Since the time of the February 1979 revolution in Iran that swept Ayatollah Khomeini into power Americans have grown accustomed to looking down their noses at "Islamic fundamentalists." Many of us see these religious fanatics who call America "the Great Satan" and promise to "avenge the Crusades" as backward people susceptible to extremism and the influence of radical clerics. But what are we to make of Robert Draper's reporting in GQ magazine that during the initial stages of launching the war in Iraq senior intelligence officials in the Pentagon affixed Bible quotations on eleven different cover sheets of President George W. Bush's "Worldwide Intelligence Updates?"
Major General Glen Shaffer, himself an ardent believer, who was a director of intelligence for both the Joint Chiefs and the secretary of defense, with Donald Rumsfeld's encouragement, played on the President's "born again" faith to give the U.S. invasion of Iraq a distinctly Christian fundamentalist aura. On April 3, 2003, for example, when U.S. troops were entering Baghdad, Secretary Rumsfeld and General Shaffer decided the President needed a good dose of Joshua 1:9: "Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not be terrified; do not be discouraged, for the LORD your God will be with you wherever you go."
I suppose we should consider ourselves lucky that Shaffer and Rumsfeld leaned toward Isaiah and Joshua instead of Deuteronomy or they could have easily found a quote from the Bible like this one:
. . . [W]hen the LORD your God has gives it into your hand you shall put all its males to the sword, but the women and the little ones, the cattle, and everything else in the city, all its spoil, you shall take as booty for yourselves; and you shall enjoy the spoil of your enemies, which the LORD your God has given you. . . . But in the cities of these people that the LORD your God gives you for an inheritance, you shall save alive nothing that breathes, but you shall utterly destroy them . . . as the LORD your God has commanded. (Deuteronomy 20:10-18)
No wonder Rummy and Bush didn't have a care in the world when Iraq descended into looting and chaos after the fall of Baghdad -- "Stuff Happens" Rummy famously said -- but what he really meant was: "It's god's will."
There's a context and a pattern here.
For example, Lieutenant General William G. Boykin (now retired) was preaching the gospel that god ordained the U.S. attack on Iraq and saying things like this about the enemy: "I knew that my God was bigger than his. I knew that my God was a real God and his was an idol." Monica Goodling was one of the 150 graduates inside the Bush Administration of Pat Robertson's "Regent University," whose purpose is "to produce Christian leaders who will make a difference, who will change the world." Ms. Goodling messed with a lot of people's careers inside the Justice Department by rejecting them for posts for which they were qualified for the sole reason they didn't share her right-wing Christian fundamentalist beliefs. The former head of Bush's "faith-based initiatives," David Kuo, exposed how Bush's "faith" programs were designed to funnel money into the coffers of Republican-connected right-wing Christian organizations as patronage to help Bush and Cheney win re-election. John Bolton, Bush's choice to be ambassador to the United Nations, was on Senator Jesse Helms' short list as "the kind of man" you want to "have by your side" when the battle of Armageddon takes place and the Second Coming arrives. And we're all wearily aware of the religious-tinged gay bashing that led to the cynical Republican ballot measures in swing states aimed to get the flock to the polls. And now we learn that the highest-ranking intelligence and military officials were framing the U.S. invasion of Iraq as a Holy War against Islam?
They tell us George W. Bush is a moral man because he opposes abortion and therefore he's superior to those baby-killing Democrats.
But when Bush vetoed a bill that would have provided elementary health care for about 9 million of America's most destitute children I didn't think it was consistent with Christian teaching about taking care of the poor.
And as Texas governor when Bush carried-out a record-setting 152 executions I thought he might have violated the commandment: "Thou shall not kill."
And when Bush approved torturing people I thought of my childhood catechism where I heard the story of Jesus being tortured.
And when Bush blocked efforts to pass on to future generations a less polluted, less hot planet I didn't think he was taking care of the "Good Earth."
And when Bush ignored the human suffering in New Orleans in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, where his negligence cost human lives, I thought he could have responded to that "act of god" a little better.
And when Bush appointed corporate cronies to head key regulatory agencies that led to the poisoning of children from tainted toys and diseased hamburgers and spinach and unsafe workplaces it didn't seem to promote brotherly love.
And when Bush, serving the richest elites in our society, unleashed Wall Street in a Social Darwinist free-for-all where swindlers pillaged the middle class costing people their homes, pensions, and jobs, I thought the "meek" inherited nothing from this president.
And when Bush lied to the American people about Iraq's WMDs and ties to Al Qaeda and brought the nation to war on false pretenses the whole enterprise seemed to bit morally questionable to me. And with Bush's war continuing to exact its deadly toll, with about a quarter-million Iraqis who met premature deaths, and 4,300 dead Americans, and tens of thousands of maimed and mangled people who will never be the same, and all the soldiers suffering from varying degrees of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and all the resources wasted that could have been better spent -- Maybe it was weirdly appropriate that General Shaffer and Donald Rumsfeld framed the war for Bush with quotes from the Bible. If any man needed a blessing for his deeds it was George W. Bush.
It's sort of fitting that a Bible-thumping administration, with a president who wore his religion on his sleeve and was prone to public displays of piety, caused so much lasting damage to the country. Bush proved that the blurring of the line that separates Church and State is not only unconstitutional, it is also wholly dysfunctional.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
There is a balance that most Christians see between what God desires and what God allows. God allows many things to occur that are not His will. God as well as Christ are holy which by nature abhor sin. That being said both desire fellowship with humans which requires believing in Christ.
If man chooses sin over Christ, he will suffer the consequences.
See Joseph A. Palermo's Profile
Thanks for the comments -- we need to get back to the secularism that was one of the great things about this country (no long history of Church entanglements like Europe) -- please read Susan Jacoby's excellent book, The Age of Unreason.
Its ok to kill our babies if they're old enough to tote a gun?.... and in the name of the Lord.
Joey; Going off something "anelder" has said on this thread, about wishing more people would read and comment on your piece, I agree. A suggestion on this point might be that maybe you should use a more sensationalized titling of your articles. For example in this case; "Christianity is Hi-jacking Our Military", or "No Atheists in Our Foxholes....' That's an Order ' ".
What do you think? Drawing more people in may elicit more responses.
See Joseph A. Palermo's Profile
Johnie, Harper's has a fascinating piece about the military and the religious tone.
I'm guessing this is it;
http://www.militaryreligiousfreedom.org/press-releases/harpers_blast.html
I'll read it anyway.
There is a phrase in the Bible. By their deeds you shall know them.
Look at everything the Bushies have done. No matter how many Bible verses they put on reports, it's pretty obvious that they are not Christians.
In Britain the church and state are not separate (the queen is the head of the Church Of England) yet no
one attends church (2%) we don't produce proselytising soldiers (did that in the 18th century) and there are virtually none of the religous fanatics america is famous for (such as the one who just swam across a lake using a pair of cardboard flippers and screwed up Burmas best hope for a sunny future) and Britains politicians are famously reluctant to admit to any sort of religious conviction whereas their American equivalents seem to need to proclaim their love of God at every opportunity lest they be regarded as unAmerican.
Sorry, the 'constitution' is just words it's Americas God and Guns mindset that needs to change.
Frankly Joseph, I would have expected quotes from Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Anton LeVay, Aleister Crowley* or Niccolò Machiavelli with the Bush crowd memos. Perhaps with pornographic images of the Simpsons as decoration.
*“Ordinary morality is only for ordinary people.”
We are all ordinary.
See Joseph A. Palermo's Profile
I think those authors would require some homework for Rummy et al.
Good point.
Other than the cheap lies that came out of Bush's mouth, what about this man did anyone think was Christian? Just looking at him was enough to know he's not.
I don't believe in any religion - think they are all completely self-serving without any factual substance as I would describe Bush as the same.
and i understand that the christianists weren't happy with bush's performance as a supporter of their political and social agenda.
I so wish more had either seen this or commented on it; I also pray that they realize that it's not the scriptures that are evil but the men who use the scriptures. Additionally I would pray they would realize that this action is truly the 'taking/using of the Lord's name in vain.'
It really isn't the swearing thing that's sinful it's the using thing.
Excellent article and it's long past time that our cowed and cowardly mainstream media shone a light on the rise to power of doctrinaire fundamentalist Christians in our military, though I won't hold my breath.. Call me crazy but I find the thought of people who believe eventual Armageddon is part of God's plan wielding power in a military that has thousands of nuclear weapons rather unsettling.
See Joseph A. Palermo's Profile
Yes, I always see Tony Perkins and Dobson on TV -- you'd think after the Haggard thing they'd back off a little.
We fought long and hard to separate Church and State. Untold hundreds of thousands have died to ensure that we are not treated as fodder for someone else's hereafter.
Fundamentalism in any religion is abhorrent. In politics even more so as the fundamentalist politician's first allegiance is neither to voter or even country, but to their version of God. Religion has an appalling record of recognising and honouring the rights of its own adherents, never mind the rights of others - I would have thought it obvious that it is incompatible with democracy as a whole.
Christians have always had a bit of a problem rendering unto Caesar while blithely interpreting God's desires as a reflection of their own wants.
Yours was a wholly excellent and revealing article/picture. When those on the world stage act In The Name of God, without His (actual) confirmation, assurance, or guidance - the repercussions have most often been of (and from) the darkest source.
Joseph, what an EXCELLENT TITLE!
Another GREAT oxymoron for the ages...
--
Yours was a wholly excellent and revealing article/picture, Mr. Palermo. When those on the world stage act In The Name of God, without His (actual) confirmation, assurance, or guidance - the repercussions have most often been of (and from) the darkest source.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rBhPDctqCg
"darkest source"
amen
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with