More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
John McQuaid

John McQuaid

Posted: January 21, 2010 12:32 PM

When the Political System Breaks, Other Stuff Breaks Too

What's Your Reaction:

What should President Obama do now? Most of the advice he's getting in the mediasphere, needless to say, is bad -- so I'm not going to add to it. But Scott Brown's win in the Massachusetts Senate race does raise a bigger question: is the system broken? I fear the answer is yes.

Thanks to a combination of arbitrary Senate rules, political polarization, and the Republican Party's near-total disengagement from substantive policy debate, it's now impossible to pass ambitious legislation of any kind - even if there is a unambiguous public support for it.

Is that necessarily bad? There's a legitimate argument that divided government does less damage, and that its persistence reflects the temperamental conservatism of the American public. But I don't think this idea stands up well given recent history. Democrats and Republicans, at each other's throats, getting nothing done - that's America! Well, that was America for most of the past 20 years. Look where it got us. And now, I'd argue that we've entered a particularly dangerous and uncertain phase in our history. We need a political system that can respond to it.

Our problems are very big, and a gridlocked system guarantees that they get even bigger - and, in some cases, blow up in our faces. They include rising economic insecurity, including the patchy and overpriced health insurance system that Obama is trying, maladroitly, to fix. Climate change, which may well lead to a series of cascading environmental, agricultural and natural disasters over the coming decades, and which requires concrete government action starting yesterday. A financial system that is intrinsically corrupt, resistant to government intervention, and prone to irresponsible, bubble-creating behavior. A national infrastructure that is either falling apart or unsuited to changing conditions (see, for example, the New Orleans levees). Severe structural problems in the nation's budget, debt service and social safety net.

Some of these problems are perennials. We confronted past crises and survived. That's cause for some hope that the system, when backed against the wall, will ultimately act constructively (as with Reagan's Social Security commission, to cite a modest example).

But most of these problems cannot be solved by bipartisan commissions. They require executive leadership to mobilize the public and national resources, in concert with congressional action. And today, after eight years of Bush and a year of Obama, can you envision that happening for anything short of a shooting war or a second 9/11?

There's a rough majority consensus on a lot of the problems the country faces. But start running them through the congressional and media gauntlet, and things get hopelessly bogged down - see health care reform. What happened there is partly Obama's fault, of course. As Ezra Klein notes, he spent so much time mastering the inside game of Baucusland that he lost sight of the outside game of galvanizing the public. And of course the sorry state of the economy is primarily to blame for Obama's political problems. But the system shouldn't just seize up in a crisis, and in this case it has.

James Fallows got at this issue in his recent Atlantic essay How America Can Rise Again (though he never really answers that question). The problem isn't America, which is doing OK. It's American government, which is a joke:

What I have been calling "going to hell" really means a failure to adapt: increasing difficulty in focusing on issues beyond the immediate news cycle, and an increasing gap between the real challenges and opportunities of the time and our attention, resources, and best efforts.

A political system that runs on point-scoring and gaming the news cycle cannot anticipate problems. It cannot even clean up messes and fix stuff that's already obviously broken. And as stresses rise, our existing government-run or government-dependent systems - fiscal, social, infrastructure, military - are increasingly going to find themselves in danger of breakdowns. Some will be manageable. But some will be catastrophic.

This post first appeared on my True/Slant blog.

 

Follow John McQuaid on Twitter: www.twitter.com/johnmcquaid

 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:58 AM on 01/22/2010
Yada , Yada , Yada .............. in the meantime we have a ticking time bomb on our hands. 40-60 million people without healthcare.... 1.5 TRILLION dollar budget deficit for 2010 ..... 12 TRILLION dollar overall deficit ..... 2 wars that our soldiers and contractors are waging....... American jobs gone overseas never to return ..... 1in 9 americans on food stamps ..... our food seems to poisoning us at every turn (mercury in fish , mad cows , bird flu , BHA in cans and plastics ...... Lead in toys from China ......additives in our food that is killing us ..... our country seems to be headed over a cliff and no one seems to have the power to stop us. The right wing media ( Limbaugh , Beck, etc. , etc.) , gripe every day but have no answers and no responsibility. The president seems to be working against the tide and democrats are not helping him . We are headed down a bad road and where it ends is anybodys guess at this point , but is doesn't look good.
02:54 PM on 01/21/2010
The failures in the Health care reform debacle can be directly attributed to large corporations exerting undue influence on the process. Lobbying is at record highs. Lobbyist spent over 6 Million dollars per elected official last year alone. Today the supreme court ruled to remove the limits of how much money corporate America could spend to influence elections. It appears we truly are headed to a "free market" economy, where the rich a powerful will have absolutely no restraints and the weak or poor will just be surplus inventory, to be disposed of at will.

How long will it be before each vote in congress is held on eBay?

One can only hope that new laws will be passed to offset this "money buys anything" mentality, that's assuming that the political system hasn't been entirely bought already. An assumption that may or may not be valid.
jhNY
Mercy.
02:21 PM on 01/21/2010
The financial system which the author describes as 'intrinsically corrupt', is not merely resistant to government regulation-- it presently owns the government because it owns both parties, and therefore directs the government's inevitably ineffectual actions against it, which therefore fail to correct the behavior of those the government has responsibility to regulate.
02:15 PM on 01/21/2010
You are partly correct. Obama has absolutely demonstrated he is inept. But , I think that ineptness was an attempt not only to "game" the media cycle but also to "game" the political process. He, Rahm, Reid, Baucus, Conrad, Nelson and Lieberman along with cooperation from McConnell tried to game the system into everyone being Mandated to pay premiums to private for profit monopolies. As you correctly surmise "A political system that runs on point-scoring and gaming the news cycle cannot anticipate problems". Obama and friends thought Coakley had it in the bag with a 30 point lead in December. The problem they didn't anticipate was Mass voters seeing thru this attempt to game a broken system
05:21 PM on 01/21/2010
That sums it up nicely!
Fanned
01:46 PM on 01/21/2010
A closed two party limited democracy system totally corrupted by money only works for the lawyer class who pass the laws that people must follow or be obliged to hire other lawyers should they break the lawyers rules. With an ignorant and lazy media and the prohibitive cost it is almost impossible for new political parties to emerge and challenge the status quo so we are left with a ruling class divided into two corrupt parties so similar that they hate each other.