iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Joel John Roberts

GET UPDATES FROM Joel John Roberts
 

Is a Homelessness Bill of Rights Just a Bill of Goods?

Posted: 06/22/2012 8:42 am

The political center has become a precarious place for lawmakers who want to embrace compromise. Extreme views from both ends of the political spectrum seem to dominate policies these days.

This same political tug-of-war is also occurring in the world of homelessness. While many cities around the country are passing anti-homelessness laws to push people experiencing homelessness out of their communities, one state is actually passing a law that gives people living on the streets the right to be there. Our country's response to homelessness is dominated by extremes.

The state of Rhode Island is on the verge of passing a "Bill of Rights" for people who are homeless. The law would give people who are homeless the right to access public sidewalks, parks, and public buildings, and protect their right to keep their private belongings.

Sure, this is a compassionate response to people who not only struggle on our streets, but also must endure the threat of being legally cited for trying to find a safe place to sleep outside.

But is protecting people on the streets from legal citations really going to help them long term?

If you wander east of Los Angeles' downtown business district, you'll find yourself smack in middle of the city's infamous Skid Row, home to thousands of people who call the streets home.

You might run into Jerome, a man who has been homeless for years. Employment is a foreign word to him, and abusing substances is his primary recreational activity. He camps, literally, on the sidewalk in front of a small toy factory with his belongings stacked three feet high.

Jerome is a fixture in this neighborhood because homeless advocates have successfully defended his legal right to be there, even though business owners have fought City Hall to get him to move along.

Sarah, on the other hand, lost her job a year ago because of the downturn in the economy. She spent six months unsuccessfully looking for work while using up her limited savings. She ended up sleeping in her Toyota Celica in a tiny neighborhood on L.A's Westside, because it seemed like the safest place to go.

Unfortunately, her housed neighbors were not too happy that she was living in her vehicle near their homes, so Sarah was cited for illegally parking on the street overnight. After a few more citations were slapped on her windshield, the city towed away what remained of her dignity. She ended up sleeping in a park, which the city has recently also made illegal.

Ironically, the right to sleep, eat, and store possessions on the sidewalk gave Jerome the means to sustain an unhealthy existence, while Sarah struggled to keep her car and find a safe place to stay without the threat of law enforcement swooping down on her.

There needs to be a balance between criminalizing homelessness with ordinances that persecute people who are forced to live on the street, and giving those same people the right to do whatever they want without any consequences. We need to find the middle ground.

Jerome needs to transition out of his self-destructive lifestyle, while Sarah needs to be legally protected until she can find a path out of homelessness.

A Bill of Rights would help Sarah during her transition, but would merely enable Jerome.

A more powerful Bill of Rights for people who are homeless, however, would consist of one simple right: the right to housing. This does not mean the right to a condo, or the right to a luxury apartment...but the right to a safe place to call home.

This means giving people who have become homeless access to transitional housing if they just need a temporary "way station" until they can get back on their feet, or the right to a permanent housing unit if their disabilities limit their ability to make it on their own.

Let's call it the Right to Housing Bill.

 
 
 

Follow Joel John Roberts on Twitter: www.twitter.com/joeljohnroberts

FOLLOW IMPACT
The political center has become a precarious place for lawmakers who want to embrace compromise. Extreme views from both ends of the political spectrum seem to dominate policies these days. This same...
The political center has become a precarious place for lawmakers who want to embrace compromise. Extreme views from both ends of the political spectrum seem to dominate policies these days. This same...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
iflew
Pro Publiae Bonae
04:04 PM on 07/01/2012
In an economy of, by and for those in control of money homeless are invisible unless bumped into by the people in office.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TruelyFedUp
Ethics is nothing else than reverence for life.
06:22 PM on 06/27/2012
We have an instance of a group of young teens bullying a grandmother and a compassionate man creates a fund that allows compassionate others to donate funds to help her. If we are in the mood to compensate folks that are bullied what would better qualify than a fund for those that have been bullied out of their jobs & livelihoods so a corporation may profit? Who better to protect than those that have been bullied out of their homes so the banks may profit? Who better to fund than those who's very right to live on the earth has been removed by city councils funded by the middle class?

Let's set up a fund to provide land, resources and the tools folks need to make themselves self sustaining. Get them living in free, self sustaining eco-villages designed like college campuses and with their own food supply which is grown by and for the people. Let them contribute to the building an running of their own communities. Give them security while you/we hoard our profits in our pretty neighborhoods.
iflew
Pro Publiae Bonae
04:07 PM on 07/01/2012
Let St. Louis know! Those in power hate Larry Rice because he keeps showing them the homeless.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BAMUDA
10:36 AM on 06/27/2012
Homeless people need homes. We have been 'managing' homelessness with shelters and transitions to nowhere for long enough. Jerome, like many folks, may choose not to stay in a shelter where people steal his possessions and possibly where his untreated mental health symptoms become worse. He has likely already been in and out of transitional programs that evicted him for failure to 'control' symptoms associated with mental illness and/or addiction. But until we can give Jerome a home, you still have not addressed the central problem.... when Jerome's presence on the street is criminalized and he is cast out ever further... where, exactly, does he go?
01:07 AM on 06/25/2012
Everybody should get the same rights. Food, shelter, communication, transportation, education, access to information, health care, and to get that they need to not be criminals. They also should be required to work, but no one should ever be required to work at a job that leaves then another day older and deeper in debt, owing their soul to the bank of america. Take care of people and invest in them and they will surprise you. It would cost much less than sending so many millions to prison.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:03 AM on 06/24/2012
i have experienced living in my car...because of lost income not drugs. the police just come and tell u to get moving...well gee officer to where?? just get moving, ok so u drive to a truck stop or a park and go thru the same thing all night long. it is exhausting emotionally and physically to be homeless and sober! but it's like you are invisible to society, thankfully i am no longer homeless just working poor ha ha..affordable housing is so badly needed in this country. build cottages and have the tenants drug and alcohol test to be able to live there. there are alot of homeless people not looking for a handout believe me i met many people living in their cars who had children. it just seems nobody cares about the issue. i challenge anyone out there who thinks its a non issue to go live outside for a week and see whats its really like, it might change your point of view
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TruelyFedUp
Ethics is nothing else than reverence for life.
06:27 PM on 06/27/2012
Free, self sustaining eco villages should be the minimum humanitarian security net for our society. Reduce our spending on wars and direct the funds to these eco villages throughout the country. With the US government holding in trust for us 30% of the land it is time each State coughs up enough to ensure that every American has a right to the basics necessary for life. It is the LEAST we can do.
07:02 AM on 06/24/2012
i had some bums trying to occupy the doorway and sidewalk of my building.......when the urine smell got to me one day, i had mister installed every 3 to 10 minutes randomly a fine mist rains down near my entry doors until 4 am.......no more bums
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Letstalkaboutit
Conservative Ideology
10:05 AM on 06/23/2012
We need transitional homes for the homeless. The Salvation Army is a good place to start and it is a charity that our community supports. You live there, you work there and in the community and you transition out to a better life.
07:03 AM on 06/24/2012
there are no homeless near my home
02:54 PM on 06/22/2012
In 2003, my deceased colleague Terry Hallman was living in a tent in Chapel Hill NC and fasted for government to ratify the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights.

I became the messenger between him and Senator John Edwards:

Edwards was later to open the Center on Poverty Work and Opportunity at UNC Chapel Hill and Hallman joined me in the UK to launch a business with the primary focus of tackling poverty we call People-Centered Economic Development, business for people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TruelyFedUp
Ethics is nothing else than reverence for life.
06:32 PM on 06/27/2012
How about, for ONCE, leaving profits out of the equation and simply making sure that a fair share of the land and resources that each of us needs to support life is available as a birthright? Drop the noble posturing and the PROFIT motive and just stop denying people the right to live freely on the land like every other species that exists on the planet!!!
03:49 AM on 08/13/2012
Indeed, that's why the social business model distributes no dividend and uses  surplus to address social needs.
   
09:50 AM on 06/22/2012
A "Right to Housing." I like that, especially when the current figures (HUD) show that it cost 3 to 4 times as much to treat a homeless person (ie, emergency room visits, etc, etc) versus just housing somebody in transitional or permanent supportive housing with some wrap around services. A compassionate rather than a punitive demeanor also helps out a lot also.
11:17 PM on 06/23/2012
I agree!
01:09 AM on 06/25/2012
The cost that keeps our government from doing these things is really just the meaness of Republicans who think they did everything on their own and everyone has to live up to their delusions. It costs less to help people than criminalize them. It costs less to build schools and infrastructure for the 3rd world than it does to go to war with them … it just does not send money to the right people.