It's becoming increasingly clear that it's game over for Mayor Bing, but if that's the case, crowning Council President Charles Pugh or President Pro-Tem Gary Brown by extension would be a huge mistake.
We read this week that the business community is on Mayor Bing and that should come as no surprise; they've been there for a while now. They outwardly expressed their displeasure with the mayor over the de-railing of the M1 Light Rail project.
According to a letter that was sent out by Downtown Detroit Partnership Chair Cindy Pasky, the business community is upset that they were not at the table when the decision to pull the plug was made. Pasky said, "the fact that they were not is completely unacceptable."
During the Mackinac Conference this past summer, Mayor Bing complained that he wasn't getting enough help: "I get a lot of lip service from a lot of people about wanting to be supportive, but not much help," he said. "Everybody has opinions. What we need is more help meeting our many needs."
Asked who he was referring to, Bing singled out the business community. So the business community cashed out on Mayor Bing sometime ago.
Along with them are city labor unions and city residents who on a daily basis express displeasure with Bing's leadership. Bing, who ran on a platform of being a businessman who knew what it took to solve Detroit's problems, has not had any success dealing with the city's massive problems of poverty and unemployment; nearly 40 percent of Detroit residents and half of all children live in poverty. Real unemployment is in the area of 50 percent. Additionally, there are problems with the bus system and public lighting. Some 20 percent of 88,000 streetlights not working.
So now the push will begin: How to best deal with Mayor Bing, particularly at a time when the city is in such financial peril. Let him ride out his term, (the next election is not until November 2013) or make him an offer he can't or won't refuse to leave now?
The best-case scenario would appear to be the appointment of an Emergency Manager who would for all intents and purposes become the city's mayor for the next two years. If the feeling is Bing has to go -- and sooner rather than later -- this would appear to be the only option.
Whatever is ultimately decided on Bing, we cannot crown either Charles Pugh, the president of City Council, or his comrade President Pro Tem Gary Brown the heir apparent in Detroit leadership. Detroit has failed miserably in picking its leaders, which is why the city stands on the brink of disaster today. It's time to make a change in our thinking and voting.
Keep in mind: Though they like to claim they're not responsible when it's convenient, City Council's current leaders are just as accountable as Mayor Bing. Let's not forget:
There are countless examples of City Council not voting in the best interest of the people. Council's responsibilities are not limited to its Charter-mandated duties; members should get as much credit for what's wrong as they would expect when things are right.
The common belief is that for Detroit to rebuild, it must first remake itself, and that should include those we place in office. However it is decided that Mayor Bing is dismissed, as leaders of City Council, Charles Pugh and Gary Brown specifically must be dismissed, too.
No sacred cows, no heir apparent.
Detroit Spikes Light-Rail Project, Strains Ties With Private Boosters
Bing fires back at business leaders, defends expanded bus transit
Thank you Mr. Bennett! You've made an excellent case why democracy just doesn't work. Oh wait; are you just wagging your finger at Detroiters, or do you think that any group (city, state, or nation) who picks/votes for a bad leader should loose their right to pick their own leaders?
You have NOT made the case with me sir. A "mayor" is not to be "appointed". BTW, what suburb do live in?
Bing is a disappointment, granted. He has allowed too many opportunities go that have nothing to do with the Council. As a business owner, he should know better. I'm really not sure what happened there, but he dropped the ball big time.
The Council.... *sigh* They need to get their crap together and the community needs to be looking over their collective shoulders every second. Obviously they can't be trusted to make good decisions. How do you discipline poor employees? You put them on probation and close supervision. So as voters, that's what we have to do. We have to be on them with every decision. We have to educate ourselves. Be in their faces every day, day in and day out.
There is too much at stake not to.
This is a very important point that Mr. Bennett has ignored.
This is simply not true. The aim of PA 4 and its preceding law is to work as efficiently and quickly as possible so as to return the community to local control in a stable condition. The EFM authority has been used in the past in Michigan communities such as Ecorse, Hamtramck, and Highland Park, and these entities have been returned to local control after sufficient time.
"If voters don't like the EM or what he or she is doing, they can't vote them out. "
A financial manager has a singular aim to restore structural solvency to the municipality. The fact that they are appointed at all indicates that previous efforts with limited powers have failed. The very existence of an EFM tells us that there are parties that were previously unwilling to make concessions, so it's clear that some actions taken by the EFM to draw these concessions will be unpopular with some people. This doesn't change the fact that they must take place.
"He has allowed too many opportunitÂies go that have nothing to do with the Council."
What opportunities does this list include?