iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Judge H. Lee Sarokin

GET UPDATES FROM Judge H. Lee Sarokin
 

I Favor an All Male Panel of Witnesses on Contraception

Posted: 03/ 4/2012 2:59 pm

I know that there was a lot of fuss over the failure of the Republicans to have any female witnesses on the issue of contraception for women. But I would have had no problem with the panel, if only they had been asked the right questions. The leader of the Republican Party, Rush Limbaugh, who also wants to elect the leader of the free world, has crystallized the party's position: Putting aside (or rather ignoring) the other benefits of contraception, a woman who uses a contraceptive to prevent having a baby is a "slut." If the contraceptive is paid for by someone else, the woman is a "prostitute," and all such sex acts should be videotaped and broadcast on the Internet. And Rick Santorum chimes in, if a woman wants to avoid being either a slut or a prostitute, and follows the admonition not to use contraception, and thus has an unwanted or unsafe pregnancy and an abortion, that woman is a "murderer." What an upbeat bunch of guys! The next Blunt Amendment will be to rescind a women's right to vote or bare her ankles in public.

What should have been asked of the male witnesses were questions such as: If a woman who has sexual relations before marriage uses a contraceptive to avoid having a baby is a "slut," what do you call the man who has relations with her? Have you ever had sexual relations with anyone before marriage for purposes other than having a baby? If so, did you or your partner take precautions not to have a baby? Have you ever had sexual relations during marriage for purposes other than having a baby? If so, what did you do to accomplish that purpose? Have you ever had extra-marital relations (like Newt) for purposes other than having a baby? Do you use Viagra? If so, has it been paid for in whole or in part by anyone else, such as your employer or insurance carrier? If so, does that make you a prostitute? Have you ever used a condom? If so, for what purpose?

Finally, have you ever had sex just for the joy of having sex without any intention of having a baby, and if so, should there be a law against it?

Contraception does so much more than merely prevent pregnancies, but even if that were its sole purpose, nothing can justify the remarks of Rush Limbaugh. Even for him -- this was a new low. Despite his half-hearted apology (not a retraction), if I were still a practicing lawyer I would volunteer to represent Sandra Fluke in a defamation suit against him. I hope someone else comes along to do it. Even free speech has its limits and so should Rush Limbaugh. Rush insultingly suggests that women can avoid pregnancy simply by "holding an aspirin between their knees." If only he would follow that advice by holding an aspirin between his teeth.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 192
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
01:01 PM on 03/06/2012
I have three daughters. We all thank you. Beautifully put and the best laugh I have had all day.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judge H. Lee Sarokin
Retired after serving 17 years on the federal cour
04:34 PM on 03/06/2012
Bobbi - Pleased to have your approval and laughter
12:53 PM on 03/06/2012
Limbaugh did not say the aspirin part, that was Foster Freiss.
03:14 PM on 03/06/2012
Limbaugh picked up & repeated it as a follow-up to the broadcast.

One has to wonder if aspirin as contraceptive might have something to do with Republicans being so um cranky.
timber1647
It's either sadness or euphoria
08:58 AM on 03/06/2012
Well stated and I like the lawsuit idea. Separating Mr. Limbaugh from some of his wealth has to be a good thing.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judge H. Lee Sarokin
Retired after serving 17 years on the federal cour
04:35 PM on 03/06/2012
timber1647 - I don't see how she can lose. Malicious and defamatory and no retraction---just a tepid apology.
timber1647
It's either sadness or euphoria
04:57 PM on 03/06/2012
I mentioned once before that my son is a former ADA in the Bronx. Smiling all the while, one of his "lines" or pearls of wisdom was that one should never argue with people in black robes. I defer to your legal expertise and hope the law student follows through.
05:17 PM on 03/05/2012
I try to view things from the most obvious or simplest perspective and move on from there. People like Limbaugh and the all male panel lean toward the absurd-when they want to-becasue they know or believe there won't be nagative consequences. That sort of confidence comes from getting away with it quite frequently. In Rush's case he may have bit the bullet on this one. Hopefully, this will serve as an evidence to the others that we know the emperor has no clothes, we've just been to polite to say so. Unfortunately, any lessons learned will no doubt only be temporary. All said Judge I would pay to see and hear their response to the questions you listed in your article.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judge H. Lee Sarokin
Retired after serving 17 years on the federal cour
09:00 PM on 03/05/2012
penndl - I sense that Rush may be getting the punishment he deserves. The advertisers are fleeing---we can only hope the trend continues.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judge H. Lee Sarokin
Retired after serving 17 years on the federal cour
11:50 AM on 03/05/2012
A number of comments have suggested that despite the questions for men with which they agree, an all male panel was inappropriate. Of course I agree. I was just being facetious and admittedly using the headline as an attention-grabber.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mdbmama
Southern liberal, lonely here
12:12 PM on 03/05/2012
I got it Judge. Thanks very much for the article. I use sarcasm often myself!!
09:48 AM on 03/05/2012
Thank you, Judge. Thank you once again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Synthmatrix
The modern GOP would have hated TR, Lincoln & Ike
09:35 AM on 03/05/2012
Your honor, you rock! Brilliant!
09:15 AM on 03/05/2012
I don't care who is on the panel EXCEPT those who are idiots. If they ask the right questions, the have the right mentality, they are open minded then I really don't care who does it. Adding women into these positions is just a cosmetic effect and doesn't do anything special UNLESS the she has received education otherwise it doesn't really matter.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mantra
08:59 AM on 03/05/2012
Priceless...!!! intelligent and funny...!!!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judge H. Lee Sarokin
Retired after serving 17 years on the federal cour
12:04 PM on 03/05/2012
mantra - Thank you---"intelligent AND funny---very kind of you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mantra
05:04 PM on 03/06/2012
You are so very welcome...!!!
hopeisalive
Old enough to know better, but young enough to try
08:46 AM on 03/05/2012
Even though I am a male, I see no justification for having a panel and/or witnesses about contraception that contains only men. This smacks of the old view of women being pushed into the background, no vote, no say in public but basically being a household slave. As for Mr. Limbaugh, he is who he is and, from my view, those who accept his views on this topic have also sunk to new lows as human beings.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judge H. Lee Sarokin
Retired after serving 17 years on the federal cour
11:47 AM on 03/05/2012
hopeisalive - I completely agree. Women should have been on the panel---I was just being facetious.
hopeisalive
Old enough to know better, but young enough to try
03:13 PM on 03/05/2012
I do that as well sometimes. Thanks for the reply and clarification.
08:40 AM on 03/05/2012
Article raises a lot of good questions, and pretty much sums up what these men (Rush, Santorum etc.) think of women and what are place is. But there should never be an all male panel on any womens issue, especially one this important that doesnt have female representation.
photo
ruthtruth
seeker of truth, willing to listen
08:30 AM on 03/05/2012
Great article. The unfairness of this whole thing will blow up in the faces of the TP/GOP. We women have had more than enough of the this party and their Dark Age thinking.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judge H. Lee Sarokin
Retired after serving 17 years on the federal cour
11:48 AM on 03/05/2012
ruthtruth - Thank you. Dark Ages indeed!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hmby42
Faux Snooze home of the most Uninformed Viewers
08:23 AM on 03/05/2012
Just like the Taliban of Afganistan the Republican party of the US is trying to dimish womens rights
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jollywhitegiant
Please, think responsibly.
08:16 AM on 03/05/2012
Despite the accuracy of his questions as regards men, there is still no reason to have an all male panel when discussing or debating matters directly concerning women. At the most basic of levels, this concept of a gender-biased panel does not make any sense. I agree with the man's questions here, but common sense tells us that we don't need to entertain these kinds of thoughts if we could just accept the baseline of common sense in the first place...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Albert Jenkin
down with the Rebs! And the Dixiecrats
07:48 AM on 03/05/2012
Well spoken, your Honor.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judge H. Lee Sarokin
Retired after serving 17 years on the federal cour
11:51 AM on 03/05/2012
Albert - Thank you
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Albert Jenkin
down with the Rebs! And the Dixiecrats
12:26 PM on 03/05/2012
You're welcome, sir.