Senate Democrats Hand Bush Another Victory

Posted February 13, 2008 | 11:21 AM (EST)



RSS stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

Despite the efforts of Senators Christopher Dodd and Russ Feingold to block granting telecommunications conglomerates like AT&T retroactive immunity for data mining on American citizens without a court warrant (as required in the Constitution) the new FISA surveillance law gives the lame duck and unpopular President George W. Bush yet another stunning victory. By a vote of 68 to 29 our venerable senators believe it is politically wise to capitulate to Bush or face uncomfortable McCarthyite charges of putting Americans at risk from "terrorism" in "wartime." The Senate has handed Bush a cudgel with which he can beat the Democrats throughout 2008 leading us to wonder: What good has it been to have the Democrats in control of the House and the Senate over the past year?

First, Senators Diane Feinstein and Charles Schumer provided the crucial votes to confirm Michael Mukasey as Attorney General even though he claims waterboarding is perfectly legal and justified and argued during his confirmation hearing that the president and his henchmen like Karl Rove need not honor Congressional subpoenas based on a novel view of executive power.

The House leadership took impeachment "off the table" before even looking into the evidence of impeachable offenses coming out of the Bush White House. They gave Karl Rove and Harriet Miers a free pass to skip on testifying to Congress even though there is a mountain of evidence suggesting that Rove violated wholesale the Hatch Act, which forbids political activities out of federal offices. They destroyed all of the White House emails and phone records during the run up to the 2004 election, which smells like a cover up and possible obstruction of justice. But do the Democrats show any guts and investigate this stuff? The answer is no.

The Democrats in both chambers have voted consistently to give Bush all the money he wants for his failed bloodbath in Iraq and his obscene bloating of the military budget, which has risen over 37 percent since he came to office. The House busies itself with vapid hearings on steroid use among professional athletes. (Who gives a damn if a bunch of overpaid pituitary cases poison themselves for a competitive edge?) The Democrats vote over and over again to fund a war they claim to oppose. The Congress, by leaving in tact Bush's destruction of the federal departments and agencies ranging from the EPA to the Department of Labor, from the Justice Department to the Mining Health and Safety Commission, is dropping a huge mess on the lap of whoever the new president is in January 2009.

Now the Senate insists on giving Bush even more power while tying the hands of those who might uncover the extent of his past abuses involving warrantless surveillance. The president essentially dismissed the jurisdiction of the judicial branch over his activities. That is called a serious Constitutional crisis. Instead of Congress pushing back, its Democratic leaders believe it is wise to surrender before the fight even begins. I wouldn't be surprised if Bush and Rove used the NSA and the telecom companies to spy on the Democratic National Committee and the John Kerry campaign during the very tight presidential race in 2004 where Bush "won" reelection (a la Richard Nixon). The Republican political operatives, cut from the same cloth as Rove and Allen Raymond, might be using the federal law enforcement apparatus right now to gain advantage for Republicans this election year. We'll never know because the Democrats in Congress are too weak and pusillanimous to challenge Bush on any of his most egregious violations of the Constitution.

The inaction of the Democratic Congress has fueled the calls for change we are hearing loud and clear in the Barack Obama presidential campaign. If Obama makes it to the White House his administration is going to be facing a huge mess left over from the disastrous Bush years. He will have to purge all of the "Bushies" out of the interstices of the federal bureaucracy, reel in the contractors Bush has given sweetheart deals to, and fight an uphill battle to regain a semblance of legitimacy for the United States in the eyes of the American people and people all over the world.

The Democrats in the Congress would be wise to work with the new president, be it President Obama or someone else, in restoring the health of our republic. So far they have shown they did not deserve to be elected to the majority in 2006. Unless it stands up to Bush, the 110th Congress will go down in history as a dismal failure. We'll have a failed president and a failed Congress.

Comments for this post are now closed


 
 

Comments
12
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- Rule Of Law See Profile I'm a Fan of Rule Of Law permalink

And Joseph, as I told Josh Silver, in so many words, to get the attention of the 1,000's of screaming partisan posters, you need to sex this issue up a little bit! Isn't there a blowjob or a bathroom stall in this boring economic stuff, somewhere?

Show us collusion, show us malfeasance and name the players involved, give us a story of bribery, death threats, CIA involvement, with Dick Cheney's hand on the lever. Find the goddamned smoking gun! Or all these blogs and we who read them will be gone in the purges sure to follow when the internet is owned by Rupert Murdoch.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 PM on 02/14/2008
- Rule Of Law See Profile I'm a Fan of Rule Of Law permalink

The Democrats aren't scared of anything! They didn't vote for this out of fear; they voted for it because they are just the same as the Republicans. We are now living in a country with a one party system! Neither Obama or Hillary or god herself will save you now. As Sundial says,

"Although the President and Vice-President are quite obviously corrupt, so also are both houses of the Congress AND the Judiciary." And people can continue to post of the Blogs we see on the HuffPo front page and eviscerate each other in their partisan fury for their candidate, and they will continue to be the pawns of the Corporate Powers that run this country.

No one want to hear it, but it needs saying; it will take a massive civil movement, commitment of hearts, minds and bodies, to achieve the restoration of our Constitution and our rights as American Citizens. Our "representatives" have abandoned us! Our system is a twisted perversion of what it was originally intended to be! They must All be removed, and the laws enforced, justice served, accountability exacted.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 PM on 02/13/2008
- JoeyP See Profile I'm a Fan of JoeyP permalink

If Obama wins and nothing "changes" he'll be a one term president and a failure -- i.e. he must end the occupation of Iraq, and deliver on reestablishing the regulatory agencies that Bush gutted -- Bush is trying to set up a situation that will be impossible to reverse after he leaves office -- he should have been a one term president but Ohio gave us the farm because they just don't like them gay folks -- plus Rove rigged it too. Now we're screwed unless Obama can purge these bastards out of the govt. and back to the lobbying firms where they belong (I'd prefer to put the whole lot in jail).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 02/13/2008
- slg See Profile I'm a Fan of slg permalink

Don't forget 61% of Republicans support BushCo. That's a very comfortable margin for a sitting President. It seems the majority of conservatives are with the neocon agenda to dismantle the Republic and rebuild it without all the nasty bits.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:35 PM on 02/13/2008
- scootmandubious See Profile I'm a Fan of scootmandubious permalink

I am infuriated by the FISA vote...infuriated enough to support a different candidate for president.

I was an Edwards supporter who held my nose and voted for Hillary in the New York primary for a variety of reasons.

However, Obama took the time to come to cast a 'no' vote on this. Hillary chose not to vote at all. I can't fathom the reason for that, outside of absurd political calculation.

That is not leadership.

I now support Senator Obama for president. I will note the change, and the reasons, tonight in my blog.

http://scootmandubious.blogspot.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:18 PM on 02/13/2008
- wayoutleft See Profile I'm a Fan of wayoutleft permalink

obama starts to fool around with big insurance, the military, or the credit industry and the real democratic PARTY- the far right democrats- will disembowel him and he knows it.
i think we all secretly know it too: that the insurance and lending industries have to be replaced with publicly administered services for anything to change. also we need a commander-in-chief who can actually COMMAND- and not some little frat boy who sits slack-jawed in front of them with his little lapel pin on listening to them spin iraq. the democrats will do the same, though. they too want to be worshipper-in-chief; not commander-in-chief.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 02/13/2008
- shaggles See Profile I'm a Fan of shaggles permalink

Very good piece. The Dems are still scared of the "soft on terror" label. The problem is that Bush and the Reps are going to label them that anyway.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 PM on 02/13/2008
- jdm58 See Profile I'm a Fan of jdm58 permalink

Obama "purge all of the "Bushies" out of the interstices of the federal bureaucracy"? He has pledged to work side by side with them! Hillary avoided the vote on immunity, but her vote wouldn't have mattered, given the number of Dems who caved on the issue. Even Feinstein voted for immunity. Here is the rollcall for those interested:
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=2&vote=00015

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 PM on 02/13/2008
- walley See Profile I'm a Fan of walley permalink

If Mr. Obama is elected one of his biggest battles will undoubtedly be with the useless do nothing members of his own party that now serve in Congress. He will inherit a Speaker of The House that refuses to take steps to protect the Constitution and members of both houses that have supported the Bush Gestapo over and over again. He is now running against a Bush supporter who, if she remains in the senate, will more than likely will be a vindictive deterrent any positive actions he might purpose.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 PM on 02/13/2008
- Sundialsvc4 See Profile I'm a Fan of Sundialsvc4 permalink

"Quit looking for a savior in November." You know as well as I do that there will not be one.

Although the President and Vice-President are quite obviously corrupt, so also are both houses of the Congress AND the Judiciary. Regardless of political-party affiliation.

So what we have on our hand is "the Founder's nightmare." All three Branches corrupted by the same influence at the same time, and driving the Republic into ruin for what they perceive to be their own material gain ... if not in this country, then in another.

It is not possible to wring one's hands for the next ten months and hope that some savior will ride in on a white horse; that isn't going to happen.

It will take an enormous and concerted public outcry to impose change upon these men and women who otherwise frankly say "let them eat cake." The system that we have works, and works well, but only when we compel it to.

Ironically, this pressure might well come from the outside of the country -- and I don't mean a foreign army. We are today at the brink of the Great Depression of 2008, and this Depression will grip the entire world not just this country. It might force us all to reconsider just how and where all this "unlimited money" has actually come from... how Microsoft can offer $40 billion for Yahoo, how a US Federal Budget can be $3 TRILlion, and so-on. The power that these men wield is, ultimately, sourced from this money. It might well turn out to be leprechaun gold. And this might be enough to provoke enough concentrated public resistance world-wide to actually break the back of their power-source.

Countries generally take the view that, to some extent, "you screw up your country that's your problem but don't screw up mine." Well, gues-s-s-s wha-a-a-a-t.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 PM on 02/13/2008
- Rule Of Law See Profile I'm a Fan of Rule Of Law permalink

Sundial, getting a little past the cycle, but I want you to know that I intend to be hitting this issue hard every chance I get. Visit Erica Jongs blog on Patriarchy 1,000...and notice the response rate vs here. They still believe that one person can change it all For them. We, you and I and a bunch of the guys who post on the economic blogs need more voices. Those idiots posting to the superstar's blog just to get their name up will be the death of us all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 PM on 02/14/2008
- Macready See Profile I'm a Fan of Macready permalink

great blog . . . you are so right . . . we have for the most part a bunch of craven spineless chimp enablers in our Democratic Congress . . . they just cave to the bush regime all the time . . . pelosi is a joke as speaker of the house . . . she should be thrown out . . . I don't understand why they are so afraid . . . nothing they do makes sense . . . they say they are working for us but they aren't . . . they seem more like paid up neo-con members . . . our so-called Democratic Congress seems more like a cosy club that cares about being where they are more than it does on upholding the Constitution which is what they are supposed to be doing . . .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 AM on 02/13/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

 
 
Bloggers Index›
Read All Posts by
Joseph A. Palermo›