Hillary's Unsurprising and Disingenuous Opposition to Real Health Care Reform

Here we go again. Hillary touting her long experience in government, claimed knowledge of health care, and ability to "get things done" as she affirms her support of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and distorts Bernie Sanders' single-payer plan for national health insurance, Medicare for all.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

Here we go again. Hillary touting her long experience in government, claimed knowledge of health care, and ability to "get things done" as she affirms her support of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and distorts Bernie Sanders' single-payer plan for national health insurance, Medicare for all.

Yes, health care reform is again center stage as a hot issue during this election season, with rhetoric, disinformation, and false allegations filling the national media -- so much smoke and mirrors. But before we give Hillary credit for her credentials in health care, recall how that worked out for her in the 1990s. After huddling with the main corporate stakeholders in our health care system -- the private health insurance, drug and hospital industries -- she brought us a byzantine plan that was poorly conceived, too expensive, too complex, and never got out of committee to a vote in the House. It would have served industry well, but not patients, as Joseph Califano, former Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare in the Carter administration, said so clearly about its complexity:

Clinton's plan rests on the belief that an army of policy wonks can predict what would happen under a program that would change one-seventh of the economy, which 30 years of experience tells us we can't do. (1)

As described in my 2010 book, Hijacked: The Road to Single Payer in the Aftermath of Stolen Health Care Reform (2), the same approach was taken by President Obama in the lead-up to the ACA -- make sure that these industries are well taken care of while accepting their claims that costs will be contained and patients will end up better off. Corporate stakeholders, not many millions of patients, however, have been better off. In 2013, three years after the ACA was enacted, health care stocks climbed by almost 40 percent, the highest of any sector in the S&P 500 (3), while a 2014 report found that 32 executives of the nation's largest for-profit health insurers received a total of $548.4 million in cash and stock options in the previous three years. (4)

Fast forward to today, as Hillary and Bernie duke it out over health care. Bernie's plan is solid, Medicare for all, national health insurance (NHI) as supported by many studies over the years, including the classic 2013 study by Jerry Friedman, Ph.D., professor of economics at the University of Massachusetts, of its costs and how it will be paid for. To briefly summarize -- all Americans will be covered with comprehensive coverage, with full choice of doctor and hospital, anywhere in the country, with 95 percent of individuals, families and employers paying less than they do now. (5) Public financing would be far more efficient with less waste and bureaucracy than with today's 1,300 private insurers in our multi-payer system. Health care would become based on need instead of ability to pay.

But here comes Hillary, claiming in recent days (as Bernie is climbing in the polls) that NHI would overwhelm the middle class with new taxes and that the ACA will work if we just tweak it around the edges, without offering any substantial reform and disregarding its many flaws nearly six years after its enactment in 2010:

  • 29 million Americans still uninsured, with tens of millions underinsured.
  • 20 states have opted out of Medicaid expansion, a cornerstone of the ACA's way to improve access to care.
  • No price controls with no cost containment in sight. (6)
  • Decreasing value of health insurance under the ACA as costs are being shifted to patients, such as through benefit designs that limit access, higher premiums and deductibles, not covering out-of-network care, denial of services, restricted drug formularies, and narrow definitions of medical necessity, especially for mental health care. (7)
  • Widespread profiteering as corporate stakeholders game the system.
  • Increased bureaucracy and waste, as illustrated by privatized Medicaid (e.g. administration of the expanded Medicaid program takes up 22.5 percent of the federal government's total expenditures for the program, more than 11 times the administrative overhead of traditional Medicare. (8)
  • Increasing health care fraud, accelerated by electronic health records, with fraud now estimated to account for 10 percent of health care costs. (9)

My just-released book, The Human Face of ObamaCare: Promises vs. Reality and What Comes Next, compares the three basic reform alternatives facing us in this election year: (1) continuation of the ACA, with improvements as needed; (2) replacing the ACA with a Republican plan (which has yet to surface); and (3) single-payer NHI. Table 1 displays their comparative features: (10)

2016-01-23-1453584882-6519048-BlogFigure1.jpg

As Hillary will not acknowledge, the ACA is a subsidized bailout for a failing private health insurance industry. The ACA needs more than a few tweaks around the edges to meet its goals of ensuring access to affordable health care. It was never designed to provide universal access, and we need to recognize its failings. If we look at experience since the 1980s and facts on the ground, it becomes obvious that Bernie's plan needs our full support.

As documented in Michael Corcoran's excellent piece recently in Truthout, Hillary has received more money from the pharmaceutical industry than any other candidate in either party during the 2016 election cycle, while health care industries have paid her $2.8 million in speaking fees between 2013 and 2015. (11) She clearly has conflicts of interest and is posturing about her commitment to real health care reform. Enough of demagoguery, distortion, and misinformation about health care reform, as are offered by most Republicans, and now by Hillary, who should know better. Her health care "plan" went nowhere in the 1990s. Let's not let it happen again.

References:
  1. Will, GF. Coming next, Clinton's year one. Newsweek 123 (4), January 24, 1994.
  2. Geyman, JP. Hijacked: The Road to Single Payer in the Aftermath of Stolen Health Care Reform. Monroe, ME. Common Courage Press, 2010.
  3. Soltas, E. Nobody should get rich off Obamacare. Bloomberg View, December 3, 2013.
  4. UNITE HERE. The irony of Obamacare, March 2014.
  5. Friedman, J. Funding H. R. 676: The Expanded and Improved Medicare for All Act. How We Can Afford a National Single-Payer Health Plan. Physicians for a National Health Plan. Chicago, IL. July 31, 2013. Available at: htpp://www.pnhp.org/sites/default/files/Funding%20HR%20676_Friedman_final_7.31.13.pdf
  6. Geyman, JP. Can we ever achieve affordable health care in the U. S.? Huffington Post, November 23, 2015.
  7. Geyman, JP. The continued degradation of health insurance under the ACA. Huffington Post, December 3, 2015.
  8. Geyman, JP. Growing bureaucracy and fraud in U. S. health care. Huffington Post, December 8, 2015.
  9. Buchheit, P. Private health care as an act of terrorism. Common Dreams, July 20, 2015.
  10. Geyman, JP. The Human Face of ObamaCare: Promises vs. Reality and What Comes Next. Friday Harbor, WA. Copernicus Healthcare, 2016, p. 203.
  11. Corcoran, M. Hillary Clinton declares war on single-payer health care. Truthout, January 21, 2016.

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot