More

John Tepper Marlin

John Tepper Marlin

Posted: January 13, 2008 11:22 PM

A New Civil Rights Wave?


Too much is being made of the special appeal of a white female candidate and a (half-)black male candidate. Electing either candidate would advance the cause of human rights. America has had universal adult suffrage for 88 years, the luckiest number in most of the world, but for 45 of those years the Jim Crow laws persisted.

As some opponents of the two leading Democratic nominees express themselves, they reveal how far the nation has to go to achieve universal human rights.

In fact the women's rights movement in the United States has historically found its voice best when linked with the voices of the anti-slavery and civil rights movements.

1. The 1848 convention at Seneca Falls is an example of this linkage. Anti-slavery leader Frederick Douglass gave the crucial speech that convinced the Seneca Falls convention to embrace suffrage as a goal. Susan B. Anthony, soon to join Elizabeth Cady Stanton as co-leader of the suffrage movement, leader, was the daughter and brother of leading Quaker abolitionists. Women and non-white men were on the same side until 1869 when women leaders were shocked to see a new suffrage law that excluded women. During the 50 years (1870-1920) it took for the United States to progress to universal adult suffrage, some advocates for woman suffrage made a few unfortunate alliances and utterances out of desperation. But women of color provided many eloquent advocates for women's rights, from Sojourner Truth ("Ain't I a woman?") to Frances Harper.

2. In the 1910s, a second women's rights movement flourished under Quaker Alice Paul, Catholic Lucy Burns and freethinking Inez Milholland, who led the suffrage marches on horseback in New York City in 1912 and Washington in 1913. Milholland was the daughter of the NAACP's first Treasurer, who spoke out vociferously against racism in the 1910s and 1920s.

3. A third wave dates from 1963. The Women's Liberation Movement was sparked by (the late) Betty Friedan's Feminine Mystique. It spread with the addition of voices like those of Gloria Steinem and bell hooks along with the ferment of antiwar sentiment and the 1960s civil rights movement. The movement may have reached its peak in August 1970 with the march of 10,000 people down Fifth Avenue to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the last state's ratification of the 19th Amendment in 1920. It was a march that Friedan described as "succeeding beyond her wildest dreams".

4. Could 2008 bring a new civil rights wave? As career-oriented younger women confront the realities of the glass ceiling in their own professions, could they pin their future on Hillary Clinton on the basis that until a woman is elected president they will never truly believe that a woman can be elected president? Similar questions may arise in the minds of African-Americans as they ponder whether or not to support Barack Obama.

Human rights must be defended for everyone, or they will be preserved for no one. Vote for Hillary Clinton, but not on the basis that someone of color has no right to occupy the White House. Vote for Barack Obama, but not on the basis that no woman has a right to become president. Vote while keeping in mind violations of other people's rights, or -- as inhabitants of Germany discovered under Hitler - our own rights will swirl down the same drain.

 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:35 AM on 01/14/2008
The Clintons are a disgrace and are now playing the race card in order to win the nomination. All democrats that support this ugly campaign are tainted by this. All people of good will must denounce this.
01:45 AM on 01/14/2008
to truly change the government the real progress lies in electing honest local government. and then paying attention to what they do in office. in other words, from the bottom up. just by electing a president who is ethnic or a woman does make a statement. but the work is barely begun.
01:41 AM on 01/14/2008
draft al gore for president.
01:28 AM on 01/14/2008
This commentary is disengenuou. These "2" candidates as "special" as chioces for crusaders or as formenters of "Human" rights (which then examples further back into American History should have been included), and to stretch false anologies or parallels, (while still arrogantly devoid of other World History civil or human libertarian champions) and to use slight of hand in the marrying of them both into "civil" rights beacons for hope is nothing less than propaganda and disinformation and an aggregious format of lies. In the wake of the most prolific destruction and ignorance of the U.S. Constitution by the present Executive Branch and President being accom[plished so easily and without any sincere challenge that it seemed almost automatic as soon as the Oath was spoken by George Bush and these 2 props served in both their First terms in the Senate and yet glaringly did nothing, much less as real heroes and patriots do, put their life at risk, but rahter they in fact chose to facillitate this Administration. To deny and actively promote the obstruction of view of these 2 peoples work/ activities denegrates your own legitimacy as a patron and decisions about defending Our Democracy! These 2 candidates, one a Yale Law Graduate, the other a Harvard Law Graduate (in U.S. Constitutional Law NO LESS) are blatantly more responsible because of their "education and experience". For first termers it is especially offensive for them to actively hide and protect their own careers and livelyhoods over their Oath's to preserve and protect the U.S. Constitution! Both are traitors to Our Democracy and mutants of all the other leaders who only serve with complacency, corruption, and comprimise of human/civil liberties and that unfortunately, no thanks to the proppaganda like this commentary forwards, find their way to exist and proliferate in office.
01:08 AM on 01/14/2008
2007 started out pretty good. It was obvious that we have great chances of producing a female or black president, and we were very happy. Unfortunately, one of those campaigns has been turning against the other. That historical unity has been shattered.
12:45 AM on 01/14/2008
Good to have the long view, the historical perspective. Our schools don't seem to be turning out citizens who understand the context in which unfolding events fit--or don't fit. Worse, we seem to be in a time when there's a disdain for history. If it's past it doesn't matter. Wrong. It remains true that those who don't understand the past are in danger of having to repeat it.
12:08 AM on 01/14/2008
Fair enough. Your last paragraph is totally reasonable.

It's just that some of us get the feeling the Clinton campaign is admonishing us "don't get charmed by this novel black guy who talks pretty. He's nothing but talk. Hillary's the REAL deal." That message is insulting on many levels. Frankly, I can understand why a lot of African Americans feel stung by that. Heck, I'm white and I'm stung by it.

I'm really disappointed that they've chosen to criticize Obama this way. I think it damages their campaign, offends people, and damages the Democratic party.