More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
John Kiriakou

GET UPDATES FROM John Kiriakou
 

It's Time for Turkish Leadership on Syria

Posted: 12/31/11 05:46 PM ET

As the new year begins and Syria lurches toward civil war, there is no logical scenario where Bashar al-Assad can legitimately hold onto power without killing many thousands more of his people than he already has. United Nations estimates of more than 5,000 dead since the uprising began in early 2011 seem quaint compared to the more than 20,000 people Assad's father, Hafez, killed over a two-week period in Hama in 1982. For his part, Bashar has just begun.

So far, the entire international community has shunned the Syrian people. The Arab League last week sent observers to Homs, the scene of horrific brutality against unarmed civilians. The observers canvassed the town, interviewed a handful of people, and reported to the press, essentially, "What atrocities? We didn't see any atrocities."

At the United Nations, the Russians and Chinese have made it clear that they will block any Security Council action against Syria, no matter how many casualties accrue. The French tried almost a year ago to raise the alarm in New York, but nobody else was willing to make a commitment and Syria is barely on the agenda there anymore.

NATO hasn't been any better. Despite some protestors in Syria going to demonstrations with signs saying, "Where is NATO?" Secretary General Anders Rasmussen said in October that the body has "no intention whatsoever" of intervening. Normal diplomatic niceties notwithstanding, Rasmussen's statement was essentially the back-of-the-hand to Syrian protestors.

The Obama Administration from the beginning of the uprising has shown that it does not have the stomach for involvement. Libya, with its pure oil and proximity to Western Europe, was one issue. Syria is an entirely different animal, although the stakes in Syria are much higher than they were in Libya.

Bashar al-Assad's downfall would shake the Iranian regime to its foundations and would isolate Iran in ways that sanctions never could. Syria is arguably Iran's closest friend and ally in the world, it is the conduit for money and weapons to Hizballah in Lebanon, and it allows Iran, its advisors and its weapons to be positioned that much closer to Israel.

So if the Arab League, the United Nations, NATO, and the U.S. have no intention of helping the Syrian people, who can? Frankly, only Turkey has the national interests, the means and the domestic political will to get the job done. Prime Minister Erdogan has expressed support for a five-kilometer "buffer zone" inside Syrian territory to protect Syrian refugees (and to stop them from flooding into Turkey, creating a humanitarian crisis and taking Turkish jobs); the Syrian opposition has asked for a 30-kilometer buffer zone.

But so far, the Turks have not proposed anything else, least of all any real assistance to the Turkey-based Free Syrian Army or the Syrian National Council that would allow them to work to overthrow Bashar al-Assad. Erdogan speaks frequently about Turkey taking its place as the region's primary power, but doesn't back it up with much more than threatening Cyprus over drilling for natural gas in the Mediterranean, training Libyan troops in Turkey and promising "assistance" for Iraq.

These actions beg the question, "Where's the beef?" If Turkey is serious about being a real regional power, it will have to take on some of the more difficult, or even intractable issues, like Syria. 2012 will likely see the fall of Bashar al-Assad, whether in an expanded popular uprising or from a bullet to the back of the head. Turkey must be on the scene if it is going to have any say in the makeup of the new Syria. The time for Turkish leadership is now. The world will soon see if Ankara is up to the task.

John Kiriakou was a CIA officer from 1990 until 2004, and senior investigator on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee from 2009 until 2011.

 
As the new year begins and Syria lurches toward civil war, there is no logical scenario where Bashar al-Assad can legitimately hold onto power without killing many thousands more of his people than he...
As the new year begins and Syria lurches toward civil war, there is no logical scenario where Bashar al-Assad can legitimately hold onto power without killing many thousands more of his people than he...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 45
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
Wozzeck
Pearl Bay, Australia
09:46 AM on 01/24/2012
The author has been arrested:
"Ex-CIA officer charged with leaking information to journalists"

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jan/23/ex-cia-officer-arrested-jounalist-leaks
photo
Djay0252
American First, Second, and ALWAYS
04:12 PM on 01/10/2012
I do not believe getting into Syrian affairs would be in Turkey's best interest.
09:42 AM on 01/03/2012
Mr. Kiriakou, as a former counter-terrorism officer of the CIA, should be asking the questions: (1) After Assad what; and, (2) what happens during the transition period. Is Mr. Kiriakou in favor of a full-fledged "free for all" civil war in Syria along the pseudo-intellectual principles of the neo-cons that were advocating the break-up of Syria and Iraq before they tried to advance this agenda during the Bush (son) Administration years with the invasion of Iraq? Neither Turkey nor Israel are enthused of having this sort of instability at their respective borders with Syria and our hopefully knows how to avoid a repetition of the Iraq experience. Mr. Kiriakou references the belligerent stance of Turkey towards the gas exploration and exploitation efforts of the independent island Republic of Cyprus. Is it possible that Turkey is simply targeting a potential annexation of Syrian coastal territory if Syria were to dissolve in a civil war in a repeat of the 1930s Turkish underhanded acquisition of Alexandretta (Iskenderun)? There is money to be made out of the undersea natural gas fields in the Eastern Mediterranean.
11:36 AM on 01/02/2012
The world community has shunned the Syrian people as have the hair-triggered protest movements. That's because Israel isn't involved. The same applies to Libya, Egypt, Bahrain. There has certainly been motive enough - national security forces murdering citizens in numbers that dwarf any legitimate action in which Israel was involved against terrorists.

If you needed evidence of misplaced priorities -- or worse -- in the international community at any level, this is it.
09:15 AM on 01/02/2012
Erdogan definitely needs a regional leadership role. Assad's out, but he can still pull with Iran:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmffgIqlAYA
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Sharmine Narwani
08:55 AM on 01/02/2012
None of Turkey's business, frankly. None of yours either. If you were actually interested in the welfare of people, you would be knee-deep in the genocide taking place in another "Arab" country - Somalia - instead of working toward manufacturing a self-serving crisis in Syria. You might also take note of the 35 Kurds killed by Turkey in one hit over the weekend. Happy new year...
09:22 AM on 01/02/2012
Curious. As I watch democracies struggling with growing inequality, massive taxpayer "bailouts" of the rich and irresponsible, and the lack of credible and creative leadership, AND consider what's happening as "Arab Spring" gives way to disturbing successes of various Islamic movements that imperil the rights of women, gays and lesbians, freethinkers and minorities---I actually feel a LITTLE bit of sympathy for Assad. Not much, mind you (he does head a despotic regime that supports terror groups like Hizbullah)...but we've seen how a quiet dictatorship can at least keep people from killing each other. In the absence of robust secular democratic traditions and a deep-rooted sense of human rights, I'm not so sure that the collapse of the Assad regime, nasty though it is, is desirable.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Sharmine Narwani
10:06 AM on 01/02/2012
I don't disagree with much of what you say, although I reject outright the characterization of Hezbollah as a "terror group." That is just a Washington narrative. Hezbollah is a legitimate Lebanese resistance group that was created entirely in response to Israel's invasion and occupation of Southern Lebanon, and is entitled under every bit of international law to repulse Israeli aggression against Lebanon's sovereignty, which continues to this day.

Assad's government may be the only thing holding Syria together as a nation-state today. We have seen in other heavily-sectarian countries like Iraq and Lebanon what can happen when there is no strong centralized government. Far be it for me to defend autocracy though. Until the Iraqis, Lebanese and Syrians are free of external machinations to undermine independent-minded leadership, a strong regime may actually be just what the doctor ordered. I suspect that our own financial crisis will do much to inhibit our aggressive interventions in that part of the world - at which point, I can foresee a loosening of the reins by those regimes. They have an existential stake in maintaining an iron fist until we are out of the region - after that, all bets are off.
09:03 PM on 01/02/2012
Of course it is Turkey's business. Did you look at a map recently? This is a country that sent in armies of Kurdish terrorists that caused immense death and destruction in Turkey until recently. So palleezzz!

35 Kurds killed by Turks? I thought they were criminals plying their trade in the middle of a war zone, frequenting the same passes that PKK uses. Hipocracy of people who pretend to care more about the lives of Turkish citizens than Turks themselves! Worse part is you probably know the truth about this accident. So palleezzz!

Having said that, I do not see what more Turkey can do other than what it already does. Probably there is more going on than we know. Maybe a security zone if things get worse and Arab League fails completely.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anfanger1
01:35 AM on 01/02/2012
It is amazing and dissapointing to me that when i posted here in the form of a rehtorical question to John Kiriakou a comment asking "how many americans (his own people) were killed by the US government ( ie, abraham lincoln ) during the civil war, it was blocked. The point being that the use of the phrase "killing his own people" to describe civil war casualties, is a framing technique or propaganda tool used to promote regime change, and to distort the reality of a situation for the purpose of promoting a military objective.
photo
unfoxworthy
We:ScottOlsens,the misfits,out to change the world
01:13 AM on 01/02/2012
A HUGE Obama failure...inciting an Arab Spring...inciting a Persian Spring
and once the fuse is lit
walking away from those affected. We Americans have burned though our political capital.
We are no longer a beacon - we are a weathered billboard...with an old message barely discernable, but vividly recalled.
If you're in for a dime - you're in for a dollar.
I have no want for taking on the Syrian govt., but I have every want to not fail the Syrian people.
12:00 AM on 01/02/2012
We should at least be funneling arms to the insurgents through Turkey. I am told the border is very porous and the Syrian army is otherwise occupied. Who knows it might already be happening. The CIA won't tell and the Turks certainly won't. Turkey can certainly pay a little more than lip service the Free Syrian Army or the Syrian National Council.
09:14 PM on 01/01/2012
This is such nonsense. What exactly is he suggesting that Turks do? Send a whole army in to dislodge Bashar? What would be the legal basis for it? Wherenis UN ans Arab League? More importantly, what exactly is the vital interest of Turkey this will serve? They are not actually attacking Turkey in case it was not noticed.

A security zone is very feasible and makes sense but it certainly is not the kind of thing that will make Bashar pack up and leave. If it is not so wide that it forces direct confrontation with the whole Syrian army, a zone carved out by Turkey may force Bashar to implement some real reforms. Though we all know how these things end up.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anfanger1
12:49 AM on 01/02/2012
COUNTERTERRORISM MEANS TERROR FROM THE OTHER SIDE....
photo
Wozzeck
Pearl Bay, Australia
01:13 PM on 01/01/2012
Interesting article by Scott Horton dealing with the author's credibility:
"Kiriakou Recants"

http://www.harpers.org/archive/2010/01/hbc-90006432
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Harris Ace Jackson
existentialist agnostic
06:52 AM on 01/01/2012
Yeah let them trade one dictator for another. Great plan. :/
You must have gotten your inspiration from Egypt's smashing success.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
12:24 AM on 01/01/2012
If they go in the EU will use it as a reason not to let them in. If they stay out the EU will say it proves they don't care about human rights and again wont let them in. Why should Turkey fight for causes that we think are worthy but not worthy enough to do anything about.