More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jonathan Kim

Jonathan Kim

GET UPDATES FROM Jonathan Kim

ReThink Review: The People vs. George Lucas -- This Is the Film You're Looking For

Posted: 05/18/11 05:06 PM ET

There is, perhaps, no filmmaker in history as beloved and despised as George Lucas. Beloved for the original Star Wars trilogy, which introduced the world to a mythological sci-fi fantasy space fable so mind-blowing, powerful, archetypal and universal that it spawned what is essentially a religion, with tens, if not hundreds, of millions of devoted followers around the world. And, of course despised for, as some indelicately put it, "raping their childhoods," first by literally rewriting history with the "special editions" of the original trilogy, then with the truly putrid prequels that created a crisis of faith that makes the Catholic Church's pedophilia scandal look like nitpicking over an awkwardly long hug.

So, for those of you who feel betrayed, disappointed, infuriated or traumatized by George Lucas, there's finally a movie for you, the fascinating, excellent documentary The People vs. George Lucas, which not only details the crimes Lucas has committed against his fans, but goes much deeper, examining the Star Wars phenomenon, the man who created it, its fans and the very idea of culture itself. Watch the trailer for The People vs. George Lucas below.

The film starts with Lucas' childhood, growing up in Modesto, California, getting in trouble and working on cars until he discovered film. But with his first two features, American Graffiti and THX 1138, studio interference was so invasive and onerous that it scarred him, which might explain why his next film was about a tiny band of freedom fighters battling an oppressive evil empire.

Of course, that next movie revolutionized filmmaking and became the biggest thing ever, and The People vs. George Lucas examines the phenomenon that followed, with fans around the world testifying to how seeing Star Wars changed their lives forever. Not only did fans attempt to relive the magic of the films through an endless array of Star Wars merchandise, but they did something unusual -- they began recreating, expanding and riffing on the trilogy with thousands of reenactments, spoofs, parodies, plays, art, websites and fan fiction to keep the story alive, with the film showing clips of some of the most interesting ones.

Naturally, the film relives the painful experiences freshest in our minds -- the excitement of the news that the original trilogy would be reissued, followed by the shock and disappointment at pointless and silly new scenes, the controversy over Greedo shooting first, and the defanging of the trilogy to supposedly make it safer for kids.

Then, of course came The Phantom Menace, where faith in Lucas was restored by the trailer, then dashed in the most brutal, heartbreaking way that can be summed up in five devastating words: midichlorians and Jar Jar Binks. And let us never speak of them again.

Along with commentary by a wide range of authors, critics, experts, bloggers and superfans, The People vs. George Lucas also includes the producer of Star Wars and The Empire Strikes Back, the man who played Darth Vader and archival interviews of Francis Ford Coppola and Lucas himself. What's so compelling is the passion, eloquence, emotion and intelligence with which all the subjects talk about the Star Wars universe, which means so much to them, and the film never for a second makes fun of even the most extreme fans.

What emerges is a portrait of a man as contradictory as the two trilogies he created, deserving of both sympathy and scorn. An anti-corporate rebel who became the head of a multi-billion-dollar corporate empire. A creative genius who became enslaved by his greatest creation. A man who testified before Congress, condemning the colorization of black and white films, then later went back to alter his masterpieces. Someone who gave his fans the greatest gift imaginable, then took a dump on their faces.

At the heart of The People vs. George Lucas are complicated questions about art, artists and culture. Shouldn't an artist do the works he wants, regardless of what his fans demand? Is the artist the owner of his work, free to change or destroy it as he pleases, or does it belong to the culture that embraces it? For all its criticism, this film is a love letter to Lucas from fans desperate to forgive him despite what he's put them through, that I enjoyed immensely. Perhaps the only drawback (if you can call it that) is that the film rightfully assumes that those viewing it already know a lot about the Star Wars films -- if you don't, the film might not mean much to you.

And to answer the question "Did George Lucas rape my childhood?", I think my comedian friend Paul Jay put it best when he said, "George Lucas didn't rape your childhood. He just jerked off and made your childhood watch."

The People vs. George Lucas is currently playing at the Nuart Theatre in Santa Monica, CA. To find out if The People vs. George Lucas will be playing near you, visit the official website.

For more ReThink Reviews, visit ReThinkReviews.net. To subscribe to ReThink Reviews on YouTube, go here. To follow ReThink Reviews on Facebook, go here.

 

Follow Jonathan Kim on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ReThinkReviews

There is, perhaps, no filmmaker in history as beloved and despised as George Lucas. Beloved for the original Star Wars trilogy, which introduced the world to a mythological sci-fi fantasy space fable ...
There is, perhaps, no filmmaker in history as beloved and despised as George Lucas. Beloved for the original Star Wars trilogy, which introduced the world to a mythological sci-fi fantasy space fable ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 40
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:33 AM on 05/20/2011
Like Star Wars? Live it! Oppose The Empire, vote for the Green Party.
photo
aceshigh11
Nowhere is the dreamer or the misfit so alone
08:21 PM on 05/19/2011
This looks great...I will definitely Netflix it when it comes out.

I saw 'Jedi' in the theater with my Dad when I was only 5 years old, and I can STILL vividly remember the experience. That's how powerful those original films were.

The prequels were largely bad...only 'Revenge of the Sith' approached competence in any way, shape or form, and even that is stretching it.

Still...it had some thrilling moments, and the final few scenes gave me a major nostalgia overload that left me a bit misty.
05:14 PM on 05/19/2011
As a Real cinema buff, I've always found his films god-awful. The acting and dialogue is
cringe worthy. Lucas is the most overrated man in Hollywood. But they do love money.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
CWPCreator
A ruckus maker for the left...the far left
01:17 AM on 05/20/2011
When you see movies as a kid, as many people did with Star Wars, many times you end up having a real love for those movies, even if adult you would normally dismiss them as crap. I saw the original trilogy as a kid in the 90's and I've been in love with the films ever since. Watching the originals now, I definitely see where people have criticisms, yet I still love the original films.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EAPrince
My other car is an Al'kesh
12:57 PM on 05/19/2011
To add one last comment, I think one of the problems with the prequels, though I did like them, was that Lucas directed. While he's a good director, he's not a great director. Think about it, he's only really directed 5 major films: American Graffiti, Star Wars, Phantom Menace, Attack of the Clones and Revenge of the Sith. He's Produced and/or written a bunch more, but not directed. And note he didn't direct Empire or Jedi and they were pretty well liked. I think the prequels might have been a little better if he'd brought in someone to direct them for him. Just a thought.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EAPrince
My other car is an Al'kesh
12:45 PM on 05/19/2011
I'm still amazed at this assumption that the Star Wars prequels were horrible. As if EVERYONE agrees about this. Were there things I didn't like about the prequels? Sure there were. For one thing I was never really comfortable with Hayden Christensen's performance, particularly in Episode 2. But, generally speaking, I really enjoyed them and still pop in the DVDs occasionally.

I can't help but feel that the original movies were canonized to such a degree that no film could ever have lived up to them. Nothing he did would have pleased everyone.

Erik
http://eaprince.blogspot.com
photo
BlackJAC
It's better to be a black king than a white knight
06:00 PM on 05/19/2011
People also forget the era in which the original movie came out: post-Vietnam malaise, sci-fi wasn't a major draw to begin with...one of the essays in Star Wars On Trial delves into this a bit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ElBruce
11:57 AM on 05/19/2011
As Lucas puts it, the first movies weren't actually all that good, it's just that most of the critics of the prequels were kids when they saw them. Once the current generation of kids grows up, they'll love the prequels just as much. I suspect he'll be right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jake Thomas
elastic
09:28 AM on 05/19/2011
I am going to go out on a limb here and suggest that Lucas's movies are all lame. He is just a money machine.
07:45 AM on 05/19/2011
For a further destruction of Lucas' diabolical prequels, I'd also recommend Confused Matthew and Red Letter Media's online reviews.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
NebDem78
Protector of Herland
02:55 AM on 05/19/2011
The star wars 'universe,' heh, if you could even call it that. Those rodents would fry if they were to ever bang with the Star Trek Galaxy.

Nice article though.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EAPrince
My other car is an Al'kesh
01:02 PM on 05/19/2011
It would be quite the battle. The Star Wars side would have the advantage of fighters, something never really seen in Trek. But of course Trek would also bring cloaking technology. No doubt the Defiant would make mincemeat out of the Millennium Falcon. ;-)
photo
BlackJAC
It's better to be a black king than a white knight
05:53 PM on 05/19/2011
During the Dominion War there were fighter-esque ships, plus who's to say a runabout couldn't take on an X-wing or TIE?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
NebDem78
Protector of Herland
02:39 AM on 05/20/2011
It should be noted that the Empire did have a form of cloaking technology. It was used brilliantly by Grand Admiral Thrawn. He mined the orbiting space of Coruscant with cloaked asteroids.
DrSnuggles
You label me and I'll label you
11:31 AM on 05/20/2011
Based entirely on within canon schematics it seems pretty obvious that the ships/tech in Star Wars would wipe the floor with those in Star Trek.

Though we have no real way of knowing the energy output of capital phasers/lasers etc. the two things we can compare are;

1. Scale - The largest star Mon Calamari cruisers (Home 1) are three times the size of a Borg cube; the super star destroyers (Executor) are even larger.

2. Propulsion - This is where Star Wars superior tech slaps you in the face; to cross the entire galaxy in Star Wars takes a matter of weeks; in Star Trek it would take a matter of decades.
photo
BlackJAC
It's better to be a black king than a white knight
05:55 PM on 05/20/2011
That's probably because Star Wars hyperdrive has more in common with Star Trek transwarp or quantum slipstream drive rather than warp drive.  And how big were the Death Stars, again?  And what exactly killed both of them, again?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
NebDem78
Protector of Herland
05:58 PM on 05/20/2011
You make some very good points. The Scale and the Speed may be an advantage for the Star Wars fleet, but what about their shielding? Do they even have shields?
11:30 PM on 05/18/2011
The Phantom Menace was awful, but Attack of the Clones was much better and Revenge of the Sith was wicked good. I know this is blasphemy, especially since I love Star Wars (but am not obsessed) but I think A New Hope was kind of boring. I know it set the stage for the rest and started the phenomenon, but Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi are way better. In my opinion the movies should be ranked in this order: Jedi, Empire + Empire tied, original, Clones, Phantom. Hayden Christianson is a brutal actor and brought both movies he was in way down, but everyone else was amazing in them (especially Palpatine) but it's not like Mark Hamill was exactly Lawrence Olivier himself. I'm 23, so I didn't live through the original mania or have "my childhood raped". Lucas also made the new Indianna Jones movie just as bad as Phantom Menace.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
libwingoflibwing
Leftist Christian, Non-Violent Revolutionary
01:08 AM on 05/19/2011
I didn't like Jar Jar Binks in Phantom, but I loved Anakin Skywalker and it set me up for Hayden's terrific performances.

I agree that Sith was wicked good. It's a beautiful and powerful film. I adored it. But I CAN'T watch it. Just writing about it tears me up. I get haunted by it. It's too much. I felt this way a little bit by Empire with the big reveal after Luke loses his hand. But the haunting there lasted only a few weeks. It's been years since Sith and sometimes at night when I can't fall asleep my stream of consciousness can end up on what happened to Anakin and I begin tearing up and can't get my thoughts off of it. No way I'd watch that entire film again. I'll dip into bits of it. But I will not put myself through that again.

Now that's a powerful film and Lucas has clearly mined something vital in the collective unconscious there.

The only other film like that, one that I really think is a great film but will never watch again is Schindler's List.
10:00 AM on 05/19/2011
The worst of Phantom was Hayden's terrible acting. I just couldn't bear watching it. The inner 'conflict' and developing rage was so poorly represented that it just ruined the entire movie. How did they ever come up with this guy? Terrible decision. I didn't watch the sequels. It was all over for me.
photo
BlackJAC
It's better to be a black king than a white knight
11:46 AM on 05/19/2011
What people fail to realize is that the prequels were never supposed to be made in the first place.  The episode numbering was supposed to be a callback to the Buster Crabbe Saturday matinee serials like Buck Rogers that inspired it ("Oh, you weren't here last week for Episode 3?  Stinks to be you.").  It was all just backstory that had to be fleshed out like gangbusters--Padme was never anything more than an abstract concept named "Mrs. Skywalker"--with about 70% of it going into Revenge of the Sith.  Even when Lucas authorized Timothy Zahn to write follow-up books and sanctioned West End Games to publish the Star Wars Adventure Journal nobody was allowed to write anything set during the prequel era.
photo
murphysgirl
I prefer coffee, not tea..
07:41 PM on 05/18/2011
Empire Strikes Back was the best out of both trilogies!! I couldn't have been more disappointed in The Phantom Menace.
photo
BlackJAC
It's better to be a black king than a white knight
05:54 PM on 05/18/2011
Why would I be looking for a film where people with misplaced priorities and nothing else going for them get needlessly upset over a 35-year-old movie saga?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jonathan Kim
07:24 PM on 05/18/2011
Because that's not really what it's about.
photo
BlackJAC
It's better to be a black king than a white knight
08:08 PM on 05/18/2011
Other than reiterate stuff that was already covered in the "Empire Of Dreams" documentary that came with my Original Trilogy DVD box set, what does it do beyond give the whiniest of the fanboys their Fifteen Minutes?  Greedo shooting first wasn't "painful," it was at most unnecessary because Han was justified in blasting him no matter who shot first.  The midichlorians were a pseudo-scientific explanation of why some people could use the Force and others couldn't.  And Chewbacca drew the same racial insensitivity criticism as Jar Jar.
 
My advice to them would be to start writing their own original material.  They'll promptly see how the alleged rape of someone's childhood is actually a command decision made because something simply didn't work the first time around.