Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
John Lundberg

GET UPDATES FROM John Lundberg
 

Should Students Be Memorizing Poetry?

Posted: 06/17/2012 2:38 pm

How much value is there in memorizing poetry? Britain's education secretary, Michael Gove, apparently thinks there's a pretty significant amount. He's requiring all of the UK's grammar school children to memorize and recite poems as part of a new, more rigorous national curriculum.

The Guardian summarized some of Gove's plans:


From Year 1, at the age of five, children will be read poems by their teacher as well as starting to learn simple poems by heart and practise recitals.

The programme of study for Year 2 will state that pupils should continue "to build up a repertoire of poems learnt by heart and recite some of these, with appropriate intonation to make the meaning clear".

I don't believe that memorization is common practice in the American education system. At least, I don't remember ever being asked to memorize a poem in school. I think it's significant, though, that the only strong memory I have of studying poetry before college is having to engage with a poem: to reorder some of T.S. Eliot's lines to create a "new" poem. I remember wrestling with what Eliot's images meant before I could do anything with them. I also remember becoming vividly aware, for the first time, of poetry's music, and feeling a little thrill from getting the chance to manipulate it. It was power. Something like giving a boy (admittedly, kind of a geeky boy) a real bow and arrow.

Memorization, I think, has a similar effect. In a Poetry Foundation podcast on the pleasures of memorizing verse, poet Dan Beachy-Quick eloquently described how memorization "inscribes" a poem in one's mind more than a simple reading ever could:

Memorizing a poem, in a strange sort of way, gives that poem access to you more than you're giving yourself access to it. Which is to say that putting the poem in oneself -- in one's memory and mind -- and going through this rote activity until every line of it, every syllable... is present in me, leaves the poem in me. And it's as if it creates a new channel of intelligence in me that isn't mine at all.

Beachy-Quick had just memorized William Bronk's poem "The World," which is kind of an easy one (just four beautiful and melancholy lines). You can feel the "drift of the world" pulling the poem apart as you read it:

I thought that you were an anchor in the drift of the world;
but no: there isn't an anchor anywhere.
There isn't an anchor in the drift of the world. Oh no.
I thought you were. Oh no. The drift of the world.

Reading Bronk's poem reminded me why I memorize poems today. A poem can be a sort of anchor in the drift of the world. Whether it serves as a bit of wisdom that helps keep you centered, or, in my case, as a feeling, a moment of beauty and power that helps keep my other feelings in perspective.

The poet and critic Clive James feels even more strongly than I do. He wrote in his book Cultural Amnesia that "the future of the humanities as a common possession depends on the restoration of a simple, single ideal: getting poetry by heart."

Do you agree? Or do you think forcing a kid to memorize a Shakespeare sonnet is no more useful than forcing him to eat a brussels sprout? Share your thoughts below. And let me know if you had to memorize any poems in school -- and if you still remember them!

 
FOLLOW CULTURE
 
 
  • Comments
  • 92
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:01 PM on 07/06/2012
"Or do you think forcing a kid to memorize a Shakespeare sonnet is no more useful than forcing him to eat a brussels sprout?"

I think they would just belch 'em.
09:38 PM on 06/26/2012
I don't recall being required to memorize poems but I did memorize most or all of verses I happened to like at the time. For example: "You may talk of gin and beer when you're quartered safe out here, ..."; "Once upon a midnight dreary as I pondered weak and weary ..."; .... And also country ballads and folk songs, which are poetry set to music. I still recite and/or "sing" them in the shower.
05:48 PM on 06/20/2012
I do think it is a good idea to memorize poetry. In my small rural school in South Dakota in the 50's and 60's, we memorized one poem per year with the intent of reciting for our parents at the county wide poetry contest. I still remember verses of Longfellow, Robert Lewis Stevenson, Langston Hughes etc.
My mom suffers from Alzheimer's disease. She has forgotten many things, but she can still recite her favorite poem, "I wandered lonely as a cloud....." Memory for music, verse, and prayers are the strongest memories we can have and provides us comfort.
05:38 PM on 06/20/2012
I had to memorize "The Road Not Taken." If you're interested in it, I think memorization can do wonders. If not, it is just like memorizing vocab words that are gone the minute you take the test.
01:18 PM on 06/20/2012
Memorization of poetry completely distorts the purpose of poetry. Anyone can memorize and regurgitate poems, scripts, essays, speeches, because words are all that it is. The real important part of poetry is to understand what the poet is trying to express. You obtain its power through that understanding. I mean, if actors did nothing but read the lines in their scripts, without putting any effort into understanding and believing what they're saying, the performance would be atrocious.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
koushnik
LibertƩ, EgalitƩ, FraternitƩ
12:32 PM on 06/20/2012
I try to memorize a new verse of "Thantopsis" by William Cullen Bryant every night, and as the article says, it's opened up new profundity every time i do.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:25 AM on 06/20/2012
I have always admired people who could recite poetry with such ease. Granted, I can do the same with song lyrics (not having to sing them), but it is all the more impressive when my British friends do it. Then again, it could just be their accent (hence, my string of British boyfriends).

I once read a study that said that recitation of poetry, especially starting an early age, strengthens the part of the brain that processes all language, and therefore, makes it easier to learn other languages. Perhaps that is why I had so much trouble picking another one up.

Anyway...yes...I agree that poetry, as well as Shakespeare's plays in their original form, is still part of our literary history and still holds value.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:39 AM on 06/20/2012
There once was a man named Ennis,

He was born with a 14"...Wait, What?

Next we will hear about the girl from Regina
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Konnie
GOP = GOLDEN CALF OLD PARTY
07:54 PM on 06/19/2012
i come from a family of musicans - by ear, play an instrument, and sing while remembering the intro, all the lyrics to all the verses, and the choruses to hundreds of songs and get paid for it - musicians. and if you couldn't, you gave dramatic long poetry recititions. in other words - entertainment. Ask any kid today and they will sing or rap popular songs. Some of the "poetry" isn't that great, but that's where "entertainment" is today. It takes the same mental ability to remember and recite The Highwayman as it does to remember long strings of computer code, the intricacies of software procedures. Ideas expressed thru poetry still have a place in today's" if it's not applicable to a profit driven enterprise get rid of it" shortsighted education system. It might also lengthen children's attention span of gnats rampant with modern technology..
09:57 AM on 06/19/2012
I am a retired third grade teacher. My children learned a verse a week. Sometimes it was a poem in itself and sometimes we continued a poem several weeks until the whole was learned. An additional benefit, I feel, for doing this is that it develops another part of the brain, and makes it easier to commit things to memory later.
09:30 AM on 06/19/2012
If I may, the language development from the time of Shakespeare to modern days are different. Try talking like Shakespeare and see the reactions of others. Shakespeare is powerful at his time because of the language was commonly used and because the experience was easily/commonly "related." Having the children enjoy and understand the time and Shakespeare experience is more important than forcing memorization. I never forget anything I want to remember and have hard time remembering things that are less significant.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phillip Ramirez
No reason, really...
09:24 AM on 06/19/2012
Memorization without guidance is pointless. One needs to have a teacher whose love for prose is extended to include her students. My era (and that's all I have to say about that) memorized several poems in my English class, foremost of which were Robert Frost poems. The intellectual discussion that occurred in regards to "Stopping By The Woods On A Snowy Evening" was particularly lively. You could tell who the pessimist/optimists were and, in my own case, who the free thinkers were.

That teacher's love extended to me and to this day I can equate the beauty of what I see in the natural world with the time-travel of reading decades or centuries old poetry and figuratively walking side by side with someone who felt exactly as I feel in a similar situation. And beauty of all this...?

Isn't it obvious? "I have miles to go before I sleep."
photo
Crisdean Wulver
We've got our priorities screwed up.
08:55 AM on 06/19/2012
I don't know to what degree it's important, but it's important.

When I was twelve I memorized the Raven, by Edgar Allen Poe. But I probably couldn't recite it today in it's entirety. never more

:-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amicusceo
08:42 AM on 06/19/2012
I think this guy has this poem pegged wrong, only the author can tell us. I think it means that there is no person who is an anchor to hold the drift of the world ( go out into the wild world and find your way, prosper, fall flat on your face etc..). It could also mean that poetry is a runaway languange, make up whatever you feel like writing about.

Six people in a boat
hole in the bottom
will not float
six people now
reduced to atoms
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phillip Ramirez
No reason, really...
09:26 AM on 06/19/2012
That's the beauty of true poetry... it's meaning can be whatever you wish it to be. Sometimes an author will be specific and say "I meant this...". But the best writers, in my opinion, when asked what their poem means, respond with an impish grin and say "Well... what do YOU think it means...?"

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder... and reader.
08:32 AM on 06/19/2012
When in elementary school, we read and wrote poetry. I love poetry to this day. I had to memorize Robert Frost's "Two Roads" for graduation from 6th grade. I do remember the first stanza. I think memorization has its place as does analyzing and critical thinking. It's all necessary. There is SO much to learn while you are young. It is tough with budget cuts and the like. Parents expect teachers to do everything and teacher want parents to do more. This world needs to slow down and look deep into the undergrowth. I may have chosen the path more heavily traveled but it has still made a difference.