Even as the economy benefits from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, or ARRA, and continues to show some signs of being on the mend, today's unemployment numbers continue to demonstrate how badly workers are faring--especially if they are low-wage and/or low-skilled men. In February, those with the least amount of education had an unemployment rate of 15.6% as compared to the general rate which remained static at 9.7%. The unemployment extension that was signed by President Obama earlier this week and the pending jobs bill should provide some relief. However, low-income men are facing serious challenges that reach beyond the impact of the recession and that affect their children and families.
Antipoverty programs are often built around serving women and children, leaving many low-income men out in the cold. Policies focused on children and families must include a greater focus on men, being mindful of the fact that many of these men are fathers who can and do make positive contributions to their children's lives while also helping to lift the economic burden from the backs of low-income women who far too often bear the majority of the cost associated with childrearing. To some this is simply a statement of the obvious. However, many Americans continue to carry negative stereotypes about poor men especially if they are people of color, lack stable employment, face difficulties financially providing for their families, have a criminal record, or possess a combination of these factors.
Policies should be comprehensive and aimed at reconnecting the disconnected. Far too many men, and especially African-American men, are disconnected from employment, but also from society and their families.
Employment disconnections require continued recession-related job creation efforts, long-term labor market solutions, investments in adult learners and community colleges, and meaningful ways of addressing employment barriers tied to race and criminal records. Special attention should be paid to reaching men as early as possible, while they are still young and have fewer challenges to overcome. This has special implications for K-12 education and youth-oriented second-chance programs such as Youth Corps and YouthBuild, which are focused on a combination of job training and education completion for those who are not meaningfully involved in school or work.
Societal disconnections are evident in our nation's history of mass incarceration that currently claims a disproportionate number of African-American and Latino men and 1.7 million children of prisoners. Family relationships are hindered by separations and the challenges associated with reentry. Placing men in prison or jail deprives many families of their income. This harm continues upon release as criminal records hurt a man's earning potential. Given that mass incarceration produces diminishing returns related to public safety, governments should reconsider their approaches and expand the use of alternatives such as community detention. Continued investments in the Second Chance Act and related efforts targeting reentry are also needed.
Family disconnections are rooted in a number of concerns. Joblessness and economic pressures put stress on families and couples, sometimes leading to separations. Incarceration also doesn't help. Further, for many low-income people separations are not accompanied by the dispute resolution services and formal visitation orders that are common amongst those with greater financial resources. This can create a greater wedge between men and their children. Thus, family disconnections provide additional reason for addressing employment disconnections. Fatherhood program innovations should be funded, relationship supports should be considered, and new investments should be placed in access and visitation services that result in family dispute resolution and visitation orders.
Addressing all of low-income men's disconnections will require policymakers and the nation to move beyond temporary job creation efforts or a simple focus on unemployment numbers. However, the approach is more likely to improve the quality of low-income men's lives. It will also equate to a greater ability on their part to financially provide for their children, either through contributions to their household income or via child support payments. This will help to lift many children out of poverty. Both fathers and children will benefit from stronger bonds. In short, addressing the disconnections experienced by low-income men is good poverty policy and good family policy.