More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
John Backus

GET UPDATES FROM John Backus
 

The Future of 'Television'

Posted: 12/02/11 01:19 PM ET

Have you looked at your cable bill lately? Mine is $240 a month. Ok, take out $40 for Internet service and $30 for phone service, and I am paying $170 for television in three rooms, with all of the attendant cable box rentals, DVR fees etc. For what? How many channels do we REALLY watch each month? With a family of five, I can name twelve channels that even see the light of day. And, except for live sporting events, my teenage boys have not watched cable TV shows on the "television set" for years. They get everything they want online on their computers.

So what "is" television?

To many, it is the big screen in the living room. To others, it is over the air broadcasts by the major networks. Many more see it as 500+ cable channels on demand. And then there is your cable company's DVR, Hulu, AppleTV, Netflix, and Tivo.

Television is about the content - not the TV set or the cable box or the computer or the iPad. And the concept of television is fundamentally changing, so as a venture capitalist actively investing in digital media and technology, this is a big deal.

Take a look at some major developments so far this year:

- Netflix was once viewed as an invincible Wall Street darling and the stock has nearly fallen off a cliff as it struggles to evolve its business model. But it realizes television is about the content so it continues to pay up to acquire premium television content for its streaming service.

- Hulu was for sale and then it wasn't.

- NBC Universal was formed by Comcast and GE.

-Amazon launched a streaming service and is offering it free to Prime members

-Google introduced YouTube channels to organize video content

-HBO, ABC and many others introduced dedicated iPad apps for users to stream their shows. Comcast and Verizon followed suit with a subset of their cable offerings streamed anywhere, anytime.

-In just the last week, Dish Networks is rumored to be exploring a radical change in its delivery strategy as it struggles to retain subscribers

Live sports are the only programs propping up the cable companies today. Everything else is becoming available, rapidly, by the show or by the channel.

The industry is changing before our eyes and this kind of innovation creates winners and losers.

The losers will be the content aggregators and delivery companies - the cable and satellite operators - who are slow to unbundle their offerings. The losers will also be the 500+ cable content channels that don't learn how to market directly to consumers - instead of collecting a small fee from every cable TV bundle subscriber.

One winner? Apple. No longer will consumers be forced to overpay for a one-size-fits-all bundle of channels and services they don't use. Unlike the others in this space, Apple has the hardware distribution clout to pull this off, with its installed base of iPod touches, iPads and iPhones,

My prediction: You will be able to buy television by the channel. You will be able to watch it live, or watch it from the cloud using live streaming for any channel any program any time slot over the last 30 days. ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox for $1.99 a month. CNN & Fox News for $.99. Discovery, National Geographic, Sprout, BET $2.99. ESPN? Maybe $4.99.

My monthly bill under this scenario? Down from $170 to maybe $50, with Apple and other new intermediaries getting a healthy 30% cut. Better yet? I will be able to watch these "stations" either as stations or individual shows on my home TVs, my iPad, my Mac or my iPhone. Wherever I am.

As venture capital investors, we are seeing a lot of interesting companies in this space. While I don't believe that an upstart will beat out Apple or Amazon or Netflix in the television content delivery arena, I do think there are opportunities for entrepreneurs. Think aggregation of user generated video. Assisting those 500+ cable stations in their new efforts to acquire individual subscribers. Helping advertisers reach consumers one at a time instead of via cable networks. What else? Weigh in, in the comments section, here.

 

Follow John Backus on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jcbackus

Have you looked at your cable bill lately? Mine is $240 a month. Ok, take out $40 for Internet service and $30 for phone service, and I am paying $170 for television in three rooms, with all of the ...
Have you looked at your cable bill lately? Mine is $240 a month. Ok, take out $40 for Internet service and $30 for phone service, and I am paying $170 for television in three rooms, with all of the ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:34 PM on 12/05/2011
Reason it is not available by the channel for decades is that market is restricted by providers and not compelled by legislation to open the market and make it free. Greatest capitalist myth is the free market.

I want to pay by the program. Billed by the program.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:26 PM on 12/06/2011
"I want to pay by the program. Billed by the program."

iTunes
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drunkarate
01:26 PM on 12/05/2011
We'll see. The major media companies still own most of the smaller cable channels and will resist a crumbling of the cable/satellite cash cow infrastructure. Paying for those channels you don't use subsidizes the channels you do watch. I don't like this model either, but it's going to be a long slog before it changes dramatically, just as it was a long slog from 3 channels to 500.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
libwingoflibwing
Leftist Christian, Non-Violent Revolutionary
11:39 AM on 12/05/2011
It makes perfect sense for Networks to put their shows online using new technology so we can't ff the commercials.
11:53 PM on 12/04/2011
As an entrepreneur in this space, I have a problem with this article. I develop TV/Display Technologies but I'm also married to a TV writer. Yes, we pay a premium for bundled content. Cable companies have harnessed consumer demands for ESPN, HBO and other big hitters and used it to feed all the little guys like TNT, HGTV, Hallmark, Logo, and a host of others. Trickling this money to the others is what has allowed smaller niche networks to produce original content like Madmen, Battlestar Gallactica, and the Closer and a content explosion. A la carte would focus those monies on the premiums and starve out the smaller guys. Content needs to become cheaper, but aggregators are good. The author sites HBO's iPad effort but forgets to note that you have to be a current "cable/satellite subscriber to access it.
Content is not and should not be free. The big fail of Apple and Google stems from the exclusive concentration on traditional media and apps. There is an untapped world of commerce to be developed and enacted on the big screen; Distance learning, real-time collaboration, live entertainment, full screen HD face to face healthcare, peer to peer enterprise, and a host of upgraded everyday uses. Watching TV will be such a small part of "Future TV", let's just change the name to "digital window" and get on with the Jetson's TV
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Republican = FAIL
09:30 AM on 12/03/2011
My prediction!

We'll find better things to do with our money.

User generated content is more authentic and meaningful.
11:50 PM on 12/02/2011
John, what about the NFL? I have a hard time believing that they would be part of any of this. If they were willing to stream their content live, for a monthly rate, wouldn't they have done so by now? Can the big networks do anything without the NFL on board?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
vonbek
Forget revolution we need evolution
04:31 PM on 12/03/2011
The NFL is taking baby steps, you can purchase NFL Rewind about 50 bucks for the season and watch the games after they happen, the service is blacked out from kickoff Sunday till after the Sunday night game and during the Monday night game. Other than that you can watch every game of the season either condensed or the full game. I dropped cable TV about 9 months ago and I am never going back. My Roku box has Netflix, Amazon prime, Hulu Plus NFL Rewind and Justin.TV find plenty to watch for about 20 bucks a month.
06:41 PM on 12/02/2011
Yep, a la carte is coming. The big five: Disney, News Corp, Viacom, CBS Corp and Time Warner have successfully "bundled" many rather useless cable channels and compelled Sat and cable to buy the "package" instead of choosing individual channels. A la Carte choices will slowly make these media giants go the way of Fat Sam. Apparently the FCC like SEC is just another worthless government agency so the market place will be the driving vehicle.