EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

John Lundberg

GET UPDATES FROM John Lundberg
 

A Big Win For Experimental Poetry

Posted: 11/22/09

If you read a review of Keith Waldrop's "Transcendental Studies: A Trilogy," this year's winner of the National Book Award for Poetry, there's a good chance it will include the word "postmodern" or "avant-garde." These are terms that put a lot of readers on guard, signaling experimental verse. And it only takes a glance at "Transcendental Studies" to see that Waldrop's poetry isn't the sort that will ever turn up in a hallmark card.

In an interview with the website The Jivin' Ladybug (we really are in avant-garde territory here) Waldrop suggested that poetry is "having nothing to say and saying it," explaining, "In my work you could find statements here and there. It isn't what I'm writing for. What I'm after is closer to music than to philosophy or information in that sense." And that aim can be confusing for a reader expecting a poem to make sense in a more traditional manner. Waldrop addressed the issue:

What I write down is a kind of script for something that sounds. I find people often don't read it that way. They have a hard time translating from lines on a page to. . .part of this is the way poetry is taught in schools and such. You get a poem and you're supposed to figure out what it means. Once you know what it means, you throw the poem away because you have the meaning. That is the destruction of poetry. I want the words to remain and if people don't know the meaning of them I don't think that's as bad as losing the sound.

Waldrop's methods of composition are also, at times, unorthodox. He employed a collage technique to create "Transcendental Studies" --building poems, in part, by combining phrases from other works. Waldrop has explained the process as "a way to explore, not necessarily the thing I am tearing up, but the thing I am contriving to build out of torn pieces." He described his method for composing part of "Transcendental Studies" in an interview to the National Book Foundation:

I put three books in front of me, all prose, a novel, then something psychological, then whatever I happened to have around. I would take phrases from these three books and make some stanzas, four, five six lines. Once I had that I'd make more stanzas of the same number of lines, and when that gave out, after a page or two, I'd say alright I have this poem now and I would take it to the typewriter and type it up and in doing so I would rearrange the stanzas alphabetically.

Alphabetizing stanzas after writing them may seem oddly arbitrary, but the process was important to Waldrop. When a portion of "Transcendental Studies" was translated into French, he instructed the translator to rearrange the stanzas alphabetically after translation--leading to poems that differ considerably from their English counterparts.

What sorts of poems do Waldrop's unorthodox poetics produce? Here a few excerpts from the book

1.

Balancing. Austere. Life-
less. I have tried to keep
context from claiming you.

Without doors. And there are
windows. How far, how
far into the desert have we come?

Rude instruments, product
of my garden. Might also be
different, what I am thinking of.

So you see: it is
not symmetrical, dark
red out of the snow.


2

Enemies for therapy, the
rind of the lime tree
in elaborate garlands.

Strew the table. Let the hall
be garlanded and lit, the will
to break away. Welcome your couches.

Witness these details. Your judgment, my
inclination. Hear. Touch. Taste.
Translate. Fixed: the river.

Disquieting thought, I am not
ultimate, full moon, memory.
Prepare for rout.


3

Here, even, in the
sand. Among the rocks, I have
heard, remnant of a cloud.

Unfleshed, short, thin, pointed.
Independent of you, a
revelation. A great city.

Flatly unknown, you do not
know of yourself, do not know
yourself, not stuck full of nails.

Under such illumination, darkness
becomes terror. Under this high
wall, dark ground.

Long before this week's award, the poet Michael Palmer called Waldrop one of the vital and requisite, semi-secret presences in American letters." His wife Rosmarie, also an accomplished poet, said in the Ladybug interview, "We haven't gotten so much attention that it got to be a bother. We don't have that problem." Let's hope it isn't a problem, because they're going to be getting a lot of attention now.


Keith Waldrop currently teaches at Brown University and edits Burning Deck Press along with his wife.

 
If you read a review of Keith Waldrop's "Transcendental Studies: A Trilogy," this year's winner of the National Book Award for Poetry, there's a good chance it will include the word "postmodern" or "a...
If you read a review of Keith Waldrop's "Transcendental Studies: A Trilogy," this year's winner of the National Book Award for Poetry, there's a good chance it will include the word "postmodern" or "a...
 
  • Comments
  • 29
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
06:08 AM on 11/24/2009
Wait a minute? This is experiment­al and avant-gard­e?

He just wrote this book of poems by taking random sentence fragments out of three different books, putting those into stanzas, then alphabetiz­ing the stanzas.

So rather than end up with something with some kind of meaning we just have gibberish in the form of sentence fragments. And that's all it is, gibberish.

Watch this:
The old photos.
Former Jon wall.
Top state regifting.

NYT's text 9.
Public subway woman.
Colorado.

I made that "poem" by clicking on every section on this site in order from left to right, top to bottom. I then went to the bottom article with a picture. I then took the first word from the headline and made stanzas. Am I pushing any boundaries yet?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Paul David Walker
10:46 AM on 11/23/2009
Excellent, I am also a poet. I am always telling my readers not to try to figure out the meanings, but to experience them. The sounds, rhythms, images and feeling they evoke are more important than the meanings. Life is experience­, not meaning. Embrace the fullness of life, not the approximat­ions of thought that reduce life.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NWBrunette
Blessed Girl
01:31 AM on 11/23/2009
If you don't like it, don't read it. Life is rich and complex. Enjoy your favorite parts and celebrate that everyone else get's to do the same.
11:02 PM on 11/22/2009
All tomorrow's parties
Come and gone
Blue shades of a moon
Captured by eyes
Hallucinat­ing on shrooms
Nothing is what it seems
Light bent apart
Years spent in the cold
Homeless we all are
Just beggars in tow

-me
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gda002
10:45 PM on 11/22/2009
I like to think of two schools of poetic thoughts as doors.
One school wants to have a locked door and you have to find a key to get anything. If you aren't smart enough to find the key, well too bad.

The other one, and the one I prefer, closes the door, but leaves it unlocked with some light showing through the bottom. Anyone can open the door and get something out of it.

Sadly, this sort "experimen­tal" poetry(aka­, stuff people skim and pretend to decipher meaning from) will always be in vogue with some people.
12:57 AM on 11/23/2009
As Waldrop states, it is NOT about "decipheri­ng meaning." Poems are not codes to be cracked, and Waldrop's work as exampled here has nothing to do with being "smart." The virtue of Waldrop's work and the mode of creation he perhaps embodies has to do with being attuned to a wide array of expressive forms and being led into an appreciati­on for previously unrealized capacities for feeling, noticing, and being. Thus, rather than looking strictly for messages, morals, or reductive meanings, treat it like music, or like your life...ass­umign you don't treat those things too dully.
01:25 AM on 11/23/2009
Sadly, that sort of easy superficia­l judgment is host to a litany of false assumption­s. The first being the faulty premise that because you found the work "difficult­" or "locked" that it must fall into the second category for everyone else too. The other premise that's problemati­c with much of art is this ridiculous notion that no special knowledge or "key" should be required. Remember working through Faulkner - or any other challengin­g literature­, art, music- for the first time? Yeah, sometimes it takes work to understand art; the history of art, literature­, music, poetry, as well as science, math, and natural history is strewn with the corpses of misunderst­ood brilliance­. That beauty gets finally recognized when the viewer, listener, or reader opens up, grows up, and comes to it, instead of demanding that art be easy. Claims of inaccessib­ility are the hallmark of the lazy and entitled, the dieing salon; history proves this over and over and over again. Of course, you can say it is not for you, but you cannot judge it as not for the people who understand it, or claim that because you don't get it, that anyone who does is pretending­.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gda002
05:45 PM on 11/23/2009
mdavidson,

That wasn't what I was saying. Of course great art is complex and hard to understand at times. What I guess I was trying to get at, and what I didn't make very clear was that art should be accessible on at least some level immediatel­y, while further viewings, listening or readers serve to deepen the meaning of the art. Though I did not understand Walt Whitman very well, I could still derive some sort of meaning from it, while this man's poem doesn't do much for me and just seems obtuse.
On another level, art should be entertainm­ent to an extent and I think we forget that. Only a select group reads poetry now and its original purpose as entertainm­ent for the masses has been lost. I think there is something incredibly sad in that.
08:48 PM on 11/22/2009
Being unconventi­onal is great if the product does something.­..expresse­s a feeling or a mood in a new and fresh way. eecummings did it a long time ago, with great effect. Taking phrases from other books is a technique used in some writing classes to jar students' imaginatio­ns.. I've heard some nice poems created from them. But this poem doesn't move me in the least. I've seen better poems created by those jigsaw puzzle words assembled on refrigerat­or doors.
08:37 PM on 11/22/2009
Why all the haters? If you don't get it, it must therefore be bad? And why do we always have to "get" everything­? I'm happy to have something elude me and stretch what I think language can do. And as far as I can tell, Waldrop is still using traditiona­l sentence structures and vocabulary­. He's not writing the Ur Sonata, for crying out loud.
01:25 AM on 11/23/2009
bravo
08:25 PM on 11/22/2009
I can see from the comments that many of you don't like the poetry. At least Waldrop is playing with words, instead of spending time in from of the boob tube.

I can't say whether I like the poetry or not. What I do know is that I prefer to hear poetry instead of reading it. Anyone living in NYC should check out the Bowery Poetry Club.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OtayPanky
You're welcome
06:09 PM on 11/22/2009
Globed fruit it ain't.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Caru
Politics is fun to watch.
02:43 PM on 11/22/2009
Oh, oh here's my experiment­al poetry:

Tree falls... down, hits... ground, road blocked.
12:31 PM on 11/22/2009
I'm a terrible singer, so I should simply relabel my singing as experiment­al and success is inevitable­.
11:47 AM on 11/22/2009
Good but it doesn't affect me or impress me. He's no Sylvia Plath. Her poem Daddy is genius.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:34 PM on 11/22/2009
I just read Daddy. The little girl is the foot, her father the boot, her father the devil, a Nazi & she a Jew..... I don't know hoe genus that is, but I am glad I am not Ms Plath.
02:14 AM on 11/23/2009
Sounds like you might need to have another, closer look at it. And then another.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Social Construct
Go left, young man.
11:35 AM on 11/22/2009
For the most part, I am apparently tone deaf when it comes to the musicality of words. In other words, I am a "meaning" type of reader, and I did find some good stuff in the above poem. Kudos to poet Waldrop for receiving recognitio­n for his artistic endeavors.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gurukalehuru
cwtc7
11:31 AM on 11/22/2009
I don't get it.
11:19 AM on 11/22/2009
is good. so is treebough.­com