Since my involvement with the Iran issue - both as a journalist and a human rights activist - I had rarely had the opportunity to hear the Iranian-American side of the story. This was changed on April 17 when I participated in the New Generation, New Perspectives, New Media Forum hosted by Columbia University. While, for many, the forum was a unique opportunity to get informed about Iran and the current situation, for me it brought about a revelation that proved both enlightening and worrying.
Many of the speakers at the forum expressed a sentiment unique to the Iranian community: "We may live in the West, but our hearts are in Iran." This is precisely the reason Iranian-Americans are suffering from the ABCD-dilemma. A few years ago, I watched a very enlightening movie about Indian-Americans being emotionally divided between their homeland and their adoptive country. The movie was aptly named "American Born Confused Deshi," deshi being a Hindi word for someone from India.
Some of the Iranian-Americans I met in the forum are not American-born. They grew up in Iran and have moved to the US in the past decade or so. And the same goes for many Iranians that I've met outside the forum. The sentiment is almost universal. They don't really feel like they can break ties with Iran and refuse to use their power as Americans to sway American politics and at the same time, don't feel like they can dictate what Iranians do inside Iran.
The best example of this is that whenever an Iranian calls for protests inside Iran and they are not within the country, other folks jump almost instantaneously with the cry, "No interference!" Well, how could this be interference if it is coming from an Iranian? This is where the roots problem lie.
The Iranian Diaspora has so far led a very symbolic and largely ineffective role in what is happening in their country because of these self-imposed restraints. True, there were many protests in the few months after the June 12 election. However, thus far there are very few PACs, lobbying groups and such to work to promote the cause for Iran's democratization. Furthermore, few intellectuals are willing to openly come out and declare their support for the Green Movement.
And let's not underestimate the power of political involvement. Israelis and Jews - many of them having an emotional bond with Israel - have worked successfully over the years to promote the cause of Israel. They have been so effective that some have created conspiracy theories to delegitimize their success or somehow stain it. The truth is, the citizens of another nation can be both American and at the same time help their country in a way that it does not harm the national interests of the United States.
Israel is perhaps he the most prominent example, but there are Cuban-Americans, Mexican-Americans, Armenian-Americans and several other nationalities who have managed to sway US foreign policy to help their brethren. Why Iranians have not been able to do so is unfortunate.
At a time when the Green Movement in Iran needs support from the Iranian Diaspora, it is almost absent. With the exception of the National Iranian-American Council, which does not openly support the Green Movement, there is scarcely anyone to represent the Green Movement in the US or abroad. Iranian Nobel Prize-laureate Shirin Ebadi has been making the rounds in Europe and the US to shore up support, but her work is humanitarian in nature.
What the Green Movement urgently needs from the Iranian Diaspora, especially in the United States, is to come together and form a strong voice of political support for the cause of Iran's democratization - if not outright liberalization. This is especially important since the Iranian government allegedly already has several organizations rooting for it clandestinely.
At the same time, a united Iranian Diaspora could serve well as a communicator of the wishes of the Iranian people. So far, what the Green Movement wants has been muddied by the fact that it has largely remained leaderless. While Iranians in the West cannot substitute that, they can certainly join hands to give them a clear voice abroad at least.
While monarchists, communists, leftists, liberals, conservatives and just 'confused' Iranians bicker and disagree, time is running out. Whether they get together or not is their choice. But if they do not choose to forgo their differences and create a single voice for of Iran's democratization, Iran's cause abroad would remain voiceless.
What happens in Iran affects Iranians living outside Iran. They have the right and the power to help the situation. What is holding them back is both their differences and their reluctance to embrace both identities. The truth is this: You can be an Iranian and an American. You can be a Canadian and an Iranian. You can be a European and an Iranian. It is time to come out and express that identity.
A democratic and free Iran is also going to help the security of the West and speed up the democratization of the Middle East - something everyone living in the West wishes - even if that's not what some politicians want. It is time to make sure that the voice you have is heard. It is time for Iran as well as your country of residence to see you in action.
Follow Josh Shahryar on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JShahryar
1. I'm Afghan and I know Iranian history as well as you do because we share the same history till about 1800s.
2. I'm an atheist and I look at science. Astrology is not science.
3. As for the Crown Prince, he can go back to Iran when the Mullahs are out and ask to be allowed to partake in the political system in whatever capacity. Maybe he can run in the elections?
4. Finally, when people are being accused of sedition daily and hanged, I'd rather be working actively to help those folks than sit home and chant mantras.
J
this shows you know little about Iran history when you think Pahlavi could go back and run for elections. Would Saddam be allowed to go back and run for elections, if he were alive? Would any of his sons be allowed? the fact is that Reza has not acknowledged the mistakes of his father. He in fact has defended his father's record. And when asked, would he give up the thrown and become a citizen, he has not answered the question.
Do I know the details of Afgan history just because I have and Iranian background? You know Iran's history? Really?
It's six simple actions Iranians-Americans (and others!) can do to stand in solidarity with the Iranian people. Here's the link: http://www.niacouncil.org/site/PageServer?pagename=Action_stand_with_the_iranian_people_challenge
And much though you and others who hate the vision of a proudly independant Iran may want to pretend otherwise, the election was by and large fair, and the winner won because the Iranian people backed him.
That's a democracy? What an inverted world you live in. Are you that thick or are you that cynical?
I like to think that something fundamental has changed in Iran, that will hopefully and eventually bare fruit. For the first time in 30 something years, the Supreme Leader’s position was questioned. Also the economic situation in Iran is just getting worse. For a country with such resources, having such an inflation and unemployment rate boggles the mind! And considering the average age there, it is not going to get better anytime soon.
Why don’t we do more? Not sure! For some it could be because they want to be able to travel back. Some might say they are worried about family there and so on… The fact of the matter is that, nothing is going to change till people are willing to make sacrifices and give something up. The question (for Iranians living in Iran AND Iranians living outside of Iran) is that: Are we ready to do so? And how far are we willing to go?
Perhaps, the lack of these goals translating to direct support of the "Green Movement" is due to lack of clarity from leadership of the Green Movement. "Green" takes a spectrum of definitions from upholding Iran's current constitution to a secular government. Many are of the belief that Iran's current constitution does not have the capacity for democracy. Therefore, it is perhaps better for the diaspora to support "democracy" in Iran and upholding of universal human rights which lack uncertainty in their definitions. Perhaps, as well, Iranians are cautious because they do not want to repeat the same mistakes of the past, where they voted for "Islamic Republic" without understanding what it entailed. Supporting "Green", without understanding what Green means is also a slippery slope.
Normal Iranians are Pagan. We love nature and life. That has been our way for 15000 years. We love life and our Spirit is enshrined in the Zend Avesta. That is what keeps our culture going, not dogma from younger religious, that have tried to wipe out Iran.
Islam did not bring greatness to the Iranian people, they are great DESPITE it.
As long as Iran is threatened by Nukes by our administration there will be no support for Green or any color movement from Iranians.
A civilization has lasted 5000 years for some reasons and one of the reasons is that an external enemy should be dealt with first before a country can engage in internal family dispute.
You can see this even in family life of Iranian. In a traditional Iranian family the dispute between family members are not shown to public and resolved internally.
So if you want greater democratic movements in Iranian community tell Obama to call his nuclear threat against Iran.
And who's talking about war here?
What does Iran offer anymore? It's not destitute, but artists are limited, as Soviet artists were. It locks up, silences and exiles its most promising artists and thinkers. The irony is, is that before this quasi-republican theocracy, the seminaries were hotbeds of open debate.
This artist says what you did, can she perform?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSdox68-Z-8
Why was Khatami not allowed to give this speech?
http://enduringamerica.com/2010/04/19/iran-document-the-speech-khatami-would-have-given-at-japan-disarmament-conference/#more-31964