iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Jon Soltz

Jon Soltz

Posted: September 3, 2008 04:41 PM

Is the McCain-Palin Campaign Violating Operational Security?


When Sarah Palin was announced as John McCain's Vice Presidential pick, I found it a little disturbing that she told the public that her oldest son, Track, would be deploying to Iraq on September 11. Generally, disclosing the date of deployment is against Operational Security (OPSEC) and illegal.

Calling around to a couple of Public Affairs Officers (PAO) who would be handling the flow of information about Track and his unit, VoteVets.org found out that, first, Track is not deploying on September 11. He may be part of a deployment ceremony that day, before going to Kuwait, though one Public Affairs Officer said that any details of the upcoming ceremony hadn't been made public yet by the military.

Governor Palin may have spilled the beans on that one, while showing she doesn't know the difference between a soldier deploying to Iraq vs. one preparing to deploy to Iraq. And while not illegal, if she really did believe that's when he's deploying to Iraq, then she didn't know enough to keep quiet about that to keep from violating OPSEC -- something a potential Commander in Chief should know.

But, more disturbing, and definitely in violation of security, are an explosion of stories that say specifically where in Iraq Track is deploying to, which have been dutifully eaten up by right wing websites, and reprinted. I will not reprint it here, because I would only be compounding the issue. But, unfortunately, it is very easy to find on the web at this point.

It is simply impossible that any reporter could figure this out on their own. Just by knowing Track's name and the date he is heading to Kuwait, one could not figure out specifically where Track and his company would be going in Iraq. There's a reason it's impossible to figure that out -- because the military doesn't want that information out there. It only serves to aid the enemy to know where are troops are moving.

Did the Pentagon release that information to the press?

No, according to another PAO that VoteVets.org talked with. In fact, this PAO said, the military was actively trying to quash this story, and keep reporters from repeating all these details, because it was a clear OPSEC violation. The PAO was adamant that the military has no idea how these details got out there and doesn't want them out there.

So where is this information coming from, if not the military? Certainly not the Obama campaign, which would not gain anything by promoting Track's service. The only people who I can think of would be those in the McCain-Palin campaign.

If the McCain-Palin campaign has disclosed details about Track's company's movements to gain stories in the press about it, they will have put many American lives in danger -- not the least of which would be Track's.

Senator McCain and Governor Palin need to immediately find out if someone in the campaign violated OPSEC by giving a reporter these details, and if they did, the campaign needs to find out where the source got this information from. Whoever that is, is in it deep.

Crossposted at VetVoice.com

Follow Jon Soltz on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jonsoltz

When Sarah Palin was announced as John McCain's Vice Presidential pick, I found it a little disturbing that she told the public that her oldest son, Track, would be deploying to Iraq on September 11. ...
When Sarah Palin was announced as John McCain's Vice Presidential pick, I found it a little disturbing that she told the public that her oldest son, Track, would be deploying to Iraq on September 11. ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 191
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
05:36 PM on 09/11/2008
My mistake - I meant Prince Harry!
05:34 PM on 09/11/2008
My son and two nephews served in Iraq. My son in law has deployed on missions overseas requiring OPSEC. My husband and brother are lawe enforcement officers. Our family knows the value of OPSEC That is one factor that helps ensure our loved ones come home alive after serving. Palin put her son and hsi whole unit in danger. Whoever has leaked the number of troops and exact unit and the location for their ultimate assignemnt to the press deserves prison. Palin should be shouting from the mountaintops that this disclosure is endangering her son. Instead, she uses him to further her political ambitions.

I hope the military cancels his individual deployment much like the Brits were forced to when Prince Andrew's info became public. Serves her right and more importantly, protects her son's life from her foolishness. This is reminiscent of Geraldo drawing that map in the sand when the war began. He was booted out of country for that one. Ms. Palin should face the punishment she deserves for this blunder. I am glad my son is not in her son's unit and fear for the safety of those who are.

Potential comander in Chief? NO WAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
12:45 PM on 09/08/2008
Please save your crocodile tears for OPSEC for something important like when your comrades at the New York Times release classified information and imperil the safety of our soldiers and the entire Global War on Terror. I am preparing for my 3rd trip to Afghanistan and my family is well aware where I am going. Every email I send home has my base on it! Wow, her son is going to IRAQ!!! I am sure that information will change the course of the war.

I know all veterans are not monolithic in their support of OIF and OEF but readers should know your views are those of a very small minority. You are certainly entitled to your opinion but really cheapen your cause with idiotic articles like this. Anybody in the military knows this line of attack to be a partisan crock of dung.
photo
ibsteve2u
Someone who cares - to his unending regret
03:13 PM on 09/05/2008
lollll...say what? A Republican worry about "violating OPSEC", when they stand to gain something from doing exactly that?

Wow, but you have high expectations, Mr. Soltz.

The next thing you know, you'll be expecting Republicans not to "out" covert CIA agents even if they have something to gain by doing exactly that.
10:19 AM on 09/05/2008
Forget military law and secrets. What high profile , influential parent would add an extra element of danger to their child's positon in a combat area, by publicaly stating any details. If I was Palin, I would have limited that information to : My son is currently serving his country in the army; I wish to say nothing further to add any extra element of risk to my son or his unit" Any reasonable person could see that a vice presidential candidate's child in a combat unit, subject to enemy exposure, would escalate the already inherent risk to a higher level; "singled out". What was she thinking? More EXPLOITATION of her family, I suppose.
10:02 PM on 09/04/2008
What's a little thing like national security, or for that matter, laws, facts, truth . . . when politcal gain is to be had?
09:25 PM on 09/04/2008
Oh my! He's going to Iraq on 9/11!
9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11

Baseball moms for obama unite!
03:43 PM on 09/04/2008
As a former Army officer (and yes, I'm a subscriber to Jon Soltz's organization), I find this incomprehensible!! That Palin would announce her son's imminent deployment for political gain (and coincidentally, or not, on September 11th), is not only absurd, it's downright awful.

If everyone remembers, when Biden stated his son was deploying (as a JAG officer, not a combat position, but still . . . ) to Iraq with the Delaware NG, he did NOT give a specific date. Just sometime in the next month, or something like that. I'm sure that the Republicans would've jumped ALL OVER Biden if he had given a specific date for HIS son's deployment.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
RickO
Musician, Atheist
03:21 PM on 09/04/2008
So in one of her first forays into national commander-in-chiefness, she discloses troop movements and the plans of a unit that will include what amounts to a high-value target for our adversaries, what does that say about her qualifications? Even if she knew full well, as she likely did, that he was not actually deploying on that date, she said it as if he was and this puts his whole unit at risk. What fools these so-called national security experts are.
02:31 PM on 09/04/2008
Every time a local unit deploys to Iraq or Afghanistan it's in the paper. You don't know exactly where they are going but you do know which country they are going to and often what unit they are relieving. The story usually runs under a pic of families being kissed goodbye or crying.
Don't pretend that it's all a huge secret.
The biggest problem you guys have is her son is serving in the military and it looks good for the Republicans. McCain has 2 boys in the military and 1 just got back from Iraq.
On the other hand you on the Left have Code Pink and videos of a protester spitting on a vet.
Face it. That's your real problem with her mentioning Track's deployment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RumiSouth
Caerbannog!
12:21 PM on 09/04/2008
You write as if OPSEC and national security applied to Republicans. Remember Valerie Plame?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dynamohum
10:16 AM on 09/04/2008
It would appear that with the Republican governance, comes a double standard. We are not to mention the troops or their mission because of national security concerns, that is unless we need a campaign bump, or a supposedly patriotic image. It is a violation of the collecitve trust of the worst kind.

Thank you to all of our military men and women for their incredible service. I just wish that all of you were being more fairly and wisely utilized by our country's leadership.
10:13 AM on 09/04/2008
One name comes ot mind, IF this is in any way, shape, form or fashion of a leak...Rove
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
maxfax
Taa - dah!
10:11 AM on 09/04/2008
Where's the military mothers? They should be outraged.
10:00 AM on 09/04/2008
Well if she did violate opsec that time, she did it again last night, once with her son and once with her nephew casey (sp?)