More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jose Antonio Vargas

Jose Antonio Vargas

What's the Future of the Journalist in Our Digital Era? (VIDEOS)

Posted: 06/25/10 01:50 PM ET

Exactly how has technology changed the journalist's role?

The question has nagged me since the latest Future of News and Civic Media conference in Cambridge, hosted by MIT and the Knight Foundation. The three-day confab drew a curious hodgepodge of technologists, academics, foundation and non-profit folks, with a smattering of so-called traditional, mainstream journalists -- "refugees," they called -- many of whom have left their traditional, mainstream jobs. But what they lacked in common in terms of resumes they more than made up in what they shared: a passion for remaking the news for 21st century.

Altogether, the crowd applauded the 12 winners of the foundation's Knight News Challenge (KNC), an ambitious, generous contest (this year's grantees received a total sum of $2.74 million) that awards innovative journalism projects. It's no coincidence, perhaps, that many of the projects were not created by traditional journalists. The bios of the winners read software engineers, entrepreneurs, video game designers, documentary filmmakers, among others, and their projects push our idea of journalism. They serve as a guide for the future.

We live in an increasingly visual, data-driven world, where content easily spreads online, all meant to be shared. That's the thinking behind CityTracking, created by Eric Rodenbeck, the founder and creative director of Stamen, a mapping and data visualization studio. The aim of the project, Rodenbeck said, is "to make municipal data" -- like crime -- "easy to understand."

And digital news consumers don't want to just read data, they want to interact with it, too. Enter The Cartoonist, developed by noted video game designers and analysts Ian Bogost and Michael Mateas. Their project will develop a free tool that creates interactive, cartoon-like, current event games, "the equivalent of editorial cartoons." For years now, games have been integrated in education, the military and of course entertainment. It's time journalism gets in the mix.

The popularity and ubiquity of Wikipedia proves that, yes, anyone can be an editor, anyone can have a voice. And that's the underlying theme behind two KNC-winning projects. There's Local Wiki, created by software engineers Philip Neustrom and Mike Ivanov, which is an expansion of the successful DavisWiki.org, a crowd-sourcing bulletin for residents of Davis, Calif. There's also Front Porch Forum, a virtual town hall space that connects residents to each other. The brainchild of Vermont resident Michael Wood-Lewis, the forum covers 25 Vermont towns. That number will go up to 250 because of the KNC grant.

What's clear in reviewing the winning projects is technology's core role in redefining journalism for the digital era. KNC enters its fifth and final year of handing out these grants, which have awarded some $23 million to to 50 projects.

What hasn't been so clear, at least to me, is the role that traditional journalists themselves -- the ones still employed in newspaper, magazine, TV and radio newsrooms across the country -- must play as technologies further evolve and the reporter's toolbox deepens and broadens. It's not just about having a Twitter feed and finding sources on Facebook and YouTube. It's about fundamentally understanding how the news ecosystem has changed. You, the reporter, don't know everything. You, the reporter, are accountable to your readers, who now can publicly question your reporting and writing. You, the reporter, must think about getting the news out, reporting stories and interacting with active digital news consumers in multi-dimensional ways.

How can social media and crowd-sourcing be leveraged in political reporting, so the journalism becomes less about horse-race coverage, the simplistic GOP-said-this-and-the-Dems-said-that kind of writing, the theater of politics?

How can beat reporters covering education use mobile technology -- one of the primary ways that parents and their teenage age communicate -- in writing about local school boards?

How can local news sites take their lead from LocalWiki and Front Porch Forum, to cite just two, and start thinking of their sites as conversation and idea hubs?

At a time in which all a journalist needs is a laptop, an Internet connection and editing software to report and publish work, what's the role of a newsroom? Or layers and layers of editors to vet what reporters are writing and publishing?

I've said this before and I will keep saying it: I cannot think of a more exciting time to a be journalist, and I cannot think of better time to be good at what I do. This is a golden age for journalism, a time for experimentation, entrepreneurship and creativity. Individual journalists must take full advantage of it. After all, the future of news is inexorably linked -- married, even -- to the future of the journalist.

Redefining journalism for the digital era is both a problem and an opportunity. "This problem cannot be solved by the newsroom alone," said Jay Rosen, the noted press critic who's professor at New York University. He's been a strong proponent of citizen journalism. "But it can't be solved without newsroom people, and their intelligence."

Addeds Alberto Ibarguen, the foundation's president and CEO who was formerly the publisher of The Miami Herald and El Nuevo Herald: "What we're talking about here is the evolution of storytelling. There was storytelling before there was writing. It's a skill, a necessity, that endures, no matter which medium is being used."

Using new technologies, the journalist must tell stories in interactive, relevant, compelling ways.

NOTE: I served as one of over 30 judges for this year's KNC contest. In the coming weeks, we'll feature blogs from past and current KNC winners, explaining the vision behind their projects and what they mean for the future of journalism -- and the journalist.

Courtesy of KNC, below is a video slideshow of this year's winners explaining the goal of their projects.


 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 55
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
03:01 PM on 07/02/2010
"How can local news sites take their lead from LocalWiki and Front Porch Forum, to cite just two, and start thinking of their sites as conversation and idea hubs?"

Unless there is engagement on the social/citizen level, traditional presses will not survive. Stop resisting! Unless hyper-local media embeds deeply within the fabric of the community, citizen journalism cannot monetize successfully.

True engagement on the local level means having an active two-way conversation. That's the foundation which has set citizen journalism and hyper-local sites far and away from the pack in the first place.

We’ve found a way to strike the magic balance. iChagrin.com is based on our own concept of collaborative entrepreneurship; proving that a for-profit entity can create a lucrative business model based in large measure on the idea that furthering the interests of an entire community is sustainable as well as profitable. For a small community: Chagrin Falls, Ohio, that’s the winning combination.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Refugees
01:43 PM on 06/30/2010
After all, it is not simply by trying to reform the journalism, the worst thing happening with globalization is that the reporters are told what to do and what do not! Commitment to the true and the marginalized calls for a transformation of reality through this choice and commitment, the history will be able to bear us for what we did on our time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thirdcloud
05:20 AM on 06/29/2010
This is a golden age for journalism, a time for experimentation, entrepreneurship and creativity
10:17 AM on 06/27/2010
The journalist job has been to help bring information to the public, much like the music industry brought music to the jpublic. With the internet and blogs, people now can do this themselves. Scientists can make their own announcements etc. Jounalism as we know it is dead. they have beome just one more voice of many.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LearningCommunity
Finding Solutions that work
10:31 AM on 06/27/2010
Santai, I agree. The role of the journalist used to go into the world to get information and publish it on a very limited publishing system. Now we have eliminted the printing press a the bottleneck of information. It is called "crowd sourcing."
10:47 AM on 06/27/2010
...and the world is much wiser for this. You call it "crowd sourcing", I call it "asking the audience" our collective intellegince is unlimited..I am just now reading Richard Rhodes fascinating book on the "The Making of the Atomic Bomb", and it tells just how much development of atomic energy depended on the speed of publishing, as the development was such a cooperative effort among scientists worldwide. The fact that we can all communicate with each other directrly and much more quickly will speed up development of new systems (both good and bad) . To be human is to be subjective, and journalists and publishers not only helped to deseminate good info...they also blocked it as much. We are all better off without this screen.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:59 PM on 06/27/2010
You'll all be worse off and sorry for the demise of legitimate journalism. People reporting their own opinions with no editors' oversight, no fact checking, no copy editing creates unreliable junk.
09:10 AM on 06/28/2010
There will be lots of editors...just like now...other people who challenge your facts. Also, in my view, there is no such thing as objective journalism...jounalists and editors just don't admit (maybe they don't even see their bias). The media is the message.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MartyJo
If the world didn't suck, we'd all fall off.
05:48 AM on 06/27/2010
You mean there are actually journalists in the American media? Coulda fooled me !!
01:25 AM on 06/27/2010
It's time to stop pretending the digital era allows journalists to spout off without evidence. Journalism is journalism, and we depend upon them to JUST DO IT.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
DaneAZ
Trapeze Artist
11:20 AM on 06/28/2010
Pretending?
YOU just did it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JPE33180
Liberal to the max.
11:34 PM on 06/26/2010
If the efforts to curtail the independence of the internet continue and succeed I would hope there are some independent newpapers to which I can turn. Between the seeming failures of net neutrality and the possibility that a President can close the internet at a throw of a switch I have low confidence that there will be a way to communicate freely. At least the "press" is mentioned overtly in the Constitution with it's freedoms clearly stated.
11:07 PM on 06/26/2010
Substance will always win over form
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:30 PM on 06/26/2010
This blog might lead one to believe that a laptop and a Twitter feed make a journalist, when neither is a requisite. What's really needed is an ability to articlute in clear language and to critically analyze what's going on from an objective perspective.
10:18 AM on 06/27/2010
..yes, but journalists abandoned that years ago...if they ever did it. To be human is to be subjective.
08:28 PM on 06/26/2010
WHAT journalists?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
mjeffn
Freedom's just another word 4 nothing left to lose
08:48 PM on 06/26/2010
News? The only place you are going to find anything that resembles "News" today is in a museum.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rp2009
05:54 PM on 06/26/2010
In the past, stories had to fit a number of paragraphs, time frame, whatever the limitations of a chosen media. Now with the web there is no excuse for not providing in depth reporting. All the research that went into any story should be available to the reader at the click of a button if he/she decides to go into a story further including complete interviews, pictures and document scans. We do not need anyone editing down or picking and choosing what information is more important or valuable to me as a reader. I really do not think any news organization has has any idea what the possibilities are as they keep doing the same lackluster job as always even though a lot of limitations have been blown away.
03:10 PM on 06/26/2010
Good journalism depends on good, discerning, appreciative, supportive readers, but the advent of shoot-from-the-hip bloggers and online aggregators has dumbed down and decimated the old-school readership base and robbed literate, quasi-scientific, public-service-oriented journalists (meaning those investigative wordsmiths and anti-propagandists who are dedicated to balance, rebuttal, neutrality, probity, etc.) of their traditional economic base. End of story, it'd seem.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
southernman
Proud Southern Progressive , Semper Fi !!
12:38 PM on 06/26/2010
It all depends on a word called integrity , the less you have the dimmer your future. If no one can trust you to tell the truth, then why should they support you, much less watch you. Or as in Fox News you will be ok if your audience doesn't want to be told the truth and integrity (or the lack of it) is not a problem
02:51 PM on 06/26/2010
Since you clearly watch Fox all the time to report on their continuing bias, you probably do not have time to watch the other networks.

The last time i saw integrity in the media in this country dates back a few years.

It is called 'pick-a-winner' and the disaster(s) we have at present are partly due to that "integrity"
06:43 PM on 06/26/2010
Honesty and integrity in the news media pretty much ended in the last of the 1990s when the corporations really started buying all the news papers, tv and radio stations. By 2000 they owned enough of the media that allowed bush/chenny enough cover to get appointed by the supreme court. By 2003 there was no news what so ever in America. Very little now. I quit watching all the talking bobble heads and all the network news in 2003. The only time I watch any of it is clips or read the transcripts.
What we have today are overpaid propaganda artists. Or in plain english overpaid liars!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Heidland
I like all things pie-ish. Oh, and cake.
12:33 PM on 06/26/2010
There was a fantastic presentation about this at the new media 2012 conference last September.

Would that I could post that in response to this article.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:57 AM on 06/26/2010
What's the Future of the Journalist in Our Digital Era?

Unemployment is the first thing that comes to mind.