More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jonathan D. Fitzgerald

GET UPDATES FROM Jonathan D. Fitzgerald
 

The Deadly Serious Connection Between Evangelicalism and Homosexuality

Posted: 01/31/11 05:03 PM ET

Last Thursday was a bad day. Two powerful blasts of bad news damn near knocked me off my feet, coming as they did within minutes of each other. Two deaths, and an unfortunate connection.

A good friend of mine from high school passed away Wednesday night. We haven't had much contact since graduating; we reconnected on Facebook not long ago and, in viewing our interactions there, I see that most communication we've had was his yearly "happy birthday" messages to me. Unrequited, I'm afraid.

Back in high school, he and some of the other guys used to go to youth group with me. They weren't evangelical Christians like I was; they were raised in Catholic families and were fellow inmates at our all male Catholic high school. None of them really liked going to my church, I don't think. It was too strange for them. I was too obviously evangelizing. But we didn't have many friends outside of each other, and I'm sure that's why they came.

My friend was bisexual. This all came out years after high school, and in the time since we reconnected he lived his life right out in the open on Facebook. He had some trouble with drugs and alcohol in those intervening years, too, but seemed to have it under control. Ultimately, from the time spent in the homophobic halls of an all-male Catholic school through the rest of his too-short life, I get the impression that due to the competing pressures regarding his sexuality, he was never comfortable in his own skin. He described himself, casually, as "a lil bit of this and a lil bit of that."

I don't know what he thought about me after all those years of trying to "witness" to him, of being judgmental about petty teenage taboos like swearing and smoking. There is a lot I regret about the kind of Christian I was in high school. I can only hope he didn't think I judged him still, or thought any less of him after he came out. I can only hope, but I'm not so sure.

Also on Wednesday night, in Uganda, a country I visited while living in Kenya, another man, David Kato, died. He was murdered. Though the police are blaming his death on a robbery, those who knew him and knew his story are drawing the obvious connection between his death and the fact that his picture was recently featured on the front page of a Ugandan newspaper under the headline "Hang Them."

He was gay.

Already, people are assigning blame for Kato's death to the U.S. evangelical preachers who visited Uganda a few years ago and stoked the fire of anti-gay ire in the country, and to the groups in the U.S. that continue to support that cause. It has been widely publicized that after the evangelical preachers visited Uganda, hosting rallies and talks, some Ugandan legislators proposed a bill that would make hanging the penalty for a person found to be homosexual.

The extent to which the preachers who have been frequently accused by name are guilty of Kato's death is unclear and probably immeasurable. But what is clear is that Christians, and evangelicals in particular, are guilty of demonizing homosexuals. We are told -- despite Jesus' example -- that it is up to us to throw the first stone of judgment at those we deem sinners. In fact, on Thursday, with unfortunate timing, Albert Mohler wrote, responding to Joel Osteen's nearly forced pronouncement that he believes homosexuality is sin, that "those who express confidence in the Bible's teaching" will have to make such a judgment.

But when we do this, we put an unbearable burden on the shoulders of our gay brothers and sisters. Even the most "love the sinner, hate the sin" believer among us is guilty. We have mistakenly labeled homosexuality as an unforgivable sin, a malfunction, a distortion or a disease. And we are guilty of a million counts of making life miserable for so many people, and of making life unlivable for countless others.

I'm calling for an end to this life threatening judgmentalism. I'm calling for a moratorium on debates over what qualifies as sin in other peoples' lives. I'm calling for a change in priorities, a shift back to what we should have been doing all along. I'm calling for love, acceptance and a global admission that we have wronged so many people. Ultimately, I'm pleading with my fellow Christians to change -- to make a marked transition from being the most judgmental and angry to the most accepting and loving. From being the police of others' morality to the bearers of others' burdens. Peoples' lives, it's clear, are at stake.

Originally published at Patrolmag.com.

 
 
 

Follow Jonathan D. Fitzgerald on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jon_fitzgerald

 
 
  • Comments
  • 58
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
03:13 PM on 02/08/2011
“I'm calling for a moratorium on debates over what qualifies as sin in other peoples' lives. I'm calling for love, acceptance and a global admission that we have wronged so many people. Ultimately, I'm pleading with my fellow Christians to change -- to make a marked transition from being the most judgmental and angry to the most accepting and loving.”

You want us to drop the commands and model that Jesus gave us?

Mark 1:15 “Repent and believe in the gospel”
Matthew 5:20 “Unless your righteousness exceeds the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven”
Luke 13:5 “I tell you, no; but unless you repent you will all likewise perish.”
Luke 13:32 “I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners, to repentance.”

John 9:39-41
“And Jesus said, “For judgment I have come into this world, that those who do not see may see, and that those who see may be made blind.” Then some of the Pharisees who were with Him heard these words, and said to Him, “Are we blind also?” Jesus said to them, “If you were blind, you would have no sin; but now you say, ‘We see.’ Therefore your sin remains.”

Yes we are to reach out to those who seek to change with love, forgiveness, and compassion, but not to the self righteous who do not believe they must repent and change.

Pastor Larry Robinson
photo
JohnFromCensornati
The End is near
07:04 PM on 02/08/2011
"You want us to drop the commands and model that Jesus gave us?"

No. Maybe you should try reading the article. She said: "I'm pleading with my fellow Christians to change -- to make a marked transition from being the most judgmental and angry to the most accepting and loving.”

None of your Je$u$ quotes commands you to be judgmental. You (not your imaginary friend) chose the self-righteous hypocrite model. You're shameless enough to call gay people self-righteous? I've got news for you "pastor". I don't subscribe to your fantasies and self-righteousness has nothing to do with it. Mind your own business.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
morgansher
just disgusted in general
04:10 PM on 02/05/2011
My dear young man, the deaths of GLBT people are *exactly* the end purpose of demonizing done by the evangelical right. It's what they WANT. They don't care whether these people are murdered or commit suicide. There is no more ambiguity about this. Hasn't been for years.
10:39 AM on 02/02/2011
"A new commandment I give to you; Love one another as I have loved you."

How does this apply to condemning and persecuting gay people?
11:49 PM on 02/01/2011
The religious Right has conditioned to Christians to focus on denouncing homosexuality, at the expense of praying for and reaching out to homosexuals. Loving someone doesn't require you to approve of or understand every aspect of their life. It means you don't let it hinder your ability to treat the person with sincerity and respect. When we believe we have to throw things in people's face in hopes of conforming them to our expectations, we are stepping into God's shoes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
detroitblkmale30
Wise Men Still Seek Him
04:56 PM on 02/01/2011
But what is clear is that Christians, and evangelicals in particular, are guilty of demonizing homosexuals."

So only Christians disagree with homosexuality according to author. We are the main culprits. This is simply not the case. Many of the actual physical gay victims of violence particularly in this country, have it occur at the hands of people of no particular faith at all. I utterly reject the notion that the mere act of believing a tenet of your faith and repeating it equates to demonizing, denigrating and the worst insinuation of all), CAUSING someone's death. No my friend, you want to claim certain Christian tenet's then claim them all including anti-homosexual commandments. However, if you feel the need to reject that one for obvious reasons, at least accept the principle of personal accountability which is also central to our faith. Having said that(vented even I admit). I do believe(maybe naively so) that there is room for people of faith who apply these tenets of the Bible and those who espouse these lifestyles in the country.

Here is the key question that will determine the ultimate level of civility on this issue. Would the author and those who agree with him be as tolerant of Christians who hold to their beliefs(albeit in a non-hateful way) as they are requesting that Christians be of gays? Afterall, I am that. I dont, hate, I just dont agree. That is my right.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Wes Isley
Writer and interfaith minister
03:15 PM on 02/01/2011
Thank you for this letter and for its message. The situation is truly dangerous. Just today a friend and I were discussing a letter in our local newspaper. It was written by a Christian man, claiming that he "technically" had justification to put homosexuals to death because the book of Leviticus said to do so. In other words, his act of murder would be overlooked by God himself. Well, we can argue about the accuracy of that theology all day--but do we want to live in that sort of society? Should I barricade myself indoors with a gun, waiting for Christian mobs to break in and stone me to death because of whom I love? If that is Christian, I want absolutely no part of it. From one perspective, this sort of religious justice is similar to what happens in many conservative Muslim nations, where men and women are mutilated or killed for supposed infractions against God. I don't want any part of that, no matter what religion it is. We live in a democracy, and we all need to be protected from the crazies down the street. Anyone can claim God has told them this or that. If you want to believe something, fine, go ahead. But when you begin to threaten my life and the well-being of those I love, you are dangerous. No, I do not fear radical Muslims in this country--I fear radical Christians.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ninetailedfox
banning people.....so childish
12:36 PM on 02/01/2011
Christians were wrong about owning slaves, they were wrong about their treatment of Galileo, they were wrong about supressing women, they will continue to be wrong.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ninetailedfox
banning people.....so childish
12:33 PM on 02/01/2011
Ill be honest with you. I dont mean to sound like a hatemonger, but I believe christianity should have been banned during the witchtrials and holocaust. Many christians tell me not to judge all christians by the actions of a few, then a new headline comes out of some evangelist doing some bad deed. I cant help it, as a non christian, i realize all christians have one thing in common: If you dont believe in jesus, you arent going to heaven. Hence my resentment towards the religion and the relationship as a whole.
11:55 AM on 02/01/2011
The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) recently decided to allow for the ordination of pastors who are in same-gender committed relationships. This was not an easy decision for a church that, in many ways, considers itself to be conservative. For myself, I can say I would rather reflect God's love to my neighbor rather than judgment. If it turns out I am wrong, I would rather be forgiven by God for being too loving and too accepting; but honestly, I don't think it is possible to be too loving and accepting.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nick Santiago
07:12 AM on 02/01/2011
Jonathan D. Fitzgerald: Amen, Brother!

If this article causes even one anti-gay Christian to take a good, hard look at their treatment of those they deem 'sinners' then it was worth it.

Peace be to you and may God bless!
07:07 AM on 02/01/2011
I think it's remarkably of mature of you to be able to look back on your teenaged self and have some regrets without beating yourself up too much. We are all pretty obnoxious as teenagers, christian or not.

And I do wish that more people would focus on "loving the sinner" than "hating the sin", if they insist on looking at it like that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jdaddy1951
10:37 AM on 02/01/2011
Agreed, with one exception. Homosexualiy is not a sin, no matter how twisted the interpretation of the bible is. For that matter, how can anyone interpret the bible literally, since it has been misinteropreted, mistranslated, edited, and generally tinkered with by religious politicians of every stripe, in every language, throughout the centuries. Better to use it as a starting point and use your own instincts as how to apply it to your life.
04:35 AM on 02/01/2011
Christianists and Islamists will continue to vilify gays. They do so out of pride, greed and ignorance. They will not stop. Evangelical Christians are America's version of Ayatollahs who derive their entire identity from hatred towards gays. We have to fight and keep fighting, because the words in this blog post will not be heeded by Evangelicals.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bsmithslo
02:58 AM on 02/01/2011
We should speak out against anyone who has suggested that being gay is an unforgivable sin or that gay people are depraved or diseased. If you accept that there are "sins" and we need God's grace to redeem us from them I am not so certain the refusal to address the issue is in harmony with the gospels. If you disagree with it be bold about it. Don't try to describe something as other that it's is however simply because you like the label while experiencing discomfort with what the label means.
09:16 AM on 02/01/2011
Being raised Catholic, we steered clear of evangelicals because of their 'holier than thou' attitude. They came off as judgmental, and SO concerned with EVERYBODY else's sins. We were taught that rather than rely completely on the Bible (because "even the Devil can quote scripture") we should listen to what Christ really said, and follow the Spirit of his life :Love God and love each other. Hounding gays is certainly not loving them. But the Church has been almost as bad. Individual priests have led the way to having a balanced, Catholic life. The best one I know said "Don't let your Church get in the way of your Faith."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bsmithslo
09:32 AM on 02/01/2011
I appreciate your story. There are many Catholics and LDS who do focus on living a Christian life and less on the sins of others. It simply is not true that Catholics are less concerned with everyone else's sins however as the Catholic Church and it's members are second only to the LDS in driving this debate. The reason why evangelicals came off as "judgmental" is because they reject the notion that listening to a man's interpretation of scripture without question is not really listening to what "Christ really said" at all. They also reject the notion that the scriptures are somehow less loving and kind than the church who has a well documented history of acts that are unloving and unkind. If I am not mistaken the example in this article was a young man of the Catholic faith. While it is only one example it is fairly common. I think the author's emphasis is misplaced however as the acceptance of bisexuality as "not sinful" would not have prevented teenage sexual confusion, guilt, fear, and anger with the risk of potential suicide. A brief review of the literature on teen suicide will quickly reveal that the potential for suicide is far more complex than that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bsmithslo
02:26 AM on 02/01/2011
Joel Osteen rarely talks about sin, much less homosexuality. He does not debate what is and what is not sin. He foolishly answered a direct question with an honest opinion. The author of this piece is suggesting that Osteen should do what he has been doing for his entire career. Most evangelicals spend far less discussing this issue, or being involved in politics at all, than many suggest here. They are building hospitals, educating children, and providing for the poor all over the world.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nick Santiago
07:14 AM on 02/01/2011
And spending millions upon millions of tithed dollars to fund anti-gay initiatives.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bsmithslo
08:48 AM on 02/01/2011
There are two primary groups responsibility for that. Most of it has been done through the National Organization for Marriage (which is sponsored by the LDS and Catholic churches and their families). Don't paint all of Christianity with the same brush. Call out the ones that are doing it. I doubt the author had either the LDS or the Catholic church in mind when writing to "evangelicals" in this piece. The one person mentioned (Osteen) does not appear to have any interest in gay marriage or politics more generally. Do you have any evidence that he does?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ninetailedfox
banning people.....so childish
12:53 PM on 02/01/2011
My beliefs are not influenced by preachers, rather my beliefs and experiences were molded from family and the illusion that christianity somehow touts family values. The reality is much more depressing than the illusion.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bsmithslo
08:30 PM on 02/01/2011
Fantastic. Why then do you post here? Apparently Osteen's views have no influence on you. Do you think he has the right to have them? Do you think anything he said to Piers Morgan endangers the life and happiness of gay people? I would suggest to you that the violence that is aimed at gays has many sources. Theologians generally don't espouse hate and are very rarely violent.
photo
FantasticFourFan
No one on the right is a christian.
12:36 AM on 02/01/2011
A perfect example of "christians" feigning victim status was the recent Chick-Fil-A incident where a store gave a donation to an anti-gay hate group. So a gay rights group called for a boycott of the franchise. The message boards were all filled with the most vile hate mongers saying the most disgusting things about gays while claiming victim status because those gays they insist are a minority anyway are taking their business elsewhere. The hypocrisy would be amusing if not for the fact that so many are so unaware of it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
detroitblkmale30
Wise Men Still Seek Him
06:16 PM on 02/01/2011
no there was nothing wrong with what Chic-Fil-A did. They have every right to do what they did. There were even bisexual and gay commentators who supported their right to do so on those boards. At least I am honest enough to see BOTH sides of the argument. The TRUE hypocrisy is those who scream tolerance and offer none for those who disagree with them.
11:59 PM on 02/01/2011
Omigosh. Can I say you are a breath of fresh air? Not because of Chick-Fil-A but because of the following statement:

"The TRUE hypocrisy is those who scream tolerance and offer none for those who disagree with them."

I've been cruising around the religion section the past few hours and it's like being pelted with rocks. I have very little respect for what passes for 'tolerance' on this site, which is a shame because there are some great topics being posted. Unfortunately, on 'progressive' sites this type of dynamic is as common as the anti-gay rhetoric displayed on many conservative sites.