iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Joe Escalante
 

Does Daily Variety Validate SOPA Fears?

Posted: 01/23/2012 4:05 pm

It's hard to find anyone these days who will actually say "Hi! I'm for SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act, or the Senate's PIPA). But at first, I admit, I thought it was the right thing to do. I own a small catalog of music releases, films, and some publishing interests. I would see a spike in sales if SOPA passed. Of that I am convinced.

I found the hysteria regarding what "might" happen if this bill passed to be way over the top. Until, however, while fighting a lawsuit myself against a large media company, I had an epiphany that instantly transformed me to the other side of this issue.

I am now against it. I've seen the beast' face to face. I have first hand knowledge of what the large media companies think of the Internet. They will never like it until they can control it 100%; of course ruining it in the process.

I host a weekly intellectual property themed legal advice radio show (sexy, I know) and my "flip flop" (why not call it what it is?) came while explaining to one of the callers what the lawyers for the large Dutch media company Reed Elsevier, Inc. were doing on behalf of its Daily Variety Magazine in a lawsuit filed against the rather obscure punk band The Vandals (full disclosure: I'm the bassist; more disclosure, Reed owns Lexis Nexis, who profit from any litigation, abusive as well as non-abusive.)

First filed in 2004, the case is now set for trial in Federal Court on April 3, 2012 where the Daily Variety will claim in front of a jury, presumably with a straight face, that mere "links" to a site that posted artwork from a discontinued CD displaying an "infringing parody" should result in the four members of the Vandals paying Daily Variety and their lawyers at Fulbright & Jaworski upwards of a million dollars.

2012-01-23-HPC_Variety_Mag.jpg


One only has to observe the Plaintiff's behavior and legal theories propounded in Reed Elsevier, Inc. vs. Escalante, et al (as it is known on the Federal docket), to get a glimpse of how the media companies would transform the Internet if SOPA or PIPA ever pass close to their present form.

If the fear is that under SOPA, the media companies will take advantage of a legal anomaly that will permit them to shut down entire web sites, with the burden of proving innocence placed on the defendant, based on trumped up claims and theories, I can tell you, it's not paranoia. It is a real world certainty.

My conservative nature resisted the notion these apparent threats to the First Amendment outweighed the need to punish I.P. thieves. However, my epiphany occurred while sharing with my audience an outrageous comment made to me during a deposition in the Variety case. Variety's lawyer from the 900 member firm of Fulbright and Jaworsky accused me of having an image of the Vandals album depicting the notorious "infringing parody" of Variety's logo on the Vandals' Myspace page.

When it was pointed out to him that it was part of News Corp's mp3 retail store and outside the control of the Vandals he signaled the theory he will present at trial to squash us. "If you had no control over the image in the retail store, why didn't you shut down your entire Myspace Page immediately so that no one could see the infringing parody?"

I laughed out loud, but then realized he was serious. This evidently passes as logical in a giant law firm representing a giant media company with 30,000 plus employees. He didn't care about this country's treasured protections provided by the First Amendment for artistic speech. He didn't care about the Copyright Act's "Fair Use Doctrine" which protects punk bands' parodies as it does every parody created on Saturday Night Live or Mad Magazine. He didn't care that if he won his case, four musicians would lose their homes, and everything they'd worked for during their modest 30-year career as a band. He only cared about scorched earth litigation to get his way.

However misguided, it was fascinating to me because he was showing us our future under SOPA. In Reed v. Escalante, et al, Variety is using burdensome litigation threats to deprive artists of due process. With SOPA, the media companies don't need that threat anymore. The law would provide cover. Victims can't strike back until the damage is done. That is a powerful sword to wield and I come from the future to tell you that they will not hesitate to stab anyone in their path with it, if it means making another nickel.

And this is just over a parody. Can you imagine the lengths they will go when it's alleged piracy? It's a hideous thought.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
12:17 AM on 01/26/2012
This coming from someone that ripped off his own band members.
04:22 PM on 01/25/2012
This is a wonderful [read: atrocious] example of the REAL risk to artists *maintained* by SOPA and it's tabling...a metaphor - unabomber bombs something, go after the postman no questions asked!

(Also, in my opinion, the morning Indie 103.1 went away out of the blue was possibly the day the music died. I definitely haven't heard "Computer Camp Love" on the radio since then and the David Lynch weather/Timothy Olyphant sports were phenomenal.)
04:08 AM on 01/25/2012
It's scary to think that any of us could be dragged and used to set an example even when we aren't aware of doing anything wrong. And few of us have the resources to even think of defending ourselves against huge law firms backed by powerful corporations. Technology is changing the rules and there are those who see this as a threat to their monopoly on power and control of the market. And it is. Change doesn't come easily and they aren't going to go down easily either.
07:18 PM on 01/24/2012
They claim that they are protecting artists and other workers in their industries. What they are seeking to protect is their own profits. It wasn't that long ago when artists were paid a pittance, even big name artists, while the company pocketed most of the profits. They are quick to get rid of any artists who isn't making them enough of a profit. Basically, they are no different than any other mega corporation. They want government to do their fighting for them.
06:57 AM on 01/24/2012
I agree with you Joe. Your point on if it was more than Parody is worryi
photo
GentleGim
The opposite of austerity is GROWTH.
06:32 AM on 01/24/2012
A lawyer can argue whatever comes into their head. It takes a judge to believe it before it matters. No reasonable judge would fail to see the use of protected parody. If they were to rule for damages they would reduce the amount stated and the whole thing would no doubt be overturned. If you don't believe our courts can distinguish right from wrong... then it really doesn't matter what laws we have - we're over.
04:43 AM on 01/24/2012
And the ultimate irony......Reed Elsevier provided the information through Choicepoint for one of the largest credit card frauds perpetrated in US history. If thousands of people who have had thier identities stolen using data provided by Choicepoint sued for $1million, it would break them. But that wont happen, will it?
12:24 AM on 01/24/2012
This is far from the first instance of the industry lawyers using these sorts of tactics, and we don't need a glimpse from the future. We can look to the past. And the fact is, every single technological advancement that made it easier to duplicate material was fought tooth and nail. The entire movie industry tried to have VCRs declared illegal, the same thing for the music industry and dual tape-decks. Every step of technological innovation has encountered a wall of lawyers trying to get it declared illegal.
And the fact is, SOPA would not have increased your sales. They block DNS names, not IP addresses, and the web is global so the IP address from overseas servers would still be available. Anyone who cared could look up the IP address and type it into the address bar and . . . viola, illegal content.
12:15 AM on 01/24/2012
Awesome piece. Now just imagine the small end of things, where you'd get individuals using the new laws to start IP suits against anyone they wanted. Nobody would be able to stop them, because under the law they'd have the upper hand and the right to sue and shut down an "infringing" site. It's not just large companies with large law firms that I'm worried about!
12:07 AM on 01/24/2012
I am thankful for your epiphany, and that your have explained your experiences here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rob Huggins
10:55 PM on 01/23/2012
Its the last desperate power grabs of a no longer needed corporations. Publishers, movie production companies, and record labels can not survive in their current form. What they do is done far better with modern technology, and none of them understand this technology in the least or else they would be making millions more.

If they don't get the power now, they will go broke and Amazon like companies will replace them publishing and producing in a service based model rather than a product based model. Instead of throwing millions down the tubes trying to win lawsuits by attrition and lobbying governments to set America firmly behind the rest of the world thechnologically, they should be learning how consumers spend money today, and how they need to change to match what consumers want.
01:22 AM on 02/03/2012
Thanks Rob. Well put. I'm going to throw it in my closing argument.
07:40 PM on 01/23/2012
Welcome to the party. No I'm not being flippant, I truly do wish you well and hope you wiill not lose sight of your new found knowledge.

Perhaps now would be a good time for someone with your legal expertise to read through some of the case files over at the Electronic Frontier Foundation https://www.eff.org . If nothing else you might get a better idea of the ongoing battle between large organizations and normal everyday people like yourself.

Who knows... You might decide to take up sword and shield and help them out.

May the light of reason always guide you path.

Serine
01:24 AM on 02/03/2012
Thanks Serine. I spoke on a panel at Harvard Law School with Fred Von Lehrman from EFF last year and he was pretty captivating.