Governor Jerry Brown's veto of the budget passed by the Democratic majority in the legislature, (as draconian in terms of gutting public resources as any in the nation), has tipped his hand: Jerry's triangulating. He's aligning himself with the Republican minority in forging a path forward out of California's deep crisis. "We need four Republican votes and in the next several days, I'm going to do everything I can," Brown said. "I'll move heaven and earth to get those votes."
No, Jerry, to get those GOP votes you'll have to lay off more teachers, gut higher education, shred the pensions of public workers, and impose on the state a far-right Republican agenda more akin to what we'd expect from Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker than from Governor Moonbeam.
The governor is willfully pretending that he's unaware of the fact that the Republican legislative minority is not a serious negotiating partner. They've already messed up Brown's governorship by stringing him along, month after month, play-acting as if they might cough up the four votes, (not to extend existing taxes, but to allow Californians to vote on whether or not we want to extend existing taxes).
Hey Jerry! Meg Whitman spent $160 million and we defeated her and put you in charge. And now you're pathetically on your hands and knees begging four right-wing white Republican men to allow the state to function?
What the Republican minority in Sacramento is demanding is that California follow the path of Wisconsin, Ohio, Indiana, Florida, Michigan, and New Jersey: a class war against public institutions and public employees. Now apparently Brown has signaled that he's willing to triangulate against his own party to enable this backward agenda.
With or without the Republican votes, the public sector is getting fleeced once again. The "starve-the-beast" strategy of Golden State Republicans is working marvelously. Somewhere, (probably a plush townhouse in Georgetown), Grover Norquist is giving high fives all around. California is the sweetest deal the Republicans got going: even when they lose, they win!
Living in Sacramento, it's hard to turn your head away from the budget spectacle, like seeing a car accident on Highway 99 (or 50 or 80 or 5). The Republican legislative minority bludgeons the Democratic majority. It's always the same. The Democrats dawdle their time away passing bullshit laws while the state burns. It was horrible to behold back when Arnold "who's-your-daddy?" Schwarzenegger was governor. But the whole kabuki dance just got a lot more pathetic when you see Jerry Brown, a Democrat, triangulating as the Republicans' Enabler in Chief.
Staring in the face budget shortfalls brought to us by the Great Wall Street Toxic Waste Dump of 2008, the Democratic legislative majority and the Democratic governor tell us there's "no choice" but to make "tough" decisions." And whenever we hear the term "tough decisions" in California (as with the nation) it means only one thing: Democratic constituencies tied to the public sector take it on the chin.
So California's system of higher education is going to get whacked with a bigger cut than anything Schwarzenegger dished out. It turns out that in addition to the $500 million cut in the California State University system, there's now going to be at least an additional $150 million cut on top of that one; with probably more savage cuts to follow if Brown continues to "move heaven and earth" to kiss the Republican minority's ass.
At least if Meg Whitman were governor now we could mount a serious opposition. The labor unions in this state could mobilize a vigorous defense of the public institutions. But with the "liberal" Brown in office, Democrats and their working-class constituents are crouching in a holding position. "He's our guy," they say, "we gotta stand behind him," we don't want to end up with a Scott Walker wannabe. So go ahead organized labor, cut more checks for the Dems, open up those Independent Expenditure accounts -- meanwhile, four Republican white men run the state into the ground. The two-thirds rule (where all legislation that touches revenue enhancement needs a super-majority) is all the more galling when we have a Democratic legislature and a Democratic governor.
California has a reputation for being a place where there's a lot of whackos. It's true, and the Republican Party out here reflects that stereotype. They're all blind ideologues and anti-tax zealots dedicated to class warfare and slash-and-burn politics. They don't negotiate, they obstruct. They gum up the works of the parliament just like we've seen far-right parties do in other contexts throughout history. You meet one demand and they got 53 more. There's your "heaven and earth," Jerry.
And the hapless Jerry Brown thinks he can reason with these people. He's going to have to govern their way or he'll never get those votes. And if he's going to govern their way then we might as well have elected Money Bags Whitman because at least we'd have an enemy to mobilize against.
The Republican minority won't give Jerry his four votes -- two from the Senate and two from the Assembly, that's all he needs -- four Republican votes, then the revenue enhancement measure could be put to a vote of all Californians. Negotiating behind closed doors, just like during the Arnold Era, they demand multi-year structural reforms to the entire state government to serve their narrow corporate and class interests -- deregulation (especially environmental regs), privatization (especially of schools and higher ed), tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations -- we've heard it all before.
No one questions why holding the state's budget hostage to attain maximal political goals that have nothing to do with the budget is a legitimate exercise. (The Washington Republicans have taken a page from the California GOP's book and are now holding the federal government hostage through controlling the debt-ceiling vote.)
At the local level we're getting creamed. The city of Sacramento, for instance, (which has one of the highest crime rates in California), is currently laying off police officers, dismantling its CSI unit, and passing on investigating burglaries and parole violations at a time when burglaries and parole violations are skyrocketing. Meantime, Sacramento County and neighboring counties have laid off about one-fourth of their sheriff's departments, and for several years now the local boards of supervisors have been slashing every single program that assisted low-income children and adults who have mental or physical disabilities, closing community centers, swimming pools, and county parks, and laying off hundreds of other personnel. Even the DA's office is laying off prosecutors. Schools are shutting down, teachers are being handed their pink slips, cops and firefighters (the vaunted "first responders" of the 9/11 attacks), and especially their unions, are being vilified and attacked.
And now we can add to this kind of class warfare a Democratic governor willing to "move heaven and earth" to help this slide into oblivion along.
Follow Joseph A. Palermo on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JPalermo
William Bradley: Jerry Brown's Big Budget Veto, and Where It Goes From Here
http://www.sacbee.com/
I think it is good to have a Governor who do the right thing rather than just toe the party line.
Brown has basically said to the legislature to quit living in fantasy land and make the hard choices.
The REALITY that Californians do NOT want to face is:
Californians can NOT have both high quality of services and low taxes.
It can NEVER happen, so Californians need to figure out what services they need and then provide all the money that those services need.
If Californians want good schools then they have to pay HIGHER TAXES.
If Californians want good roads then they have to pay HIGHER TAXES.
If Californians want good health services then they have to pay HIGHER TAXES.
If Californians want ________ then they have to pay HIGHER TAXES.
One of the problems in California is how the taxes are structured. For example most commercial property is still paying property tax rates from the 1970s because commercial property never gets sold in the way people think of a "sale" thereby skirting the law.
PS The state of Arkansas is the only state in the history of the United States to declare bankruptcy. It was forced to cut it's state budget by FIFTY PERCENT!
Brown has nothing to lose but the political legacy he built and his name.
If Brown and the Sacramento Bee say there are gimmicks, I have a hard time discrediting the two.
Brown has nothing to gain by passing a reckless budget.
Dem's showed they would vote to kill certain things. redevelopment and are on the record having done so. They can do so again as they have alredy taken the political risk.
Now those powerful entities that didn't like this proposed budget the chamber, CSAC etc... Well they better get to calling the republicans say cut a deal.
And lets look at what he did veto.
- $3.4 billion in deferred payments to K-12 schools, community colleges and the University of California. Schools could maintain programs as long as they borrow to fund them.
Ok schools we'll give you authority to spend more than we're giving you but you'll end up paying interest on it if you decide to spend it and can get the loan. Great if you want to send school districts into state receivorship or if we can't fix the problem make it worse next year.
- $1 billion in taking First 5 funds, a move already under legal challenge.
Yeah pre school kids aren't important.
- $1.7 billion by asking redevelopment agencies to contribute money to the state under threat of elimination.
OK I support this cut as it's welfare for developers and I believe stifles development while developers wait at the trough for their money to improve their properties (Also a great bargaining chip)
I agree, but which people??
---The T-Baggers? To easy a target. We all know they're ignorant.
---How about Democrats? You'd think that'd be an easy one, though,
in general, if their ox ain't gored, you'll never hear a peep out of them.
---Progressives! You will hear them all day long, spouting truth to power (I know, I've done it.Had my own radio show for two years), getting all worked up, diligently quoting unassailable facts that just float into the either, seldom to be heard again. You see, we have no echo chamber, we have no FOX in this fight.
Maybe what we need is a "National Vetting Channel"!?!?
It could come on every night at seven, when the news day for the most
part is done, and tell us who lied, how badly, and what the truth actually is!!!
It could be headed by a Blue Ribbon panel of people the
American people have voted on as being trust worthy!!!
Sometimes, I think that all we are doing here is preaching to the chorus and my activity drops off because I don't see much in the way of progress. Then I realize that we don't dare to let the progressive idea just die and this is a valuable effort after all.
I'm sorry that I missed your radio show, I'd bet that it was a good one. But I don't for one minute believe that those "unassailable facts" just disappeared into the either. Someone heard at least some of it and maybe passed it on. Just keep on keeping on!
UC faculty, chancellor, vice chancellor, UCOP wage concessions:
No furloughs
18 percent reduction in UCOP salaries & $50 million cut.
18 percent prune of campus chancellors', vice chancellors' salaries.
15 percent trim of tenured faculty salaries, increased teaching load
10 percent decrease in non-tenured faculty salaries, as well as increase research, teaching load
100% elimination of all Academic Senate, Academic Council costs, wages.
Overly optimistic predictions of future revenues do not solve the deficit. However, rose bushes bloom after pruning.
UC Board of Regents Sherry Lansing, President Yudof can bridge the public trust gap by offering reassurances that UC salaries reflect depressed wages in California. The sky will not fall on UC