iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
John Dominic Crossan

GET UPDATES FROM John Dominic Crossan
 

The Search for the Historical Paul: Which Letters Did He Really Write?

Posted: 07/05/11 05:20 PM ET

The 13th-century Sopoćani monastery is a UNESCO World Heritage Site near the source of the Raška River, just east of Novi Pazar in the south-western corner of Serbia. After two centuries of attack, desolation and abandonment, its Church of the Holy Trinity is now rebuilt, its frescoes restored and its monastic life revived.

In the southern choir of that eastward-pointing church are frescoes of seven apostles. Five are now unidentifiable, as time and decay has literally defaced them, but each is folding a single scroll. Matthew is identifiable and he is holding the book of his Gospel. But the most clearly identifiable is the leading figure on the choir's east wall. It is the apostle Paul, complete with his recognizable receding hairline. His right hand is raised in the traditional Byzantine teaching gesture of fingers separated into two (for two natures in Christ) and three (for three Persons in the Trinity). What is extraordinary, however, is that his left hand holds 10 clearly distinguishable scrolls -- not a single scroll or book but 10 scrolls in a cluster.

Why 10 scrolls when Christianity's New Testament attributes 13 letters to the apostle Paul: letters to communities such as the Romans, Corinthians (twice), Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, Thessalonians (twice) and to individuals such as Timothy (twice), Titus and Philemon.

There is, however, a massive consensus in modern scholarship that those three letters to Timothy and Titus were written in Paul's name but long after his death. It would seen, then, that around 1265 a Byzantine artist at Sopoćani already accepted that viewpoint -- hence, only 10 scrolls for 10 letters.

There is also a strong (but not massive) consensus among much of modern scholarship that a further three of those 10 letters were not written by Paul. In other words, we have seven letters certainly from the historical Paul (Romans, 1-2 Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, 1 Thessalonians, Philemon), three others probably not from him (Ephesians, Colossians, 2 Thessalonians) and a final three certainly not from him (1-2 Timothy, Titus). Those are all, of course, historical conclusions and not dogmatic presumptions. Well and good, but, even if correct, so what? And why should anyone care?

It is not just that we have factual and fictional letters of "Paul" or that those 13 letters are mixed between a Paul and a Pseudo-Paul. It is not just that, after Paul's death, followers imagined him in new situations and had him respond to new problems -- as if in a seamless if fictional continuity from past into present and future.

The problem is that those post-Pauline or Pseudo-Pauline letters are primarily counter-Pauline and anti-Pauline. What happens across those three sets of letters is that the radical Paul of the authentic seven letters (Romans, 1-2 Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, 1 Thessalonians, Philemon) is slowly but steadily morphed into the conservative Paul of the probably inauthentic threesome (Ephesians Colossians, 2 Thessalonians) and finally into the reactionary Paul of those certainly inauthentic ones (1-2 Timothy, Titus).

In other words, the radical Paul is being deradicalized, sanitized and Romanized. His radical views on, for example, slavery and patriarchy, are being retrofitted into Roman cultural expectations and Roman social presuppositions. Watch, then, how it works in terms of slavery (I leave patriarchy for my next blog in this series on Paul):

The radical and historical Paul sent back the now-converted slave Onesimus to his owner and told him that a Christian could not own a Christian for how could Christians be equal and unequal to one another at the same time? He reminds him "to do your duty," to free Onesimus, and to consider him "no longer as a slave but more than a slave, a beloved brother -- especially to me but how much more to you, both in the flesh and in the Lord" (Philemon 1:8,16).

Next, the later, conservative counter-Paul takes Christian owners with Christian slaves absolutely for granted, addresses both classes and reminds each of its mutual obligations. "Slaves obey ... fearing the Lord" and "Masters treat your slaves justly ... you also have a Master in heaven" (Colossians 3:22-4:1 & Ephesians 6:5-9). Christian-on-Christian slavery is back but now in kinder, gentler mode!

Finally, the still later and reactionary anti-Paul never mentions mutual duties, addresses only the master, and says to "tell slaves to be submissive to their masters and ... to be an ornament to the doctrine of God our Savior" (Titus 2:9-10).

What is at stake in that sad progression from Paul to anti-Paul? Why is it of importance that -- at least with regard to slavery -- radical Christian liberty is being changed back into normal Roman slavery. It means this: Jewish Christianity is becoming Roman Christianity. And this: Constantine here we come!

 
 
 
The 13th-century Sopoćani monastery is a UNESCO World Heritage Site near the source of the Raška River, just east of Novi Pazar in the south-western corner of Serbia. After two centuries of attack, ...
The 13th-century Sopoćani monastery is a UNESCO World Heritage Site near the source of the Raška River, just east of Novi Pazar in the south-western corner of Serbia. After two centuries of attack, ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 513
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ZENNEPHI
06:10 PM on 08/16/2011
The letter of Saint Paul at Corinth:
..."Some men are not to marry. For the are neither given nor taken in marriage.
Some men are borne of there Mothers womb...Other men are borne of other men,
While other men are borne of the Kingdom. Thus after fulfilling the Will of the Father,
move on to thrive, a little bit below the Angels..."[NKJV-1611 Thomas/Nelson Trans]
photo
daily randy
Danger, Will Robinson! Danger!
04:04 PM on 07/26/2011
Wow! Growing up one of Jehovah's Witnesses and learning about the Bible at 3 meetings a week for years and years, I have to say that I was always confused by Paul. I could never quite get a grip on his personality and where he stood on things. I found him to be mostly aggressive, forceful, opinionated, and even arrogant ... and he pushed his thoughts and believes on others. But he also seemed to be so kind, understanding, and patient. The "two Pauls" always seemed to be different people to me ... different personalities ... and I was always questioning where he really stood on issues. This article helps shed some light on that for me. Thank you for writing it!
03:15 PM on 07/11/2011
Prof. Crossan doesn't go in to the details of why the scholarly consensus agrees that most likely 6 letters were not written by Paul. Part of the reasoning is based on the fact the pseudo-Pauline letters contradict the theology of the undisputed letters. But the other difference is the change in the character of the language. This change is perhaps only evident in the original Greek but the difference between the disputed and undisputed letters is as stark as the difference between Shakespeare and Seuss: "to be or not to be" vs. "I do not like green eggs and ham."
05:23 AM on 07/11/2011
It's amazing how when you prove things, by computer analysis of writing style or by content, there are those whose motto might just as well be: "I wouldn't believe you, even if you proved it!" The major Christian churches admit there were forgeries. The Christian academics know they are, they are just, understandably, finding it hard to admit the whole of The Greatest Lie Ever Told!
billstewart
Not a micro-biologist
04:14 PM on 07/10/2011
I think a much more likely explanation is that Paul was getting older, and the letters you're disputing were written later in his career.
photo
busterggi
I'm a Sally Randian
02:17 PM on 07/11/2011
You mean when he changed his mind about what Jesus "told him"?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:12 PM on 07/11/2011
Hi buster,

1. Paul did not personally know Jesus,
2. Paul was guided by the same Holy Spirit that came over Jesus, and as they are in need of direction or counseling, they pray and meditate for an answer, which may come from a dream, vision or thought form
3. The "differences" between the early and later Paul writings, deal in "physical" areas under Paul's discretion on what is the best way to organize his groups (church), which means sometimes the "teacher" has to "discipline" the "students"
4. Those "disciplinary rules" have nothing to do with the "spiritual" message; that in due time, the holy Spirit would come to work on them, should they be willing
5. If folks would like the assistance of mentors considered further along in their spiritual walk in life, orders and rules are a prerequisite (parochial school anyone? what difference does it make to ones spiritual growth, or to God, whether you wear a uniform or hairstyle)
6. The holy character traits of peace and quiet (as well as many others) comes about over a life long struggle with self-: control, sacrifice and suffering
7. Church rules comes from the physical side, a human being; Paul, the Holy Spirit comes from God on the spiritual side, they are separate,
8. Just because someone goes to the organization (church) does not mean they have the HS
9. Just because someone does not go, does not mean they can't get the HS
10:09 PM on 07/09/2011
BTW, what ever happened to a word like “forgery” for the Constantine Army Manual add ons or “Pseudo-Pauls”? If the real Paul founded Christianity without meeting Jesus, Constantine could surely found his Roman empire church without meeting Paul or Pseudo-Paul. The formula works both ways.

What you are saying is nothing new to people who bother to research these things. In fact I might suspect that this article is Pseudo-Crossan to be rather technical about it from my point of view.

Why is it that clerics like Bishop Morris in Australia, the Cardinal in Portugal or the retired Egan in NY run statements by us very, very briefly like there are few theological barriers to such matters as female ordination or celibacy just before they retire?

No guts. No glory. Just a comfy pension check for a job not well done for pushing the same old dead dogma along with a broom for another generation or two. The people of God do not matter anymore to you all in charge of the theology thingy. They have been written out of every modern equation - political, economic and now religious sad to say.

People – here and NOW - is Jesus! Not some weakening heart and spirit presently found in obsolete language, dogma, ancient history. The word is living. The word is not a book or a supposed Pauline blog article published in that book.
01:05 PM on 07/09/2011
Gee, what about today, as xtians are pushing for the passage of anti-homosexual legislation in over a dozen African nations. Each of these xtian backed pieces of legislation make it a capital offense to be or to engage in the natural actions for such people. Or the funding of anti-prop 8 campaign in Cal., or pushing for creationism in schools, or the use of food in starving areas to force conversion like Queen Victoria did with the Irish. Your past is still with you and it is not just history, it is fundamental to your cult.
12:30 PM on 07/10/2011
Hey, here is the short concise story of Christianity: the belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolical­ly eat his flesh and telepathic­ally tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul this is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree.
photo
busterggi
I'm a Sally Randian
02:20 PM on 07/11/2011
When you put it that way it almost sounds unreasonable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bakdoc1980
Trying to take rational national...
02:50 PM on 07/11/2011
you mean that some of this may be silly? giggle...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jdl51
11:57 AM on 07/09/2011
Well, at least Mohammed had one thing right. He wrote every word in the Koran himself, unlike the Christian bible that was written piecemeal over centuries by who knows how many people, some, if not most of whom are nameless and faceless, even though they're attributed to some of the prophets. And you would think that if God actually took human form to live among us and instruct us, he would have at least had the foresight to write down what he wanted for us to do instead of us getting it second, third and fourth hand sometimes generations later. It does not compute.
12:57 AM on 07/10/2011
==..... Mohammed ...... He wrote every word in the Koran himself,==

Really?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jdl51
03:26 AM on 07/10/2011
Well, he dictated every word. Point is, he was the one and only person that came up with what's in the Koran. The bible has multiple sources over centuries and we don't even know who many of them are, but people base their beliefs on whoever these nameless men are, they were inspired by God. If you don't believe the Angel Gabriel revealed the Koran to Mohammed, why aren't people equally as skeptical about the bible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bakdoc1980
Trying to take rational national...
02:51 PM on 07/11/2011
Are you aware that Mohammed , by his own declaration , was illiterate?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lordgamble
ATWWWHG And They Wonder Why We Hate Gov't
01:56 AM on 07/09/2011
Crossan isn't nearly as bright as he thinks he is. The presumption of the artist's theological views is preposterous. Consider. To take an artist's fresco as proof of a political agenda, and yes, proving Paul didn't write all 13 is a political agenda, shows a lack of critical thinking skills. Just as likely is that the artist decided for artistic purposes that 13 was just too many to try to show in the fresco. They call it Artistic License. Also in the era of 1265, before the printing press. the artist may never have even seen a bible or have been able to read it. The artist may simply have not known the exact number of scrolls. You do know that all bibles in 1265 in Spain would have been in Latin, not Spanish. Not many people could read. Fewer still could read Latin. Fewer still had Bibles only available at great cost (hand scribed) in Latin.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jdl51
12:21 PM on 07/09/2011
Artists were usually commissioned to do their work and most probably were given guidelines or instructions on what to do. I don't doubt that rough drafts would have been done first for approval by whoever commissioned the work. In work done in churches, cathedrals and monasteries, someone in the clergy would have had the final say on what would be presented. Michelangelo's work on the Sistine Chapel wasn't his idea alone, it was a collaboration with church officials, most notably Pope Julius II. I'm sure this artist was under the supervision of whoever ran the monastery, the local bishop or even a cardinal. They just didn't let artists do whatever they heck they wanted just like you wouldn't let a contractor do whatever they wanted in your house. You would have the main input and final approval.
02:56 PM on 07/11/2011
read Crossan's book. His arguments are not based on this artistic rendering. It's just a writer's way of beginning an article to paint a vibrant scene.
01:08 PM on 08/15/2011
I realize that Crossan is not basing his arguments on the rendering. However, the fresco is a badly chosen example because there are other explanations than pseudonymity of the pastorals for 10 books in Paul's hand. For example, if 1st and 2nd Corinthians are one scroll, 1st and 2nd Thessalonians are one scroll, and 1st and 2nd Timothy are one scroll, you get 10.

I think it unlikely that in 1265, almost a millennium after St. Augustine's council of Carthage in 397, either an artist or an abbey would go against Paul's having 13 epistles. Though I am undecided on the authenticity of the Pauline corpus, I think that the artist and those who commissioned him would have had no such doubts.
10:20 PM on 07/08/2011
Mr.Crossan, I think your conclusions are presented here on very thin evidence. Not buying what you're selling. No one should.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CMB1969
raging moderate
05:57 PM on 07/08/2011
I actually don't see the two letters to Timothy and the letter to Titus as being any sort of the doctrinal departure, because (on face value) they were written for quite different purposes. The letters written to churches (Romans, Corinthians, ect.) were being addressed to all hearers, while the Timothy and Titus letters were addressed specifically to young (presumably already quite zealous) presbyters ("elders"--the office that would eventually evolve into the ordained priesthood) and centered on practical advice and the need to keep a certain measure of discretion.
11:22 PM on 07/08/2011
I agree with you and believe Mr. Crossan knows not whereof he speaks. His final conclusion is a total misunderstanding of what Paul was saying. Too, are we sure that in both cases regarding slavery, Paul was talking to Christian slave owners in both cases? I would buy that Paul was talking to a Christian slave owner in Philemon, but is speaking to slaves themselves who are enslaved to non-Christian owners. I believe Paul is saying to Christian slave owners not to own Christians as slaves, but saying to slaves of non-Christian owners to not run away, but to serve as unto the Lord, because their service to their owner could ultimately serve a greater purpose of converting their owners. I also think Mr. Crossan's designating 'fictional' epistles solely on the basis of a restored monastery is very thin. And he is misleading in stating a 'massive consensus of Christian scholarship' believes anything when he doesn't name names or give numbers. What is massive in his mind? Is he exaggerating to try to sway to his point?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cosmosdan
08:27 PM on 07/07/2011
So what does that say about the nature of inspiration, or the authority granted the Bible, or the reliability of the men who declared these books canon. How obvious does it have to be that many Christian traditions are not factual. If one is concerned about being set free by the truth, maybe that ought to matter.
photo
heron77
Drive on the right
08:53 PM on 07/08/2011
The important issue is not who the writer was, but how the message agrees with the rest of scriptures. If Jesus' teachings found in the other gospels are in principle with Pauls' letters and any other letter, then the writer doesn't matter

A similarity might be found in Shakespeare's works, where some scholars believe some works were not written by Shakespeare, but someone writing for him. Irregardless, the stories and plays are still enjoyable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cosmosdan
07:55 AM on 07/09/2011
Enjoyable and authoritative are very different words. The problem IMO is the authority given to the Bible, a book written, copied , and interpreted by men.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Scott
06:32 PM on 07/07/2011
Bart Ehrman's book, "Forged" goes over a bunch of the arguments challenging the epistles in question. This stuff above is old news. Crossan (and Ehrman) are merely making public what scholars have known for a long time. The New Testament is full of forgeries and misattributions. Except for the seven letters of Paul that scholars are certain about, nobody knows who the authors of the New Testament were. Even conservative apologist Craig Blomberg admits the Gospels were anonymous in Lee Strobel's "The Case For Christ."
07:07 PM on 07/07/2011
I presumed--and mentioned--that consensus on the pseudo-pauline letters. That is not news. What is new or at least needs a lot more emphasis is that the the pseudo-paulines are counter-and anti-pauline letters. In other words, they prove that the historical Paul was too radical for them (as, of course, was Jesus).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:21 AM on 07/08/2011
I understand what you mean, it is possible,

It seemed God commissioned Paul to set up a "religion" based on Jesus, its both a help and a hurt, it was Paul's baby

2 Corinthians 11:28 "Besides everything else, I face daily the pressure of my concern for all the churches."

1 Thessalonians 3:1-5 "So when we could stand it no longer, I sent Timothy to you to strengthen and encourage you in your faith. I was afraid that the tempter might have tempted you and our efforts might have been useless."

Titus 1:5 "The reason I left you in Crete was that you might straighten out what was left unfinished and appoint elders in every town, as I directed you."

when a person is going all out and stressed, they tend to become more controlling and contentious (Acts 15:36-41)

Paul grew more harsh, the people he formed into his church organization are new comers, unskilled in the faith and not far along in their spiritual journey, his job is to organize, not do the work of the Holy Spirit, so mistakes are happening and Paul has to go around solving problems, what seems to be called "anti-Paul" was references to keeping the carnals from becoming destructive in his church organization, that was basically what the physical law was meant to do (Galatians 3) "the law and rules were put in place till faith or the HS came and changed their hearts and character"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:51 PM on 07/07/2011
Looks a lot like St. Paul has been hacked.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mundane Egg
Decency is the new black.
10:03 AM on 07/07/2011
Good article and good discussion (well for those who actually want to discuss). The problem we have when we approach Paul's letters is that he does say some universal truths then there appears to be cultural statements. Paul tells Corinthian women to not cut there hair. This was due to the practice of temple prostitutes shaving their heads. He doesn't address this in ever letter. So does this mean this is inerrant and inspired or a statement to a certain church in a certain locale? If it is addressing a cultural issue at that time and place then how does the letter become an inerrant statement of God's word.
Another point would be the differences in Paul's statements. Someone brought up the Ronald Reagan defense...(Shudder) But if we are talking about the literal inerrant word of God then there would be no defense.
Neo-Orthodox would not throw out the baby with the bath water. It would look for certain threads that do exist and recognized these as divinely inspired while these other elements are take as statements made specifically to that community and is not made for universal appeal.
11:16 AM on 07/07/2011
I now try not to get caught up in the he said she said, works great to deceive many. We are all temples of God, why God said there will be no temples when HE comes. We all are the temples of God, when we become one with God in spirit. God said Look to the ant to learn wisdom. Ant? The ant has no ruler over them, all are one equal. Thus the same for us. God only is our God, authority. Love says it all. Lion will lie with the lamb in peace.  We are all lambs of God.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mundane Egg
Decency is the new black.
09:38 AM on 07/08/2011
I'm with ya Sunshine...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:34 PM on 07/07/2011
Hi Mun,
I am not sure of the technical terms you use, the bible has a "spiritual" message and a "physical" message, God wants people to go the spiritual route, the physical helped keep people out of jail

there have been many overcomers, and they have vast differences on the physical side, some were important rulers like Daniel, David and Joseph, but many have been dirt poor nobodies

there has been many personal changes in overcomers positions, such as Moses acted as a Judge with people coming to him, he changed because it was getting too difficult as the community got larger, and instituted Priests and Levites (civil servants), this reminds me that the US Constitution set the number of representatives at 1 rep for each 30,000, Art 1 Sec 2 they started to run out of space, so instead of building a larger place they limited the seats and let the number go up it is now somewhere in the range of 1 rep for each 300,000 people, changes happen based on time and cultural circumstances

there were judges, yet because of public pressure, Samuel was forced to change and make Saul King

the apostles who were Jews started out following the physical side till the day came for their spiritual transformation, they believed that salvation or the Holy Spirit was only "for the Jews" later, Peter and the others discovered that Gentiles who never went the physical route, can be saved and get the HS
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mundane Egg
Decency is the new black.
09:37 AM on 07/08/2011
Good points. I am just saying that for one who believes in that every word of the Bible is inerrant it is problematic when you do a historical/grammatical analysis of the text.