More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
John Eskow

John Eskow

Posted: February 8, 2011 11:48 AM

To me, the horrific part of Christina Aguilera's rendition of the National Anthem -- and "rendition" is an apt term for it, because she kidnapped the song and shipped it out to be tortured -- was not her mangling of the words, but her mangling of the tune itself: to paraphrase the great Chuck Berry, she "lost the beauty (such as it is) of the melody until it sounds just like a (godawful) symphony."

This is the same grotesque style -- 17 different notes for every vocal syllable -- that has so dominated the pop and R&B charts for years. Mariah Carey and Whitney Houston are relatively minor offenders, but singers like Aguilera -- who admittedly possesses a great instrument -- just don't seem to know when to stop, turning each song into an Olympic sport as they drain it of its implicit soul, as if running through the entire scale on every single word was somehow a token of sincerity.

It's called melisma -- the bending of syllables for bluesy or soulful effect -- and what's creepy about the way it's used now is that it perverts America's true genius for song, as evinced by its creators in the world of gospel and R&B, like Ray Charles and Aretha Franklin.

You will hear more of this tonsil-twisting insincerity -- to your eternal sorrow -- if you watch any episode of American Idol.

The great Jerry Wexler -- who produced both Ray and Aretha -- coined a great term for it: "oversouling." He described it as "the gratuitous and confected melisma" that hollows out a song and drains it of meaning. Wexler, who knew more about soul than any producer before or since, said:

"Time and again I have found that flagrantly artificial attempts at melisma are either a substitute for real fire and passion or a cover-up for not knowing the melody... Please, learn the song first, and then sing it from the heart."

And Christina, he wasn't referring to the words.

POSTSCRIPT: I was lucky enough to know Wexler a bit, near the end of his life, and I can hear his raspy, streetwise voice in my ear, insisting I clarify his point: the problem is not Melisma--which I believe is also the name of Joan Rivers' daughter--it's Oversouling. It's like those corny educational films I saw in grade-school: "Fire can be our greatest friend...or our worst enemy!" The same goes for melisma. Without melisma, no Ray or Aretha, and also no Sam Cooke, no Waylon Jennings, no B.B. King, no Charlie Parker. It's rare for a singer or instrumentalist to disdain melisma completely; Miles Davis and Merle Haggard come to mind, but even they employ it, sparingly, at times. The nightmares begin when--as several posters have wisely pointed out--singers practice Melisma Abuse in order to draw attention to themselves and away from the song. Then it becomes, as Jerry Wexler said, that "gratuitous and confected melisma" that has driven so many of us to the point of shrieking, Aguilera-style, in despair.

CODA: Racism is heartbreaking, in all its permutations. After I wrote this piece, a friend half-jokingly predicted that I might be accused of anti-white racism for attacking Aguilera in favor of Aretha Franklin and Ray Charles. Then, as comments started flooding in, I was concerned that a few of them were implying--whether the commenters realized it or not--that the National Anthem should be kept simon-pure, unsung except by white Europeans. That was disturbing, and it provoked me into writing the Postscript above, to clarify the original point about the abuse of melisma.

Then--and, granted, it was only from a few trolls, whose endless repititions made only them seem like an army--we began to see another face of racism take its ugly shape. I was accused of "touting" Wexler--whatever the hell that means--over the black singers he produced, a nonsensical charge belied by the piece itself. Then it became: how could I write about this subject, since I "clearly" didn't sing myself? And once that charge was refuted, suddenly trifling matters like "credentials" and "experience" in R&B didn't matter. Then, finally, any attempt at subtlety was dropped, and the problem was revealed to be"guys like me"--guys who, I was sternly admonished, had shown--by their love for Sam Cooke and BB King--that they "used to" prefer Mozart to Jelly Roll Morton (huh?) As the goading campaign collapsed into total incoherence, and other commenters tried nobly to reason with the trolls, the whole thing just got sadder and sadder.

So, for the record (literally as well as figuratively): oversouling does not mean "too black." Quite the opposite: oversouling, whether you like the term or not, is a kind of vocal minstrel-show, a theft of real feeling in the service of corny show-biz. It is a failure of artistic taste. It can be committed by rock-and-roll guitarists, opera singers, actors, and painters, but these days it's most spectacularly--and frequently--thrust into our consciousness by singers. We all enjoy what speaks to us, so if you prefer Christina Aguilera to Aretha Franklin--or Michael Bolton to Otis Redding--Godspeed. But don't defend it by trying--feebly--to police the word-choices of those with other opinions.

Finally, I thank God I've spent so much of my life among musicians, black and white, who are inspired solely by their love of the groove, no matter the color of the person who's laying it down--whether it's Paul Butterfield or James Cotton playing harp, Charley Pride or Merle Haggard singing country, Mitch Ryder or Wilson Pickett screaming R&B. Brothers and sisters: keep making that joyful noise--and, as Sly and the Family Stone sang, let "all the squares go home!"

 
To me, the horrific part of Christina Aguilera's rendition of the National Anthem -- and "rendition" is an apt term for it, because she kidnapped the song and shipped it out to be tortured -- was not ...
To me, the horrific part of Christina Aguilera's rendition of the National Anthem -- and "rendition" is an apt term for it, because she kidnapped the song and shipped it out to be tortured -- was not ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,589
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (49 total)
05:41 PM on 02/22/2011
I really have to agree with this. I never cared for the over-done vocal acrobatics style of singers like Aguilera. Don't get me wrong, I think she is beautiful and richly talented -- a truly soulful performer but sometimes the "soul" part gets laid on a bit thick. I don't care that is was the national anthem, I just find that, unless done with the right balance of melody, such soulful vocal acrobatics actually ruin a song.

Just my two cents. Still thought her rendition of "Lady Marmalade" was straight-up spine tingling.
04:47 PM on 02/22/2011
This is a long-understood concept. I took several master classes with great bebop pianist Barry Harris. He told us "blue notes are like four-letter words. If you use them now and then they spice up your language, but if you use them all the time you just sound ignorant." Of course in capitalism the market gets a vote, and if the masses pay more for vocal gymnastics than they pay for artistry, the gymnasts are going to have the biggest record deals and management that hooks them up with the Super Bowl and other major corporate tie-ins. Corporations do not put the product ahead of the consumer.
03:04 PM on 02/22/2011
Thank you for putting your finger precisely on what I thought was wrong with Ms. Aguilera's performance. Oversouling! Melisma Abuse! Brilliant! Too much of a good thing without artistic integrity. To be crude -- vocal masturbation. Enough already.
12:27 AM on 02/22/2011
Jerry Wexler always cited Sam Cooke as the Master of Melisma. Sam never over-baked a performance-- every note counted. Aretha, at least in earlier years, took heed of her idol (and crush!) Sam's example. In fact, much of her emotional power stemmed from the restraint she exhibited. Some of that economy in style abated somewhat as the '80s and '90s progressed, perhaps as a response to seeing her musical progeny (i.e., Whitney and Mariah) walk away with "Best Female R&B Grammys" --aka "the Aretha Award"-- for their florrid, over-the-top performances. Mariah is no minor offender, John. She certainly is responsible for inspiring and influencing countless young thrushes and "Idol" contestants.

I'm as disappointed as you must have been to have had this syndrome identification called out as an idiosyncracy of race. If anything, I think it's perpetrated more often and egregiously by white "soulful wannabes". Reba McEntire notoriously launched the trend in country music, and it has proliferated much like our Stink Bug epidemic here on the East Coast.

A song from the heart will always trump a song from the head...or ego.
07:13 PM on 02/20/2011
She does look like Cindy L!!!
06:35 AM on 02/20/2011
The great thing about being an artist is you get to create. The end result is exactly the way its supposed to be if you (the artist, singer, painter, writer, poet, etc) like the way it comes out. So in terms of how Christina and all of the other (world famous, beloved, with millions of adoring fans) singers that have been named and politely thrown under the bus in this article choose to sing, they are doing the
'right" way.

If you don't like it, then thats all there is to say about it. There is no such thing as "over-singing" or "over-souling". Its the equivalent of a guitar or drum solo in a jam session,its the singer expressing and his/her self with their instrument.

Granted, there is a point where the song can be lost if you run off track or key but a riff or run here and there is hardly the worse thing in the world.

As far as the anthem goes, its a song and the funny thing about songs is, once you put them out into the world, you loose control over them and when you put them into the hands of a singer, your going to get their style, there phrasing, perspective, and their sensibilities in the song. Obviously, The folks in the NFL wanted Aguilera's take on it. If you have a problem with that, write them an angry email but don't get mad at Christina.
03:07 PM on 02/22/2011
I think the problem is that not every singer is a genius. The idea is not to be mad at Ms. Aguilera, but to examine where musical interpretation can go wrong. In this case, I think it did. But the beauty of our free society is that we can agree or disagree. I'm sure there are some, like yourself, who thought her rendition was art. I didn't. It sounded to me more like pure self-indulgence, in which the song itself had no intrinsic meaning.
12:24 AM on 02/17/2011
this is an excellent piece that is right on the money! all of us who watched and listened made the same analysis and even joked about it...some melisma is good as it allows the singer to express some soulful emotion but she was downright annoying with her exaggerate d vocals...i f she could control it she'd be awesome with the powerful voice she has...
09:07 AM on 02/15/2011
Taste is an individual thing.

Just because her style of ornamentation doesn't appeal to you, doesn't mean that it is without merit.

Frankly, the sort of vocal phrasing that is peculiar to country music, generally makes me want to break out into a rash on a good day....and makes my ears want to bleed on a bad day.....but one's man's meat is another man's poison.

Just say that it doesn't speak to you...and move on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roger Ochs
ribald raconteur
05:56 PM on 02/19/2011
I would agree with you if there were no standards to be held. The embellishments of the Baroque period may be a matter of taste but confusing "soul" with the rococo narcissism of so many pop singers is more a matter of ignorance.
01:46 PM on 02/20/2011
Singers are in the buisness of selling their talent and art, Its not necessarily "narcissism". Many people confuse being job oriented in the entertainment business with being narcissistic but it is kind of part of the job. Many pretend to be modest and humble to appeal to consumers but at the end of the day, they are all scrapping for chart positions and to appeal to their bases as well as trying to attract new fans to stay relevant and under contract.

She a STAR. She's in SHOWBUSINESS. She "shows off" what she has for a living. There are no rules when it comes to singing pop music or any other for that matter you do what you're led to do and people either take it or leave it. So all this talk of over doing or over singing is pretty dumb. In the end it all boils down to taste. Thats completely personal and subjective. Some folks need to realize that its just that and it truly has no bearing on the world or art form at all. Far too many confuse their personal preferences and sensibilities with an actual rule or standard that needs to be followed by everyone. Thats not the case. To each their own so articles and post like this one are pure bloviation, aren't they?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:22 AM on 02/15/2011
This blog post is so much more important than Lady Gaga's egg arrival.
photo
RealityBaseCamp
My micro-bio did not meet someone's guidelines!
12:29 AM on 02/15/2011
Thanks for writing this. I knew it wasn't just me, but I should have realized there were technical terms for this kind of thing. Idol, for instance - I don't usually watch, but sometimes I catch the freak show of the auditions. WOW those people overdo every note, because they think that's what shows talent. Now I know it's a miasma of melisma.
02:39 PM on 02/14/2011
Read this yesterday morning, and cringed (as usual) last night when I heard what I now know as melisma. Ugh! Enough already.
01:52 PM on 02/14/2011
Melisma has been overdone since. .. . the Middle Ages, believe it or not. People have been critical of it since it began.

I, for one, can't stand overdone melisma. Good blog.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
torgman3
Romney/Kony 2012
12:34 PM on 02/14/2011
I thought that was covered by Cephus and Reesie on "In Living Color"
08:05 AM on 02/14/2011
I actually call it "tarzan singing".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gup
my tolerance will not be insulated!
10:13 PM on 02/13/2011
Great! Now let's talk about the abuses of auto-tune....