iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

John Lumea

John Lumea

Posted: August 11, 2008 08:42 AM

The John And Elizabeth Edwards Affair


Let's cut through this, shall we?

From late 1995 to early 1997, President Bill Clinton engaged in an extramarital sexual relationship with Monica Lewinsky.

This story broke in January 1998, and --- as a direct response to Clinton's subsequent efforts to hide the relationship --- in December 1998, the U.S. House of Representatives impeached Clinton on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice.

The U.S. Senate eventually acquitted Clinton in February 1999 --- but, by then, the damage had been done. The brute fact of what happened from late 1995 until the Senate's acquittal in early 1999 was a threshold --- and, arguably, determinative --- factor in Al Gore's loss, and George Bush's elevation to the presidency, in 2000.

Fast-forward to 2006, when John Edwards --- who basically started preparing for 2008, the day after he and John Kerry lost in 2004 --- was contemplating exactly when he might announce a second run for the presidency.

Roughly in mid 2006, Edwards engaged in (and, he says, ended) an extramarital sexual relationship of his own, with Rielle Hunter.*

Both John and Elizabeth Edwards say that, shortly after that --- still in 2006 --- John told Elizabeth about the affair.

At that point, John and Elizabeth Edwards had an opportunity. They could decide that, with easily resurrected memories of Bill and Monica and impeachment lying just below the surface and thus ripe to be picked open by Republicans and salted like a freshly-descabbed sore, what John Edwards had just done with Rielle Hunter was a ticking time bomb that --- presidential aspirations and two years of groundwork and planning be damned --- took a 2008 run off the table.

Instead, in late December 2006 --- just eight years after the House impeached Bill Clinton --- John Edwards, acting with Elizabeth's blessing, declared his candidacy. It was a candidacy that John and Elizabeth could sustain only via a cover-up --- only by keeping the unkeepable secret of Rielle Hunter.

And keep their secret John and Elizabeth did, until now. From December 2006 until this past Friday, John and Elizabeth Edwards engaged themselves in a grand public deception against Democrats in particular --- and the American people in general --- about Edwards's affair. They did this --- both John and Elizabeth did it --- in light of, and despite, what Bill Clinton had done to their own party and to the country from late 1995 until early 1999.

So don't feel too sorry for Elizabeth Edwards. She knew what she was doing. So did John.

Not only was it a lie when Elizabeth, in 2007, was using every stump she could find, to tell all who would listen what a great husband John was, while John sat there in aw-shucks silence. It had been only nine years since Bill Clinton had dragged his party, his country, and the presidency itself through the gutter, for doing the very same thing John and Elizabeth were doing for every single day of their campaign: lying about sex.

We Americans have short and forgiving memories. But not that short.

It's easy to forget that, even before Bill Clinton's recently strained relationship with African-Americans, he was having to work out his political and national redemption. Let's remember, though, that Clinton's mishandling of the Monica bombshell effectively neutered his entire second term. It's fair to say that, whatever the stated rationale of the Clinton Foundation, the unstated rationale is to help redeem Clinton for what, as President, he did to --- and didn't do for --- the country and the world, as a direct result of his inability to control his sexual appetite and his refusal to tell the truth about it afterwards.

But don't kid yourself. Bill Clinton remains a long way from redemption. We can pretend to have forgotten what he did. But we haven't forgotten. And we hadn't forgotten, when John Edwards announced in December 2006.

John and Elizabeth Edwards's determination to play roulette with that history and those memories --- and, thus, with the futures both of the Democratic Party and of the country --- betrays an arrogance that is quite shocking, when you think about it.

In the statement he released on Friday, John Edwards said (emphasis mine):

I was and am ashamed of my conduct and choices, and I had hoped that it would never become public. With my family, I took responsibility for my actions in 2006 and today I take full responsibility publicly.


Elizabeth Edwards said, in her own statement (emphasis mine):

This was our private matter, and I frankly wanted it to be private because as painful as it was I did not want to have to play it out on a public stage as well. Because of a recent string of hurtful and absurd lies in a tabloid publication, because of a picture falsely suggesting that John was spending time with a child it wrongly alleged he had fathered outside our marriage, our private matter could no longer be wholly private.... John has spoken in a long on-camera interview I hope you watch. Admitting one's mistakes is a hard thing for anyone to do, and I am proud of the courage John showed by his honesty in the face of shame. The toll on our family of news helicopters over our house and reporters in our driveway is yet unknown. But now the truth is out, and the repair work that began in 2006 will continue. I ask that the public, who expressed concern about the harm John's conduct has done to us, think also about the real harm that the present voyeurism does and give me and my family the privacy we need at this time.


Really, Elizabeth? Bill Clinton was impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives for lying about his extramarital affair, and --- only nine years later --- you and your husband deserve to be able to lie about his own affair, while he runs for President of the United States? The real problem is that the National Enquirer found out about it? The real problem is news helicopters overhead and reporters in the driveway of your $26 million house?

You're blaming the media for this? How very Clintonian.

And do remind me, again, how leveraging your husband's campaign --- and thus his potential nomination and election --- on a lie was a demonstration of "the courage John showed by his honesty in the face of shame." Do you really believe that Democrats would have been hailing John's "courage" and "honesty," if he --- and not Barack Obama --- were the presumptive nominee? Are they hailing it now?

It's all very nice to wish that we Americans could be more "Euro" about the private lives of our politicians. I, too, wish that we did not believe that infidelities of the sort that Edwards and Clinton engaged in necessarily should have any bearing on our trust in --- and on the effectiveness of --- our public servants.

But that's not the country we live in.

There is no question but that John and Elizabeth Edwards continue to experience real pain in their marriage, as a result of John's actions in 2006. We all should be sorry for that, and should respect their need and their right to deal with that in their own way.

But private is never entirely private in American politics --- least of all, when it comes to sexual indiscretion.

That John and Elizabeth Edwards pretend, even now --- even after Bill Clinton --- that the real problem is that the United States is not France just adds insult to the injury they were all too willing to inflict on the country they proclaim to love.


* Hunter's name is a bit of a pastiche. Born Lisa Druck, Edwards's former mistress appears to have spent most of the 1980s in New York and then moved to Los Angeles, where she married Alexander Hunter in 1991. At around that time, she was pursuing an acting career, using the stage name "Rielle Hunter," which she legally adopted in 1994. Hunter and her husband divorced in 1999.

 
 
  • Comments
  • 30
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Sandy Goodman
Retired Producer for NBC Nightly News
03:33 PM on 08/12/2008
I'm with John Lumea 100 per cent. Edwards put the whole Democratic party and, potentially, the whole future of this country at risk because he couldn't control his libido, and his wife went right along with him. And, as Lumea reminds us emphatically, he had the whole Clinton affair in front of him to remind him of the disaster the could befall everything he stood for and everybody who supported him, and ignored it. What selfishness. And what lying, arguing he told 99 per cent of the truth when he left out the single most important truth. And who knows about paternity and the rest of it. You can trust him as far as the baby can throw him. No this isn't France or Italy, and if he likes those countries' rules or mores better, let him move to one of them and run for office there, or pass their bar and return to chasing ambulances. Another thing: The Enquirer is not like other supermarket tabloids. When they say something about somebody important, they usually have the evidence to back it up: as they showed with Jackie Gleason's stomach cancer, Lewinsky, OJ, and Rush Limbaugh's drug addiction to mention just some cases. You don't have to like what they do or how they do it to acknowledge that they sometimes scoop everyone else and get it right.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Kathy Harter
01:57 AM on 08/12/2008
Just once I'd like to see the wife of a cheating husband/politician say, I'm outta here, I'm not an enabler of a man who has zero respect for me or the voters.

I will never vote for Hillary Clinton because she went on television and said, "I'm not standing by my man like Tammy Wynette," and then she did exactly that. Through the entire sordid mess. Talk about her first lie to the American public.

Elizabeth Edwards has young children and a life-threatening disease. It's possible she can't cope with a divorce. But she could have said no to the candidacy. She could have said no to the lies.
09:50 AM on 08/12/2008
Did it ever occur to you that wives of high-power poiliticians are themselves high power women with ambitions to match. In these relationships, I expect that sexualiity is way down on the list of priorities for both partners and the accommodations they come to in order to maintain their respective power positions may be quite different from the average couple. The last thing an ambitious wife in a power couple is goig to do is say I'm outta here.
photo
saami
Cranky old lady
03:05 PM on 08/13/2008
Some people marry for life and don't give up on each other when the chips are down or when the person doesn't live up to their end of the bargain. The person he has zero respect for is himself. He is caught up in the hubris of his celebrity and has some midlife crises that makes him need to prove that he is handsome, virile and attractive to younger women. It is pathetic and sad. Women who choose to stay with their husbands, just might love them and do not walk away from someone they love. People in affairs do not think clearly or rationally and those surviving them are just trying to stay afloat. What happens in their marriage is their business. They made a huge mistake in thinking they could keep it secret and pursue their dreams. Why aren't you upset about John and Cindy McCain? He had an affair with her while he was still married and then dumped his wife and kids for Cindy, trophy wife (money, good connections and young.) Oh, I forgot he has family values.
07:00 PM on 08/11/2008
I have always wondered how many of the male talking heads (or female) or legislators could say they never never cheated sexually on a partner? People in the public eye who are petted and fawned over seem to fall into this trap. The higher up the more they do it. Than when caught they say they "made a mistake".
All and all this makes no difference to people in their every day life. Dosn't bring down gas prices, clean up polution or make life better in any way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Morcat
07:11 AM on 08/12/2008
Agreed. What it does, however, is distracting from the issues in this presidential campaign. The outcome of the campaign will very likely determine whether this nation survives, regardless of what happens in the Edwards' marriage.
04:47 PM on 08/11/2008
Amen.
04:12 PM on 08/11/2008
Perhaps John and Elizabeth Edwards thought the American media was not scurrilous enough to dig up an affair that was finished and no one's business but those involved and perhaps they also thought that the American people were intelligent enough to separate John Edwards' politics from his personal life. Too bad they were wrong on both counts as we would be proven to be a better country had they been correct.
04:10 PM on 08/11/2008
It's over. It's done. The guy couldn/t get elected dogcatcher now. Can we please just let it die.
03:55 PM on 08/11/2008
"So don't feel too sorry for Elizabeth Edwards. She knew what she was doing. So did John."

I don't and never did! When I watched the footage of John Edwards repeatedly denying the affair and waxing on and on about how it would be impossible for him to cheat on such an "intelligent, sexy and loving" wife as Elizabeth, it revealed just how nakedly ambitious and self-serving they BOTH are!

Clearly he didn't think she was so "intelligent, sexy and loving" to not cheat on her, and she knew it. He could have simply responded, "I'm not going to respond to any intrusions in my marriage." If that didn't satisfy the publick, than so be it. But it wouldn't have been a lie about the affair or their marriage.
03:08 PM on 08/11/2008
Great article and great insight into this mess. Yes, both Edwards were trying to sell us snake oil.
And I am sure glad they didn't succeed. At least in Hilliary's case with her scum bag cheater, she
didn't (as far as we know) help him to cover it up, to save her own face.
02:54 PM on 08/11/2008
Too much news satuation on the Edawrd's affair. Quit beating a dead horse!
02:46 PM on 08/11/2008
Clinton didn't just lie about his affair, he lied under oath.

Gore "lost" the election in part because he kept Bill Clinton away from the campaign.

I also believe that if he was able to run for a third term, Bill Clinton would have been elected by a landslide.

Yes, John Edwards was stupid for engaging in the affair and now he's pretty much out of politics forever. He paid the price for his arrogance.

Are we done with this story now?
04:43 PM on 08/11/2008
It will only be over when Edwards quits lying. He was forced into telling one truth and now we must wait for the rest of the story to come out. What about he money Rielle was paid then and is being paid now, was the affair begun and over when he said it was, and is it really his child? These are just a few things that need to be cleared up. There may be laws that have been broken here.
05:14 PM on 08/11/2008
He's out of politics for good now.

I don't care if the child is his--why should you?
I don't care if he's holding things back about his affair.
I don't want to dig
any deeper into his sex life. Do you?

He's admitted to cheating on his wife. His career in the political
arena is over.

At the moment, there is no proof that he broke any laws. If it anything ever comes to light, then we can deal with it. At the moment it's just speculation and gossip.

Meanwhile, in the world where things matter...we should be more outraged about what is happening to our constitution. What is happening in Russia. The laws that our current administration is breaking.

The Edwards story pales when compared to things that are actually affecting our country.

But sex sells and the stuff that really mattters is just too hard and too unglamorous for most journalists to pursue.

Just think if the Enquirer went after Bush like they went after Edwards? Justice might truly prevail.
02:36 PM on 08/11/2008
Seriously, does everyone have to write a column on the John Edwards affair?
02:16 PM on 08/11/2008
Yes, they did. They did not care about anyone else of the Party or country. They deserve each other and whatever comes at them.
01:43 PM on 08/11/2008
Let me remind you all of one thing, just one. If Elizabeth and John Edwards had not gone ahead with his candidacy, issues such as healthcare and poverty or social justice would not have seen the light of day in the campaigns of either Clinton OR Obama.
04:44 PM on 08/11/2008
Amen. As for the legitimacy of the outrage directed at J&E Edwards in this and other posts, here's my two cents:

Our business: the $114,000 in campaign contributions that funded Hunter's webisodes.
Not our business: Everything else about this sad and tawdry affair.
11:23 AM on 08/12/2008
Think not?

The main task of politicians is to determine what issues the voters care about, and to demonstrate the proper empathy or anger or whatever else the pollsters determine will sway the voters.

I'm sure that, in the absence of John Edwards, attention to those issues would have been provided by the other candidates, in the most precisely proportioned and packaged manner that modern polling science would allow.
Jamchinadian
The naked truth is better than a well dressed lie
12:55 PM on 08/11/2008
Okay Mr. Lumea, you've made your point. I have one question for you. Why is it that these failings are so destructive to Democrats but not to Republicans? Why is there no price to pay for McCain with his many affairs, his abandonment of his injured wife, not to mention his public sexist insults to his current wife? What are your insights on this phenomenom?
03:52 PM on 08/11/2008
I agree with Drew Westen's assessment that the media is applying a double standard here.

Westen's thoughts are at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/drew-westen/catching-the-wrong-john-w_b_118064.html
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
biglover
06:04 PM on 08/11/2008
They are equally destructive in the real world - but in the world of who owns the media, the repuglicans have a far better chance of destroying folks since the control the agenda - regardless of those who believe there is a liberal media. There may be liberal journalists who work for the media, but they don't control the message. Their bosses do and since they like collecting a paycheck, don't hold your breath for anything substantive except what is sent down in the daily memos from the powers that be in the media.
09:37 AM on 08/11/2008
Very insightful piece--excellent points--adult, sensible view--which is why many here will probably go rabid over them.
11:46 PM on 08/11/2008
I turned my TV off six years ago and now I'm ready to turn off the blogosphere. It seems more has been covered about this affair in a few short days than about the entire Bushco bag of crimes against humanity in the last five. The left-wing blogosphere is leading this endless stream of juicy reporting. Please please keep things in perspective and get back to concentrating on reporting on current affairs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Over40
01:29 AM on 08/12/2008
Amen to this comment!
06:47 PM on 08/14/2008
I completely agree with you, it's sad.
04:15 PM on 08/14/2008
Sexual affairs are PRIVATE matters and concern only those intimately involved.

Those in public life deserve privacy in their sex lives unless their affair is TREASON and poses a genuine threat to the security of our nation - then it should be exposed!

The media chooses to waste time and energy on NONSENSE and SHOULD BE LIED to about matters that are none of anyone's concern!

Focus on REAL ISSUES and be of SERVICE to real journalism, your country and it's constituents in this crucial time and leave bedroom matters behind closed doors.

Media fixation with sensationalism is far more obscene than any affair or lie to keep it PRIVATE!

Please talk about something that may help voters make an intelligent choice in this upcoming election???!!! Leave the Edwards family alone already and stop making self-righteous judgments!