iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
John Seager

GET UPDATES FROM John Seager
 

Global Gag Rule's Return Would Threaten Women Worldwide

Posted: 09/19/2012 9:26 am

Thanks to Mitt Romney's appearance on Meet the Press, we now have confirmation of his views on a crucial and often overlooked issue:

He'd bring back the gag.

Ever since President Ronald Reagan introduced it in 1984, the Mexico City Policy, known by family planning advocates as the Global Gag Rule, has negatively affected women every time it's reinstated. President Clinton overturned the Gag Rule, which says the United States can provide no assistance to foreign non-governmental organizations that even discuss abortion or provide referrals for their clients. President George W. Bush reinstated it. President Barack Obama overturned it again in one of his first presidential actions. Red light, green light. Red light, green light.

What difference does this make in the lives of women overseas? For some of them, it's a matter of life and death.

When the Global Gag Rule is in effect, organizations that receive foreign aid from the United States are forced to choose: They can accept funding but censor the programs they've developed to serve their populations. Or they can refuse to comply and lose funding, at the risk of going bankrupt and being forced to shutter their doors.

In either case, it's the world's most vulnerable women who suffer.

Under President George W. Bush, the International Planned Parenthood Federation, or IPPF, chose the second option. It refused to comply with the Global Gag Rule in order to protect its comprehensive sexual and reproductive health programs. IPPF lost more than $100 million in funding over an eight-year period. In Kenya alone, three clinics were forced to close, leaving 56,000 clients out in the cold.

Meanwhile, 20 developing nations saw shipments of U.S.-donated contraceptives end -- contraceptives that don't just protect against unwanted pregnancy. Family planning protects natural resources, reduces maternal and child mortality and allows women to pursue education and careers -- boosting the prospects not just for families, but for entire nations.

And here's the real kicker: Under the Global Gag Rule, organizations are not even allowed to discuss the dangers of unsafe abortion with their clients. This information saves the lives of desperate women in developing nations.

For decades, reinstating the Global Gag Rule has been seen as the default "pro-life" position. I would argue that it's anything but. When United States' policy leads to more unintended pregnancies, more unplanned births, higher maternal mortality, worse outcomes for infants and children and more deaths due to unsafe abortion and inadequate resources, the United States needs to seriously rethink that policy.

It's time to gag the Global Gag Rule -- permanently. But I'm certainly not holding my breath.

 
FOLLOW WORLD
Thanks to Mitt Romney's appearance on Meet the Press, we now have confirmation of his views on a crucial and often overlooked issue: He'd bring back the gag. Ever since President Ronald Reagan intro...
Thanks to Mitt Romney's appearance on Meet the Press, we now have confirmation of his views on a crucial and often overlooked issue: He'd bring back the gag. Ever since President Ronald Reagan intro...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:18 PM on 09/22/2012
Stories like this make ashamed to be American.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MeanKitty
03:54 PM on 09/19/2012
why should the USA have anything to say about reproductive freedom ANYWHERE? I am disgusted by the IDEA that American have any say about policy concerning women's health, except to support it. Women around the world (and men) need EDUCATION about family planning options, not suppression! Stop treating the women of the world as children!!! It's an antiquated, repulsive idea.
11:40 AM on 09/19/2012
Governments need to stop taking decisions that affect others, based on their own religious beliefs. I wouldn't abort, but that's my choice, and I don't have any right to impose that to others with different views, religions, circumstances and lives. These guys think they are good people by doing that, but in reality, they're playing God: telling others what they can or can't do, presuming they know what's good and bad, they act like little Gods, but in ignoring the well being of others, they really are little sinners.