komen Can Kiss My Mammogram" board on Pinterest.
Whether Komen was actually using dollars for breast cancer screenings as a political pawn in the war against abortion and women's reproductive rights, we may never know for sure (though according to at least one report, Komen's VP for public policy, who is staunchly anti-abortion, was one person behind Komen's plan to ditch Planned Parenthood.) But in some ways, it doesn't really matter now. Komen has offended its base and there may be no fix for that.
I doubt there is a woman on the planet who doesn't know someone who's had breast cancer. My grandmother had breast cancer. My best friend died of breast cancer. And a good and wonderful friend Susan Niebur -- a planetary scientist, mother of two, author of the blog Toddler Planet and known as "@whymommy" on Twitter -- has been a graceful and eloquent advocate for her particular form of breast cancer. Susan is in hospice and the people whose lives she has touched have been sending their good thoughts and prayers to her through virtual cards being produced by her friend Amy aka TeachMama.
When an organization uses the lives of our friends and families as political fodder, we don't take kindly to that. And we know how to raise a ruckus. And we're not afraid to do that in the name of good people who aren't statistics, but who are important parts of our lives. For those of us for whom this is personal, it doesn't matter that the amount of money the Komen Foundation wanted to pull from Planned Parenthood was only a small part of that group's annual budget. What matters is the message it sent -- that keeping political benefactors happy was more important than even one woman's life.
As one person pointed out to me, the Komen Foundation can do whatever it wants with its money and give it to whichever organizations it believes advances its agenda. And that's true. But as others have said, "Susan G. Komen is dead to me," and "I'll never give the Komen Foundation another dime." I suspect a great majority of Komen supporters will find those other organizations in a hurry. I know I have.
Joanne Bamberger is the author of the Amazon.com bestseller, Mothers of intention: How Women and Social Media are Revolutionizing Politics in America (Bright Sky Press, 2011). Joanne, Washington, D.C.-based writer and political/media analyst, is the founder of the political blog, PunditMom, as well as the Editor-in-Chief of The Broad Side, a new online magazine of women's commentary. Joanne is also a contributor at POLITICO's Arena, iVillage and Babble Voices.
Follow Joanne Bamberger on Twitter: www.twitter.com/PunditMom
The Komen affair is in a similar vein, and in the big picture it is small potatoes, but it may be the turning point in the war now being waged against women.
here is a look at the money they have access to at SGK...... tens of millions for mammos.......WHAT ABOUT THE COUPLE HUNDRED MILLION RAISED???
I would like to use the Komen fiasco to channel our collective energy into changing the dialogue that rather than "finding a cure" moves towards "FUNDING" one!
But I still have 2 unanswered questions:
1) Why did Nancy Brinker and her personal friend and political alli Ari Fleischer use our donated money to pay lobbyists to kill a Senate bill that would have started a government funded and sponsored program that would give women of all incomes free cancer screenings, mammograms, and treatments?
2) Why was Fleischer, who is as misogynistic as a man can get and who is not a member of the SGK Foundation in any way, put in charge to find a new SVP?
I also agree that it was the perception that women were once again under assault by the social conservative forces in our country that caused many women to push back. I am very encouraged by this. I hope it helps keep these types of divisive forces out of our government and our lives.
Now she's going to have to find a real job because she's about to lose the one she has.
Join us and express yourself:
https://www.facebook.com/pages/De-fund-the-Komen-Foundation/171880872914883
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum/story/2012-02-07/komen-planned-parenthood-contraception-catholic/52992232/1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_the_United_States
The National Association of Free and Charitable Clinics has a website where you can either donate directly, or find specific clinics in your area to give money to (if you have personal ideology issues with Planned Parenthood), or just call up your local hospital or doctor's office and ask them what they need the most. By giving a direct donation to any university/cancer center engaged in cancer research you are assured that more of your money is going where it was intended to go.
http://www.nafcclinics.org/
Enter you zip code to find the charitable clinic closest to you.
http://www.cancerindex.org/clinks8.htm
Most of these are NCI designated Comprehensive Cancer Research Centers.
http://ww5.komen.org/CorporatePartners.aspx