More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Joe Mirabella

Joe Mirabella

Posted: July 9, 2010 02:33 PM

Don't Close the "gAyTM"

What's Your Reaction:

The LGBT community is understandably upset by the lack of movement towards full equality at the federal level.

The Employment Non Discrimination Act (ENDA) which would make it illegal for someone to be fired for being LGBT is still not law despite multiple promises from Democrats that it was a priority for 2010.

The repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" is still vulnerable.

The Defense of Marriage Act still prevents gays and lesbians from gaining access to federal relationship recognition.

Until now, the LGBT community was a dependable constituency for the Democratic National Committee (DNC.) We have deep pockets, we are active volunteers, and we vote.

However, since a super majority in Congress and a Democratic President has yet to move our equality forward, there is a recurring call to close the "gAyTM" and discontinue all contributions to the DNC until we see a return on our investment.

I certainly understand the motivation for hitting the DNC where it hurts. Why should we continue to give to a political party that takes us for granted?

The Huffington Post's Sam Stein wrote a startling article that I hope will convince you why money is so important in 2010.

He wrote:

On the left hand side of the chart is a list of ten Republican aligned institutions, ranging from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to the Family Research Council. Next to it is a column listing the amount of money each group has pledged to spend by Election Day. A third column on the right details what those groups actually spent in 2008 on federal elections.


The number at the bottom delivers the key message. If their pledges are fulfilled, these ten groups will unleash more than $200 million in election-focused spending -- roughly $37 million more than every single independent group spent on the 2008 presidential campaign combined. This time around, almost every single penny will be going to Republican candidates or causes

(Update: A Democratic operative makes the case that the total could rise to roughly $300 million if it includes additional pledges for campaign spending from Americans for Prosperity, promising $45 million, the Club for Growth, $24 million, the National Rifle Association, $20 million, and the Susan B. Anthony List, $6 million)

$300 Million can do incredible damage to not only the Democratic Party, but to the LGBT community. The Republican Party remains viscerally opposed to equal rights for LGBTs. If you think sitting on your wallet is helpful to our community, you are simply wrong.

I realize not every Democrat is perfect and some are downright wrong on our issues. This is why I urge the DNC to create an LGBT fund. Allow us to contribute to the DNC while knowing our money won't support candidates who do not support us.

In the mean time, it is not time to hold back. We are too close to our goals to allow the Conservatives to take over. Don't misunderstand me, I remain frustrated that the progressive agenda is still just out of reach, but this is not the right time to turn off the gAyTM.

 

Follow Joe Mirabella on Twitter: www.twitter.com/joemirabella

 
 
  • Comments
  • 58
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:49 PM on 07/11/2010
As someone who has voted for and supported Democrats since the 1970s, I've had enough wmpty promises and indifference from them. There are individual candidates I will support but the DLC dominated House and Senate election committees, the DNC as revised by homophobic Rahm Emmanuel and Obama, will not receive another penny or another vote from me. Nor will groups like the HRC that aid and abet the perpetuation of this nonsense.

How long are we going to let the Dems play Lucy while we Charlie Browns try to kick te football past the goal?

My priority is to elect officals who will work to realize the promise of equal protexction under the law, it is not to advance the politocal career of any more self serving charlatans like Bill and Hillary Clinton, Barak Obama or Patty "DOMA" Murray..
11:42 PM on 07/11/2010
Joe, would you tell an abused spouse to give their partner one more chance? No. The gAyTM must remain closed. Anything this administration has done on gay rights issues it has done half-heartedly and only after being forced into it. Just listen to Robert Gibbs try to put two coherent sentences together about gay rights and you can see how uncommitted this administration is to our issues. The bottom line is that they do not want to risk ANY political capital on us unless absolutely necessary. Forget about it, no money from me (and I used to give a lot). Dems made their bed, now let them lie in it. We have been warning them for two years that if we didn't get gay civil rights legislation accomplished during the first two years it would be next to impossible with a less friendly Congress. And guess what, that is what we will be facing, just as predicted. Oh yeah, I am wondering if all that bi-partisanship Obama sought is helping him win over the Republican base - - it is amateur hour at The White House.
10:30 PM on 07/11/2010
What goals are we close to? There is no chance of us getting anything from democrats if we still let them think that we will be there to help them regardless of what they don't do for us.Also, there is no way at this point, and based on past history, that they will guarantee that an LGBT fund would go to pro LGBT candidates only if you don't believe that just ask the people who support the progressive fund.
04:43 PM on 07/11/2010
Sorry Joe, holding back our money from people who hurt us is just common sense, if it's constantly a matter of the lesser of two evils can you blame anyone for giving up on it at this point? Request a separate fund, lovely, but until something like that actually exists, no one should be made to feel guilty from withholding their $ from the DNC.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mykelb
03:03 PM on 07/11/2010
Well Joe, I think you have gotten the consensus of those of us who value our lives, money, time, votes and equality. Take the "GayTM Closed" sign back to DC and hang it on the front door of the DSC, DNC, and HRC.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bill J4321
01:45 PM on 07/11/2010
No more money from me.

How many times can the Democrats use us to help them get elected, only to spit in our faces after we've done so? And when will the LGBT community learn our lesson?

Sorry, Obama and the DNC.

Purchase declined.
photo
StevenWells
Objects in the avatar are larger than they appear
09:44 PM on 07/10/2010
A DNC "LGBT Fund" may, as Mr. Mirabella describes it, be effective to some degree. But there may be a feeling in "the community" that it might be worth enduring a few years of Republican control in order to convince Dems we're not to be ignored, and to subsequently replace the party's foot (or knuckle) draggers with reps of more commitment.

As I often say (and have done three times today, I think): to Republicans, we're too important; to Dems, we're not important enough.
01:01 AM on 07/11/2010
I don't thing the DNC should be trusted with an LGBT fund. They would find a way to funnel the money to candidates that don't deserve it. When you look at the ridiculous list of "accomplishments" that this administration published recently, they could find a way to justify using that money for almost any candidate. For gawd's sake, they listed putting Sotomayor on the Supreme Court as an accomplishment for the LGBT community simply because she wasn't the type of right winger McCain would have nominated. If they could do that with a straight face, they could justify using LGBT money to support anyone including Blue Dogs.
photo
StevenWells
Objects in the avatar are larger than they appear
01:39 AM on 07/11/2010
Good points, all.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mykelb
07:07 PM on 07/10/2010
The Democrats will get exactly what they have given the LGBT community in the last 30 years. Derision, demoralization, denounciation, and second class citizenship in the next election. As far as I am concerned they will get exactly what they have given the LGBT community -- NOTHING.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
liberaldemdave
03:07 PM on 07/10/2010
sorry, joe, but you're in the minority within the GLBT community. it seems the vast MAJORITY of us support the "don't ask, don't give" campaign. why financially support the enablers of homophobia (and in many cases, political homophobia...like that of our "fierce advocate")?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProudLiberalDan
Standing up an fighting conservatives since 1987
02:47 PM on 07/10/2010
Without accusing the author of anything untoward, doesn't Mr. Mirabella make his living in part consulting for politicians about networking in the gay community? If so, doesn't the author have a direct financial interest in getting us to give to Democrats who don't do anything for us or even actively oppose our equality? If so, shouldn't that have been disclosed as a matter of ethics?

The point is that there are are lots of "professional" gays at organizations like that HRC, or even work for the DNC, DSCC and DCCC, who's jobs may be at stake if they cannot deliver "gay money" for the DNC, DSCC and DCCC and their apologists at the HRC -- who care more about their "access" than our "progress".

There will always be an upcoming election. There will always be a reason why Democrats and their apologists in the gay community tells us that now is not the time to stand up for ourselves..

From now on it is C.O.D. The credit line to the DNC, DCCC, DSCC is CLOSED.

Money is tight for everyone, including the gay community, therefore we need to be extra scrupulous about where to give.

Lamda Legal, GLAAD, The Trevor Project, GMHC/SFAP/APLA, NGLTF and hundreds of other nonprofits, including one's not specifically focus on gay issues are all starving for cash in this economic climate. There are gay candidates out there who need our financial support. No one understands our issues better than we do.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProudLiberalDan
Standing up an fighting conservatives since 1987
02:55 PM on 07/10/2010
The amount of money I can afford to give is less this year, but as a California gay I'd be better off giving my money to Jerry Brown's campaign against Meg Whitman's attempt to buy the election and to the Courage Campaign and Equality California in preparation for the 2012 referendum.

Why would I waste that money on the DNC forwarding it to Ike Skelton and Ben Nelson?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
liberaldemdave
03:28 PM on 07/10/2010
my partner of 16.5 years and i are getting married in d.c. in september (and, possibly, with the DOMA unconstitional decision coming back to texas to challenge our bigoted marriage law)... i'm more and more inclined to have the nuptials either in front of 1600 Penn. Ave. NW or the steps of the SCOTUS. right now, it's a toss-up (and i NEVER woulda thought that when i was campaigning and raising money for the fierce advocate).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
liberaldemdave
03:10 PM on 07/10/2010
fanned/favorite/co-sign. the gAyTM is closed until further notice (that is, until the promises of a FULL REPEAL of DADT, the repeal of DOMA and the passage of ENDA are realized).

want to know more about the DADG campaign?:
http://gay.americablog.com/2009/11/dont-ask-dont-give.html
http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/o/6006/t/5410/petition.jsp?petition_KEY=727
02:30 PM on 07/10/2010
Joe, you seem to be in the minority of gays on this issue. Pay attention. Fear politics is the GOP's shtick. True progressives don't fall for it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AnastasiaBeaverhausen
02:27 PM on 07/10/2010
I am so proud of my community reading the comments here. I too am done with the whole "take one for the team" approach of the DNC. I won't contribute to cowardice, and that's all we've gotten, and not just on LGBT issues -- no public option, too-big-to-fail still exists, every chance at progress has been compromised to triviality in the name of bipartisanship only to have the weakened legislation voted against unanimously by the Party of NO.

When the DNC starts putting the interests of Democrats AHEAD of the interests of corporations and the teabaggers--come see me. Until then, they can kiss my money, my time, and probably my voter participation GOODBYE.
01:54 PM on 07/10/2010
Anger does not always cloud the mind; it can also concentrate it. Anger is a positive social force when channeled into activities that make society more attentive, more humane, more caring, more equal. Anger fuels all movements for social justice and social change.

I'm a lifelong Democrat and spent more time and money working for Obama than ever before and I am fed up with the lack of progress on GLBT issues (and much more) and with being told that I should be patient/I shouldn't be angry. I am not a child. I am an adult whose anger has brought me to a place of cold insight and sharp disappointment.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProudLiberalDan
Standing up an fighting conservatives since 1987
02:52 PM on 07/10/2010
No more Mr. Nice Gay.

We have been "focused-group" to death. I am sure in the calculations in the backrooms of the DNC, DSCC and DCCC that it is more worth their while to dangle carrots in front of us and not deliver and keep asking for money lest fear of the Republican winning (gasp!), then it is to actually deliver on their promises.

That's all we are to them is an ATM machine. Our votes don't matter. Our volunteer time and energy doesn't matter. Keeping their campaign promises doesn't matter. Doing the right thing doesn't matter.

We are supposed to be good little gays and go away quietly while they triangulate against us.

We've lived through centuries of persecution. We were killed in the holocaust along with the other undesirables. We lost a generation to aids. We lived through two Bush presidencies. I can survive a Republican winning an election against a do-nothing Democrat if that teaches a fair-weathered friend a lesson.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
liberaldemdave
04:08 PM on 07/10/2010
co-sign.

adults unite! (i'm horribly offended by being treated like a petulant child, too!)
12:44 PM on 07/10/2010
I'm fine with giving our fair-weather friends my vote, but I'll be damned if they're getting anything more than that from me without some decisive, equality-minded action of substance. I don't need anymore lip service. They've been giving us so much of that for years now that I have a surplus.

If you really do feel that you have to send money their way, don't send it to the DNC. Donate directly to LGBT and allied candidates.
12:36 PM on 07/10/2010
The Democrats today remind me of a multitude of love interests I had in my youth. "You're a great guy and we can keep dating (and, by association, having sex) but I need to see other people."

No. I don't put up with that in my love life, and I won't put up with it from the party of my choice. If Democrats want my financial support, if they want me to staff the phone banks, if they want me to canvas. . . if they want ANYTHING from me, from now on, they have to follow through on the multitude of broken promises.

Are we afraid Republicans will win if we don't support Democrats? Democrats have only themselves to blame. They squandered their chance.