|
||
Rebranding Slick Sarah, the Make-Believe Maverick
VP choice Sarah Palin keeps repeating her lie that she said "thanks but no thanks" to the "Bridge to Nowhere" -- even in the face of unusually strong and widespread media debunking and strong visual evidence to the contrary. When Fox News' Chris Wallace debunks your multiple lies, it's probably time, at the very least, to work up some new lies.
Either Slick Sarah cynically believes that you can fool all the people all the time, much as Bush and McCain do, or Prevaricatin' Palin has actually come to believe her own lies, much as Bush and McCain do.
And, of course, Slick Sarah is an old-style lobbyist-hiring pol, who may well be the queen of pork. Slick Sarah and her lobbyists lined Alaskan pockets with U.S. taxpayer money to the tune of $4000 per citizen of Wasilla. But McCain "can't wait to introduce her to Washington." If she replicates that "success" on a national level as VP, that would be more than $1 trillion in earmarks.
Slick Sarah is all hat and no moose. She's the make-believe Maverick.
Her obsessive phoniness in the face of the facts, I think, opens the door to not just call her a liar, as the campaign has started to do, but to actually give her a defining nickname to describe what appears to be a fundamental character flaw.
This strategy would also give you an instant framing response to every new lie, like the absurd "lipstick on a pig smear," which I discuss at the end.
Memorable nicknames stick to your lips like lipstick. They invariably use one of the memorable rhetorical figures of speech -- alliteration, assonance, consonance, rhyming, metaphor, or pun. [Yes, that is a bit redundant: Almost all of the figures of speech were developed 25 centuries ago specifically to aid the memory of both the speaker and the listener.] For instance, "Sarah Barracuda" is metaphor and assonance/consonance combined. Very memorable.
So I float the alliterative Slick Sarah, which has the additional benefit of a simple metaphorical word that conjures up oil slicks. I'd love to hear your suggestions. All you really need is a thesaurus and an imagination. Prevaricatin' Palin?
As for "make-believe Maverick" (alliteration and consonance), yes, I did just write a post saying Obama shouldn't keep calling Slick Sarah a maverick in his ads. And he shouldn't. But there is another rhetorical strategy worth considering. If you think a label is seared to the flesh like a real brand, then an even better strategy is to piggyback on the existing label.
Karl Rove and George W. Bush, for instance, knew they couldn't escape the conservative label, so they used alliteration, assonance, and consonance to create the memorable phrase, "compassionate conservative" -- you know, the kind of guy who waterboards people, but only with bottled water.
In this case, the McCain campaign is spending millions of dollars on ads to link their names irrevocably to the word maverick -- and the media has been sold on this particular myth. So rather than trying to spend millions of dollars countering that brand (or, foolishly, simply saying they are "not mavericks"), the trick is to taint their brand with an equally memorable phrase. That way, when voters go into the polls, they not only remember the word Maverick associated with McCain/Palin, but also "make believe." This is the Rovian jujitsu strategy, turn strengths into weaknesses.
It would require a great deal of repetition through advertising, the candidates, and their surrogates. And, of course, the blogosphere. Needless to say, Democrats are not known for picking a message and staying on it.
By the way, for all those who worry that the focus should be on McCain, not Palin -- defining Palin as the make-believe maverick is a two-fer, since it simultaneously rebrands McCain, too. They are, after all, the original make-believe Mavericks. As a bonus, slick rhymes with maverick.
Finally, the Dems should drop all criticism of Slick Sarah's supposed lack of experience. It is off message and just blows back to voter concerns about Obama. Indeed, going after her for lack of experience actually helps her -- it makes her seem like she's Mrs. Smith goes to Washington. The right message is that Slick Sarah has too much experience, not too little. Palin's pseudo-strength is that she and McCain are selling themselves as atypical politicians, supposed reformers and mavericks. But Palin is already the earmark queen, a leader in lobbying, and apparently a pathological liar or supremely cynical pol -- or both.
Hence Slick Sarah, the make-believe Maverick.
LIPSTICK UPDATE: Once you have established that Sarah is slick and that she and McCain are make-believe mavericks pushing the "old politics" -- then you have an automatic response to the next lie from the Palin-McCain campaign, like the absurd smear that Obama was referring to Palin when he said of the McCain campaign's new change theme, "you can't put lipstick on a pig."
You say, "Slick Sarah strikes again with another false smear" and "the make-believe mavericks are once again practicing the old politics of smear." Yes, you could call Palin-McCain liars, but their Rove-designed strategy is to simply lie all the time, so if you constantly call them liars -- and I'm aware that the Obama/Biden team hasn't come close to reaching that tipping point -- it wears thin.
In any case, the "liar, liar" attack has its limits because people assume politicians lie and the media hates to repeat the word "liar." More important, "liar" has no rhetorical memorableness in it, like Slick Sarah or make-believe maverick. If you don't use the figures of speech, your messaging won't be memorable.
Of course, the LAST thing you want to do is defensively repeat their inane message and say "I'm not sexist" (see "Obama, Don't Call McCain a Maverick Five Times in Your Ad!")
The only winning strategy is to respond to every attack with another attack. If you aren't attacking, you're losing.
To read more from Joseph Romm, go here.
Loading comments…
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
You know that whining nasal tone that Sa-RAH uses when sniping? I call it the "Palin drone".
[I can't believe noone's thought of that one yet. ]
I have a good one: "Snipehunt" Sarah. She's both the snipehunt played on the American people, and the naive tenderfoot who doesn't know enough not to go out hunting snipes.
Tonight I was in the middle of watching a short biography of Obama on MSNBC when all of a sudden we have breaking news that Palin has come home. So what. Biden and Obama come home too. I don't see a rally for them. I turned the channel and never got to see the end of the biography. I now see that Palin and McCain are campaigning together. He doesn't have Liberman to correct his mistakes so he needs her. She needs him because she knows nothing about the federal government and America's problems so we have two weak people who need each other. On Friday she'll give a speech sending off her son to Iraq. That will probably be breaking news also. While what he is doing is honorable, thousands have gone before him some going three to four times with less fan fair. Over four thousand haven't come back. Their parents suffer in silence. No fan fairs for them.
Don't call her Sarah--that makes her "folksy." Call her Failin' Palin
Great article!
Forget maverick. Here's a real issue. We don't need a woman in the VP or Presidential position with a newborn baby! Plus that child has special needs to boot. If she's half the woman that 'traditional family values' would have us believe, then she should be spending several interactive hours per day with this baby, period. If she does, then she'd be a decent mother. But, if that's the case, we don't need the country's second or top spot run by a part time worker. These are twenty-four hour a day jobs for serious contenders. Otherwise, if she devotes appropriate time and attention necessary to the job she'll be a woefully neglectful mother, leaving the child in it's most formative years to nannies, as the husband has a full time job too. On this basis she has no leg to stand on with the 'traditional family value' bit that the evangeilcal crowd seems to believe they have some sanctimonious special claim to.
So Sarah, raise your child responsibly at home, study part time about all the issues national and international that you know nothing about. You've just started the basics recently with the Joe Liberman 101 tutorial. Come back eduacted and prepared when your child is of school age and then we'll see about you. This job is not a forty hour a week fantasy fulfiller born of some misapropriated notion from bad 80s movies that you can 'have it all'. We don't need or want you.
want more bush? sarah delivers
Every time I hear McCain call himself a Maverick and a reformer I hear Inigo Montoya (Mandy Patinkin in the Princess Bride) say... "you use that word a lot. i do not think it means what you think it means".
or is it just me?
with palin in charge, the best government will be found on ebay
sarah, the sweetest elitist
maverick moose = pachyderm pork barrel packrats
The coronation of Sarah Palin as the republican candidate for Vice President of the United States is the most eggregious example of tokenism I have ever seen. she is there only because she is female, only because she makes the ticket look young and exciting, and only because she is a religious zealot. She was appointed because she was a woman. It occurs to me that any thinking woman would bitterly resent this piece of fluff being put up as window dressing. Then we are told that she has somehow become a standard bearer for women's issues.
It is tokenism pure and simple and clearly displays the Republican's disrespect for women.
Some last-minute questions for Charlie Gibson, composed in the Rovian style of questioning:
1. You forcefully said no to the Bridge to Nowhere, but it does appear you kept the money for Alaska. How much of the money did "The First Dude" spend on hookers? If the answer is "none," do you have the receipts to prove it?
2. Some people say your pregnant daughter is a tramp. Is this true, or is this simply a case of parental incompetence?
3. When did you last refer to Barack Obama as "uppity" and do you promise to stop using the N word if elected?
McCain/Palin: the Magical-Thinking mavericks!
After eight years of illusions, it's time to move forward America...
Tell them '"Thanks, but no thanks!" on their Bridge to Nowhere.
Vote for *actual* Change.
Vote Obama/Biden 2008
I don't think so. I think it's more repug business as usual. Who's against any of W's policies on this team?
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with
