As a father, I feel responsible not only for my three little girls' health and well being, but also for their emotional security, their education, and their safety. Because of this, I believe that it's my responsibility to do my utmost to make the world a better place.

It's...

In foreign policy, "red lines," or public statements of policy boundaries, are often set by one nation to make it clear to another that, if the red line is breached, there will be consequences. Setting a red line can be a very powerful tool for advancing a particular policy.

It...

I've just returned from a weeklong work trip to Israel and the West Bank. It had been more than three years since my last visit. While Israel never disappoints in its ability to delight the senses, inspire, and thrill, it is clear that the pressure of the changes in the...

President Obama will visit Israel in March. This will be his first visit as president, and third visit overall. His agenda also includes visits to the West Bank and Jordan. His trip will take place just days after Israel's new government is formed.

There could not be a...

When I served in the U.S. Senate as a foreign policy aide, the Iraq war dominated the political debate and the nation's attention. Just like the budget fights of today, there was practically no other policy issue that wasn't viewed through the prism of where one stood on Iraq.

During...

America's policy toward Israel and the Middle East was front and center in the political debate this election year, from Iran's nuclear program to Israeli-Arab peacemaking to America's response to the Arab Spring. And American Jews decided resoundingly -- by a 70 percent - 30 percent margin -- that Barack...

Syria is in free fall.

Forty thousand civilians and combatants have been killed with the toll still rising; 175,000 Syrians have been wounded; half a million refugees have been sent over Syria's borders; and 1.5 million Syrians have been displaced internally.  

The fate of this country, which is in the heart of the Middle East, directly affects our security interests and those of its neighbors, including Israel.  We have never experienced anything like this before, where a country, which also has a large chemical weapons arsenal, is collapsing before our eyes. We are in new territory now. 

While there are no good options for how to deal with this situation, there still are options that we must explore that will both put an end to this conflict while securing our interests.

The strategic objective of our policy should therefore be to seek a managed transition that moves Syrian President Bashar al-Assad out of power without provoking a total state collapse.  Integrated into this delicate policy should be plans to secure the chemical weapons currently in Assad's hands, and to work with the Syrian opposition to create a functioning representative political system that achieves broad support and national stability.

To do this, our diplomacy should focus on working closely with our allies, such as Turkey, Jordan, France, Britain and the Persian Gulf states.  We should also continue to actively engage our competitors, such as Russia and China, who have influence over Assad. And we must criticize those who directly support Assad, such as Iran, with the hope of changing their behavior.

The goal of this diplomacy will be to help the emerging Syrian opposition political leadership and the Free Syrian Army to support a managed transition.  

There are alternatives to a managed transition, such as Assad holding out and continuing to fight, or a pure collapse of the regime with no one to fill the power vacuum that it leaves behind. Yet these alternatives will only guarantee further bloodshed and danger to our security interests.

If there's one lesson we learned from the invasion of Iraq, it's this: When countries implode and their governing structures disintegrate, there is no one left to pick up the pieces and chaos ensues. A managed transition therefore is the only viable path toward ensuring an end to the Syrian conflict that will keep the country intact.

Syria today is volatile and being torn apart, but it is not yet Iraq after the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime. We must do our utmost to avoid that outcome.

A managed transition will also reduce the likelihood of the conflict spreading throughout the region. Currently, the conflict is directly affecting Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan. But these impacts are all still manageable. As time goes on, though, this conflict expansion could intensify and spread to Iraq and even Israel. Fortunately, all of the neighboring countries are still intact, and international efforts to manage a Syrian transition will ensure that they stay that way.

A managed transition is also the best way to prevent jihadi terrorist groups and other radical organizations from profiting any further from the fighting. The roots of the Syrian rebellion are from the early days of the Arab Spring, when peaceful protest erupted across the country and then Assad cracked down. His crackdown has radicalized elements of the opposition, but not all of it, and it has also opened the door to other extremists. As we work with the opposition's external political leadership and internal military leadership, we must seek to manage this troubling evolution so that the more moderate forces supporting change in Syria take control, either before or soon after Assad's fall.

Of course, a managed transition may be so elusive that we continue to witness the downward spiral of Syria.   

Some say that, as a result of the deepening conflict, we should move to send troops in to Syria as soon as possible, initially by creating a no-fly zone. This would not be wise if it were done for solely tactical effect. Such an effort would need to be part of a comprehensive, internationally backed policy that would ensure that a no-fly zone would be one part of a fuller plan for securing Syria's chemical weapons, pushing out Assad, and supporting the opposition's takeover. Absent such support -- as is currently the case -- the managed transition approach is the least bad of only bad options.

So now, more than ever, the world is looking to the United States to orchestrate a policy toward Syria that moves us past this dark period. There will be no clear outcomes and no easy solutions. But make no mistake: the Syrian transition is coming. Now is the time for us to decide how to manage it.

This piece originally appeared in the Jewish...

President Obama will be in the White House until January 2017. His reelection and the political space it creates for him now allow him to advance his foreign policy priorities with confidence. These are, as he stated in the campaign, to vigorously fight terrorism, to end the war in Afghanistan,...

Last Monday's foreign policy debate was supposed to provide a contrast between two competing visions about America's role in the world, the path forward in the Middle East, and the 21st century threats over the horizon.

At the core of the debate was the question of American policy towards...

Fifty years ago this week, the world stood at the brink of a cataclysmic war. As the Cuban Missile Crisis grew more dangerous every day, President John F. Kennedy and his advisers directed quiet military and diplomatic efforts to avoid a disaster. Importantly, Congress allowed the president to do his...

The killing of four American patriots in Benghazi, Libya last month was an act of terror. Those four Americans, including the U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, represented the best of our country. They put their lives on the line to advance American interests in a volatile region. They deserved the support...

While most media attention focused on the cartoon bomb presented by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during his speech at the United Nations General Assembly, something even more newsworthy passed almost without notice: Netanyahu made it clear that he has endorsed U.S. President Barack Obama's policy on Iran. By literally...

Why is it that when terrorists kill an American official abroad, such as what recently happened in Libya, some in our country blame America rather than the actual perpetrators of the crime?

The recent murders of four American patriots -- U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three other American...

Chris Stevens and three American colleagues from the U.S. mission in Libya were killed by a mob yesterday. The first American governmental deaths in the Arab world since the Arab Spring began less than two years ago, their deaths should be a clarion call to our country about the risks...

The loose talk of war is back after a brief period of calm.

This is stunning, as the facts about Iran's nuclear program have not changed since negotiations over its nuclear program began in April. Iran does not have a nuclear weapon nor is it on...

Mitt Romney is in the midst of his first international jaunt as the presumptive Republican nominee for president. This is a moment for him to show the world and the American people that he is a serious alternative to President Obama, a leader who understands the complexities of...

Syria is in revolt. Negotiations with Iran are complicated. Egypt's political future is up for grabs. The United States has a significant stake in the outcome of these Middle Eastern challenges.

Yet unfortunately, these dynamic changes are happening at precisely the least serious time of our national conversation -- the...

As negotiations aimed at controlling Iran's nuclear program continue and all sides report serious and productive discussions, two things are crystal clear. First, America's national security and intelligence leadership believes a negotiated solution is our best path to resolving the issue. Second, the American people strongly favor a negotiated solution...

Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu is convinced that Iran is on the verge of acquiring a nuclear weapon. He believes that the Iranians cannot be deterred through diplomacy, and he views the Iranian threat as one that may bring about a second Jewish Holocaust.

Negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program will soon morph into technical discussions about levels of uranium enrichment, nuclear inspections protocol and fuel swaps. As the negotiations proceed, policymakers -- particularly in Washington -- will grow increasingly nervous about the prospects for a nuclear deal.

It is therefore essential that...