iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
John Shore

GET UPDATES FROM John Shore
 

What Francis Chan (And His Ilk) Get So Terribly Wrong About Hell (VIDEO)

Posted: 05/23/2011 7:03 pm

This video, released last week and currently gone viral (as of this writing it's received almost 114,000 views in four days), stars Francis Chan. It's a commercial for his new book, Erasing Hell: What God Says About Eternity, and the Things We've Made Up, due out in early July. Erasing God is clearly meant as a refutation of Rob Bell's Love Wins.

Slickly produced by David C. Cook, Erasing Hell's Christian publishing house, there are a great number of things about this video that I don't like, most of it having to do with its almost astounding pretentiousness: the all-white, faux-heaven set; the astral, Muzak-from-heaven background music; the posing pretending to be pondering; the fact that it's all about how Francis is prayerfully writing this book, when the cover of the book itself shows that it was, in fact, written by Francis Chan and Preston Sprinkle. (That "and" is everything. In displaying the name of a book's co-author, publishers have four choices: don't show the name anywhere in or on the book; show it only on the book's copyright page; show it on the book's cover in such a way that it reads Author with Co-Author; or show it on the book's cover so that it reads Author and Co-Author. "And" signifies maximum involvement of the co-author. In fact -- and I know this because I've been in book publishing for years, and have myself co-authored five books -- if on a book jacket you see and before the name of the co-author, you can pretty much bet that's the person who really wrote that book. Whether or not that's true in this particular case, it's at the very least disingenuous of Mr. Chan to not once so much as mention Mr. Sprinkle's name.)

But the primary problem I have with this video is that while in every last way pretending to be about practicing love, it's really about instilling fear. What Chan is really saying here -- as subtly as it's hidden beneath his humble, searching, open-minded attitude -- is, "Be afraid. Being wrong about hell has terrible, terrible consequences. It's not something about which you can afford to be mistaken."

And this is exactly where he, and every other Christian leader who preaches that hell is real, gets it so extraordinarily and harmfully wrong.

The truth that Chan and his evangelical ilk are missing (or at the very least are failing to properly consider), is that, if you're a Christian, it does not matter whether you're right or wrong about hell.

And why not? Because if you're a Christian, then no matter what you think about hell, you are safe from hell.

Christians who believe in hell go to heaven; Christians who don't believe in hell go to heaven. Virtually no Christians, from the evangelical right to the progressive/liberal left, argue that. (Or, if they do, they don't via anything in the Bible.)

All Christians agree that if you are a Christian -- no matter what you believe about hell -- you go to heaven, and not hell, when you die.

I think it's reasonable to say (and it's certainly been my experience writing about Christianity here on Huffington Post) that nothing keeps more people shunning Christianity than does the doctrine of hell as a real place. People just can't get on board with a God so cruel and unfair that he would condemn to eternal physical torture anyone who, for any reason whatsoever, dies without first believing in him. Most non-Christians don't see the Christian god as loving and all-powerful. Due primarily to the doctrine of hell being real, they see him as an egomaniacal psychopath. They think it's just ... baffling that anyone could believe in a God so insanely punitive.

And so they reject Christianity.

And thusly (according to the evangelical mindset) do they doom themselves to hell.

Now let us take great care to ensure that we're here employing flawless logic.

If rejecting the Christian God condemns people to hell; and

If a Christian who is wrong about hell goes to heaven anyway; and

If preaching about hell significantly contributes to people rejecting Christianity;

Then evangelicals should shut-up about hell.

It's a simple, logically airtight, unarguable truth that a Christian preaching about the reality of hell is: A. Doing nothing whatsoever for Christians; and B. Significantly contributing to non-Christians remaining non-Christian.

This can only mean that any Christian who preaches about hell being real is broadcasting to the world that he or she cares more about being right than they do about actually saving anyone from hell.

If evangelicals really want to do God's work, and really want to save people from hell, then they need to either radically rethink their concept of hell, or, at the very least, stop preaching about it.

 
 
 

Follow John Shore on Twitter: www.twitter.com/johnshore

 
 
  • Comments
  • 83
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:40 AM on 07/12/2011
The only problem I see to NOT speaking/teaching/preaching on the reality of Hell as you suggest is now the full gospel is not being presented... just as Holy Spirit for example has been removed by many from the infallable contents of the bibles pages regarding todays Christianinity. It all has to be taught....
05:31 PM on 06/27/2011
"... it's really about instilling fear"

The fact that you see this as a problem speaks volumes. Yeah, this is something that should instill fear into the heart & mind to every unbeliever on the planet.

"This can only mean that any Christian who preaches about hell being real is broadcasting to the world that he or she cares more about being right than they do about actually saving anyone from hell."
So, let me get this straight...Rob Bell says hell isn't permanent. We say it is. We are then accused of having to be right all the time which detracts from saving people from hell???
09:37 AM on 06/23/2011
The problem with this article, Mr Shore, is your arguement that this is something we should not talk about because it offends people and drives them away. If that were a truth that we all lived by in this society we would never talk about anything. And furthermore using that same logic, Jesus would never have preached a word! Jesus caused offense everywhere he went. The religious leaders of his day despised his teachings so much that they consipred successfully to have him killed. Jesus spoke much of both heaven and hell. Are you saying that you know better about what he should or should not have taught? This is a relevant discussion. I assume you applaud Mr Bell's book Love Wins. He has a view point. He has written a book. It is worthy of discussion. Mr Chan has written several amazing books. He has a different view point from Mr Bell. His view is also worthy of discussion. Both of these men are Christian leaders. But there is only one of them you wish to silence. My guess is it is the one who makes you uncomfortable.....
01:30 AM on 06/19/2011
Changing the truth to suit my needs or preferences does not actually change the truth. Hell should scare you. But lakes of fire and sulfur should pale in comparison to eternal separation from the God (Jesus) who created us. If it does not, then you haven't connected with the God of the Bible.
Consider a root canal. Nobody likes them. There is no way to dress them up and sugar coat them. Dentists spend little if any resources to change the public's opinion of the horribleness that is a root canal. Because they are what they are. You could make the argument that promoting better dental health could prevent the need for a root canal. But to write them off as non-existent would be ridiculous. Even those with perfect teeth would need to know about a root canal, because it is an absolute consequence of bad oral hygiene.
Hell is an absolute consequence to those who do not choose to follow, with all mind, soul, spirit and strength, Jesus Christ. Christians still need the correct knowledge of hell not because we are in danger of it, but because there are those that are, and if we love those others as Jesus commands, then we don't want them there.
02:13 AM on 06/07/2011
If all Scripture is in fact profitable for teaching, reproof, correction, and training in righteousness then teaching Hell is valid. Both from Scripture and a great many of the Ant-Nicaean Fathers we find a plethora of proof-texts that support an eternal Hell, Chan following Jesus, Apostle Paul, Apostle John, and a great many Early Church Father's believes it is both important and edifying to teach Hell. I do not understand what the beef is with the doctrine.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:00 PM on 06/06/2011
Francis Chan does a good job of making the point that we shouldn't worship a god that we create to suit ourselves...rather to worship the true God as depicted in the bible...EVEN IF...we don't like how the God of the bible is depicted. When man exercises his liberty to create a god to suit himself...well there's already a term coined for that...it's called 'Idol Worship'
02:02 AM on 06/07/2011
It is also called heresy.
10:27 AM on 06/02/2011
Jesus did say that he wished we would either be hot or cold. He wasn't talking to non christians, he was talking to a church. He also said that not everyone who calls him Lord would enter the Kingdom, only those who do the will of the Father. Francis Chan tells it like it is and the Holy Spirit brings conviction in my life, which I need. One day the Lord will seperate the goats from the sheep. Im not being judgemental, but realistic. You cant call yourself a christian and then go on about your marry way and do whatever you want and make it to heaven. THAT WILL NEVER WORK. Jesus calls them kind of people- hypocrites. And He will spit them out of His mouth. Hell is very real and all who enter there will be the ungodly and them that DON'T DO THE WILL OF THE FATHER.
01:11 PM on 05/28/2011
John, this post offers nothing helpful or beneficial to anyone--Christian or not. No alternatives. Just judgmental statements about Francis Chan and his passion to teach the Bible.
07:01 PM on 05/26/2011
Cannot agree with you here Mr. Shore. Whatever forum is applicable to the salvation of even one person, is worthy of discussion. Even if fear is the motivator. Further, there is nothing in the bible that should be off-limits for discussion among Christian's. We shouldn't cower away from difficult subjects because they make some uncomfortable. No one intended for heaven will be lost says the Lord.......and All scripture is intended for edification, teaching, correction. I have no trouble covering this subject with those who aren't Christian's without being judgmental. This isn't about me. I didn't make the rules, and I don't have to agree with all of them in order to practice Faith......But, I sure don't have to cater to 'the ilk' that wants to make Christianity all user-friendly and non-controversial either. I am a 20 year Christian, not perfect, and had never heard of Chan before today.......The jury's still out about "Erasing Hell" no matter who actually wrote it......but I say, why not have a look see before we condemn anyone making an effort to educate.....We have brains and can decide for ourselves. :-)
11:27 AM on 05/26/2011
To pick up on a previous poster: the name of the book is still not corrected at the end of the first paragraph! (Minor point, but you had said you had correct it, so I thought you'd like to know).

Secondly, the book IS available for pre-order on Amazon.

Thirdly, and most importantly, your article talks a lot about Christians believing they will go to "heaven", but isn't that the point of the book: that christians should be concerned for others, not just for themselves. I wouldn't interpret this as playing on fear, but more encouraging people to be less about "me, me, me" and more thinking about others. Irregardless of my own personal religious or non-religious views, I can't knock the author for encouraging his followers to be think outside of themselves.

Your article seems to be more about you wanting to passionately promote your own, anti-christian views, rather than being a review of a book. Which leads me to question what Francis Chan "and his ilk" have done to you in the past to make you so bitter?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rsttho557949
What is Job's Crucible?
04:41 PM on 05/25/2011
If I understand Mr. Chan's motivation, I believe the man is doing something that liberal minded believers and non believers should take seriously. I totally disagree your flawless logic about the security of a Christian for he or she can fall so far away from Jesus and the Truth, that he'll be left outside the pearly gates thinking he was home free. Said another way, " it ain't over till it's over." I don't believe that I am taking liberties with the Bible but the Book of Revelation warns the believer over and over, that one must endure to the end. (Revelation 2:7,10,11,15,16,17,26-3:12,19,21). It appears that the issue of compromise was brought up by Jesus to churches (people) that claimed Jesus and referred to themselves as Christians. Mr.Chan is right that a believer should remind believers and non-believers that hell will be a reality for many souls that thought they made it. Jesus uses the word "repent" over and over, so I know these are not my own thoughts. Sounds like you have compromised like the failed churches with your intolerance to Christian reminders. Read Revelation, my friend...all of it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wes Hopper
Preferring facts to opinion or blind faith
11:43 AM on 05/25/2011
It isn't just fundamentalist Christian doctrine that turns people off, it's fundamentalist Christian behavior. Things such as opposing LGBT equality, supporting our massive military adventures, supporting without question Israel's oppression of the Palestinians, and supporting political policies that would kick 60% of Americans under the bus are not things that make unbelievers want to become part of the group. Why do fundamentalist Christians do these things? Because they focus on hell and salvation, and not upon the teachings of Jesus. Such as "In as much as you have done it unto the least of these, you've done it unto me." When Christians become models of compassion and social justice, then you might see more interest in being part of the group.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rsttho557949
What is Job's Crucible?
05:45 PM on 05/25/2011
Hi Wes,

Look I am also not trying to change your mind about your view. I just want to make a couple of comments that I believe Christians should hear. # 1. if a person doesn't come to Jesus is because they have already made up their minds to reject Jesus. Jesus reminded us of that fact. So if a Christian has this or that trait( Fundalmentalist or pain in the butt) the person who says that he turned away from the Light because people were saying, "Your nature is corrupt and you need a Savior", or "Hell is going to be a reality- do the right thing by people", he or she is a liar...period! Truth is, these people simply despise God, Jesus and any reminder that their hearts oppose God. The other thing is that Christians are vilifying each other and have given into public pressure and would rather compromise with the world, rather than stay faithful. It's sad that Jesus is only supposed to be discussed in a limited amounts( Christians of compromise have set this parameter) yet folks have no problem exposing their members to every type of filth in copious amounts. Again, the person that is turned off by hell stories is that way because he or she knows the nature of their heart towards Jesus(Jeremiah 17:9). They want to give the excuse that the old, mean and bothersome Christians made me an atheist or turn to a Brand X religion. Don't compromise.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Soulmentor
"To thine own self be true...."
01:55 AM on 05/25/2011
After my comment below, I continued on reading the comments. John, you sure opened laid the foundation for a tower of Bable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Soulmentor
"To thine own self be true...."
01:39 AM on 05/25/2011
Thank you John. Yet another example of how spot on you always are. Your thinking is always so rationally concise. Remarkably refreshing.....coming from a Christian.
02:13 PM on 05/24/2011
There is no god