iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Josh Ruxin

GET UPDATES FROM Josh Ruxin
 

Gorillas: 20, Humans: $25,000

Posted: 06/26/08 08:00 PM ET

Rwandans and foreigners alike gathered in the thousands to celebrate an extraordinary event last week: Kwita Izina -- the annual naming of the baby gorillas. This year, 20 baby gorillas were named. Just 30 years ago, it seemed implausible that there could ever be such an event. The gorilla population in 1978 had dwindled to 262. Today's population is up over 400. That's an extraordinary accomplishment for a slow-reproducing large mammal. How did this happen?

Bill Weber and his wife Amy Vedder, who lived with the gorillas in the 1970s, are central to today's success. They chronicled their experiences in the wonderful book, In the Kingdom of Gorillas. Both worked closely -- at times tempestuously -- with Diane Fossey. Vedder spent over 2,000 hours studying and habituating the gorillas to human observation, while Weber considered the bleak challenges faced by the small population. Ultimately, the then-controversial conclusion Weber reached was that tourism could potentially save the gorillas and would certainly not do any more harm than was already occurring at the time.

2008-06-27-Images-Gukina.jpg

Time has proven Weber right and resulted in one of the great conservation success stories of our time. In 1978, the gorilla park saw about $5,000 in revenue from tourism. This year, 18,000 people will come to Rwanda to see the gorillas for $500 per ticket and generate $25,000 in daily revenues. More compellingly, while Weber still advises the conservation efforts in Rwanda through the Wildlife Conservation Society, there are dozens of capable Rwandans who lead the programs on the ground. Local capacity has been built and the numbers look better and better; 23 babies were named last year and attracted a crowd estimated at 10,000.

Unfortunately, it's still a small, extremely vulnerable population, not far from the heart of one of the world's worst civil conflicts. Their habitat rests on the Congolese border and constitutes a mere 400 square kilometers of land. That's just about one gorilla per kilometer and the way our gorillas eat, Rwanda may have reached its optimal carrying capacity. There's now talk of expanding the perimeter of the park, but that's a challenging political endeavor given Rwanda's standing as the most densely populated country in sub-Saharan Africa. It's a huge shift for today's conservationists to be scratching their heads about what to do about too many gorillas, as opposed to addressing issues of near-extinction.

Some gorillas are now leaving the park and chewing on eucalyptus trees. Is that because they've discovered they like it or because conflict in Congo is pushing populations into Rwanda and straining food resources? It's tough to say just yet, but today's challenges beat those of a few decades ago. Yesterday's poachers are now today's gorilla trackers, and substantial funds from all proceeds are being invested into neighboring communities. So the current gorilla scoreboard continues to look promising: Gorillas 20, Humans $25,000 per day.

 

Follow Josh Ruxin on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@JoshRuxin

 
 
  • Comments
  • 1
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:49 AM on 07/03/2008
This is truly one of the great success stories of conservation in Africa. Bill Weber is the father of Gorilla Tourism. Now the gorillas seem to be reaching the limits of their very constrained living area. (The European Union funded the excision of more than half the park in the 1960's for pyrethrum cultivation.) As with other charismatic fauna (e.g. elephants in the Shimba Hills reserve of Kenya, tigers in the India parks) that are going beyond the carrying capacities of their preserves, this requires that conservationists confront the unthinkable. The culling of elephants in the interests of rational management is conceptually unacceptable and raises high emotions among conservationists. Imagine trying to manage a rational debate about the necessity of culling mountain gorillas!

It is interesting to read a posting by Ruxin, a very careful and very successful self-promoter, in which he doesn't modestly claim any credit for himself at all. Gorillas bring out the best in people.