More

Use Stimulus Funds to Expand Charter Schools


As stimulus funds begin to hit state coffers, and as states develop their own stimulus packages, the inevitable debate has begun as to where the money should be invested. Infrastructure? Green energy? Healthcare? Despite these important areas, investing in the education of our children remains the best strategy for strengthening our communities while fueling long-term economic recovery and growth.

Governments should devote stimulus funds to charter school expansion and encourage public private partnerships to ensure efficient use of the funds. Charter schools have illustrated the ability to improve the quality of education in the communities they serve. Yet, across the nation, these schools struggle to finance new construction or capital improvements.

The Illinois State Legislature, in a broadly supported bipartisan measure, just set the bar for innovative educational funding around the nation by appropriating approximately $150 million for charter school expansion. To put the amount in context, this appropriation nearly triples the $50 million stimulus dollars that the Obama administration allocated for charter schools nationally, illustrating the bold steps that Illinois Is taking to lead the country.

The United Neighborhood Organization (UNO), Chicago's largest Hispanic community-based organization, was the recipient of $98 million of those funds, which is estimated to be the single largest charter school appropriation to any community-based organization in American history.

Secretary of Education Arne Duncan realizes the importance of charter schools and has devoted much of his career to that mission. Indeed, the Obama Administration has even established a $5 billion fund to reward states and school districts that adopt innovative strategies and expand charter schools. The Obama strategy is aggressive, yet even the president was likely surprised by his home state's commitment to charter schools.

Through this funding strategy, Illinois is creating a new public/private partnership model for public school construction. This model will focus on school construction in urban school districts where dense populations and decaying infrastructure inhibit development. Such partnerships can be highly effective in building schools efficiently and relieving overcrowding more quickly.

Using UNO as an example in Chicago, we have established a track record of building schools for a fraction of the cost and almost four times as quickly as the public school system. UNO can build an elementary school in 12-18 months for $18 million dollars whereas a comparable school built by the Chicago Public Schools would take nearly four years and cost upwards of $32 million. This stark comparison shows how much can be saved and reinvested in the students through charter schools.

Over the past few months, Chicago parents came out in force to demand an end to overcrowding and a better educational environment for their children. The Illinois Legislature heard their pleas and responded with unanimous support for an appropriation that will become a new standard for innovative education funding nationwide.

It's time for state and federal leaders to follow this example and dedicate stimulus funds to charter schools so children everywhere can learn and grow into the leaders of tomorrow.


Juan Rangel is Chief Executive Officer of United Neighborhood Organization (UNO), Chicago's largest Hispanic community-based organization.

 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:37 AM on 06/12/2009
Can you explain your statement "Charter schools have illustrated the ability to improve the quality of education in the communities they serve. " ? I see very little evidence of that and would like to know what you are thinking of.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
senorlou
Why would anyone vote GOP?
02:41 AM on 06/12/2009
When I just graduated from teaching school, I went looking at charter schools, since there was a freeze on hiring in the public schools. This was 5 years ago. I saw 4 charter schools. Honestly, after what I saw there, I'd suggest parents teach their children at home.
Some were admirable - mixing severely autistic and mentally handicapped children into regular classrooms. Most did not work at all. Again, I only saw four. Last I heard, one of them lost their accredation and closed down.
Some experimental schools are very important. How about funding all our public schools to previous levels so we can get back the tens of thousands of teachers we just laid off in California?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
08:06 PM on 06/11/2009
Juan,

You DO realize, don't you, that the public school system, in spite of ALL it's failings, not only outperforms charter schools (once you account for family income) but could use far less money far better than charter schools to show results!!!
10:43 PM on 06/11/2009
I am not for all charter schools, but some are neccessary. For example special needs charters are incredibly neccessary because so many kids with special needs receieve totally inadequate education in the "one sized fits all system" particularly with teachers that don't bother to differentiate and don't give a damn about bullying. Also I believe gifted charters are neccessary as if you learn something in school that you learned at home 3-4 years ago... you get bored real quickly. Both of those are from experience fyi. In addition to this, virtual charters are incredibly useful for the aforementioned kids that don't live in a big city where they can attend such a charter. Also why not create charters that teach in different ways (Montessori comes to mind) to also help kids that don't get a great education in the traditional system. All charters are not neccessary, but some certainly are.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
10:31 AM on 06/12/2009
I'm not saying that charter schools don't have their place. I'm saying that it's wrong to take money away from the public school systems to provide for charters in most cases.