More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Judith E. Schaeffer

Judith E. Schaeffer

Posted: January 14, 2011 10:40 AM

With Martin Luther King, Jr. Day coming up this Monday, January 17th, Americans across the country will be celebrating the birth of the great civil rights leader and also enjoying a three-day weekend. But this weekend also brings us another important, albeit far less happy, moment in our Nation's history, as Sunday, January 16th, just happens to be the 92nd anniversary of the ratification of the 18th Amendment -- Prohibition. (Didn't you have this on your Outlook calendar too?)

The Framers of our Constitution wisely included a process by which the document could be amended, a reason that the Constitution has endured as our Nation's governing charter more than two centuries after it was first written. Indeed, the original Constitution, as progressive as it was for its time, was seriously flawed, among other things condoning slavery. Since the Founding, "We the People" have amended the Constitution 27 times, improving our "imperfect" union by expanding democracy and individual rights, incorporating into the Constitution the soaring principles of liberty and equality set out in the Declaration of Independence.

The 18th Amendment, however, is an outlier in the constellation of Amendments -- imposed in a fit of moralizing and immediately unpopular, it is the only Amendment that took away individual rights. But thanks to the very same amendment process that gave us Prohibition, "We the People" were able to correct this constitutional misstep, repealing the 18th Amendment 15 years later, through the ratification of the 21st Amendment.

So what's my point? Simply that we do ourselves a disservice as a Nation if we forget our history, if we forget that our Constitution has never been a perfect document.

Last week, when the Constitution was read aloud on the floor of the House of Representatives, the GOP leadership declined to allow the entire Constitution to be read, omitting portions that were repealed or considered to have been superseded, including the fugitive slave clause, the abhorrent provision added by the "three-fifths compromise," and the 18th Amendment. House leaders were promptly criticized for presenting America with a sanitized Constitution, glossing over the fallibility of the Framers as well as the progressive arc of our constitutional history.

The 18th Amendment was a rare detour from that progressive arc, but the course was soon corrected. And so, on January 17th, when we raise a glass to toast Dr. King's extraordinary life and contributions, we will all be able to do so with the beverage of our choice. Our imperfect Constitution has simply gotten more perfect over time.

Cross-posted at Text & History

 

Follow Judith E. Schaeffer on Twitter: www.twitter.com/MyConstitution

 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:58 AM on 01/17/2011
“Some men look at constitutions with sanctimonious reverence, and deem them like the ark of the covenant, too sacred to be touched. They ascribe to the men of the preceding age a wisdom more than human, and suppose what they did to be beyond amendment … I am certainly not an advocate for frequent and untried changes in laws and constitutions. I think moderate imperfections had better be borne with; because when once known, we accommodate ourselves to them, and find practical means of correcting their ill effects. But I know also that laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind … institutions must advance also, and keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy, as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.â€

– Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Samuel Kercheval, July 12, 1816
photo
Victoria Tripple
Atheist Scientist
11:50 PM on 01/16/2011
great article.......that its a living document is a good thing!
09:28 PM on 01/16/2011
Amendment to come.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlairCase
11:09 AM on 01/16/2011
The repeal of the 18th Amendment simply made prohibition a matter of local jurisdiction. Today, the sale of alcoholic beverages is still prohibited in many jurisdictions. State and local jurisdictions are free to ban just about any product, except guns, which are protected by the Second Amendment. For example, many counties and cities ban fireworks. Federal and state laws also outlaw the sale, possession and comsumption of controlled-substances, usually narcotics. The Constitution simply isn't as restrictive as many people think.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:39 PM on 01/15/2011
RE: "So what's my point? Simply that we do ourselves a disservice as a Nation if we forget our history, if we forget that our Constitution has never been a perfect document. "

Agreed. We need also and simultaneously remember that there's nothing better.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:11 AM on 01/15/2011
I disagree with the contention that the 18th "is the only Amendment that took away individual rights."

The 11th Amendment clearly took away an individual right:
"The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by citizens of another state, or by citizens or subjects of any foreign state." This amendment restored "sovereign immunity" to the states. The Supreme Court had found that under the Constitution only the people and not the states were "sovereign" and that individual citizens had the right to sue the states.

The 22nd Amendment also took away an existing individual right. It stripped from every Native Born American, excluding Harry Truman, but including Herbert Hoover, the right to be elected to the Presidency more than twice or to be elected more than once after having served more than two years of another persons term. More importantly, it eliminated the collective right of the American electorate to elect such persons.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
NebDem78
Protector of Herland
09:43 PM on 01/14/2011
Great Article!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edward Standley
opinionated jerk
03:19 PM on 01/14/2011
Good article. Our ability to amend our Constitution allows us to keep the document pertinent through the changes that a society will necessarily experience over the years. "Strict constructionists" or "originalists" have only one thing in mind - Using verbal hocus pocus to twist the Constitution to their own uses.
08:47 PM on 01/14/2011
But, if you aren't "strict" about the interpretation of the Consitution, then it can be interpreted any old way, no?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edward Standley
opinionated jerk
12:25 AM on 01/15/2011
And it has been. That's one of the things that makes the document so alive. I think that if all the texts and scholarly papers written on the Constitution were laid end to end, they'd likely reach to the moon and back. It's a very short, very open little paper, and was written with growth and debate in mind. If the Constitution's authors had wanted every little detail spelled out, they would have done so, they didn't "just get tired of writing". When someone claims that their legal opinion is "backed by the Constitution", get ready for some lively debate! It's a wonderful thing.
09:22 PM on 01/14/2011
I think they also think of the Constitution as a variation on "scripture", on the infallible Bible, word of God. It's as if they thought the men who wrote the Constitution were gods of some sort, incapable of making mistakes. Therefore, it's heresy to interpret their words in anything other than a literal interpretation. If they had to admit one chink in the Constitution, they'd have to admit that it was all up for discussion and debate. After all, human beings wrote the Constitution - people no different from or better than ourselves. We are just as free as they were to "form a more perfect Government."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:09 AM on 01/15/2011
Remember our founding fathers were in it for themselves, slave owners yes.
You will recall they were the landowners if the time, white men only, women didnt have the right to vote...surprised yet? They believed in god as much as anyone today...as long as you can say what god wants, after all 'he' is your god. Religion is after all a tool.