Fred Thompson finally threw his hat into the ring of Republican presidential candidates.
In the Senate he was known for being a lazy legislator but an energetic pursuer of poon.
He is a one-dimensional actor with a tiny palette. But he is the best right-wing Hollywood candidate in his price range.
Ever since Ronald Reagan lowered the bar of American politics to enable mediocre thespians to run for high office we have suffered our share of Republican cardboard.
Sonny Bono became a Congressional representative. Arnold Schwarzenegger became Governor of California. And even the talentless drip who played "Gopher" on The Loveboat held a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives from Iowa.
Now Fred Thompson wants to get into the act. His "qualifications" amount to little more than being able to emote on demand and read a mean teleprompter. He's not an "empty suit," but a desiccated, mummified version of 1950s Man. John Wayne meets Charlton Heston.
His ideas about blockading Iran while continuing to occupy Iraq make him the scariest Republican presidential aspirant to come out of the woodwork since the day Rudy Giuliani announced his candidacy.
Where is William Shatner when you need him?
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Thompson For President?
4 MORE WARS
4 MORE WARS
4 MORE WARS.
Shatner's Canadian.
Fred? Rudy? Suddenly, Mitt's looking pretty good, no?
Paul/Kucinich - Tag Team 2008 - They are the 1!
yes,
but Mitten the Mormon has about 11% while Thompson has 38%, and rising like a rocket. As the sockpuppet man said, this isn't about qualifications stupid. Look at Bush. They want a mouthpiece for their policy. Fred the Actor can deliver.
Believe me in a Fred verses Hillary smackdown, Fred will win.
~
Yes, it's pretty clear how it's going to turn out. Just check out the Rasmussen Report...
.rasmussen reports.co m/public_c ontent/pol itics/dail y_presiden tial_track ing_poll__ 1
'New polling on general election match-ups shows Giuliani by a point over Obama, Obama by four over Thompson, McCain rebounding against Edwards and Edwards with a double digit lead over Romney.' ...
http://www
I don't think that freddie can win, even against hil. Of course, I don't think she'll get the nod, either. Remember right now he's at about 40%, but nobody's said anything bad about him (except that he's got a trophy wife). Wait until the mudslinging starts...
Come now, you can't seriously believe that Right Said Fred would survive a debate with Hillary??
Why, it would be... No Contest.
~Lannie~
Fred is the ultimate empty Republican offering, the corporate sock puppet that can deliver his own lines.
Google "Fred Thompson's pickup truck".
Fred "Ready Freeddie" Thompson Bunper Sticker Contest" LAZY & THE BITCH
TWO BOOBS FOR ONE
VOTE READY FREDDIE CAUSE HE IS UGLY
READY FREDDIE & BIT TITS
FREDDIE & JERI: TAKE A POLL
If America elects this schmuck, it deserves what happens. I can hear the toilet flushing now.
Freddie is a joke, like all the rest of the "WHITE MEN'S CLUB", republican candidates for president. Big money will pour millions into their campaigns (to no avail this time) because the rich are desperate to maintain power in the US Government (that is what made them rich). But I will give them credit, they are also pouring untold millions to the Democratic candidates, in the hopes they can be bought also (become Republican-lite). I truly recommend this sad system will not end until we have federal funding ONLY for all Federal elected positions, no use of personal wealth, or any contributions for anyone else. Make or break on what you get, then America will finally have elected officials who want to serve the public, not their rich contributors.
And a campaign that is only a few weeks long, or at most a couple of months!
Great point LeftRight. This forever campaigning is ridiculous (not to mention annoying) and a huge waste of money that certainly could be put to better use, like helping the poor! Think of the all the people that make money from campaigns. The world would be much better off if they used their talents to help people in need.
But.....
.ctj.org/c orpfed04pr .pdf
...will his campaign be successful?
Anyone running on a platform of "corporate taxes are just to danged high, and HAVE to be come down" will be given so much money the mint will have to buy more presses.
The truth? 82 large, successful American corporations got away w/o paying taxes in George bush's (personal) America.
http://www
Fred - Lazy like a fox.
I have no doubt that Fred Thompson is "The" candidate that the Right Wing,King_Makers want and have planned extensively,to put in the White House as the next President. I also think that both Obama and Hilliary are integral to these same plans,in the calculation that they will cancel each other out,either because of scandals or because voters aren't ready to elect either a black man or a woman as pesident.T hompson then will be made to look like the only safe choice.
Ex Majority Leader Republican Frist on PBS" Charlie Rose Weds night endorsed Fred Thompson. The Elitist Supremist South isn't gonna give up on 2008 Yet, and Don't forget Dr. Richard Land, of the Southern Baptist Convention, covert agent for talking the easily fooled Christian Right into filling the offering plates since the Reagan/Bush Presidency, helping George Bush win Governorship in Texas, and then of course on into the White House.
Yeah, and Bill Frist diagnosed Terry Schivo over the TV as well and we saw how that worked out. Perhaps his endorsement is a good thing?
Delivery boys for grocery clerks.
The very successful Reagan presidency and popularity obviously still angers the left. From his tax cuts which revived our Carter Dead economy to pulling down those soviet Union Walls....t he left cannot give the man credit for all the great things he did.
Smearing Fred Thompson too? I'm not surprised.
The Reagan tax cuts certainly revived the deficit and made it a healthy, growing part of the economy until that awful Clinton balanced the budget. Just in time, W. came along to save it.
Gorbachev brought us the end of the Soviet Union, not Reagan.
Conservatives are so awful at governing that they have had to become very good at revisionist history.
Stevelagain: Very successful? How about the most corrupt administration in history? At least 110 Reagan administration were either, indicted, convicted or resigned under a cloud and that included the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Interior as I recall. How about a national debt greater than all the other presidents combined? Iran Contra - illegal arms sales to our enemy? How about a staff that allowed him to serve while he was in the early stages of Alhzheimer's? You say it's success. I say it just sucks.
As the years go on, yes, even the university professors who rate presidents are gritting their teeth and having to admit Reagan was a successful and great president.
Besides, a thespian has just as much right to run for president as does a lawyer. Somebody show me in the constitution were you have to be a lawyer to be president?
oh yes, we must remember ronnie and nancy did it all by their very own selves. blessed saints.
Reagan gutted the middle class, cut social programs, and lied to the American public. Is it a conincidence that gang violence, coke, and the decent of the public education system all began during his presidency?
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with