(My comment is subjective and thus prone to errors.)
This mirrors my own thoughts on the topic. I have noted certain anomalies in press behaviour that would seem to suggest a concern or irritation with the way the game has changed.
In several cases the press (blogsphere and MSM alike) writes stories that are wrong, or at least off-the-mark, even when there is plenty of documentation to the contrary. This was visible in both the Jeremiah Wright and the Bittergate cases. In both cases, there was damning commentary from press commentators about the effect of these issues on the primaries - AFTER polls and other documentation gave very good indication that no such effect was visible. It gave off an impression that the actual commentators *could not believe* that the press was unable to beat the candidate down.
"Cool Heads for Obama'08"
"Support & Constructive Criticism"




Loading comments…
Posted April 17, 2008 | 04:33 PM (EST)