iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
John Weeks

GET UPDATES FROM John Weeks
 

Berwick's Exit from Medicare a Loss of a Brother-in-the-Trenches for Integrative Medicine

Posted: 12/09/11 04:59 PM ET

The forced exit of Don Berwick, MD as administrator of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services was a double whammy for the emerging field of integrative medicine.

Berwick is a knowledgeable advocate of the core principles of integrative health care. Few policy leaders are on record as such outspoken supporters. Yet the more profound loss for integrative medicine is Berwick's promotion of what he called the "majestic thing" known as Obamacare.

Berwick'a alignment with integrative principles became apparent in a presentation at the National Academy of Sciences in late February 2009. In a keynote at the Institute of Medicine Summit on Integrative Medicine and the Health of the Public, Berwick ticked off his "Basic Principles for Integrative Medicine."

• Place the patient at the center.
• Individualize care.
• Welcome family and loved ones.
• Maximize healing influences within care.
• Maximize healing influences outside of care.
• Rely on sophisticated, disciplined evidence.
• Use all relevant capacities - waste nothing.
• Connect helping influences with each other.

Nothing in Berwick's prescription will jar the multidisciplinary multitude of integrative health advocates. Patient-centered? Much to the dismay of the dominant school of medicine, patients arguably created the complementary and alternative medicine movement. Berwick's list is enshrined in the definition of integrative medicine endorsed by the 51 medical schools in the Consortium of Academic Health Centers for Integrative Medicine.

Yet the deeper impact for integrative medicine's health-creating orientation is Berwick's promotion of payment and delivery methods that mimic incentives in government-directed systems. The very structures that provoke the ire of Republicans who gave Berwick his pink slip support integrative medicine.

A growing cadre of integrative medicine professionals recognizes the acronym jungle of the emerging ACOs (Accountable Care Organizations) and PCMHs (Patient Centered Medical Homes) as a fertile host for mushrooming use of integrative care.

Ira Zunin, MD, MPH, MBA is the founder of the 40 practitioner Manakai O Malama PCMH-integrative hybrid in Honolulu. Zunin explains in an interview that linking electronic medical records with local hospitals immediately facilitated referrals for his acupuncturists, massage therapists and naturopathic doctors.

Zunin says the more significant friend to integrative medicine in the PCMH is the break from fee-for-service. He explains: "You have unassigned dollars that aren't directly connected to a provider or a procedure or a code. Payment plays into the hand of integrative practice. You can use the dollars from an integrative perspective."

Zunin adds: "The PCMH model is supposed to help the whole person, in his or her community. We [in integrative medicine] have always been looking at everything with a bigger tool set, with a focus on health. We're oriented to this model. We're oriented to teams."

Tom Trompeter, CEO of Healthpoint, agrees with Zunin. For 15 years, his growing network of 10 federally-qualified health centers in the Seattle-area has had naturopathic doctors, acupuncturists, massage therapists practicing alongside their medical doctors, nurses, nutritionists and clinical psychologists. In a recent interview, Trompeter told me in an interview how the PCMH is a "break from the paradigm of a physician owning a patient." He says this opens the door to team care and "the team approach opens the door for diversity" of providers and services. "To use a well-worn term," Trompeter adds, "our approach is holistic."

When I spoke recently with David Moen, MD, the executive medical director with Minnesota's Fairview Health Services, he echoed Trompeter: "Many of today's costs are associated with a lack of a holistic, integrated approach." The new outcomes focus of ACOs is ready made for integrative medicine: "The movement is toward more holistic measurements of health and well-being." Moen spoke readily of the "good evidence that some integrative therapies help a patient's ability to cope." He adds: "Integrative medicine supports self-efficacy."

These new structures won't disappear with Berwick's exit. In fact, Moen and others believe that the shift toward ACOs and PCMHs will continue regardless of any negative judgment by the courts on the Obama-Pelosi reform.

Moving huge agendas, whether to advance integrative health philosophy and practice or to restructure the incentives in the system, is not movement of furniture. Manifesting the principles Berwick outlines for integrative medicine require culture change. Anyone engaged in such sometimes Sisyphian work knows that advocacy from the top is not merely critically important. It is necessary. This is as true for leaders of new ACOs and PCMHs as it is for integrative medicine's line-workers.

With Berwick running CMS, the person in the bully-pulpit of the nation's most powerful payment system was integrative medicine's brother-in-the-trenches. Berwick has a chest full of medals for valor in campaigns to transform our reactive, wasteful system to one organized around keeping people healthy.

Berwick will be missed in ways most of us have not yet begun to imagine.
_________________


Disclosure: John Weeks earns part of his living directing a consortium of academic organizations associated with complementary and integrative health disciplines.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Dr Surf
If it looks too good to be true; it probably is...
02:59 PM on 12/11/2011
Patients have a tendency to do what they want. Latest trend, Medicare patients colluding, foregoing a "medical home," to avoid paying co-pays. They march into the local ER and demand care. Federal Law prevents the ER (and the on-call physicians) from turning them away. The patient must be seen regardless of ability (or willingness) to pay their co-pay. Socialized healthcare exists for some in our population. The rest of us must pay the bill for those too poor to pay for healthcare, or those unwilling to pay for healthcare (who believe in freedom of choice, their right to refuse until the last moment, or even beyond). Where is the on-call physicians' freedom of choice; he or she MUST see the ER patient regardless?
04:25 PM on 12/10/2011
'Any health care funding plan that is just, equitable, civilized and humane must, must redistribute wealth from the richer among us to the poorer and the less fortunate. Excellent health care is by definition redistributional.' - Donald Berwick

'A remarkable study (Norton & Ariely, 2010) reveals that Americans have no idea that the wealth distribution (defined for them in terms of "net worth") is as concentrated as it is. When shown three pie charts representing possible wealth distributions, 90% or more of the 5,522 respondents -- whatever their gender, age, income level, or party affiliation -- thought that the American wealth distribution most resembled one in which the top 20% has about 60% of the wealth. In fact, of course, the top 20% control about 85% of the wealth' -G William Domhoff.

A wonderful thing, the www, where I can sit in Amsterdam and read an excellent article written by a friend in Seattle and then surf for some background on the subject..

Looking at it from here it seems like a man of truth and integrity has been let go. Is it something in the water?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Paul Loeb
Author Soul of a Citizen and The Impossible Will T
08:14 PM on 12/09/2011
Important piece. The Republicans oppose Berwick precisely because he's advocating for effective and cost-effective medicine. It's the same reason they're filibustering any and all of Obama's Consumer Protection nominees. Their donors like things as they are and resist those who'd dare to change them to benefit a greater common good.